logo
Ukraine's race to rebuild power plants under Russian bombardment

Ukraine's race to rebuild power plants under Russian bombardment

Telegraph07-06-2025
Valeria was about to take a bite of pizza when the Iskander landed nearby.
The blast from the Russian missile shattered all the windows in the Mykolaiv CHP (combined heat and power) plant in southern Ukraine, igniting a gas fire and propelling shrapnel through the canteen.
'I had imagined what I might do when a missile or a Shahed [drone] comes, like if it really happens to me, and I had told myself I should be really calm at that moment,' says the 27-year-old.
She and her twin sister Alyona led a hyperventilating colleague out of the plant's office to her car. The trio were still driving away when the second Iskander hit, devastating the plant's boiler-room.
After that Oct 10 strike, the plant was targeted again, in January, February and May, each time with Shahed drones.
On Thursday night, Russia renewed its campaign against Ukraine's national energy infrastructure, breaking a loosely followed ceasefire Vladimir Putin agreed with Donald Trump in a phone call on March 18.
Power facilities were struck in the western city of Ternopil and targeted in other areas, days after Putin warned he would avenge Ukraine's elaborate 'Spiderweb' attack on Russia's bomber fleet.
'The scumbags haven't hit the energy sector en masse for five months,' wrote Myroshnykov, a Ukrainian military blogger. 'Ballistics on transformers – only the scumbags could do that.'
On Friday night, Moscow struck the northeastern city of Kharkiv with what the mayor described as the 'most powerful attack' since the start of the war, involving more than 50 Iranian-made drones, one rocket and four guided bombs.
At least three people were killed and 22 wounded in the devastating strikes. Harrowing scenes saw bloodied residents being carried out on stretchers from their homes by rescue workers wearing gas masks.
Respite is direly needed. Ukraine faces shortfalls in both electricity and natural gas production after the wave of Russian attacks – and every hour without further explosions allows for the progress of repairs.
Few appreciate the challenges like Dmytro Myroshnychenko, the chairman of Mykolaiv CHP plant. On a tour of the facility, he grimly points out the legacy of Russia's bombardment: the boiler-room is a tangle of charred iron and splintered rebar; shrapnel perforates an oil tank; flaps of corrugated roof panelling limp over the walls of the destroyed turbine control centre.
In full health, the Mykolaiv CHP heats 160,000 homes and provides 26MW of electricity to the national grid. The latter was ended by a February drone strike. That the plant managed to deliver heat over winter is testament to the grit of its staff.
After the first Iskander strike in October, Mr Myroschnychenko ran through the facility to check if anyone was injured. 'My first thought was, everyone is lying on the floor,' he says. Luckily, everyone survived.
The next day, repairs began. Russia's attack hit two weeks before the start of Mykolaiv's heating season, when residents can turn on their radiators as temperatures sink below freezing. Staff were nervous coming to work but 'everyone understood the importance, as if we didn't rebuild the city would be left without heat'.
Only interrupted by air raid alerts, workers frantically shifted pipelines from the two ruined boilers to a 1930s predecessor.
When he pushed the button to turn on the heat again, Mr Myroschnychenko felt little relief. 'I knew more attacks would be coming,' he says, 'so we started preparing for them.'
The £29.5million needed to build two new boilers is prohibitive; instead, the plant is focused on keeping its elderly system running. Four small metal air raid shelters have been placed on the plant floor, in addition to three underground bunkers.
Gennady, a 47-year-old machinist, escaped the boiler room by touch in one strike, unable to see through the clouds of dust. Now, when sirens warn of an impending strike, he often has to climb up and down several ladders: unlike the destroyed computerised systems, the surviving parts have to be operated by hand.
He jokes there is one advantage: 'It is difficult to break them so easily, as there are no electronics.' But they are harder to shut down in an emergency.
One new metal air raid shelter stands a few feet from the boiler. As Gennady opens the door, a worker caught in a lunchtime nap guiltily slips out.
The most serious challenge facing Ukraine ahead of the next heating season is a shortage of gas, with underground storage badly hit by the Russian strikes: Mykolaiv CHP lost large quantities when the Iskander destroyed a pipeline.
'We need to find $2.5 billion and purchase gas, putting aside the risk of further strikes. The task is quite clear, but extremely difficult,' Oleksandr Kharchenko, the director of Ukraine's energy research centre, told RBC-Ukraine, a local news outlet, this month.
Last winter, Ukraine avoided a crisis. Record high temperatures and low industrial use spared residents from major power cuts. Experts are calling for small boilers, firewood and coal to be delivered to the worst-hit cities – Mykolaiv, Odesa, Dnipro and Kryvih Rih – before winter.
Should there be long-lasting blackouts, further waves of refugees will head west. Others will freeze to death.
In Mykolaiv CHP, the workers plough on with gallows humour. The plant knows war: it was destroyed by the Nazis when they were forced out of Mykolaiv by the Red Army in 1943.
A portrait of Lenin has been left above the doorway in one workshop, with the name 'Morozov' scrawled underneath; a decades-old reference to a lookalike employee.
The shipyard next door built Russia's only aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetzov, before this invasion began.
All the plant's staff are protected from conscription. But it needs another 40 people to get up to speed, admits Mr Myroshnychenko.
At work, Valeria and her friends no longer eat pizza. The next time they sat down to one after the October strike, an air raid sounded immediately. 'It's become a joke,' she says – and another reason to loathe the Russians.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia's warning to the West as it pulls out of missile treaty
Russia's warning to the West as it pulls out of missile treaty

Daily Mail​

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Russia's warning to the West as it pulls out of missile treaty

Putin has dramatically pulled out of a Cold War-era treaty banning short and medium-range nuclear missiles while warning the West to 'expect further steps' as tensions spiral. Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev - now deputy head of the country's powerful Security Council - blamed NATO nations for forcing Moscow 's hand. In a fiery post on X, he wrote: 'The Russian foreign ministry's statement on the withdrawal of the moratorium on the deployment of medium- and short-range missiles is the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy. 'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps'. Medvedev, who has been exchanging barbs online with US President Donald Trump, gave no details about what those steps entailed. But his warning comes just days after Trump said he had ordered two nuclear submarines to 'appropriate regions' in response to Russian threats. The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed in 1987 by Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, eliminated an entire class of ground-launched missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500km. The US withdrew from the deal in 2019, accusing Russia of breaching its terms - a charge Moscow vehemently denied. Since then, Russia had pledged not to deploy such weapons unless Washington did so first. The collapse of the INF Treaty has stoked fears of a replay of a Cold War-era European missile crisis, when the US and the Soviet Union both deployed intermediate-range missiles on the continent in the 1980s. Such weapons are seen as particularly destabilising because they take less time to reach targets, compared with intercontinental ballistic missiles, leaving no time for decision-makers and raising the likelihood of a global nuclear conflict over a false launch warning. But Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov signalled last December that Moscow would abandon the moratorium if 'destabilising actions' by the US and NATO continued. Lavrov told Russia's state news agency RIA Novosti in December that Moscow's unilateral moratorium on the deployment of such missiles was 'practically no longer viable and will have to be abandoned'. 'The United States arrogantly ignored warnings from Russia and China and, in practice, moved on to deploying weapons of this class in various regions of the world,' he told the news agency. In a statement yesterday, Russia's Foreign Ministry confirmed it no longer considered itself bound by the ban, citing NATO's growing military presence in Europe and Asia-Pacific. It specifically cited US plans to deploy medium-range Typhoon and Dark Eagle missiles in Germany starting next year. 'Since the situation is developing towards the actual deployment of US-made land-based medium- and short-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, the Russian Foreign Ministry notes that the conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons have disappeared,' the statement said. According to its statement, the West is openly stationing short-and medium-range missiles in various parts of the world, while Russia's initiatives on the issue have seen no reciprocity. In its first public reaction to Trump's comments on the repositioning of US submarines, the Kremlin on Monday said it was not looking to get into a public spat with the US president. 'In this case, it is obvious that American submarines are already on combat duty. This is an ongoing process, that's the first thing,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. 'But in general, of course, we would not want to get involved in such a controversy and would not want to comment on it in any way,' he said. 'Of course, we believe that everyone should be very, very careful with nuclear rhetoric,' he added. It comes as Russia's missile forces chief declared that the new Oreshnik intermediate-range missile, which Russia first used against Ukraine in November, has a range to reach all of Europe. Oreshnik can carry conventional or nuclear warheads. Putin has praised the Oreshnik's capabilities, saying its multiple warheads that plunge to a target at speeds up to Mach 10 are immune to being intercepted and are so powerful that the use of several of them in one conventional strike could be as devastating as a nuclear attack. The Russian leader has warned the West that Moscow could use it against Ukraine's NATO allies who allowed Kyiv to use their longer-range missiles to strike inside Russia. But as Russia escalates its nuclear rhetoric, Ukraine continues to face relentless attacks. The move comes amid a deadly wave of missile strikes pounding Ukraine overnight, with one railway worker killed and four others injured after Russian forces targeted a key rail hub in Lozova. The strike on Lozova - described by the city's mayor as 'the most massive attack since the beginning of the war' - injured two children and damaged residential areas. Elsewhere, two more people were wounded in a Russian drone attack on Zaporizhzhia , while Ukraine's air defences reported shooting down 29 Iranian-made Shahed drones overnight. The developments come as a deadline set by Trump for Russia to take 'steps to end the war' looms, with his envoy Steve Whitkoff set to visit Moscow this week for talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

India could end the Ukraine war tomorrow. Modi needs to pick a side
India could end the Ukraine war tomorrow. Modi needs to pick a side

Telegraph

time11 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

India could end the Ukraine war tomorrow. Modi needs to pick a side

As White House spokesman Stephen Miller describes India's continuing purchase of Russian oil as 'unacceptable', the extent to which India is prepared to ramp back its long-standing close relationship with Russia remains unclear. As pressure mounts from the incentives for a closer US-India relationship and a pragmatic need to move closer to a Western military alignment in the face of a growing Chinese threat, India will have to choose. India's longstanding close relationship with Russia harks back to the Soviet era, and particularly the 1971 Bangladesh War of Liberation. In 1971, at the height of the Bangladesh (then-East Pakistan) conflict, a threatened US intervention on behalf of Pakistan's then-President Yaya Khan in the form of an aircraft carrier was deterred by a Russian naval presence. Since that time, India has relied on mainly Russian-made military equipment for its forces but with an increasingly wider inventory in recent times including US, French and Israeli equipment. Prime Minister Modi maintains a good personal relationship with Vladimir Putin but is increasingly pressured by a pragmatic need to face up to their nuclear-powered rival in Pakistan and its developing close ties with China. However, with an increasingly muscular China exerting its influence in the region all previous certainties have waned considering the new reality. India sees itself increasing surrounded by potential enemies. Sri Lanka has found itself, through certain trade and development projects which have erred off plan beholden to China. A massive Chinese base is one aspect of that. Bangladesh is increasingly turning for commercial and other reasons to a more welcoming stance towards China. In the case of Pakistan, as the most recent 100-hour war showed, China has made Pakistan a close ally if not, in the eyes of some, a proxy. Without going into the details of the encounter, there is strong evidence that, with the assistance of China, significant equipment and tactical shortfalls were exposed on India's side. Additionally, there is a perception that Pakistan won the diplomatic and presentational round too. This in mind, the Indian military are looking options for modernisation and developing a more domestic reliance for defence procurement. One key area in which India was found wanting was in the capability of its drones versus Pakistan's capability, which many see as China's capability. In looking at solutions to this shortfall, India has looked widely at the best in class, including the Ukrainians. That has proven to be a blind alley, since their continued close association with Russia precludes any cooperation. Additionally, India has found that buying cheap Russian oil has been convenient to say the least. Before the extension of the war in February 2022, India bought around 68,000 of oil per day rising to 2.15 million barrels in May 2023 and levelling at around 40 per cent of its oil needs today, and in doing so – if President Trump is to be asked – funding the Russian war effort. Will that change in the short term? On one hand, India's diplomatic pragmatism is a strong asset in an increasingly transactional diplomatic world. On the other, the burgeoning Chinese presence on India's borders and her membership of the Quad, an association of Japan, Australia and the USA, may nudge India away from its very close relationship with Russia to a more of an association of convenience. If the Indian military was to be asked that is the way forward. But in the end, it is the direction that Prime Minister Modi is inclined to lean that will dictate the direction of travel. Perhaps a Trump charm offensive may be more decisive in the short term as opposed to any form of coercion or strong words.

Russia pulls out of treaty prohibiting short and medium-range nuclear missiles and issues warning to the West
Russia pulls out of treaty prohibiting short and medium-range nuclear missiles and issues warning to the West

Daily Mail​

time11 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Russia pulls out of treaty prohibiting short and medium-range nuclear missiles and issues warning to the West

Putin has dramatically pulled out of a Cold War-era treaty banning short and medium-range nuclear missiles while warning the West to 'expect further steps' as tensions spiral. Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev - now deputy head of the country's powerful Security Council - blamed NATO nations for forcing Moscow 's hand. In a fiery post on X, he wrote: 'The Russian foreign ministry's statement on the withdrawal of the moratorium on the deployment of medium- and short-range missiles is the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy. 'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps'. Medvedev, who has been exchanging barbs online with US President Donald Trump, gave no details about what those steps entailed. But his warning comes just days after Trump said he had ordered two nuclear submarines to 'appropriate regions' in response to Russian threats. The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed in 1987 by Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, eliminated an entire class of ground-launched missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500km. The US withdrew from the deal in 2019, accusing Russia of breaching its terms - a charge Moscow vehemently denied. Since then, Russia had pledged not to deploy such weapons unless Washington did so first. The collapse of the INF Treaty has stoked fears of a replay of a Cold War-era European missile crisis, when the US and the Soviet Union both deployed intermediate-range missiles on the continent in the 1980s. Such weapons are seen as particularly destabilising because they take less time to reach targets, compared with intercontinental ballistic missiles, leaving no time for decision-makers and raising the likelihood of a global nuclear conflict over a false launch warning. But Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov signalled last December that Moscow would abandon the moratorium if 'destabilising actions' by the US and NATO continued. Lavrov told Russia's state news agency RIA Novosti in December that Moscow's unilateral moratorium on the deployment of such missiles was 'practically no longer viable and will have to be abandoned'. 'The United States arrogantly ignored warnings from Russia and China and, in practice, moved on to deploying weapons of this class in various regions of the world,' he told the news agency. In a statement yesterday, Russia's Foreign Ministry confirmed it no longer considered itself bound by the ban, citing NATO's growing military presence in Europe and Asia-Pacific. It specifically cited US plans to deploy medium-range Typhoon and Dark Eagle missiles in Germany starting next year. 'Since the situation is developing towards the actual deployment of US-made land-based medium- and short-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, the Russian Foreign Ministry notes that the conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons have disappeared,' the statement said. According to its statement, the West is openly stationing short-and medium-range missiles in various parts of the world, while Russia's initiatives on the issue have seen no reciprocity. In its first public reaction to Trump's comments on the repositioning of US submarines, the Kremlin on Monday said it was not looking to get into a public spat with the US president. 'In this case, it is obvious that American submarines are already on combat duty. This is an ongoing process, that's the first thing,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. 'But in general, of course, we would not want to get involved in such a controversy and would not want to comment on it in any way,' he said. 'Of course, we believe that everyone should be very, very careful with nuclear rhetoric,' he added. It comes as Russia's missile forces chief declared that the new Oreshnik intermediate-range missile, which Russia first used against Ukraine in November, has a range to reach all of Europe. Oreshnik can carry conventional or nuclear warheads. Putin has praised the Oreshnik's capabilities, saying its multiple warheads that plunge to a target at speeds up to Mach 10 are immune to being intercepted and are so powerful that the use of several of them in one conventional strike could be as devastating as a nuclear attack. The Russian leader has warned the West that Moscow could use it against Ukraine's NATO allies who allowed Kyiv to use their longer-range missiles to strike inside Russia. But as Russia escalates its nuclear rhetoric, Ukraine continues to face relentless attacks. The move comes amid a deadly wave of missile strikes pounding Ukraine overnight, with one railway worker killed and four others injured after Russian forces targeted a key rail hub in Lozova. The strike on Lozova - described by the city's mayor as 'the most massive attack since the beginning of the war' - injured two children and damaged residential areas. Elsewhere, two more people were wounded in a Russian drone attack on Zaporizhzhia , while Ukraine's air defences reported shooting down 29 Iranian-made Shahed drones overnight. The developments come as a deadline set by Trump for Russia to take 'steps to end the war' looms, with his envoy Steve Whitkoff set to visit Moscow this week for talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store