Federal budget bill could strip 300K Pennsylvanians of Medicaid coverage, push rural hospitals to the brink
HARRISBURG — President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill could have a disastrous effect on the health of rural Pennsylvanians and the operations of the hospitals and other medical centers that care for them.
The federal budget proposal, which passed the U.S. House by a one-vote margin in May, calls for nearly $800 billion in Medicaid cuts over the next decade. It also includes a new 80-hour-per-month work or service requirement for Medicaid recipients between the ages of 19 and 64 who aren't caregivers or who have disabilities. Among other changes, the bill would require verification of coverage eligibility every six months rather than annually.
While supporters of the budget bill argue that it will slow spending and safeguard government programs, critics say the cuts and new requirements will create more paperwork for states and make it harder to access essential care. Opponents also argue the changes would push struggling rural hospitals and other providers to the brink, and force them to scale back services or close entirely.
More than 3 million people in Pennsylvania — 23% — are covered by Medicaid, according to data from the state Department of Human Services, which administers the program. The agency estimates that more than 300,000 would lose Medicaid coverage under the proposal.
Val Arkoosh, secretary of the department, said the bill would not only hurt those losing coverage but 'all of us who would face the real-life consequences of crowded emergency departments, increases in the cost of health insurance, and the catastrophic effects on economies and health systems in rural areas.'
More than 737,000 Medicaid recipients live in rural counties, where residents are typically older and more reliant on government-funded insurance programs. Such programs reimburse at lower rates compared to private insurance companies and haven't kept up with inflation.
Cameron County Commissioner James Moate, a Republican, said the Medicaid reimbursement rate should have never been less than 100%.
'That's why we have struggling hospitals,' he told Spotlight PA.
On average, Pennsylvania hospitals absorb a loss of 18 cents on the dollar for care provided to Medicaid patients, said Nicole Stallings, president and CEO of the Hospital and Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania, which represents more than 230 hospitals statewide. In rural communities, the average loss is 26 cents on the dollar, she added in a May statement.
'Medicaid plays a vital role in the health of rural residents, and it is important to preserve this funding so that families can continue to access the care they need for healthier lives,' said Douglas Winner, chief financial officer for Penn Highlands Healthcare, a nonprofit system with nine hospitals in rural counties.
Penn Highlands President and CEO Steve Fontaine has told lawmakers that consolidating with other health systems and expanding into new areas has helped facilities survive. This strategy, which has helped Penn Highlands diversify its patient and insurance bases, is why the system expanded into Centre County, where resident numbers are expected to grow, he told lawmakers last year.
Still, the health system has shuttered services and reported operating losses over the past year.
Winner said Penn Highlands is 'greatly concerned' about the proposed Medicaid cuts.
'Rural hospitals have experienced substantial cost increases for labor, drugs, and supplies,' he said in a statement. 'Coupled with decreasing volumes, inadequate reimbursement rates, and ongoing staffing shortages — recruitment and retention — we are struggling financially.'
Advocates worry the cuts in the federal budget will force rural hospitals to slash services even more or close altogether. And once facilities end a service or shut down, they rarely reopen, Stallings told Spotlight PA.
Community health centers could also be strained. These facilities, also known as federally qualified health centers, provide services regardless of someone's ability to pay and primarily see patients who use Medicaid and PENNIE, the state's Affordable Care Act marketplace.
More uninsured people will likely lead to an increase in uncompensated care, said Eric Kiehl, director of policy and partnership for the Pennsylvania Association of Community Health Centers. And these facilities are already strapped for resources, he told Spotlight PA.
A surge in demand could cause these health centers to shutter core services — such as medical, dental, or behavioral health — reduce hours, or close, Kiehl said.
Pennsylvania's U.S. House delegation voted along party lines on the federal budget bill, with Republicans supporting and Democrats opposing the proposal.
Medicaid spending totaled roughly $44 billion in fiscal year 2023. The federal government provided almost $28 billion of those dollars.
Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro has said the state won't be able to make up those dollars to support the Medicaid program. In a statement, Shapiro said he hopes 'common sense and a concern for the people of Pennsylvania' will prevail in the U.S. Senate, where Democratic U.S. Sen. John Fetterman and Republican U.S. Sen. Dave McCormick disagree on aspects of the bill.
McCormick did not respond to a request for comment for this story. He has expressed support for the budget bill, which he says will reduce and slow government spending. During a Fox News forum, McCormick said he isn't advocating for taking benefits from 'vulnerable people' but is trying to ensure 'people for whom the program was designed' benefit.
Fetterman called the plan 'a bad bill,' telling Spotlight PA in a statement: 'Republicans want to put more money in the pockets of the ultra-rich at the expense of hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians who will lose access to Medicaid if this disastrous bill is passed.'
and help us reinvigorate local news in north-central Pennsylvania at spotlightpa.org/donate. Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability and public-service journalism that gets results.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Oversight Chair Comer warns DC council to approve Commanders stadium before August recess
A top House Republican is urging Washington, D.C., leaders to expedite approval of redevelopment plans for the Robert F. Kennedy Stadium site before district lawmakers break for the month of August. 'The federal government transferred administrative control of this valuable property with the clear expectation that the D.C. Council would act decisively to maximize its potential,' House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) wrote in a letter to D.C. Council Chair Phil Mendelson on Thursday. 'The Committee understands the need for deliberation and the availability of financial analyses and expects all required votes to be completed before the Council's August recess.' Congress approved legislation last year to help facilitate the redevelopment of the area known as the RFK Stadium site and the Washington Commanders' return to D.C. after playing in Maryland for nearly three decades. The D.C. Council recently delayed finalization of its RFK Stadium deal amid public pressure over costs and housing priorities. Mendelson said in a statement to The Hill that the Council is 'moving as quickly as possible' to finalize a deal. 'I've had and am continuing to have meetings with representatives from the Commanders and those meetings have been very productive and pleasant and constructive and we're working well together,' he said. 'The Council is trying to move towards a positive vote on the stadium.' The Commanders franchise vowed a $2.7 billion private investment in exchange for the redeveloped site. In a tentative agreement, the District said it would invest $1.1 billion over eight years to build a new stadium, housing and green space on the federal owned site along the Anacostia River. Comer urged the Council to promptly act 'without unnecessary and politically motivated delays.' WTOP News reported this week that the D.C. Council missed a crucial deadline to vote on the site, possibly jeopardizing the $3.7 billion project. Legislation formalizing the deal is scheduled for public hearings later this month.


The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Murkowski: Vought ‘disrespects' the government funding process
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) on Thursday said she thinks White House budget chief Russell Vought 'disrespects' Congress' annual funding process after he said it should be 'less bipartisan.' 'I think he disrespects it,' Murkowski said. 'I think he thinks that we are irrelevant, and I wish I had actually heard the speech.' Vought drew attention Thursday for remarks he made at an event hosted by the Christian Science Monitor, at which he said 'the appropriations process has to be less bipartisan.' 'There is no voter in the country that went to the polls and said, 'I'm voting for a bipartisan appropriations process,'' he said. 'That may be the view of something that appropriators want to maintain, and I want to have very good relationships with all Republican appropriators.' As for Democratic appropriators, Vought said he's 'willing to work with' them 'if they conduct themselves with decorum.' 'I think it will lead to better results by having the appropriations process be a little bit partisan, and I don't think it's necessarily leading to a shutdown, I think we will be able to get to a good result,' he said, while criticizing how the appropriations process has been carried out in Congress thus far. He also said the power of the purse remains with Congress, but he added, 'It's a ceiling. It is not a floor. It is not the notion that you have to spend every last dollar of that.' 'Two hundred years of presidents had the ability to spend less than appropriations and did,' he argued. 'It was not only precedent, but it was a part of how the original founders understood what they were separating, the powers between the executive and the legislative branch.' Murkowski said later on Thursday that quotes she's seen in coverage of Vought's comments appear 'pretty dismissive of the appropriations process.' She was also asked about the administration's plans to send Congress additional requests for cuts to funding previously approved by lawmakers. Congress is on the verge of passing legislation that cuts roughly $9 billion in cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting funds ahead of a looming Friday deadline. The Senate passed the rescissions package early Thursday morning, with Murkowski voting against it. 'I do not think that should be our path,' Murkowski, a senior GOP appropriator, said. 'It's not legislating. It's basically the White House saying this is what we want you to do. Take it or leave it.'


Los Angeles Times
a few seconds ago
- Los Angeles Times
Commentary: The reality of 'defunding' Planned Parenthood in Orange County
They came for abortion. But instead they took away your birth control, cancer screenings, and testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections. Congress has passed Trump's budget bill and in doing so, they have jeopardized access to basic healthcare. The Trump administration and Congress have turned their backs on our communities, and the consequences of this bill will echo for generations in Southern California. One of the central provisions of this bill is 'defunding' Planned Parenthood, by excluding all Planned Parenthood health centers from any Medicaid reimbursement, simply because the organization provides abortion services. Far from being a 'handout' as some characterize it, Medicaid is actually a federal health insurance program that reimburses providers for medical services. By blocking Planned Parenthood from Medicaid, the Trump administration and its Republican allies have unjustly blocked the largest provider of reproductive healthcare in the country from accessing any federal reimbursement for all services, including birth control, STI testing/treatment and cancer screening. Here's the truth: the government has already prohibited federal funds from being used for abortion since 1977, thanks to the Hyde Amendment. But now, upset that they have not been able to ban abortion outright, Republican lawmakers have chosen to block access to more than 90% of the services we provide each year by excluding us from a major health insurance program enabling millions of low-income Americans to get healthcare. Republicans have turned misinformation into policy, traded facts for fear — and sacrificed lives for leverage. Defunding Planned Parenthood is not about balancing the country's budget. This is a blatant attack on healthcare access for people who need it the most, and a backdoor attempt to block people from accessing abortion, birth control, and other medical services that most Americans support and are legally protected in California. They may operate from hate, but we act from humanity. For Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties (PPOSBC), that means showing up, no matter what. At PPOSBC, we are exploring every possible budgetary solution to ensure that the more than 130,000 patients who rely on us for care each year can continue to access the medical services they need. Like any health care provider in this country that accepts Medicaid, we receive federal funding as reimbursement for the care we provide. Now we are being forced to make some tough decisions as a result of this targeted and unjust attack on the patients we serve. However, we refuse to let cancers go undetected or let STIs go untreated. We refuse to stand idly by while patients are blocked from accessing birth control, vasectomies, comprehensive sexual health education, and more basic and legally protected healthcare services. Even as the Trump administration tries to block people from accessing the health care they need, it cannot deter us from our mission. Our patients and communities are relying on us, and we will continue to show up for them with strength, courage, and dignity. Our compassion will always exceed their cruelty. This fight is not over, but we have difficult days ahead of us. If you're angry, heartbroken, believe in health care access for all, or have ever been to a Planned Parenthood for care, please channel that energy into action. We need everyone in our community to stand with us and help us fight back, because we will not stop fighting for our patients. With your support, we're not going anywhere, and neither is our care. Krista Hollinger is the President and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties. Previously, she held leadership positions at UCI Health and St. Jude Heritage Health Care. She is a resident of Anaheim.