Separatists want to 'hold Poilievre's feet to the fire' in Alberta byelection bid
The first hurdle for Poilievre, who represented suburban Ottawa as an MP for two decades before losing his seat last month, will be convincing locals that he's not just another central Canada politician who sees Alberta as a giant ATM machine.
'I'm somewhat suspect that Mr. Poilievre has said publicly that he doesn't feel there should be any big changes to the equalization formula,' said Rick Strankman, referring to the federal wealth redistribution program Alberta hasn't seen a dime from since the mid-1960s.
Strankman is a third-generation resident of Poilievre's prospective riding of Battle River—Crowfoot, who represented the area as an Wildrose MLA from 2012 to 2019.
He says he's seen an uptick in support for Alberta separatism within the community since last month's federal election, which saw the Liberals win their fourth-straight mandate.
'I think many people are deeply unsatisfied, and many people are frustrated in that they don't know how to achieve a positive change, unless it… evolves from a referendum,' said Strankman.
Province-wide polls show up to two-thirds of Albertans who support the governing United Conservative Party would vote 'yes' in a referendum on Alberta independence.
Poilievre said last week that he was 'against (Alberta) separation' but sympathized with the 'legitimate grievances' of those who were for it.
Strankman, who's involved with the pro-separation Alberta Prosperity Project, noted that the group has several upcoming events in and around the riding, including a forum in the 800-person town of Castor next month.
'I just saw a poster for the Castor event at my local tractor repair shop,' said Strankman.
Strankman doesn't think that Poilievre is in danger of losing the byelection but suspects that turnout could suffer if he ignores the rising tide of Alberta separatism.
'You could almost run a straw bale in our riding under the Conservative flag and that would get elected… but there might be an apathy there if (Poilievre) can't shake the label of being a parachute candidate from Ottawa,' said Strankman.
Jeffrey Rath, a lawyer with the Alberta Prosperity Project, says he expects the high-profile byelection to attract 'a strong pro-independence candidate or two' with 'good local name recognition.'
'It would be fascinating to see somebody hold Poilievre's feet to the fire and make him explain how it is that federalism still works for Alberta,' said Rath.
Rath publicly dared Poilievre last week to run in Battle River—Crowfoot under the slogan 'No more Alberta tax dollars for Quebec, and a dairy cow and micro-dairy in every Alberta barn that wants one.'
Prime Minister Mark Carney said shortly after the election that he'd ensure Poilievre's byelection took place 'as soon as possible' if his fellow Conservatives wanted him to stay on as leader.
The soonest the Battle River—Crowfoot byelection can take place under federal law is in early August, meaning it will likely follow three provincial byelections expected for earlier in the summer.
One of these byelections, coincidentally, will take place in Olds-Didsbury-Three Hills, where Alberta's first, and thus far only, separatist MLA Gordon Kesler was elected in a 1982 byelection. Kesler was beaten soundly in a general election later that year.
Cameron Davies, leader of the Republican Party of Alberta, announced on Tuesday that he will be running in the riding, hoping to follow in Kesler's footsteps as a separatist voice in the Alberta Legislature.
He says that Kesler, who's still active in the riding, has been an indispensable source of support and wisdom as he embarks on his own political journey.
Davies told the National Post he doesn't see Poilievre as an advocate for Alberta, even if he ends up winning a federal seat in the province.
'(Poilievre) is a federal politician… he has to be a Team Canada player,' said Davies.
'Alberta no longer wants to be part of team Canada, and so at some point (he'll) have to reconcile with that.'
National Post
rmohamed@postmedia.com
Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
4 hours ago
- Associated Press
Frontline WSIB Workers Rally at Ford's Office Amid Growing Strike Tensions
TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jul 2, 2025-- Harry Goslin, President of the Ontario Compensation Employees Union (OCEU/CUPE 1750), will join striking Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) workers on the picket line outside Premier Doug Ford's constituency office at 823 Albion Road in Etobicoke on Thursday, July 3, between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. ET. This picket follows new revelations that WSIB has begun outsourcing core work performed by frontline union members, despite an ongoing province-wide strike now entering its seventh week. Over 3,600 OCEU members have been walking the line across Ontario, standing up against chronic understaffing, stagnant wages, and the erosion of public services through privatization. The strike marks the first in the WSIB's 110-year history. 'The Ford government is allowing WSIB to quietly outsource union jobs in the middle of a legal strike,' said Goslin. 'That's a betrayal of public trust — and a direct threat to every injured worker depending on a strong, stable, and public compensation system.' Despite mediated talks, the WSIB has refused to table a final offer. The union's bargaining team remains available around the clock to reach a fair agreement. 'We're calling on Premier Ford and WSIB leadership to get serious,' said Goslin. 'Stop the outsourcing, get to the table, and settle this strike before any more damage is done.' mb/cope491 View source version on CONTACT: For more information, please contact: Bill Chalupiak CUPE Communications Representative [email protected] 416-707-1401 KEYWORD: NORTH AMERICA CANADA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: PUBLIC POLICY/GOVERNMENT LABOR STATE/LOCAL SOURCE: Canadian Union of Public Employees Copyright Business Wire 2025. PUB: 07/02/2025 07:44 PM/DISC: 07/02/2025 07:44 PM
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
GOLDSTEIN: Questioning Canada's immigration policies is not racist
The Mark Carney government will be performing a public service to Canadians if it abandons the reflex position of the Justin Trudeau government that any questioning of federal immigration policies is racist. A report by The Globe and Mail that said 17,600 foreigners had their criminal convictions forgiven by the Immigration Department over 11 years, up to and including 2024 — thus removing a ban on them coming to Canada — is a case in point. If five years have passed since a foreign criminal's conviction or completion of a sentence, the Immigration Department has the power to deem them 'rehabilitated,' meaning they can apply to enter Canada through work and study visas, as permanent residents or visitors. Last year alone, 1,390 people had their criminal convictions forgiven, while 105 applications were refused, according to The Globe and Mail report. There can, of course, be legitimate cases where, for example, an individual has been convicted by a dictatorial foreign government on false or trumped-up charges of criminal offences or where the convictions are for relatively minor offences. Lax immigration vetting makes Canada prime target for Iranian infiltration, says Secure Canada Federal minister plans to hold consultations this summer on immigration intake But the problem is the Immigration Department won't provide any breakdown of what crimes were forgiven, other than to say that in the most serious offences the immigration minister would be involved in the decision. As Conservative immigration critic Michelle Rempel Garner told The Globe and Mail, this lack of transparency has to end 'if the public is going to have any confidence in the immigration system's vetting process.' (Also of note here is that since the data covers an 11-year period up to and including 2024, it means it was in place during the Harper Conservative government, which was in office up until 2015, although the bulk of the decisions would have been made under the Liberals.) This isn't the first time Canadians have had a reason to ask legitimate questions about who is allowed into Canada and why. Last year, in answering an order paper question by Conservative MP Laila Goodridge, which was reported by Postmedia, the Canada Border Services Agency responded that the federal government had lost track of almost 30,000 people who failed to appear for deportation proceedings. Similarly, auditor general Karen Hogan reported in 2020 that the federal government had lost track of the whereabouts of over 34,000 foreigners ordered deported from Canada, including almost 3,000 criminal cases. All the way back in 2003, then-auditor general Sheila Fraser reported that Ottawa had lost track of 36,000 people the federal government had ordered deported, adding that mismanagement of deportees was encouraging illegal immigration. Obviously this is a chronic problem within the federal government that never gets resolved, but concern about losing track of foreign deportees is but one reason to be concerned about Canada's immigration system. In 2024, for example, internal government documents obtained by The Canadian Press revealed that in announcing a significant boost to its immigration targets in 2022, the Trudeau government ignored warnings from its own public servants that doing so would increase the cost of housing and negatively impact Canada's already beleaguered health-care system. That, of course, is exactly what happened with then-prime minister Trudeau eventually conceding the higher immigration targets had gone 'far beyond what Canada has been able to absorb' and was 'something that we need to get back under control,' which the Liberals belatedly attempted to do. One presumes Trudeau and the Liberals didn't consider themselves to be racists in doing so.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ottawa must pass a law revoking digital service tax before it can issue refunds: CRA
OTTAWA — Companies that paid the now-defunct digital services tax will have to wait for Ottawa to pass new legislation before they can get their refund, the Canada Revenue Agency has confirmed. Prime Minister Mark Carney announced late Sunday that Canada was dropping the tax on global tech giants in a bid to restart trade negotiations with the United States. The first payment was due Monday and would have collectively cost American companies like Amazon, Google, Airbnb, Meta and Uber about US$2 billion. The tax was a three per cent levy on revenue collected by digital firms from their Canadian users and the first payment was retroactive to 2022. A CRA spokesperson said the agency collected some revenue from the digital services tax before Ottawa's reversal but didn't cite an amount. The spokesperson said Parliament will need to pass legislation formally revoking the tax in order for taxpayers to get their money back. Members of Parliament are currently on break and are scheduled to return on Sept. 15. The CRA waived the requirement for taxpayers to file a DST return ahead of the June 30 deadline and will not ask for any related payments in the meantime. Carney said Canada and the U.S. restarted trade talks Monday morning and are still aiming for a deal by the July 21 deadline he set when he and U.S. President Donald Trump met in Alberta at the G7 summit last month. After Carney announced the end of the digital services tax, the White House claimed that Canada had "caved" under pressure from Trump. The prime minister said Monday that the move was "part of a bigger negotiation" and "something that we expected in the broader sense that would be part of a final deal." Carney said the decision would provide businesses with some certainty. "It doesn't make sense to collect tax from people and then remit them back," he said on Monday. Some businesses reported the last-minute change caused some confusion among companies that were in the process of paying the tax. Tariq Nasir, a partner at EY Canada's indirect tax practice, said Monday that some companies have given instructions to pay the tax, but the payments were not going through at the CRA. He said companies that have made the payments were wondering how to account for the payments in their quarterly statements, due in the next month. — With files from Anja Karadeglija and David Baxter This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 2, 2025. Craig Lord, The Canadian Press
