logo
Despite growing anger, Trump marches on with his projections of power

Despite growing anger, Trump marches on with his projections of power

There was nothing wrong with the idea that America might want a 250th anniversary celebration of the US Army. The celebration that US President Donald Trump finally got after
pushing for it since his first term could have been billed as a front-running event connected to the country's 250th birthday, since we are almost one year away from that significant date.
Advertisement
And for those longing for a break from the blood sport that US politics has become, the event did not end up as Trumpian as might have been expected. Although the president was positioned between two tanks on his reviewing stand – a set piece that made him appear as the central figure – he still managed to get through his speech without repeating election lies or
lashing out at his political enemies . A gold star for him.
Beginning with a historically costumed fife and drum corps and then continuing through the eras of battle machinery, the presentation did not veer into political territory unless you were watching on Fox News, where Defence Secretary
Pete Hegseth offered commentary including: 'The haters can hate. Let them. We don't care.'
The Trump-friendly Newsmax offered up commentary that would make North Korean leader Kim Jong-un blush. Meanwhile, major broadcast media such as CNN toggled between images of the parade and the millions of Americans at
'No Kings' demonstrations that proceeded from Bucksport, Maine to Los Angeles, where police
used tear gas and flash bangs to disperse protesters.
The nationwide demonstrations knocked the parade off the top headlines. A shooting during a march in Salt Lake City that left one person critically injured pushed Trump's event further below the fold.
Advertisement
The president must have known in the run-up to the parade how large and widespread the protests against him were shaping up to be. If he didn't,
the political assassination of Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, which Minnesota Governor Tim Walz called an act of 'targeted political violence', should have given him the message that the nation needed a salve.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Senate Democrats try resolution to cancel Trump's Brazil tariffs
US Senate Democrats try resolution to cancel Trump's Brazil tariffs

South China Morning Post

timean hour ago

  • South China Morning Post

US Senate Democrats try resolution to cancel Trump's Brazil tariffs

Top Senate Democrats are working to block President Donald Trump's plan to implement high duties on goods from Brazil, charging that they are being used for political purposes. Advertisement 'We're particularly concerned about these tariffs on Brazil – which are being put into place to get the Brazilian Supreme Court to stop its prosecution of Trump's long-time friend Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil's former president who is facing criminal charges for inciting a violent coup,' Senators Tim Kaine, Chuck Schumer, Jeanne Shaheen and Ron Wyden said in a statement. A 50 per cent tariff is set to be imposed on Brazilian imports next week, though the emergency declaration exempts many of the country's biggest exports. 02:12 Brazil plans to retaliate against US tariffs that partly aim to free former leader Bolsonaro Brazil plans to retaliate against US tariffs that partly aim to free former leader Bolsonaro The senators intend to file a privileged resolution, one of the few tools Congress has to rein in the president's tariff efforts. The move would allow them to bypass certain procedural hurdles and force a vote on the floor, requiring senators to go on the record with their position. A separate Democrat-led move earlier this year to end the tariffs on Canadian goods passed with bipartisan support, though its companion resolution in the House was blocked before getting a vote. Trump could veto such a resolution, which he threatened to do to the one to end tariffs on Canadian imports, though Congress could override the veto with a two-thirds supermajority. Advertisement

Court in Washington to hear arguments on legality of Trump ‘reciprocal' tariffs
Court in Washington to hear arguments on legality of Trump ‘reciprocal' tariffs

South China Morning Post

time7 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Court in Washington to hear arguments on legality of Trump ‘reciprocal' tariffs

A federal appeals court just steps from the White House could derail US President Donald Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs before they take effect on Friday, a move that could weaken Washington's leverage in trade talks with China and other key partners. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hear arguments on Thursday in Washington on whether the tariffs can survive legal scrutiny. The lawsuit, V.O.S. Selections v. Trump, challenges Trump's claim he can unilaterally impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, arguing he overstepped his authority by bypassing Congress. IEEPA gives the president power to regulate economic activity during a national emergency. No president before Trump has used the statute to justify tariffs. The case consolidates two lawsuits: one filed by 12 states led by Oregon, the other by five small American businesses. The lead plaintiff, V.O.S. Selections, is a New York-based wine importer. In addition to Oregon, states named as plaintiffs include Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York and Vermont. The legal challenge also targets Trump's February decision to impose 20 per cent to 25 per cent fentanyl-related tariffs on imports from China, Mexico and Canada.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store