
A month after ceasefire with Israel, Iranians fear another war
"I don't think this ceasefire will last," said Peyman, a 57-year-old resident of Shiraz in Iran's south, one of numerous cities hit last month as Israel unleashed an unprecedented bombing campaign against its staunch rival.
The Israeli offensive targeted key nuclear facilities and military sites, killing top commanders and nuclear scientists and hundreds of other people, while also wreaking havoc in some residential areas.
The attacks triggered the fiercest fighting in history between the longtime foes, ending with a ceasefire announced on June 24.
But Israel has signalled it could return to fighting if Iran attempts to rebuild nuclear facilities or carry out any actions deemed a threat, such as moving to develop an atomic bomb -- an ambition Tehran has consistently denied it was pursuing.
Live Events
Iran, in turn, has vowed to deliver a harsh response if attacked again.
Nuclear diplomacy with the United States -- which briefly joined the war with strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites -- has stalled, deepening a sense of uncertainty about what lies ahead.
"I am scared the war would start again," said Hamid, a 54-year-old government employee who gave only his first name.
"It will lead to the death of more innocent people and the destruction of the country's infrastructure."
During the war, Israel struck major Iranian cities including the capital Tehran, hitting military sites, government buildings and the state television headquarters.
More than 1,000 people were killed in Iran, according to authorities. Retaliatory missile and drone attacks killed 29 people in Israel.
- 'Don't want to flee again' -
Many residents fled Tehran, seeking refuge in other parts of the country, even though few regions were untouched by the blasts and smoke-covered skies.
Nearly a month later, a series of fires that broke out across Iran in recent days -- including one at a major oil facility -- have triggered speculations which officials were quick to dismiss, denying any acts of sabotage.
"This war really frightened me," said 78-year-old housewife Golandam Babaei, from the western Kermanshah province.
She lived through the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s, a painful memory for many of her generation.
"I kept telling myself, please God, do not let the past repeat itself," Babaei told AFP.
The war with Israel, although much shorter and fought mostly with air strikes and missiles rather than by ground forces, revived grim memories of the conflict with Iraq.
That war, triggered by an Iraqi invasion in 1980, killed an estimated 500,000 people on both sides.
It featured chemical warfare and prolonged front-line bombardments, scarring Iranians in the then-nascent Islamic republic born out of the 1979 revolution.
Since then, for decades, Iran had managed to keep conflicts away from its territory. But now after the 12-day war with Israel, some Iranians feel a profound sense of vulnerability.
"I kept thinking I don't want to flee again, we have nowhere to go. I cannot run to the mountains like the past," said Babaei.
- Uncertain future -
For Ali Khanzadi, a 62-year-old war veteran, the conflict with Israel highlighted a change compared to the 1980s when "we didn't have any advanced military equipment" to fight the Iraqis.
Khanzadi, who was wounded in battle in 1983, said that the war with Israel, while much shorter, had a more sinister dimension.
Unlike in the past, modern military technology means "they can kill a child in his sleep remotely using a drone," he said.
In the face of the Israeli threats and attacks, Iranian authorities have repeatedly invoked national unity.
Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has said the offensive was aimed at toppling the Islamic republic's clerical system, and urged Iranian diplomats and military officials to proceed with "care and precision" as the country cautiously moves on.
Tehran has said it remained open to nuclear diplomacy with the United States which the war had derailed, but officials have expressed concerns over renewed attacks and demanded unspecified US guarantees to resume negotiations.
Ordinary Iranians appear to share fears that the conflict could erupt again.
"I hope that this will not happen," said Hamid.
Babaei said she was praying "for peace, for us to remain safe in our homes".

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
'We'll pay $200M': Columbia announces deal with Trump to settle dispute over anti-Semitism claims
Columbia University announced that it would pay over $200 million to the US government as part of a sweeping settlement made public on July 23. The agreement came after months of tension with the Trump administration, which had accused the university of failing to adequately address antisemitism during pro-Palestinian campus protests related to the war in Gaza. In March, the administration had penalised Columbia by cancelling $400 million in federal funding, claiming that its response to alleged harassment of Jewish and Israeli community members was insufficient. Show more Show less


NDTV
37 minutes ago
- NDTV
Hamas Replies To Latest Gaza Truce Proposal, Seeks Amendments
Hamas confirmed on Thursday that it has responded to an Israeli proposal for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, after more than two weeks of indirect talks in Qatar have failed to yield a truce. "Hamas has just submitted its response and that of the Palestinian factions to the ceasefire proposal to the mediators," the Palestinian militant group said in a statement on Telegram. The response included proposed amendments to clauses on the entry of aid, maps of areas from which the Israeli army should withdraw, and guarantees on securing a permanent end to the war, according to a Palestinian source familiar with ongoing talks in Doha. Negotiators from both sides have been holding indirect talks in Doha with mediators in an attempt to reach an agreement on a truce deal that would see the release of Israeli hostages. Of the 251 hostages taken during Hamas's 2023 attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. But the talks have dragged on for more than two weeks without a breakthrough, with each side blaming the other for refusing to budge on their key demands. For Israel, dismantling Hamas's military and governing capabilities is non-negotiable, while Hamas demands firm guarantees on a lasting truce, a full withdrawal of Israeli troops and the free flow of aid into Gaza. Israeli government spokesman David Mencer on Wednesday accused Hamas of obstructing talks. "Israel has agreed to the Qatari proposal and the updated (US special envoy Steve) Witkoff proposal, it is Hamas that is refusing," Mencer told reporters, adding that Israel's negotiating team was still in Doha and talks were ongoing. The United States said Witkoff will head to Europe this week for talks on a possible ceasefire and an aid corridor. More than 100 aid organisations warned on Wednesday that "mass starvation" was spreading in Gaza.

The Wire
an hour ago
- The Wire
India Escalates Concerns at UN: Gaza Needs Ceasefire, Not 'Intermittent Pauses'
New Delhi: India on July 24 called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, warning that the 'ongoing human suffering must not be allowed to continue' and stressing that civilians are facing 'acute shortages' of food, as well as a lack of access to health care and education. The remarks were delivered by India's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, P. Harish, during the UN Security Council's quarterly open debate on the situation in the Middle East. The meeting was held amid growing international concern over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where hunger and restricted aid access have triggered alarm among governments and humanitarian agencies. As in previous statements, India did not name Israel directly. However, Wednesday's intervention probably marked New Delhi's most forceful public expression of concern about the humanitarian toll since the conflict began. India's votes Last month, India abstained from a UN General Assembly resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all hostages, and unimpeded humanitarian access. Although India said it supported the resolution's key points, it cited the need for 'dialogue and diplomacy' as its reason for abstaining. India was among only 19 countries that abstained, while 149 supported the resolution. India's vote has stirred sharp criticism from opposition parties, who accused the government, known for its close diplomatic relations with Prime Minister Netanyahu's administration, of abandoning India's traditional foreign policy stance. 'Pauses not enough' More than a month later, India reiterated its position but raised the tone of concern on the worsening humanitarian situation. 'Today's meeting takes place against the backdrop of a persisting humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Intermittent pauses in hostilities are not enough to address the scale of humanitarian challenges confronting the people, who grapple daily with acute shortages of food and fuel, inadequate medical services and lack of access to education,' said Harish. He underlined that the collapse of services was especially stark in the health and education sectors. 'WHO estimates that around 95% of all hospitals in Gaza are damaged or destroyed. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights reports that more than 650,000 children have had no schooling for over 20 months,' he said. Militarising aid According to UN records, more than 875 people have been killed over six weeks in shootings by Israeli soldiers against Palestinians trying to reach food distribution points operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The private foundation, backed by the US and Israel, has been criticised for lacking neutrality and for militarising the delivery of aid. There is growing concern over rising deaths due to starvation. According to Gaza health ministry, at least 113 starvation-related deaths have been recorded so far. On July 21, 28 countries, including UK, Japan and Australia, issued a joint statement describing Israel's aid delivery model as 'dangerous'. The statement condemned ' the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food'. Two days later, over 100 aid agencies released a joint letter calling for unrestricted access to humanitarian assistance. 'The starvation of civilians as a method of warfare is a war crime,' the statement said. Four major news organisations, AFP, BBC News, Reuters and Associated Press, also issued a rare joint expression of concern, s tating that they were 'desperately concerned for our journalists in Gaza, who are increasingly unable to feed themselves and their families'. 'No other fixes' At the UNSC meeting, India's ambassador reiterated New Delhi's position that 'ongoing human suffering must not be allowed to continue' and stressed that 'humanitarian assistance needs to be facilitated in a safe, sustained and timely manner'. 'There is no substitute to peace. A ceasefire must be put in place. All hostages must be released. Dialogue and diplomacy remain the only viable paths to achieving these objectives. There are no other fixes or solutions,' Harish stated. He also noted that India shared 'historic and strong ties with our Palestinian brothers and sisters'. 'We have always stood by them and our commitment towards the Palestinian cause is unwavering. We were the first non-Arab country to recognize the State of Palestine. We support the Palestinian people in various ways, directly and through our support to other organizations such as UNRWA,' he said, adding that India is implementing projects valued at more than $40 million in Palestine. Reaffirming India's support for a two-state solution, Harish expressed hope that next week's High-Level International Conference on its implementation would lead to concrete steps towards realising that goal. 'In conclusion, India underscores its readiness to contribute to efforts aimed at shaping a political horizon that restores hope for the Palestinians and brings lasting peace to the Middle East,' he said. 'Only a trickle' Meanwhile, the Israeli permanent representative Danny Danon accused the UN was misrepresenting the situation and claimed that hundreds of UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) employees were undergoing security vetting, with some personnel facing denial of permit renewals due to 'strong affiliation with Hamas'. He said the head of OCHA's Office in the Occupied Palestinian Territory would not have his visa renewed and must leave by July 29. At a media briefing in New York, UN Secretary-General's spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric said Israeli authorities alone decide what aid enters Gaza and under what conditions. 'All too often, civilians approaching our trucks are shot at,' he said. 'To collect supplies safely, we must get reliable assurances that troops would not engage or be present along the routes of our convoys.' He added that the aid entering Gaza is 'only a trickle compared to the immense needs' and reiterated that 'above all, we need a ceasefire to put an end to this devastating situation'. Responding to Israeli threats against OCHA, Dujarric affirmed the UN's full confidence in the agency's professionalism and impartial work. 'Any punitive measures will only add to the obstacles preventing us from reaching people facing hunger, displacement and deprivation,' he said.