Jury urged to clear Charles Hanson after claim his wife lied to ‘build' her case
A three-week trial at Derby Crown Court has heard allegations that Hanson put his wife Rebecca in a headlock while she was pregnant with a baby she later lost, repeatedly 'grabbed' her, locked her in a hotel room, pushed her, and scratched her as she tried to snatch a mobile phone.
The Crown claims WhatsApp messages sent by Hanson to his wife amount to a 'set of confessions' to the charges.
In his closing speech to jurors on Wednesday, Crown counsel Stephen Kemp said the messages, including one in which Hanson promised to never again 'lay a finger' on his wife, provide a clear picture of the couple's relationship.
Hanson – who has appeared on TV shows including Bargain Hunt, Flog It! and Antiques Road Trip – denies charges of controlling or coercive behaviour between 2015 and 2023, assault occasioning actual bodily harm and assault by beating.
He told the court he was 'almost a slave' to his wife, who left him 'a beaten and broken man' by controlling him.
His lawyer Sasha Wass KC claimed Mrs Hanson 'was not controlled in any sense of the word' and was instead unstable and unhappy and 'felt resentful and hard done by' at her husband's work commitments before their marriage 'imploded' in 2023.
Ms Wass, addressing jurors on Thursday, asked them to consider whether the incident involving an alleged headlock – which Hanson claims was simply a hug – was 'a real incident' which Mrs Hanson had distorted to 'build up a false case' against her husband.
The defence KC said of the incident, which took place in 2012 and is not part of the charges: 'Putting it shortly, if she is capable of lying about that, she is capable of lying about anything.'
Another alleged example of controlling behaviour – a threat to throw embers from a fire – was 'rubbish', while another in which Mrs Hanson had tried to grab her husband's phone was a 'family row' which 'really should not find itself in the criminal courts at all', Ms Wass said.
By the middle of May 2023, she added, Mrs Hanson was 'desperate to leave and get Charles out of the house', while he was trying to save his marriage.
Ms Wass alleged that Mrs Hanson, who married the defendant in 2010, had been 'vindictive' towards him and had 'capitalised' on the details of visits to Relate to make distorted allegations of 13 incidents of violence or controlling behaviour.
The lawyer told the seven women and five men on the jury: 'The entirety of the case rests on the testimony of Rebecca Hanson. There is nothing else. You have to be sure that she is reliable, accurate and truthful.
'The reality, I suggest, is that Rebecca Hanson is none of those things and she has used this court, a criminal court, as an extension of her divorce battle.
'She has not hesitated to lie.
'There is no way that Rebecca Hanson was coercively controlled.
'This is a criminal court with criminal standards (of proof) and I suggest that Rebecca Hanson has dismally failed to satisfy the standard that is required that Charles has committed any criminal offences whatsoever, and invite you to acquit him of all the charges.'
Mr Kemp has alleged that the account given to the court by 46-year-old Hanson, of Ashbourne Road in Mackworth, Derby, 'stretched credulity beyond any reasonable limit'.
Judge Martin Hurst is summing up the evidence to the jurors and has told them they will not be under any time pressure to reach verdicts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hockey Canada trial: Judge acquits five hockey players accused of sexual assault, citing inconsistencies
This story contains descriptions of alleged sexual assault. The five hockey players who were accused of sexual assault have been found no guilty, as the months-long Hockey Canada trial came to a close on Thursday. Michael McLeod, Dillon Dubé, Cal Foote, Alex Formenton and Carter Hart, who faced charges of sexual assault, were acquitted by a judge in London, Ontario. The charges dated back to an incident that took place in 2018, when the five players were in London for a gala and golf tournament in honor of their championship win as part of Canada's world junior hockey team. A woman, known as E.M. in the trial, has alleged that the players sexually assaulted her over several hours in a hotel room after the event. McLeod was also facing a second charge for being "party to the offense," pleading not guilty to that charge as well. McLeod was acquitted of that charge as well. Judge Maria Carroccia opened Thursday's verdict by saying that she did not find E.M.'s testimony to be "credible or reliable," later noting that her story had inconsistencies. Importantly, the judge felt that prosecutors did not prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, giving her the need to lean towards acquittal. "Having found that I cannot rely upon the evidence of E.M. and then considering the evidence in this trial as a whole, I conclude that the Crown cannot meet its onus on any of the counts before me," the judge said earlier in the ruling, via multiple outlets. Carroccia's primary issue was whether the sexual contact was not consensual, which is what makes the incident sexual assault. Carroccia cited videos filmed by McLeod where E.M. said that what was going on was "all consensual"; additionally, E.M. had consensual sex with at least one of the players earlier in the night, complicating her story. In that manner, the judge said that prosecutors did not successfully prove that E.M did not consent. "In this case, I have found actual consent not vitiated by fear," Judge Carroccia said during the ruling. The trial, which took place seven years after the original incident, has taken a long and meandering path to Thursday's verdict. E.M. initially reported the incident to London police in 2018, but initial investigation was closed in 2019 due to a lack of evidence. The case was re-opened after E.M. reached an undisclosed settlement with Hockey Canada and the Canadian Hockey League in 2022. That lawsuit had alleged that eight players, who were unnamed at the time, had been involved. Charges were not filed until 2024, when the names of the five players who were charged were finally revealed. Other players were involved but did not face charges, having allegedly left the hotel room before the assault took place; those players were called to the stand to testify on the night in question. Additionally, Judge Carroccia's ruling was given six weeks after the trial's arguments concluded. Four of the players — McLeod, Hart, Dubé and Foote — were playing in the NHL at the time that charges were filed, while Formenton was playing in a Swiss league. All of them went on indefinite leave and are not currently under contract with a team. The five players have also been barred from playing for the Canadian national team after the Hockey Canada opened an investigation, though it is probable that the acquittal will have an effect on that investigation.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Carter Hart found not guilty in Hockey Canada sexual assault trial
LONDON, Ont. — Carter Hart was found not guilty in the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial on Thursday. Decisions on Michael McLeod, Dillon Dubé, Cal Foote, and Alex Formenton — like Hart, members of Canada's 2018 world junior hockey team — will be released as Ontario Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia continues to issue her judgments. Advertisement All five men were charged with sexual assault in connection to an alleged incident in June 2018 in which a woman known publicly as E.M. — her identity is protected by a publication ban — said she was sexually assaulted over the span of several hours in a London, Ont., hotel room. The players were in town for a Hockey Canada event celebrating their victory at the World Junior championships earlier that year. Carroccia delivered her decision on Thursday, nearly six weeks after legal arguments concluded, and seven years after the alleged assault was first reported to London police. Carroccia said that she did not find E.M.'s evidence 'credible or reliable,' in explaining her reasoning. 'Having found that I cannot rely upon the evidence of E.M. and then considering the evidence in this trial as a whole, I conclude that the Crown cannot meet its onus on any of the counts before me,' Carroccia said earlier in the day. 'Having found that I cannot rely upon the evidence of E.M. and then considering the evidence in this trial as a whole, I conclude that the Crown cannot meet its onus on any of the counts before me,' the judge said. E.M. and McLeod met at Jack's, a popular bar in London, and after a night of drinking and dancing, left to have consensual sex at McLeod's hotel in the early-morning hours of June 19, 2018. After that sexual encounter, E.M. said that McLeod invited his teammates to his room to engage in sexual activity, without her knowledge or consent. The allegations became public in late May 2022, when TSN reported that Hockey Canada settled a civil lawsuit with E.M. Later that year, The Globe and Mail reported that Hockey Canada had historically used money partially drawn from registration fees to settle allegations of sexual abuse; the organization's CEO and board of directors subsequently resigned, and an exodus of major sponsors ensued. That year's World Junior Championships in Edmonton were held without sponsors. Advertisement No charges were laid after the initial probe into the incident, however, a renewed criminal investigation ended in sexual assault charges against the five players filed in January 2024, with McLeod facing a second charge of sexual assault for 'being a party to the offense.' During her testimony, E.M. said that over the course of the night, she was pressured to perform a number of sexual acts with the players, including oral sex with McLeod, Hart and Dubé and vaginal sex with Formenton. She also said she was slapped on the buttocks and that Foote did the splits over her and grazed his genitals in her face. The Crown argued that E.M. did not voluntarily consent to any of the specific sexual activity and that once men began arriving in the room, E.M. found herself in a 'highly stressful' and 'unpredictable' situation that caused her to feel fear. Naked, drunk and in a room of what she said were eight to 10 men who were strangers to her, E.M. described feeling vulnerable and unsure of what would happen if she did not do what they wanted. She detailed going on 'autopilot' — dissociating as a trauma response to get through the night. The defense's case centered around E.M.'s credibility, which all five legal teams repeatedly questioned and sought to undermine. Attorneys for the accused argued that E.M. was the instigator of the group sex, urging McLeod to invite his teammates back to the hotel room for a 'wild night.' The Crown has not yet indicated if it plans to appeal the judge's ruling. This story will be updated. (Courtroom sketch of Justice Maria Carroccia and some of the defendants from earlier during the Hockey Canada sexual assault by Alexandra Newbould / The Canadian Press via AP)
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Defence seeks absolute discharge for Lich in ‘Freedom Convoy' sentencing hearing
OTTAWA - The lawyer for 'Freedom Convoy' co-leader Tamara Lich said Thursday she should receive an absolute discharge because she and co-accused Chris Barber tried to mitigate the protest's effects on downtown Ottawa. That decision would mean Lich would not receive a criminal record. Lawyer Lawrence Greenspon argued that his client and Barber took 'unprecedented' steps by working with police and city officials throughout the protest to limit the protest's impact. 'This is an individual who came to this city with the best of intentions, as recognized by the judge. She has been under strict bail conditions for three-and-a-half years. She spent 49 days in jail for the offence of mischief,' Greenspon said during the court's lunch break. 'And if one looks at the positive impact that she's had on the lives of many Canadians and the community service that she has continued to do, there's absolutely no reason for her to not receive an absolute discharge.' Lich and Barber were both found guilty of mischief in April for their roles in the convoy protest, which saw activists fill much of downtown Ottawa for three weeks beginning in late January 2022 to protest vaccine mandates and other pandemic measures. The Crown is seeking a prison sentence of seven years for Lich and eight years for Barber, who was also found guilty of counselling others to disobey a court order. Barber's lawyer, Diane Magas, is also seeking an absolute discharge for her client because he has been on bail for the last three-and-a-half years without incident. Greenspon became emotional at times while reading from dozens of support letters submitted on behalf of his client. He read out messages from people who said the convoy protest gave them hope after two years of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated public health measures that some saw as government overreach. 'Tamara Lich, Chris Barber stood up for what they believed in and what many, many people — thousands of people across the country were not capable of standing up (for). And those people were inspired,' he said. Crown prosecutor Siobhain Wetscher is scheduled to respond to defence submissions Thursday afternoon before Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVey begins her deliberations. Wetscher said during her sentencing submissions Wednesday that she is seeking stiff sentences for Lich and Barber because of the broad community harm caused by the three-week 2022 protest in Ottawa's downtown core. She said that she is seeking long sentences not because of Lich and Barber's political beliefs, but because of their actions during the protest. Wetscher said that while Lich and Barber may have come to Ottawa with noble intentions, they continued to encourage people to take part in the protests even when it became impossible for them to ignore the effect it was having on downtown residents and businesses. Greenspon said Thursday that it's 'facile and inaccurate' to say the Crown's sentencing proposal sentence is not motivated by his client's politics. He said Lich continually called for protesters to remain peaceful and can't be held responsible for the actions of individuals at the demonstration. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 24, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
