Air India captain's eerie words to his first officer before doomed jet crashed killing 260 'are revealed in black box recording'
'The plane is in your hands,' Captain Sumeet Sabharwal allegedly told First Officer Clive Kunder, two Western sources familiar with the contents of the recordings told Corriere della Sera.
The sources said it was not unusual for the captain of a flight to yield the controls to a first officer during takeoff. The plane left the ground at 1:38:39pm and remained airborne for about 30 seconds before losing power and crashing into a residential area.
Mr Kunder was at the controls of the Boeing 787 and asked the captain why he moved the fuel switches into a position that starved the engines of fuel, a source briefed on U.S. officials' early assessment told Reuters. He was said to have requested that he restore the fuel flow before the crash.
'Why did you shut off the engines?' Mr Kunder asked the senior pilot, according to Corriere's sources. Another microphone recorded a 'vague' denial: 'I didn't do it'.
The outlet reports that Mr Kunder was 'unconvinced' and asked the same question 'several more times' over a further six seconds.
A preliminary report released by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Saturday confirmed that the fuel switches had switched from 'run' to 'cutoff' just after takeoff -- but did not say how they were moved.
The report also said one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel and 'the other pilot responded that he did not do so.'
Investigators did not identify which remarks were made by Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and which by First Officer Clive Kunder, who had total flying experience of 15,638 hours and 3,403 hours, respectively.
There was no cockpit video recording definitively showing which pilot flipped the switches, but the weight of evidence from the conversation points to the captain, according to the early assessment by U.S. officials.
The plane momentarily disappeared from view behind trees and buildings before a massive fireball erupted on the horizon in this horrifying clip
The Wall Street Journal first reported similar information on Wednesday about the world's deadliest aviation accident in a decade.
Citing U.S. pilots familiar with the AAIB report, the outlet reported that 'as the pilot actively flying, [First Officer] Kunder likely would have had his hands full pulling back on the Dreamliner's controls at that stage of the flight'.
'Sabharwal, as the pilot monitoring, would have been more likely to have had his hands free as he oversaw the operation.'
According to the report, the switches were apparently moved in succession, one second apart, before both were turned back on about 10 seconds later.
The movement of the fuel control switches allows and cuts fuel flow to the plane's engines.
The report did not say how the switches could have flipped to the cutoff position during the flight.
The switches' 'locking feature' meant pilots had to lift them up before changing their position - they are not simple push buttons that can be accidentally turned off.
Almost immediately after the plane lifted off the ground, closed-circuit TV footage showed a backup energy source called a ram air turbine (RAT) had deployed, indicating a loss of power from the engines.
The London-bound plane began to lose thrust, and after reaching a height of 650 feet, the jet started to sink.
The fuel switches for both engines were indeed turned back to 'run', and the airplane automatically tried restarting the engines, the report said.
But the plane could not gain power quickly enough to stop its descent. The report stated: 'One of the pilots transmitted "MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY"'.
The plane clipped some trees and a chimney before crashing in a fireball into a building on a nearby medical college campus, the report said, killing 19 people on the ground and 241 of the 242 on board.
Both fuel switches were found in the run position at the crash site.
Aviation expert and former airline pilot Terry Tozer said the engine cutoff switches being switched to off only seconds after takeoff was 'absolutely bizarre.'
'Unfortunately, the altitude was so low that the engines were only beginning to recover and they didn´t have enough time,' Tozer told Sky News.
India 's civil aviation minister, Kinjarapu Ram Mohan Naidu, said the report´s findings were preliminary and one should not 'jump into any conclusions on this.'
'Let us wait for the final report,' Naidu told reporters.
Investigators are said to be looking at the medical records of the pilots as part of their probe.
Captain Mohan Ranganathan, a leading aviation safety expert in India, claimed that one of the pilots had suffered with their mental health, citing other Air India pilots.
Speaking to The Daily Telegraph, he claimed: 'He had taken time off from flying in the last three to four years. He had taken medical leave for that.'
Captain Sabharwal is also understood to have taken bereavement leave after the death of his mother, though Mr Ranganathan understands that he had been 'medically cleared' by Air India prior to the fatal crash last month.
Air India, in a statement, said it is fully cooperating with authorities investigating the crash.
A final report is expected within a year.
In an internal memo on Monday, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson said the preliminary report found no mechanical or maintenance faults and that all required maintenance had been carried out.
Wilson also urged the airline's staff to avoid drawing premature conclusions about the crash.
The AAIB's preliminary report had no safety recommendations for Boeing or engine manufacturer GE.
The AAIB, which is leading the investigation, said in a statement on Thursday that 'certain sections of the international media are repeatedly attempting to draw conclusions through selective and unverified reporting.'
It added the investigation was ongoing and it remained too early to draw definitive conclusions.
Most air crashes are caused by multiple factors, and under international rules, a final report is expected within a year of an accident.
The plane´s black boxes - combined cockpit voice recorders and flight data recorders - were recovered in the days following the crash and later downloaded in India.
Indian authorities had also ordered deeper checks of Air India´s entire Boeing 787 Dreamliner fleet to prevent future incidents. Air India has 33 Dreamliners in its fleet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
13 hours ago
- Times
‘Total failure of justice': all convicted of Mumbai train blasts acquitted
When bomb blasts ripped through the carriages of packed commuter trains and two stations during Mumbai's evening rush hour on July 11, 2006, India's prime minister vowed to defeat the terrorists and secure justice for the victims. But 19 years on from the carnage of the attacks, which left 189 dead and more than 800 injured, justice remains elusive. On Monday, 12 Muslim men who were convicted of planting the bombs were acquitted after the prosecution case against them was found to be based on forced confessions and unreliable evidence. The suspects, who were accused of being Pakistani separatists, were convicted in 2015 for one of India's worst terror attacks. Five of the men were sentenced to death, while the other seven were given life imprisonment, pending an appeal. A decade on from the conviction, judges at the Bombay High Court found the prosecution had 'utterly failed to prove their case against the accused'. 'It is hard to believe that the accused committed the crime. Hence their conviction is quashed and set aside,' Justices Anil Kilor and Shyam Chandak said. The men were ordered to be released from jail 'if they are not required to be detained in any other case'. During the 2006 attacks, seven bombs placed inside pressure cookers to maximise the intensity of the blasts went off within minutes of each other, causing horrific casualties. One surgeon described his hospital in the aftermath of the attacks as 'bloodier than an abattoir' in a report published on the front page of The Times the next day. Prosecutors said the devices were assembled in Mumbai and deliberately placed in first-class coaches to target the city's wealthy Gujarati community. They said the bombings were intended as revenge for the riots in the western state of Gujarat in 2002, which left some 2,000 people dead, most of them Muslims. Prosecutors accused the Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba of being behind the attacks, although a little-known outfit called Lashkar-e-Qahhar later claimed responsibility. • Times report, 2006: 7 bombs, 10 minutes, 160 dead On Monday the judges spoke witheringly of police failures to prove what kind of bombs were used. The explosives and arms presented as evidence appeared 'unrelated to the blasts,' they said. Eye witnesses presented by the prosecution were also deemed unreliable, as many of them made statements to the police months or even years after the bombing. The judges observed that it was unlikely they would remember the accused after such a long period. 'The defence had raised serious questions about the test identification parade. Many witnesses remained silent for unusually long periods, some over four years, and then suddenly identified the accused. This is abnormal,' the judges noted. Apparent confessions by the accused, they concluded, were likely to have been obtained through coercion. One of those convicted, Kamal Ansari, died in 2021 from coronavirus while in jail. The remaining 11 have spent 19 years behind bars. Monday's acquittal does not mean the saga is over, as the prosecution can appeal against the order to the Supreme Court in Delhi. Given that cases move very slowly through India's judicial system, and that it took a decade for the convictions to be overturned, the men are likely to remain behind bars for months if not years. Rebecca Mammen John, a lawyer at the Supreme Court, said the investigation and prosecution did 'a disservice both to the people framed who spent years behind bars and to the families of the victims who are left without justice'. 'When you don't have a robust investigation and you have fabricated evidence, you are letting down an entire community of people who deserve better than this,' she added. 'This is a total failure of the justice delivery system.'
BBC News
19 hours ago
- BBC News
2006 Mumbai train bombings: India court acquits 12 men
A court in India has acquitted 12 men previously convicted in the 2006 Mumbai train bombings that killed 187 people and injured over had in 2015 sentenced five of the accused to death and the remaining seven to life Monday, a two-judge bench of the Bombay High Court overturned the earlier order, ruling that the prosecution had "utterly failed" to establish that the accused had committed the offences for which they had been prosecution can appeal against the order in a higher court. On 11 July 2006, seven blasts ripped through the busy commuter trains during the evening rush hour in one of India's deadliest terror bombs, packed into seven pressure cookers and put in bags, detonated within six minutes of each blasts took place in the areas of Matunga, Khar, Mahim, Jogeshwari, Borivali and Mira Road, with most on moving trains and two at bombs appeared to have targeted first-class compartments, as commuters were returning home from the city's financial security agencies blamed the attack on Islamic militants backed by Pakistan, an allegation the country accused, who were arrested shortly after the blasts, have been in jail since then. One of them, Kamal Ansari, who had been sentenced to death, died of Covid in 2015, a special court convicted the men of murder, conspiracy and waging war against the country. The prosecution appealed to confirm the death sentences, while the defence sought July 2024, the Bombay High Court formed the two-judge bench to expedite the hearings. Reports say that over the next six months, the court conducted more than 75 sittings and examined 92 prosecution witnesses and over 50 defence the 667-page order on Monday, the court noted that the defence had questioned the credibility of the witnesses produced by the prosecution, as well as the confessional statements made by the accused. It also acknowledged the defence's contention that the recovered evidence was not maintained in a "sealed condition throughout".Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, X and Facebook
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Pilots are to blame for South Korea plane crash that killed 179 when aircraft slammed into concrete wall and burst into flames, report finds
Tragic errors by the pilots of South Korea airliner were the direct cause of the devastating crash that killed 179 people last December, according to a bombshell report by investigators. The Jeju Air Boeing 737 was moments from landing at the coastal Muan Airport after a flight from Bangkok on December 29 when it struck a flock of birds - believed to be Baikal teal ducks - which sent one its engines into failure. In a horrifying twist, investigators say the pilots then shut down the wrong engine, sealing the fate of those on board. Instead of switching off the damaged engine, the crew mistakenly cut power the only one that was still functioning. 'A pilot may have mistakenly turned off the engine,' investigators said. The aircraft, now critically compromised, continued its botched descent at dangerously high speed, with the landing gear still retracted. Moments later, the plane careened off the runway, slammed into a reinforced embankment, and erupted into a fireball. Only two of the cabin crew members seated at the rear survived the inferno. In a chaotic press conference on Saturday, grieving members of the victims stormed the room, accusing officials of scapegoating the pilots. 'They've just blamed it all on the pilots' a man shouted. Amid the uproar, investigators hastily retrieved copies of the interim findings from journalists, claiming the report was not yet officially released. Despite the backlash, investigators stood by their conclusion - that there was no mechanical fault with the Boeing aircraft. Instead, a catalogue of cockpit errors led to South Korea's worst aviation disaster in decades. 'The pilot should have turned off the right engine, which was severely damaged by the bird strike, but he turned off the left engine, which was spinning, and the black box and power went out,' an official told South Korea's MBN television news. Disturbingly, the final moments of the flight remain particularly shrouded in mystery. Power to the aircraft's flight data and voice recorders cut out for four minutes before the crash, severely hampering the investigation. Experts also say the pilots violated safety protocol following the bird strike, climbing abruptly and executing a risky turnaround before attempting an unorthodox landing - on the same runway but from the opposite direction. Aviation professionals have pointed out chilling similarities to the 1989 Kegworth crash in the UK, where a British Midland 737 went down after pilots also shut off the wrong engine. That disaster claimed 47 lives. Families of the Muan victims are now demanding accountability and transparency. Kim Yu-Jin, head of the bereaved families group, deemed the report 'unconvincing' and warned that the way officials handle the findings could affect compensation for grieving loved ones. 'When investigators take a position, it should be accompanied by documents that support their position and convince the bereaved family that their conclusions are inevitable,' she said. 'We were only given their conclusions. She added: 'We have repeatedly asked them to be careful about these disclosures because the way that the results of the investigation are communicated can have an impact on the compensation that families receive.'
