logo
What Poland can teach the Internet Right

What Poland can teach the Internet Right

Spectator09-06-2025

A change in politics is coming. Until now, the progressives were the ones with networks, stemming from Joe Biden's White House, to think tanks, and the legacy media. For the right, politics was not a fair fight. The internet has changed that. Karol Nawrocki's win in Poland's presidential election marked a key moment in the translation of the new right from the internet to geographical reality. Donald Trump's backing was combined with that of Kristi Noem, the US Secretary of State for Homeland Security, at Poland's first ever Conservative Political Action conference (CPAC).
From the 1960s onwards, the progressives turned universities into a reproduction mechanism for their own political ideals in a 'long march through the institutions'. Conservative ideas were forced online. Right-wingers adapted to online systems of idea replication, becoming more aggressive to optimise for social media engagement. It took Trump's two elections to get the 'Internet Right' into the institutions.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will TikTok be banned? Trump says there's a new group of buyers
Will TikTok be banned? Trump says there's a new group of buyers

The Herald Scotland

time16 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Will TikTok be banned? Trump says there's a new group of buyers

"We have a buyer for TikTok by the way," Trump said in the interview, which was released June 29. "I think I'll need probably China approval, and I think presidency will probably do it." He said the buyer is "a group of very wealthy people" without providing additional details. Ten days ago, Trump signed a 90-day extension preventing a TikTok sell-or-ban law from going into effect after it was passed by Congress. Lawmakers have said they're worried the company was using the mega-popular video platform to spy on Americans. The latest delay was the third time Trump has moved to keep the law from going into effect using an executive order. Congress approved the ban of the app if was not sold to a non-Chinese company last year, and former President Joe Biden signed it into law. The Supreme Court has since upheld the potential ban's constitutionality, but since returning to office, Trump has directed the Department of Justice not to enforce it. His executive orders have kept the app from going dark.

Donald Trump makes his return to Disney World ride with new speaking role
Donald Trump makes his return to Disney World ride with new speaking role

Daily Mail​

timea day ago

  • Daily Mail​

Donald Trump makes his return to Disney World ride with new speaking role

Donald Trump has made a centerstage return to Disney World's freshly reopened Hall of Presidents - with a new and improved look from his first term. The animatronic political attraction in Magic Kingdom discreetly opened its doors on Sunday morning after being closed for five months. It shuttered on January 20 after Trump was inaugurated into his second term. The display shuts down after every presidential transition so Disney can update the show. Disney World did not announce the well-known display's sudden reopening - leaving both guests and employees confused. Cast members inside the Hall of Presidents' theater on Sunday morning told The Park Place they had no clue the show was returning and only found out when they came to work. Other than Trump's animatronic having a speaking role, no major changes have been made to the mechanized performance. The 20-minute demonstration begins with a narrated history lesson featuring all the country's former commander-in-chiefs, with Joe Biden's robot seen on stage behind Trump. A robotic Abraham Lincoln recites the Gettysburg Address, followed by a speech from George Washington. This time around, those invested in Disney's portrayal of the president have noticed the robotic figure has been upgraded to bear more resemble to the real life Trump The realistic Trump figure, situated in the middle of all the presidents, then gives his oath of office speech while mimicking Trump's hand gestures and mannerisms. He states: 'I, Donald John Trump, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, so help me God.' When Trump was elected for his first term, people accused the theme park of creating a Hillary Clinton animatronic and sloppily switching it to Trump after she lost the 2016 election. Critics on pointed out how the robot meant to look like Trump looked far more like Clinton. 'Here (sic) me out on this. Clearly Disney had Hilary's (sic) robot ready to go and then had to try to make it look like Trump,' one user wrote on X, which was Twitter at the time. 'Don't hate me. This is just a necessary and painful fact we all need to deal with.' 'The more I see of Disney's 'Hall of Presidents' Trump, the more I'm convinced they made a Hillary one first and had to redo it,' another user agreed. 'Disney was so sure Hillary would win they just made a Hillary robot for their hall of presidents and when Trump won they just put a trump skin over it and it looks like something straight from hell,' someone joked. This time around, those invested in Disney's portrayal of the president have noticed the figure has been upgraded to better resemble to the real life Trump. 'Damn. I will miss Hilary (sic) Trump,' one person joked on X, as another added 'I guess that's an improvement.' 'AA [audio animatronic] was fixed and looks much much better now,' one man agreed. 'Maybe they could update the animatronic to better look like him. The last one they did was poorly done,' a user, who had not yet seen the new version, asserted.

This national monument is ‘part of the true history of the USA'. Will it survive Trump 2.0?
This national monument is ‘part of the true history of the USA'. Will it survive Trump 2.0?

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

This national monument is ‘part of the true history of the USA'. Will it survive Trump 2.0?

It's easy to get lost in the Sáttítla Highlands in remote north-eastern California. There are miles of rolling lava fields, untouched forest and obsidian mountains. At night, the darkness and silence stretch on indefinitely. This is one of America's newest national monuments. It's also one of the most threatened. In January, the Pit River Tribe celebrated a victory decades in the making when Joe Biden granted federal protection to nearly 230,000 acres of forested lands with the creation of the Sáttítla Highlands national monument. 'The awe-inspiring geological wonders collectively described here as the Sáttítla Highlands have framed the homelands of Indigenous communities and cultures for millennia,' the proclamation reads, recognizing the area as 'profoundly sacred'. The tribe, along with environmental groups, had fought for years to safeguard the land from industrial energy development. The area just north of Mount Shasta, popular for recreation and some of the darkest nighttime skies in the US, is the site of the tribe's creation story and regularly used for ceremonies. 'This is a healing place for our people. It's really tied to our traditional health,' said Brandy McDaniels, a member of the Pit River Tribe. 'We've spent a lifetime trying to defend this area.' The designation ensures no future energy development and mineral extraction can occur on the land while keeping it available for public recreation. But then in March, Donald Trump said he would undo Biden's action and roll back protections for Sáttítla and Chuckwalla national monument, which he argued 'lock up vast amounts of land from economic development and energy production'. Although legal experts say there is no clear mechanism for a president to rescind monument protections – only to shrink them – the justice department argued in a recent memo that it is in fact within Trump's authority to 'alter a prior declaration', suggesting the administration will move forward with efforts to remove national monument designations for hundreds of thousands of acres of wilderness. Now, as the tribe tries to move forward after years of pushing with limited resources, pro bono attorneys and 'scraping up every cent' to get to court hearings and protests, another battle could be on the horizon. Located five hours north-east of the California state capitol in a sparsely populated region, Sáttítla is far off the beaten path. 'You're not trying to get somewhere else if you're going there. It's very dark, it's very quiet, there's no cellphone reception,' said Nick Joslin, the policy and advocacy director with the Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center, an area environmental advocacy group. 'It's very easy to get lost.' The monument's 224,676 acres include portions of the Modoc, Shasta-Trinity and Klamath national forests, are home to endangered and rare flora and fauna, massive underground volcanic aquifers that supply water to millions of people and store as much water as 200 of California's largest surface reservoirs combined. Due to heavy snow, it's largely only accessible by car for a few months of the year. The landscape, with its islands of old-growth pine forests, snow covered mountainsides and scattered lakes, is stunning and otherworldly. It is filled with unique geological features such as ice caves, lava tubes and lava flows, Joslin said. Then there is the half-million-year-old dormant volcano, roughly 10 times the size of Mount St Helens, within the monument. Locals routinely camp, hike the hundreds of miles of trails or take boats out on Medicine Lake. 'It's a place that's known for its high quality of silence that you can't experience in any other place, and also its night skies,' McDaniels said. 'Depending on where you're at, people describe it as it's almost like you're in another world, like you're on another planet.' There are markers of human disruption. Checkerboard swaths of forest where trees have been clear cut, and large stretches of land with second-growth trees that look like toothpicks from the air. For Indigenous people, this area is sacred as the place of the creation narrative of the Pit River Tribe. The tribe holds important ceremonies there and collects staple foods such as berries from manzanita and currant plants, sugar pine seeds, and plants used in medicinal capacities. 'The landscape of the area literally tells the history of our people. In that way, it is part of the true history of the United States of America,' McDaniels said. The tribe fought to protect the area for nearly three decades, she added, challenging geothermal development and large-scale logging. Because Sáttítla is a volcanic area, there was speculation that there might be enough heat to develop geothermal resources, and in the 1980s the federal government awarded leases on thousands of acres to private energy companies, said Deborah A Sivas, the director of the Environmental Law Clinic at Stanford. The Environmental Law Clinic represented the tribe in a series of litigation challenging the extension of some leases and proposed projects, arguing the federal government had failed to consult the tribe, Sivas said. Industrial energy development would have required a dramatic transformation of the landscape to achieve and the tribe was opposed to such an intrusion on sacred land, and feared the hydraulic fracturing used to generate geothermal energy could pollute the aquifers. Ultimately there wasn't the resource potential initially thought, Sivas said. The final settlement with Calpine, the last remaining company with control over the land, was signed just two days after the monument declaration. While there has been broad community support for a monument, Joslin noted, some elected officials in the conservative region have been more tepid. Doug LaMalfa, a congressperson whose district includes Sáttítla, described Biden's action as 'executive overreach' and argued it would 'create unnecessary challenges for land management, particularly in wildfire prevention and maintaining usage for local residents'. But there has been no organized opposition against the monument. Presidents have the authority to give protected status to land with cultural, scientific or historic resources of national significance, and Biden and other presidents have typically used it for conservation and to support tribes. In the case of Sáttítla, the designation protects against industrial energy development, but does not prevent recreation, Sivas said, or bar the US Forest Service from doing wildfire management work. But Trump has taken a combative stance on national monuments as part of his pro-energy agenda, slashing the size of Utah's Bears Ears and Grand Staircase national monuments during his first term (a move that was later reversed by Biden). Earlier this month, the Department of Justice issued a memorandum opinion arguing that Trump has the authority to not only shrink but entirely abolish national monuments created by his predecessor. But the legal argument for that position appears tenuous. Sivas said the Antiquities Act, the statute under which national monuments are designated, does not give the president the authority to do so. 'There's no language in there that suggests that he could de-designate or roll back what prior presidents have done,' Sivas said. She added that the recent argument made by the administration was not particularly persuasive. Given the lack of opposition to Sáttítla, the move seems designed to instead test the limits of the president's power, Sivas said. If the administration does proceed with a rollback, legal action will follow, she added, which she expects will make its way to the supreme court. 'We will be filing litigation if that happens. This is a kind of a canary in the coal mine.' McDaniels described the efforts to rollback protections as 'perplexing'. She pointed to the interior secretary Doug Burgum's address to the National Congress of American Indians in which he indicated he didn't believe the nation's 'most precious places', such as parks and monuments, should be targeted for development. But the tribe is focused on celebrating the monument, informing the public about the significance of these lands and ensuring it continues to serve as a healing place for the Indigenous people who have endured a long history of genocidal acts and injustices, McDaniels said. 'Truth and healing cannot begin if we're constantly fighting to protect our sacred lands,' McDaniels said. 'That's what we don't want for our kids, our grandkids and all future generations. Everybody deserves the right to experience the gifts that this land makes available for people.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store