Top Salvadoran ex-military officers sentenced for wartime killing of Dutch journalists
The three were charged on Tuesday for the killings of journalists Koos Joster, Jan Kuiper Joop, Johannes Jan Wilemsen and Hans ter Laag, who were reporting for IKON Television during a 1982 military ambush on a group of former Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front (FMLN) guerrillas - some of whom were armed.
A U.N. truth commission 11 years later found the ambush was "deliberately planned to surprise and kill the journalists."
The trial was closed and details about the defendants' pleas and arguments were not made public.
El Salvador's civil war stretched from 1980 to 1992, pitting leftist guerrillas against the U.S.-backed Salvadoran army and leaving 75,000 people dead and 8,000 more missing.
Former Defense Minister General Jose Guillermo Garcia was sentenced by a jury in the northern town of Chalatenango, alongside two colonels: former Treasury Police chief Francisco Moran and former infantry brigade commander Mario Reyes.
All three - respectively aged 91, 93 and 85 - were sentenced in absentia. Garcia and Moran are in hospital under custody and Reyes currently lives in the United States though El Salvador is in the process of seeking his return.
"Truth and justice have prevailed, we have won," Oscar Perez, a representative of the Comunicandonos Foundation that represents some of the relatives, told reporters. "The victims are the focus now; not the perpetrators."
Prosecutors had requested the 15-year sentence, taking into account the military officers' age and health conditions.
The jury also issued a civil condemnation to the Salvadoran state over the delay in delivering justice, a symbolic measure that obliges the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, President Nayib Bukele, to publicly ask for forgiveness from the victims' families.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
35 minutes ago
- NBC News
Going Dutch: LGBTQ Americans find Trump-free life in Netherlands
AMSTERDAM — It had been months since Alex and Lucy, a trans couple from Arizona, felt safe enough to hold hands in public. They rediscovered that pleasure after moving to Amsterdam this year. The couple, who did not want to give their last names because of the sensitivity of the subject, decided to leave the United States soon after Donald Trump was re-elected last year. They arrived in the Netherlands on Jan. 19, the day before Trump was inaugurated and swiftly issued an executive order saying the government would only recognize two sexes — male and female. 'We're both visibly trans and faced growing discrimination. It ramped up right after the election,' said Lucy, sitting alongside Alex in their De Pijp apartment in Amsterdam's south. 'It felt like people had taken off their masks — waiting for an excuse to finally say what they wanted. We went from being tolerated to openly despised,' she added. Alex, who is disabled, feared staying put might also mean losing access to their federal health insurance. 'In the end, it became a matter of life and death,' Alex said. In his first six months in office, Trump has enacted multiple policies affecting the lives of LGBTQ Americans in areas from healthcare to legal recognition and education. In the face of this rollback of rights, some LGBTQ people have voted with their feet. While there is little official data, LGBTQ people and activists told the Thomson Reuters Foundation that many people head to Portugal and Spain, while Costa Rica and Mexico are also popular destinations, alongside France and Thailand. The Netherlands stands out, though, for its strong legal protections, its record on LGBTQ+ inclusivity, and due to a Dutch–American Friendship Treaty (DAFT) and its affiliated visa. DAFT — established as a 1956 act of Cold War cooperation — enables U.S. citizens to live and work in the Netherlands if they start a small business investing at least 4,500 euro ($5,200), can secure Dutch housing, and are able to prove they have enough money to live on. The permit is valid for two years and can be renewed. 'Europe was always on the cards, but the Netherlands had a really high percentage of queer folks, and we knew people here (who) were trans and happy,' said Lucy, who got a DAFT visa. 'Numbers increasing' While the Dutch Immigration and Naturalization Service (IND) does not keep statistics on the sexual orientation or gender identity of DAFT applicants, overall applications have increased since 2016, with January 2025 registering the highest number of any single month on record — 80. 'The numbers are increasing. We don't know why,' said Gerard Spierenburg, IND spokesperson. Immigration lawyers also report an increase. 'From the day after the election, my inbox began filling up with requests of U.S. citizens wanting to move to the Netherlands,' said lawyer Jonathan Bierback, adding that about a fifth came from the LGBTQ+ community. Three other lawyers in Amsterdam confirmed the trend in interviews with the Thomson Reuters Foundation. Jack Mercury, a trans adult performer from California, moved to Amsterdam almost a year and a half ago — 'literally the moment I knew Trump was going to be re-elected'. He said the DAFT visa was 'one of the few financially accessible visas' for him. He now lives in west Amsterdam with a partner and two cats. 'The words to describe the U.S. in the last 100 days are uncertainty and fear. For trans people, it's fear that they'll lose access to healthcare, rights like housing or the ability to work. And for gay people and lesbians, it's that they will become the next targets,' Mercury said. This year, more than 950 anti-trans bills were introduced in U.S. state legislatures, according to the Trans Legislation Tracker, of which 120 have passed, 647 failed, and 186 are still under consideration. 'I feel very lucky. I know many people who cannot afford to move, because they're not high earners, they are sick, have family or children,' said Mercury. His friend Topher Gross, a trans hair stylist from New York who has been in Amsterdam for four years, offered housing tips and recommended a lawyer. 'Everyone's exploring any possible way to get out,' said Gross. 'But not everyone can — many trans people of colour can't afford to leave. It's terrifying.' He noted that the climate of fear was exacerbated by deportations under Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. 'Basic rights are being stripped away.' Jess Drucker, an LGBTQ relocation expert with U.S.-based Rainbow Relocation, said many U.S. clients choose to go Dutch. 'People see how quickly rights can erode, with the global rise of right-wing extremism, and want to move somewhere where those rights are more likely to hold,' Drucker said. 'We've seen a major increase in requests for consultations. We are absolutely full.' Because not everyone can afford a DAFT visa, the Dutch NGO LGBT Asylum Support is urging the government to consider asylum options for LGBTQ Americans. Spokesperson Sandro Kortekaas said about 50 trans Americans had contacted the group since Trump's inauguration. In June, the group asked the government to reassess the status of the United States as a safe country for queer asylum seekers. However, Bierback does not expect success as such a shift would be seen 'as a provocation towards the U.S.' Spierenburg from the IND said there had been more asylum applications from the United States this year than last, although the numbers were still low — 33 against 9 in 2024. Lucy and Alex are grateful for their new life. 'When I came here, I felt more at home than I ever did. I have so much hope,' said Lucy. But she does worry that a future Dutch administration — a right-wing coalition collapsed in June — could kill off DAFT. 'I'm really concerned that the treaty is going to be damaged by current political agendas. And so I'm doing everything I can to make sure that I stay within the rules. I don't want to be extradited for any reason.'
Epoch Times
36 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Panamanian President Backs Lawsuits That Threaten Sale of Panama Canal Ports
If successful, the lawsuits could pave the way for Panama to take over the two key ports. An aerial view shows containers at the Balboa Port, operated by Panama Ports Company, at the Panama Canal, in Panama City, Panama, on Feb. 1, 2025. An aerial view shows containers at the Balboa Port, operated by Panama Ports Company, at the Panama Canal, in Panama City, Panama, on Feb. 1, 2025. Enea Lebrun/Reuters Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino on Thursday signaled that the Central American nation may take control of two ports at either end of the Panama Canal, potentially threatening the $22.8 billion sale plans of the ports' current owner, Hong Kong-based conglomerate CK Hutchison, to a U.S.-based investment company. The announcement came after Panama's comptroller general, Anel Flores, filed two cases with the nation's highest court seeking to invalidate a contract extension with Panama Ports Company, which would then allow Panama to establish its own public-private partnerships for the two ports. Panama Ports Company, 90 percent owned by CK Hutchison, has operated the Balboa and Cristobal ports since 1997 and renewed a 25-year concession in 2021. Story continues below advertisement Flores on Thursday criticized the renewal as 'unfair' and 'abusive,' alleging that it was signed without proper authorization and failed to deliver adequate financial returns. His first lawsuit seeks to outright nullify the concession, while the other asks the court to declare it unconstitutional. 'The ports are ours; they belong to the Republic of Panama, and therefore to all Panamanians,' Flores declared at a press conference on Thursday. 'It doesn't seem right to me that other people, in other places, are negotiating the future of assets that belong to us, the Panamanians.' The lawsuits have the backing of Mulino, who also endorsed an April 7 audit of Panama Ports Company by Flores's office, citing alleged royalty underpayments and irregularities in the concession renewal. The results of that audit have yet to be released. 'The Court now has a decision in its hands regarding the Comptroller's well-founded claim. We will wait for the verdict,' Mulino said on the lawsuits at the press conference on Thursday. 'The country will be fully informed about the decisions when they are made,' he said. 'But at this moment, I don't see the continuation of that Panama Port [Company] contract, amended or not.' Story continues below advertisement Should the court rule in favor of Flores, it could complicate U.S. asset management giant BlackRock's bid to gain control of the strategic shipping lanes. In March, BlackRock, along with Switzerland-based Mediterranean Shipping Company, formed a buyer consortium to acquire Panama Ports Company as part of a broader deal involving 42 CK Hutchison-owned container terminals worldwide. The deal remains subject to approval from the Chinese regime. On July 28, CK Hutchison announced that it would add a 'major strategic investor from mainland China' to the consortium, in an effort to secure approval from 'all relevant regulatory authorities.' The inclusion of a Chinese partner is expected to ease political pressure from Beijing, which has perceived the proposed sale as a threat to its overseas interests, particularly the transfer of strategic terminals near the Panama Canal to a consortium backed by a major U.S. financial institution. Since the announcement of the deal, Chinese state-aligned media have launched a coordinated propaganda campaign targeting CK Hutchison and its founder, 96-year-old billionaire Li Ka-shing. Story continues below advertisement Ta Kung Pao, a Hong Kong-based newspaper linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), published a series of blistering commentaries accusing Li of 'betraying and selling out all the Chinese people' and urging him to 'think carefully about what position and which side to stand on.' Li, who officially retired in 2018, is personally involved in negotiating the port deal that's widely seen as an effort to offload assets caught in escalating geopolitical tensions between China and the United States. Since his reelection, U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly suggested that the United States should regain control of the Panama Canal, citing overcharges for its use on U.S. ships and the CCP's growing influence over the key waterway. 'Above all, China is operating the Panama Canal. And we didn't give it to China. We gave it to Panama, and we're taking it back,' Trump said in his second inaugural speech CK Hutchison and the White House did not respond to requests for comment by publication time. BlackRock declined to comment.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump says Fed's Powell should be put 'out to pasture'
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday that Federal Reverse Chairman Jerome Powell should be "put out to pasture." He made the comments in a Truth Social post, where he ordered the firing of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Erika L. McEntarfer. "The Economy is BOOMING under 'TRUMP' despite a Fed that also plays games, this time with Interest Rates, where they lowered them twice, and substantially, just before the Presidential Election, I assume in the hopes of getting 'Kamala' elected – How did that work out? Jerome 'Too Late' Powell should also be put 'out to pasture,'" Trump wrote. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
