logo
Inside the pain and torture of a family ruined by Munchausen by Proxy disorder

Inside the pain and torture of a family ruined by Munchausen by Proxy disorder

Yahoo16-02-2025
Early 2009 was a difficult time for the Fort Worth, Texas-based Ybarra family.
Hope Ybarra, a mother of three, had been fighting a rare form of bone cancer for eight years.
Now, the cancer had reappeared after two remissions, and this time, she told her family, it would be fatal.
Making this worse was that her youngest, 5-year-old Sophia, had been sick almost since birth with cystic fibrosis, generating a 15,000-page medical file.
After hearing the news of Hope's remission, Sophia put her arms around her. 'I'm going to miss you, Mommy,' she said.
But according to Andrea Dunlop and Mike Weber's new book, 'The Mother Next Door: Medicine, Deception, and Munchausen by Proxy' (St. Martin's Press, out Feb. 4), none of this was true.
Ybarra wasn't dying.
She had never had cancer.
And Sophia, who had spent her life being subjected to medical procedures including a surgically implanted feeding tube, had also never actually been sick.
The form of abuse that causes a parent to subject her child to years of unnecessary medical intrusions is known as Munchausen syndrome by proxy.
Dunlop, who hosts a podcast about the condition called 'Nobody Should Believe Me,' emphasizes that Munchausen syndrome by proxy is defined by deliberate deception and 'are not cases of someone who is simply anxious or even having outright delusions about illnesses.'
In 2001, Ybarra, then a mother of two, was six months pregnant with twins when she told her husband, Fabian, that she had cancer.
'Hope faced an agonizing decision,' Dunlop writes of the story Ybarra shared.
'Her treatment could put the babies at risk, but if she forwent it, they could all die. She went ahead with the radiation, and two weeks in, she was hit by another blow. She had lost the pregnancy.'
Her family was devastated.
'[Her sister] Robin remembers seeing ultrasound pictures of the twin girls, whom they had already named Alexandria and Alexia,' Dunlop writes. 'Robin would go on to name her son Alexander in memory of the lost little girls.'
Sophia was born in March 2004 four months premature, and was diagnosed with cystic fibrosis soon after. For five years, the family's life was dominated by concerns for both Sophia's sickness and the possibility that Hope's cancer would return.
Eventually, Ybarra moved with Sophia to Birmingham, Ala., after Sophia's pulmonologist relocated there, necessitating regular 10-hour drives back and forth for treatment.
Ybarra's parents, Susan and Paul, raised almost $100,000 for the family, including donations from many of their friends and clients.
By April 2009, when Ybarra was supposedly dying, she was moved to the hospital to receive palliative care.
But when Sophia's oncologist called Susan for information on Ybarra's care team, the grieving mother couldn't find anything.
Ybarra's lie was exposed. For her family, it was as if the fabric of reality had split apart.
'One minute your child is dying,' Paul told Dunlop. 'Now your child's a really confusing character.'
Ybarra was transferred to the hospital's psych ward and diagnosed with major depressive disorder and Munchausen syndrome.
Susan and Paul had to return the money they had raised, and sharing the story destroyed their lives.
Paul was asked to leave his job for 25 years. The couple lost their home and their marriage fell apart, though they did eventually reconcile. (Susan died in 2019.)
But also, the family was forced to ask what else Ybarra might have lied about — like if the pregnancy she lost had even been real.
Susan checked the urn that supposedly contained the twins' ashes. It was empty. Alexandra and Alexia had never existed. Robin had named her son after a lie. Now doubly devastated, the family knew they needed one more potentially heartbreaking answer.
The Ybarras brought Sophia in for the test that determines whether a child has cystic fibrosis. It came back negative.
'For almost any parent in the world, the news that their child didn't have a terminal illness would have brought tears of relief,' writes Dunlop. 'But upon hearing the test results, Hope broke down in tears for a very different reason. She'd been caught.'
Over the course of an hours-long interview turned interrogation, Weber, who Dunlop describes as 'the only detective in the United States who has made this a focused area of expertise,' got Ybarra to admit to putting a pathogen in the cup that was used to test Sophia's saliva, among other misdeeds.
Ybarra was arrested in October 2009. A $25,000 bond was set, but no one would pay it. One year later, she accepted a plea bargain of 10 years in prison, and Dunlop writes that 'she served every day of her ten-year sentence.'
The three children, now grown, have had no contact with Ybarra since her arrest. Fabian visited her in prison just once, to ask what happened to their once sizable savings account. But Ybarra said she didn't remember.
'To this day, her favorite line is, I don't remember,' Fabian told Dunlop.
'She's still the victim,' Fabian said. 'She will always be the victim.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

N.H. Governor Kelly Ayotte signs bills banning gender-affirming care for minors
N.H. Governor Kelly Ayotte signs bills banning gender-affirming care for minors

Boston Globe

time18 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

N.H. Governor Kelly Ayotte signs bills banning gender-affirming care for minors

Proponents have said the ban is an important way of protecting children from treatments they believe to be harmful and irreversible. But opponents say the new law discriminates against transgender youth, removing treatments they view as life saving, and interfering with doctors' ability to make appropriate medical decisions with families. Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up Violations of the new law will go before New Hampshire's board of medicine, which can take administrative disciplinary action. Advertisement The new law also allows someone who was harmed by receiving this care to bring a lawsuit against the person who provided the care and violated the law. The new ban comes as legislative efforts targeting transgender people have grown in recent years. Last year, New Hampshire lawmakers passed a bill banning gender-affirming genital surgeries for minors, even though providers have said such procedures are exceedingly rare in New Hampshire. All of the other New England states have laws protecting access to gender-affirming care, according to the Movement Advancement Project, a Colorado-based think tank that promotes equality. Advertisement Some New Hampshire families with transgender children have been warily watching as the bill advanced and, in some cases, have been Republican lawmakers in New Hampshire who championed the ban were encouraged by a But some attorneys say there are still avenues for pursuing a possible legal challenge of New Hampshire's new law. That could include a challenge based on the New Hampshire constitution, arguing that the intent of the law was to harm transgender people, or a challenge on the basis of parental rights, according to Chris Erchull, a senior staff attorney at GLAD law. Ayotte also signed a second bill banning gender-affirming surgeries for minors. The bill explicitly prohibits 'transgender chest surgery' for minors as part of a gender transition. Violating the law is classified as unprofessional conduct and would be subject to discipline by the board of medicine. The law also allows minors to sue for damages if they received such a treatment in violation of the law. And the attorney general can bring a suit to enforce compliance with the law. Amanda Gokee can be reached at

Trendy coffee choice sparks controversy when allergic child nearly takes a sip
Trendy coffee choice sparks controversy when allergic child nearly takes a sip

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Trendy coffee choice sparks controversy when allergic child nearly takes a sip

A teenager's innocent coffee choice recently sparked an online debate after it nearly exposed a severely allergic child to a nut allergen. In a Reddit post, an 18-year-old wrote that the trouble began after she carried a hazelnut coffee to her friend's house for a study session. Advertisement She claimed the drink was only for her — but her cup of joe caused a stir. 'After a while, I got up to go to the toilet,' the student recalled. 'When my back was turned, my friend's little sister (8), who is allergic to hazelnut, tried to drink my coffee.' The Redditor's boyfriend quickly intervened, telling the 8-year-old girl that she couldn't sip the drink, according to the post. 'When I explained to her that the coffee has hazelnut, my friend got very upset at me, saying I shouldn't bring over something that could endanger his sister,' the young woman added. Advertisement A hazelnut allergy is one of the most common types of known tree nut allergies, according to For individuals with tree nut allergies, beverages made with real hazelnut extract can be life-threatening, according to WebMD. A hazelnut allergy is one of the most common types of known tree nut allergies, according to New Africa – The most severe reaction, anaphylaxis, can cause the body to go into shock and may be fatal without immediate treatment like an Epinephrine injection, as Fox News Digital has previously reported. Advertisement The 18-year-old admitted that the thought of an allergic reaction didn't occur to her when she got the drink. 'I just didn't think it would happen since she's always asked before eating any of my sweets and candies,' she said. On Reddit, people were split over the sticky situation, though most of the commenters took the teen's side. Advertisement 'The 8-year-old should not be sipping other people's drinks at all,' one person wrote. 'Especially if she has a serious food allergy. Who was supervising her?' 'Why is an 8yo drinking coffee (also without asking)?' another person asked. 'Assuming from your story that she is only affected by ingesting nuts (as opposed to airborne).' Others felt the original poster overstepped by bringing a nutty beverage into the child's home in the first place. 'It's generally considered a bad idea to bring something that someone is allergic to into their home – even if you thought they wouldn't eat it/touch it,' one user said. 'Cross contamination is real and dangerous.' 'There should be special attention given to any food that is out [and available] when a child has a serious allergy.' Another wrote, 'The child shouldn't have [taken a drink of] your coffee, sure, but what if you had spilled it somewhere communal or something and exposed the child that way?' Diane Gottsman, a Texas-based etiquette expert, weighed in on the debate. Gottsman, who owns the etiquette-focused Protocol School of Texas, called the situation 'unfortunate.' Advertisement She told Fox News Digital, 'If the person bringing in the hazelnut coffee knew there was an allergy, they should not have brought the coffee in.' 'But often the person bringing in the allergen does not know unless they are alerted by the family member.' Speaking from personal experience, Gottsman said that her own adult daughter has a serious nut allergy and takes precautions. Advertisement Others felt the original poster overstepped by bringing a nutty beverage into the child's home in the first place. JCM – Ultimately, children don't reason the same way adults do, which is why adult supervision matters. 'A parent can teach a child to not share foods or drink without permission … [but] when it comes to a child, they are young and do not have the same type of reasoning skills,' she said. 'While the person who brought in the hazelnut did not do it intentionally, it could have still been dangerous.' Advertisement At 18 years old, the Redditor is still learning the ropes of adulthood – and Gottsman chalked up the error as a simple accident, though it could have had serious consequences. 'There should be special attention given to any food that is out when a child has a serious allergy,' she concluded. 'While the person who brought in the hazelnut did not do it intentionally, it could have still been dangerous.'

I'm a doctor — 3 toxic items in your bedroom that you should throw out ASAP, follow my 2-year rule
I'm a doctor — 3 toxic items in your bedroom that you should throw out ASAP, follow my 2-year rule

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

I'm a doctor — 3 toxic items in your bedroom that you should throw out ASAP, follow my 2-year rule

Forget the monster in your closet — the real nightmare in your bedroom is lurking in plain sight. A Harvard-trained doctor is sounding the alarm, warning that everyday items in your sleeping quarters may be teeming with chemicals, critters and other hidden hazards. In a recent Instagram video, Dr. Saurabh Sethi, a California-based gastroenterologist, revealed the three 'toxic bedroom items' you should ditch before they wreck your health. 4 Dr. Saurabh Sethi is warning about the potential dangers of holding onto three common bedroom items. Saurabh Sethi / Instagram Pillow problems First up: old pillows. 'Pillows accumulate dust mites, sweat and allergens over time,' Sethi explained. This can turn them into breeding grounds for bacteria, leading to unpleasant odors and even skin infections. Moisture — from spills, saliva, sweat, humidity or wet hair — can also cause mold and mildew to grow, which not only stinks but poses serious health risks, especially for those with respiratory issues. But it's not just the gross stuff to worry about. Pillow filling breaks down over time, making older pillows flat, lumpy and uncomfortable. That can trigger neck pain, headaches and restless nights. 'If yours is over one to two years old, it is probably time to replace it,' Sethi advised. Chances are, many of us are overdue. In one survey, nearly two-thirds of more than 100 respondents admitted to using pillows older than two years. 4 Synthetic pillows and memory foam pillows typically last 1-2 years. Satjawat – No spritz here You should probably toss that synthetic air freshener, too. Nearly three-quarters of Americans use them weekly, but despite their popularity, research suggests many odor eliminators may actually pollute your indoor air — and pose serious health risks. 'In one of the studies, 86% of air fresheners tested contained phthalates, which are chemicals associated with reproductive harm and asthma,' Sethi warned. Many also release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) like formaldehyde, benzene and toluene, which can irritate your respiratory system and trigger coughing, wheezing and shortness of breath. 4 While intended to improve the smell of a room, some air fresheners can release chemicals that may negetively impact air quality. Marevgenna – For some people, the strong scents can spark headaches or migraines. Others may break out in rashes or experience itching and redness from allergic skin reactions. In the long term, some studies suggest prolonged exposure to synthetic fragrances could increase the risk of chronic illness and even cancer. Check your bed Sethi also wants you to take a hard look at your mattress. 'A mattress that is more than 7 to 10 years old can lower sleep quality and cause chronic back pain,' he said. 4 Back pain is one of the top complaints Americans bring to their doctors. Satjawat – Just like pillows, old mattresses collect dead skin cells, dust, moisture, mites and other allergens over time — polluting your bedroom air and potentially triggering health issues. They also lose their shape and support, often sagging or forming lumps that leave you stiff, sore, and anything but well-rested. Even the coils inside can become squeaky and creaky over time. While this might seem like a minor inconvenience at first, it can quickly become a sleep saboteur. More Americans are likely dealing with these issues than you might think. In one study, researchers found that the average mattress in the US isn't replaced until it's 13.9 years old — nearly four years past the recommended lifespan. In another survey, 18% of respondents said they were sleeping on a mattress that was ten years old or older. That kind of wear and tear may be taking a serious toll. Nationwide, about a third of Americans — roughly 84 million people — aren't getting the recommended seven hours of sleep per night for optimal health and wellness. At the same time, nearly 16 million adults — around 8% of the US population — suffer from chronic back pain that interferes with daily life.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store