Victoria police pay $90,000 to climate protester who claimed head was slammed into wall, door and ground
Timothy Buchanan, 39, alleged their head was slammed into a metal wall, the ground and a glass door that their head was then used to open, during their arrest at a protest at an international mining conference in Melbourne.
Victoria police paid the protester a sum of $90,000 as part of the settlement in the civil case in which Buchanan alleged police misconduct, Guardian Australia has confirmed.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
The settlement was reached in February, within days of the commencement of a class action trial against Victoria police in the supreme court in relation to alleged excessive use of oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray at the same mining conference.
'Victoria police does not comment on the specifics of civil settlements or settlement amounts,' a spokesperson for the force said.
'The settlement decision had nothing to do with separate legal proceedings relating to OC spray.'
Buchanan, a Wiradjuri person, participated in the protest at the International Mining and Resources Conference (Imarc) held at the Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre in October 2019, where police arrested scores of protesters amid hostile scenes.
In their statement of claim filed with the Victorian county court in 2022, Buchanan claimed that during the protest on 29 October 2019, Sgt Nicholas Bolzonello, a member of Victoria police's Public Order Response Team, grabbed them by the shirt and pushed against their chest before they were tackled by five other officers. Bolzonello was not personally sued in the case.
In its defence document filed with the court, the state argued the use of force was not disproportionate due to the threat posed to Bolzonello by Buchanan and to the objective of keeping the area, where an arrest was occurring, 'safe and free from protestors'. The defence argued Bolzonello's actions were in response to Buchanan's, including attempting to pull the police officer towards protesters and breaking free during an attempted arrest.
Buchanan went on to claim that the arresting officers, which did not include Bolzonello, then allegedly tackled and repeatedly slammed their head into the ground.
The state argued Buchanan resisted police members during the arrest. It said the five officers took hold of Buchanan to control their movements and arrest them, and that the protester was taken to the ground to allow the arrest to take place.
The state said it otherwise denied the allegations regarding the arrest.
Buchanan alleged that after their arrest Bolzonello slammed their head into a metal wall multiple times. The state denied the allegation in the defence.
It was alleged Bolzonello subsequently slammed Buchanan's head into a glass door, and then used the pressure on the activist's head to open the door.
The defence argued Buchanan resisted while being escorted from the exhibition centre to a police vehicle by Bolzonello and another police officer.
Bolzonello placed his hand on the protester's head to control their movements and protect himself from their 'continued erratic movements', the state said.
It said Buchanan's resistance increased as police members attempted to open the glass door, including trying to escape the officer's hold on them.
The defence admitted 'one or more parts' of Buchanan's body came into contact with the glass door as the police members and activist were passing through the door as the officers sought to readjust their grip to retain control of Buchanan.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'Bolzonello's hold on the plaintiff's head was for the purposes of controlling [their] movement as they moved through the door,' the defence said.
'After they passed through the door the police members placed the plaintiff against the wall so as to control the movements of the plaintiff as [Buchanan] was continuing to resist.'
The claim also alleged that Bolzonello made 'derogatory' comments at Buchanan, including calling them a 'faggot' between the arrest and transfer into the police vehicle. The state denied the allegation.
Buchanan's claim argued the alleged actions of police officers towards them were disproportionate, equated to excessive force and were unlawful.
It alleged officers did not inform the activist of their arrest, constituting false imprisonment, and that the actions of police officers breached their duties under the state's human rights charter.
The state said the arrest was lawful and Buchanan was informed of it at the earliest reasonable opportunity.
The claim said as a result of the alleged actions of officers, Buchanan had suffered psychological injury and aggravation of anxiety and depression. The state denied this.
The claim alleged Bolzonello acted with 'contumelious disregard' for Buchanan's rights as the protester 'had been arrested, restrained and posed no threat of harm or violence' to police officers or members of the public. The state rejected the allegation.
Police dropped charges, including assaulting an emergency worker, against Buchanan, Guardian Australia has confirmed. The protester pleaded guilty to a charge of obstruction in 2022, without a conviction.
Buchanan told Guardian Australia they felt a sense of 'compensation but not justice' after the settlement was reached, in which the state made no admissions.
'I don't want this to happen to people,' Buchanan said.
Buchanan's lawyer, Jeremy King, said Victoria police had an 'unfortunate history with protesters'.
'You've got to remember that free speech and peaceful protests are fundamental to our democratic society,' he said.
'There is no meaningful independent oversight of police in Victoria. The only way you can hold them to account is by bringing civil proceedings. Otherwise, nothing happens and there is no accountability.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Wiradjuri man Paul Coe, a ‘legend of the land rights movement', dies age 76
Aboriginal lawyer and activist Paul Coe, who helped create the first Aboriginal Legal Service and championed the fight for land rights, has died aged 76. The beloved community figure has been remembered as a giant of the land rights movement who 'changed the lives of Aboriginal people across the nation'. His family have described him as a 'Wiradjuri warrior' who dedicated his life to upholding his people's ways – overcoming discrimination to blaze a trail for Aboriginal justice, land rights and self-determination. Sign up: AU Breaking News email NSW Aboriginal Land Council chairperson Raymond Kelly said Coe was an 'incredible fighter' who would be remembered for generations. 'He has changed the lives of Aboriginal people across the nation … pointing out uncomfortable truths about police brutality and institutional racism,' he said. The chairperson of the NSW Aboriginal Legal Service, Keith Morgan, paid tribute to a 'towering figure in the fight for Aboriginal justice'. 'An inspiration and a fearless leader, Paul was a well-respected Aboriginal man that people looked up to as an uncompromising advocate for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander rights,' Morgan said. 'He leaves a legacy at the ALS that is unquantifiable.' In a statement, his children vowed to honour the legacy of the beloved father, grandfather, brother and uncle. 'This is a loss we will all feel so deeply,' they said. 'Rest in Power, Dad. 'Yindyamarra.' Coe was born in 1949 at Erambie Mission in Cowra in central west New South Wales, at a time when Indigenous people were subjected to strict laws that controlled every aspect of their lives. He was the first Aboriginal student at Cowra high school to pass the HSC and be elected prefect, going on to become one of the first Aboriginal people to study law at the University of New South Wales. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion As the civil rights movement swept the US in the 1960s and 70s, Coe was central to developing the Australian arm of the Black Power movement from Sydney's Aboriginal heartland in Redfern. He and other activists created a database to demonstrate the scale of 'racist actions by police', fighting back through protest, advocacy and legal avenues – a movement which led to the creation of the NSW Aboriginal Legal Service. Coe was also part of the state's first Aboriginal Land Council, throwing his support behind the Gurindji people's fight against the Vestey Company in the Northern Territory (better known as the Wave Hill walk-off, which inspired the protest anthem, From Little Things Big Things Grow). In 1979, Coe launched legal action against the Commonwealth in the high court, arguing for the recognition of Aboriginal people as the prior inhabitants of Australia before European colonisation. Though unsuccessful, the case helped lay the foundation for the landmark 1992 Mabo judgement that overturned the concept of terra nullius and paved the way for native title legislation. Coe was named one of the inaugural winners of the NSW Aboriginal Land Council's (NSWALC) chairperson's award in 2017. In his acceptance speech, he paid homage to other staunch land rights activists – including his parents, Les and Agnes – from whom he drew wisdom and strength.
The Guardian
4 days ago
- The Guardian
Jason Clare vows to use new childcare centre powers as soon as possible with list already in sights
The use of CCTV in childcare centres, a national register of teachers and mandatory child safety training are top of the agenda for a meeting of state and federal education ministers, as governments race to respond to abuse in the early childhood sector. The Albanese government will seek to rush its bill through parliament this week to strip funding from below-standard childcare centres, with the education minister, Jason Clare, promising to use his new powers as soon as he is legally able to – with some centres already in his sights. 'My department is working right now with states and territories on a priority list of providers to bring action against,' Clare told Guardian Australia. 'We are determined to do what needs to be done to rebuild confidence in a system that parents need to have confidence in.' He confirmed a special meeting of state and territory education ministers would be held on 22 August to focus on child safety in early education. Sign up: AU Breaking News email There were three main topics for the meeting, dealing with key areas identified by providers: efforts to accelerate a national register of early education and care workers, discussing mandatory child safety training for early education and care workers, and investigating the role of CCTV in responding to safety concerns. Large providers spoken to by Guardian Australia said they were strongly supportive of a national register and more funding for training, but some have reservations about CCTV, with concerns about cost, resources to operate and monitor feeds, and the potential for footage to fall into the wrong hands. A separate meeting of the standing council of attorneys general , also to be held in August, would discuss reforming the working with children check system. The federal attorney general, Michelle Rowland, told parliament on Monday that the system needed 'long overdue improvements'. 'Different states and territories have inconsistent schemes covering eligibility and reportable conduct. They do not talk to each other and there is no system of national oversight or real-time monitoring,' she said. 'We need meaningful change and we need it urgently. It's time to stop predators exploiting cracks in the hodgepodge of separate systems around the country.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The education ministers and AGs meetings would advance reforms which must be agreed to by states and territories, in a bid to unify systems run by separate governments. They come in addition to the federal government's early childhood education and care (strengthening regulation of early education) bill 2025, introduced by Clare into parliament last week, which gives the education department the power to take action against providers not meeting national quality standards on safety. The department would be empowered to undertake unannounced raids, publish the findings of its inspections, and potentially suspend or cancel a provider's ability to access the childcare subsidy. This legislation would give the commonwealth government power to cut off funding to childcare centres that do not meet the national quality standard when it comes to safety and quality, where there is a breach of the law, or where centres are acting in a way that puts the safety of children at risk. Labor hopes to pass the bill this week. Once the legislation is in force, approximately two weeks after it passes parliament, Clare said the federal education department would begin preparing to issue the first 'show cause' notices to underperforming providers – the first step toward potentially cancelling or suspending funding. 'As soon as these new powers come into force, we will use them to strengthen safety in childcare,' Clare said, noting state regulators already have such powers to respond to imminent safety threats. 'This legislation gives the federal government additional powers to lift safety in childcare. This is about making sure the safety and quality in childcare centres is what parents expect and children deserve.
The Guardian
5 days ago
- The Guardian
Labor and Coalition want convicted rapist Gareth Ward expelled from NSW parliament
Moves are afoot to expel the MP for Kiama, Gareth Ward, from the New South Wales parliament after he was convicted of serious sexual offences involving two young men. State parliament sits next week and Ward has not yet said whether he intends to appeal Friday's convictions. The MP has also not indicated whether he might resign from parliament and did not respond to questions from Guardian Australia. Ward was granted bail ahead of a hearing on Wednesday, when the prosecution will seek to have him taken into custody ahead of his sentencing. A date for that is due to be set on Wednesday. The 44-year-old stood trial in the NSW district court after pleading not guilty to sexual intercourse without consent and indecent assault charges. Several politicians have been convicted of 'an infamous crime' or a crime that carries a sentence of five years or more – which is the threshold that disqualifies a person from sitting in the NSW parliament. Most have chosen to resign when they have been charged and were well out of parliament by the time they were convicted. So the question of how lodging an appeal – or winning an appeal – might affect an MPs right to sit in the parliament has rarely arisen. Both major parties are hoping that Ward will choose to resign from parliament and the matter is resolved quickly. But Ward has, to date, shown little inclination to end his own political career. In 2021, Ward left the Liberal party and moved to the crossbench after identifying himself as the state MP under investigation by the child abuse and sex crimes squad of the NSW police force. When charges were laid in March 2022, then NSW Premier Dominic Perrottet called for his resignation. On 24 March 2022, Ward was suspended after a motion unanimously passed the Legislative Assembly. In mid-August 2022, Ward was committed to stand trial. But Ward's voters in the south coast state seat of Kiama re-elected him in March 2023 and he returned to Macquarie Street. The Minns government believes Ward should not sit in parliament now he is convicted of serious crimes and that seniment is echoed by the opposition. The premier, Chris Minns, said on Monday that Ward should resign or he would move a motion to expel him. Minns stressed Ward was convicted of 'incredibly serious charges' relating to 'multiple accusers.' 'He should resign,' the premier told reporters. 'It is completely ridiculous to be in a situation where someone has been, not just accused, not just charged, but convicted of incredibly serious sexual assault convictions and stay as a member of parliament. 'You name me one workplace in the whole world where that person would continue as an employee, facing that kind of jail time.' Minns said he had sought legal advice from the NSW cabinet office and believed expulsion was an option. Sign up to Morning Mail Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion But it's not straightforward. The expulsion cannot be 'punitive' but must be founded on protecting the integrity of the NSW parliament. That will mean establishing that Ward's conduct brings the house into disrepute and that he cannot adequately perform his duties – which would be easier to argue if he was incarcerated. 'It seems ridiculous that he could stay as a member of parliament. Steps need to be taken,' Minns said. He said it was 'untenable' for Ward to remain the MP for Kiama. Minns does not have a majority in the Legislative Assembly so would need the opposition or crossbenchers to gain the bare majority needed to pass an expulsion motion. The opposition leader, Mark Speakman, has said he would support an expulsion motion, subject to seeing the government's legal advice. 'The jury finding is about behaviour that is sickening,' Speakman told reporters on Monday. 'He should not be in parliament; his position is untenable. There is no way he can effectively represent his constituents. He should resign, and if he doesn't, parliament must take all the steps it can to protect its integrity.' Ward could alternatively be suspended or granted leave but both options would result in the convicted rapist continuing to receive his parliamentary salary and entitlements until he resigned, the next election was held in March 2027 or all appeals were finalised. These alternatives would prevent a by-election from being held. An expulsion or suspension could be challenged in the courts. There have been only a handful of cases challenging orders of parliament but, as constitutional expert Anne Twomey has said, courts have expressed wariness when it comes to expelling MPs. The situation would be complicated further if Ward appeals. Ward has 28 days to lodge any appeal. The appeal process itself would likely be lengthy, and if Ward was expelled, he would challenge that decision in the courts. Of course, there will be practical problems for Ward continuing in parliament if he is jailed pending any appeal. He couldn't attend parliament or effectively represent his constituents.
