
Inside the Roosevelt, a migrant shelter no more, echoes of a crisis
The luggage room, once just for tourists, held a few suitcases left behind by migrant families that had cycled through the hotel. The gift shop shelves were bare, except for the diapers that city workers had handed out to new mothers.
Advertisement
Upstairs, the grand ballroom was desolate. Gone were the migrants who had slept on cots as they waited for rooms, on the same carpet where New York politicians once campaigned. A map of the United States was all that remained, with small arrows pointing to New York, and a handwritten note in Spanish: 'You are here.'
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Those were the last traces of New York's migrant crisis inside the Roosevelt before the hotel stopped operating last week as the city's best-known migrant shelter — 767 days after it opened as a city-run shelter in May 2023.
Chaos, criticism, and conviction had greeted the shelter's arrival. It closed quietly, fading away with little fanfare, much like the migrant crisis, as the city relocated the remaining families to other shelters and housekeepers turned over its thousands of rooms.
Advertisement
On the day before the hotel closed, Maria Lumbi, 35, a mother from Ecuador, was among the last migrants to show up, along with her three children, ages 8, 12, and 16.
She was not seeking shelter but rather plane tickets to Ecuador to self-deport— as President Trump has encouraged migrants to do— two years after the family arrived in the country.
'I haven't been able to work,' she said. 'I prefer to go back.'
The Roosevelt's volatile chapter as a shelter turned the century-old hotel into an unlikely lightning rod in the nation's divisive immigration debate. Its role welcoming migrants drew comparisons to Ellis Island but also accusations from Trump that it was a waste of taxpayer money, a hotbed of criminal activity, and a beacon for illegal immigration.
The administration of Mayor Eric Adams announced the closure of the Roosevelt shelter in February as border crossings plummeted, slowing the flow of migrants to a trickle. The hotel's future remains unclear, amid speculation that the 18-floor building in midtown Manhattan may be redeveloped into a skyscraper.
But over two years, the Roosevelt cemented its place in the annals of New York's winding immigration story. It functioned as a base for city officials to process new migrants, transforming its marble lobby into a gateway for people arriving in New York, and the United States, sometimes just a day after they had crossed the border.
The numbers were staggering.
More than 155,000 migrants from 150 countries passed through the hotel's doors. The city, legally required to house anyone who is homeless, paid a nightly rate of $202 per room as part of a $220 million, three-year deal with the hotel's owners to use its more than 1,000 rooms to house migrant families.
Advertisement
'For them, this can be that memory of where their life turned around, where they were able to start a better life for their families,' said Dr. Ted Long, a senior vice president of the city's public health system, which managed the Roosevelt Hotel operations. 'This is going to be their memory of coming to America.'
The lobby — the arrival center, as city officials called it — once buzzed with activity.
Interpreters and caseworkers assigned migrants to city shelters and connected them to legal services as they applied for asylum and work permits. National Guard soldiers hurried past families from Venezuela and men from West Africa. City-contracted workers screened for diseases and offered vaccines — efforts meant to protect migrants but also guard the city against a public health crisis as it absorbed a mass of people from faraway countries.
Nurses worked 12-hour shifts in the lobby, treating migrants who often arrived exhausted and disoriented. Pregnant women who had not received prenatal care sought help. Some migrants arrived without medication and in dire need of treatment for cancer, diabetes, hypertension, or AIDS.
'For me, it was about taking care of my patients. Everything else was noise,' said Dr. Karen Sutherland, 54, who over two years helped vaccinate hundreds of migrant families, some of whom still text her. 'I met doctors, dentists, police officers, detectives — people who really want to make a difference,' she added.
What comes next for the Roosevelt is murky. Pakistan International Airlines, which is owned by the Pakistani government, has owned the hotel since 2000. Company representatives did not respond to requests for comment about the hotel's future.
Advertisement
Its past, a remnant of old New York, still lingers.
The hotel, which occupies an entire block on East 45th Street, opened in 1924 and was named after former president Theodore Roosevelt, who had died five years before. The suite where Thomas Dewey once lived and worked while he was governor of New York, the same suite where he learned that he had lost the 1948 presidential election in an upset to Harry Truman, is still there. So is the hotel grill where Guy Lombardo led the house band, right above the secret underground tunnel that guests once used to walk to Grand Central Terminal.
When the hotel opened, the city's mayor at the time, John Francis Hylan, proclaimed that it had 'fittingly chosen a name that stands as a tower of strength.' A century later, in a country seemingly divided over everything, the Roosevelt's second life as a migrant shelter took on different meanings.
For Adams and his top officials, the hotel became an underappreciated emblem of the extraordinary steps the city had taken, with little help from the federal government, to house thousands of migrants as border crossings reached record highs under former president Joe Biden.
Employees at the hotel, many of them the children of immigrants, saw themselves as front-line workers in a humanitarian crisis. At the Roosevelt, migrants received a lifeline — free food and housing, sometimes for months — as they found their footing in a new country.
Advertisement
But to some New Yorkers, the immigrants who crowded the sidewalks outside the hotel, sometimes smoking marijuana and blasting music, fed a perception of disorder that underscored quality-of-life concerns.
The flashes of violence and a string of robberies associated with some migrants turned the Roosevelt into a target for Republicans stoking fears about what they called a migrant crime wave, even as police insisted that most of the newcomers were peaceful.
'It's important to be real with people, and real with New Yorkers: Yes, there are a number of people at the Roosevelt Hotel who decided to join gangs or create gangs or be part of criminal elements,' said Manuel Castro, the commissioner of the mayor's Office of Immigrant Affairs. 'But it's only a very small number of people.'
'What makes us really sad is that there's this attempt to minimize what we've accomplished or disregard it, or even erase it,' Castro continued. 'I think that is not only sad, it's a great mistake, because we want this response to serve as an example of what a city can do in response to a humanitarian crisis.'
This article originally appeared in

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
17 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Russia and Ukraine trade drone strikes as Kyiv signs deals to boost drone production
Russian air defenses shot down 120 Ukrainian drones during the nighttime attacks, and 39 more before 2 p.m. Moscow time (7 a.m. EST) Sunday, Russia's Defense Ministry said. It did not clarify how many had hit targets or how many had been launched in total. Advertisement Early Sunday, Ukrainian drones injured two civilians in Russia's Belgorod region near the border, its Gov. Vyacheslav Gladkov said. The Ukrainian attacks came just days after Russia pummelled Kyiv with waves of drones and missiles overnight into Friday, in what Ukrainian officials called the largest such strike since Moscow's all-out invasion. The seven-hour onslaught killed at least two civilians, wounded dozens more, and caused widespread damage, Ukraine said, while Moscow In total, Russia launched 550 drones and missiles across Ukraine that night, according to the country's air force. The barrages have coincided with a concerted Russian effort to break through parts of the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line, where Ukrainian troops are under severe pressure. Advertisement Large-scale Russian drone strikes Sunday injured three civilians in Kyiv and at least two in Kharkiv, Ukraine's second-largest city in the northeast, officials said. A Russian attack involving Shahed drones also targeted port infrastructure in Mykolaiv in central Ukraine, according to local Governor Vitaliy Kim. He reported that warehouses and the port's power grid were damaged, but there were no casualties. Hours later, Russia launched a glide bomb and a drone at the front-line town of Kostyantynivka in eastern Ukraine, killing four civilians and injuring a fifth, the prosecutor's office said. The drone struck a car in which a married couple were travelling, killing the 39-year-old woman and 40-year-old man on the spot, it said. Zelensky said Saturday that Ukraine had inked deals with European allies and a leading US defense company to step up drone production, ensuring Kyiv receives 'hundreds of thousands' more this year. Zelensky did not name the US business in his nightly video address to Ukrainians, but said Ukraine and Denmark have also agreed to co-produce drones and other weapons on Danish soil. His remarks came days after the US Ukraine has previously used homemade drones to hit high-value military targets deep inside Russia, demonstrating its capabilities and denting Moscow's confidence. Last month, Advertisement Outmanned and outgunned, Ukraine's army has also turned to drones to compensate for its troop shortage and shore up its defenses. While Russia has Friday, Zelensky said he had a 'very important and productive' phone call that day with President Trump, discussing possible joint drone production alongside Trump said his phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin Thursday left him 'very disappointed,' adding he did not think Putin was serious about ending the fighting.

18 minutes ago
Trump admin's crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus activists faces federal trial
BOSTON -- A federal bench trial begins Monday over a lawsuit that challenges a Trump administration campaign of arresting and deporting faculty and students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations and other political activities. The lawsuit, filed by several university associations against President Donald Trump and members of his administration, would be one of the first to go to trial. Plaintiffs want U.S. District Judge William Young to rule the policy violates the First Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act, a law governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations. 'The policy's effects have been swift. Noncitizen students and faculty across the United States have been terrified into silence," the plaintiffs wrote in their pretrial brief. 'Students and faculty are avoiding political protests, purging their social media, and withdrawing from public engagement with groups associated with pro-Palestinian viewpoints,' they wrote. 'They're abstaining from certain public writing and scholarship they would otherwise have pursued. They're even self-censoring in the classroom.' Several scholars are expected to testify how the policy and subsequent arrests have prompted them to abandon their activism for Palestinian human rights and criticizing Israeli government's policies. Since Trump took office, the U.S. government has used its immigration enforcement powers to crack down on international students and scholars at several American universities. Trump and other officials have accused protesters and others of being 'pro-Hamas,' referring to the Palestinian militant group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Many protesters have said they were speaking out against Israel's actions in the war. Plaintiffs single out several activists by name, including Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, who was released last month after spending 104 days in federal immigration detention. Khalil has become a symbol of Trump 's clampdown on campus protests. The lawsuit also references Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk, who was released in May from a Louisiana immigration detention. She spent six weeks in detention after she was arrested walking on the street of a Boston suburb. She claims she was illegally detained following an op-ed she co-wrote last year that criticized the school's response to Israel's war in Gaza. The plaintiffs also accuse the Trump administration of supplying names to universities who they wanted to target, launching a social media surveillance program and used Trump's own words in which he said after Khalil's arrest that his was the 'first arrest of many to come.' The government argued in court documents that the plaintiffs are bringing a First Amendment challenge to a policy 'of their own creation.' 'They do not try to locate this program in any statute, regulation, rule, or directive. They do not allege that it is written down anywhere. And they do not even try to identify its specific terms and substance,' the government argues. 'That is all unsurprising, because no such policy exists.' They argue the plaintiffs case also rest on a 'misunderstanding of the First Amendment, 'which under binding Supreme Court precedent applies differently in the immigration context than it otherwise does domestically." But plaintiffs counter that evidence at the trial will show the Trump administration has implemented the policy a variety of ways, including issuing formal guidance on revoking visas and green cards and establishing a process for identifying those involved in pro-Palestinian protests. "Defendants have described their policy, defended it, and taken political credit for it," plaintiffs wrote. 'It is only now that the policy has been challenged that they say, incredibly, that the policy does not actually exist. But the evidence at trial will show that the policy's existence is beyond cavil.'

Wall Street Journal
19 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Asian Markets Fall as Tension Rises Ahead of Tariff Deadline
Asian stock markets and U.S. futures were in the red Monday, as remarks by President Trump stirred up already-tense markets bracing for tariffs to hit dozens of countries this week. Trump took to Truth Social to announce that 'tariff letters and/or deals' will be delivered starting Monday, and threatened an additional levy on countries aligned with Brics. Brics is a group of countries including Brazil, Russia, India and China.