Breast milk or formula feeding? Gynaecologist shares pros and cons to explain which is better for the child
In an interview with HT Lifestyle, Dr Niti Kautish, director and HOD, obstetrician and gynaecologist, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Faridabad, said, 'New mothers often face the dilemma of whether to breastfeed traditionally or opt for the convenience of formula feeding. This uncertainty often stems from discomfort, hesitation, and a lack of adequate knowledge.' Also read | Breastfeeding 101: Best practices, benefits and overcoming challenges
Here's what you need to know about the pros and cons of breast milk and formula feeding:
1. Nutrition:
Breast milk is tailored by nature with a perfect balance of nutrients, enzymes, hormones, and antibodies, whereas formula milk is industrially produced to mimic breast milk.
2. Ease of digestion:
Breast milk is easily digested, reducing the risk of constipation, gas, or colic in infants. Formula milk is heavier and takes longer to digest, which may lead to digestive discomfort in some babies.
3. Emotional bonding:
Breastfeeding encourages skin-to-skin contact and emotional bonding between mother and baby. Formula feeding allows other caregivers to participate in feeding, but may not provide the same level of bonding.
4. Cost
Breast milk is free and always available without the need for external preparation. Formula milk is expensive and requires bottles, sterilisation, and clean water for safe preparation. Also read | Breastfeeding tips to boost your milk supply: Simple diet hacks every new mom should know
Know the pros and cons of formula feeding.(Shutterstock)
5. Preparation and flexibility
Breast milk needs no preparation but may involve challenges like public feeding or pumping. Formula milk offers flexibility and allows feeding by others at any time, which some mothers find more convenient.
6. Composition
The composition of breast milk naturally changes according to the baby's age, time of day, and feeding stage. Formula milk has a fixed composition and does not adapt to the baby's changing needs. Although different compositions of formula feed are available, customised to age.
7. Postpartum weight loss
Breastfeeding helps the uterus contract, supports postpartum weight loss, and reduces the risk of breast and ovarian cancers. Formula feeding does not provide any physical health benefits to the mother.
8. Conditions to know
There are a few conditions where your doctor might recommend formula feeding over breast milk. This comprises a baby's health-related issues, such as a severe congenital lactose intolerance, a few inborn errors of metabolism or when the mother is on some anticancer drugs or is HIV positive with a high viral load. At such times, supportive family involvement and spreading informed awareness about both choices play a vital role in helping mothers make confident decisions. Also read | Ultimate nutrition guide for breastfeeding mothers: Dietician shares 24 tips for a healthy lactation period
Note to readers: This article is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the advice of your doctor with any questions about a medical condition.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
38 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Replacing milk with methi: Dietician's guide to improving bone and joint health
It is a common notion that only calcium and vitamin D can help in strengthening bones and joints. But according to Dr. Simrat Kathuria, dietician and wellness coach, it is more than that. In an interview with HT Lifestyle, Dr. Simrat Kathuria said, 'As more people are lactose intolerant and others are opting for a plant-based lifestyle, we need to discuss replacing calcium-rich foods. Ragi (finger millet), instant block-inducing soy products (tofu), almonds, and fortified plant milks are formidable options and provide equal nutrition.' Also read | Ultimate Indian diet for strong bones: Doctor says eat these 4 foods, avoid these 4 for healthier bones Calcium and vitamin D can help in strengthening bones.(Freepik) The power of methi over milk: 'Methi (fenugreek), traditional kitchen staple during the winter months, is now receiving acclaim for its anti-inflammatory properties. Methi is high in iron, magnesium, vitamin K, anti-oxidants and other vitamins, which helps relieve stiffness and pain in the joints. Soaking methi seeds or making methi parathas as dietary additions could be appreciable options especially for women with higher risk of developing osteoporosis post 35 years of age,' the dietician added. Also read | Osteoporosis: Foods for women over 30 to prevent weakening of bones Methi is high in nutrients. Bone and joint health supportive foods: Dr Simrat Kathuria further shared a list of food items that can help in improving bone and joint health: Turmeric (with curcumin), ginger, and omega-3s such as flaxseed and walnuts help with inflammation and overall movement. Vitamin C is also important for collagen formation, which acts to cushion joints. The vitamin C comes from citrus fruits, bell peppers, and amla. Including protein is also important. Include dals, eggs, lean meats, or paneer (as appropriate to you) because protein is part of repairing tissue and preserving the integrity of our bones. Be conscious of packaged foods that are high in sodium and drinks that are high in sugar, which promotes leaching from our bones. 'The diet that supports our joints and bones should be varied, not just milk! There is also a variety of whole foods, including, methi, seeds, pulses and greens. Treat your bones like the investment they are, whether you are 20 or 50; your bone health starts with one meal at a time,' the dietician emphasised. Also read | Food for strong bones: Nutritionist shares tips Note to readers: This article is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the advice of your doctor with any questions about a medical condition.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Gujarat HC orders CRPF to promote HIV-positive officer in ministerial posts
The Gujarat high court has ordered the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) to promote a woman officer to the Inspector rank, ruling that the force could not stop her promotion to the ministerial post merely on the ground that she was HIV-positive. The Gujarat high court ordered CRPF to promote her as Inspector (Ministerial) with effect from the date her juniors were promoted, and consider her for promotion to the post of Assistant Commandant (Ministerial) The high court ordered CRPF to promote her as Inspector (Ministerial) with effect from the date her juniors were promoted, and consider her for promotion to the post of Assistant Commandant (Ministerial) by placing her in the gradation list along with her juniors. A special departmental promotion committee should be conducted to consider the petitioner's candidature. 'Upon consideration, if the petitioner is found fit on all other aspects, she shall be given promotion to the post of Assistant Commandant (Ministerial) from the date the junior(s) to her have been promoted against the vacancies of the year 2024-25,' a bench of chief justice Sunita Agarwal and justice Pranav Trivedi said in its verdict on Monday. The detailed judgment was uploaded to the high court's website on Tuesday. The court ruled that the entire exercise should be completed within two months. The petitioner, a CRPF officer who was diagnosed HIV-positive in 2013, was denied promotion on multiple occasions despite being medically classified as Shape-I — the highest fitness level — between 2017 and 2022. In 2024, she was temporarily placed in Shape-II for 12 weeks, despite a CD4 count of 562. On that basis, her name was excluded from the list of officers considered for promotion to the post of Assistant Commandant (Ministerial). 'Applying the medical category Shape I as an essential (pre-requisite) condition for promotion of the force personnel in all groups/ranks/cadres in the CPMF and, thus, denying promotion to HIV/AIDS +ve persons who are 'protected persons' within the HIV/AIDS (Prevention & Control) Act' 2017 resulted in arbitrary exercise of powers at the ends of the respondents,' the court said. The CRPF had tried to argue that medical classification in Shape-I was a mandatory requirement for promotion and cited Standing Orders and Recruitment Rules. It also sought to reason that promotion could not be claimed as a matter of right and that the petitioner's exclusion was based on applicable policy and medical reports. It also claimed that while she had been temporarily upgraded to Shape-I in the past, she did not appear for timely review medical examinations as required, including in 2024, which affected her eligibility. The officer, on the other hand, said that she had been consistently declared fit for service, with CD4 counts well above the clinical minimum of 200 cells/microlitre, and that she had been arbitrarily downgraded in the medical system without consistency. She said she was denied promotion despite meeting the eligibility and superior Annual Performance Appraisal Reports. She also argued that applying the same physical medical standards to ministerial staff — who do not serve in combat or field duties — was irrational and discriminatory. The bench agreed with the petitioner's arguments. The court ruled that the current rules and standing orders placed an unlawful restriction on DPCs by denying them discretion to assess overall fitness. It stated: 'It seems that HIV/AIDS +ve persons are being treated in the force as the persons suffering from illness of permanent nature and, as such, they are either being declared unfit by DPC even though they are otherwise fit for promotion or not even included in the list placed before the DPC for consideration for promotion on the ground that they do not fall in Shape-I category. This is what has exactly happened with the petitioner herein,' the court observed.
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Tamannaah Bhatia's pimple hack is applying morning saliva to pimples before brushing teeth: Does it work and is it safe?
Tamannaah Bhatia's cheap and easy pimple hack involves applying morning saliva to pimples before brushing her teeth. In an August 3 interview with The Lallantop, the actor said it works due to the antibacterial properties present in morning saliva, which can help dry out pimples. However, in an interview with HT Lifestyle, dermatologists caution against this 'unverified trick', citing potential risks of bacterial infections, skin irritation, and pH imbalance. Also read | Want to pop a pimple before a big day? Dermat shares how to do it safely, step by step Doctors are cautioning against Tamannaah Bhatia's unconventional skincare hack of using morning saliva to treat pimples, citing potential risks of bacterial infections, skin irritation. (Instagram/ Tamannaah Bhatia) 'I am no doctor, but this is my personal hack' Asked to share her 'pimple hack', Tamannaah Bhatia said, 'Spit, thook. It works, but the morning spit, which is before brushing. It's scientific. When you wake up in the morning…I am no doctor, but this is my personal hack, and I believe there is science to it. Your body has created enough antibacterial elements in your mouth when you wake up in the morning. This is why our eyes are full of mucus, our nose is full of mucus, and our mouth is battling all the bacteria that have accumulated during the night before brushing our teeth. If you use that spit, it dries up the pimple immediately, if it's not cystic.' Does this actually work? While Tamannaah raves about her morning saliva hack for pimples, doctors warn it contains bacteria and microorganisms that can harm skin and cause infections. They also point out that there is no concrete study supporting saliva's effectiveness in treating acne, and, in fact, saliva's enzymes and acidity can actually irritate or dry out sensitive skin. When asked about Tamannaah's unusual skincare hack — applying morning saliva on zits — Dr Priyanka Kuri, consultant, dermatology, Aster Whitefield Hospital, Bengaluru, said, 'There is not much clinical evidence to support saliva as a therapeutic choice for acne. Morning saliva does have antimicrobial enzymes (lysozyme, peroxidase, lactoferrin), but they are weakly antibacterial. It is theoretically possible that it could kill some of the acne-related bacteria, like Cutibacterium acnes. However, the concentration of these enzymes is not strong or stable enough to produce lasting or safe effects on inflamed or infected skin.' 'Can increase risk for irritation, infection, allergy' She added, 'Saliva also carries many hundreds of different strains of bacterium – some harmless in the mouth but becoming opportunistic pathogens when spread to open or sensitive skin. Putting saliva, for example, on broken skin, cystic acne or open zits could increase the risk for irritation, infection, or allergic reaction, especially for those with sensitive skin or who have underlying skin conditions such as eczema or dermatitis. Saliva is also allergic to our skin, which causes irritation. A lot of people will have contact dermatitis after it touches their skin. So, it is always better to avoid applying saliva to your pimples.' Although Tamannaah's advice may be long-held general knowledge or even personal experience, morning saliva is not a medically accepted treatment protocol for pimples, she added. The best course of action in treating skin issues is to have confidence in tried and tested best practice, particularly for such skin issues as acne, which can cause permanent scarring or infection if the lesion does not heal appropriately, the doctor said. Dr Kuri also said, 'The morning saliva theory was more folklore or hearsay than evidence. It may provide temporary ownership for some, yes, but don't forget that oily skin really needs to be cleaned, controlled, and treated specifically. Saliva without the evidence doesn't mean anything, salicylic acid, benzoyl peroxide, topical retinoids that have been studied are much safer and effective and used with appropriate frequency.' 'Don't fall prey to any such unverified claims' Dr Shareefa Chause, dermatologist, Dr Shareefa Skin Care Clinic, Mumbai, added that while some people tend to believe that applying morning saliva is a natural remedy and works wonders on the skin, 'it is not at all advisable to do so'. She explained, 'There is no scientific evidence available regarding applying morning saliva to pimples. In fact, saliva contains bacteria and enzymes that help digestion, not skin healing. Applying it to the face, especially on sensitive or acne-prone skin, can irritate or worsen breakouts by further worsening the problem. Pimples are commonly seen due to clogged pores, excess oil, and bacteria, and they require proper skincare and, in some cases, even medication. Relying on such unverified tricks can delay proper treatment and even spread infection and steal one's peace of mind.' She warned, 'Don't just follow any trend because your favourite celebrity is promoting it. If you have pimples, and they are not getting better, then it is imperative to consult a doctor without any further delay, who will initiate timely intervention. Also, use the products recommended by the doctor only. Don't fall prey to any such unverified claims that aren't backed by experts. Not everything that goes viral may be beneficial for you. So, take utmost care of your skin.' Note to readers: This article is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the advice of your doctor with any questions about a medical condition.
