Fears Queensland is ‘closed for clean business' as LNP cancels billion-dollar windfarm despite conditional approval
Planned for a site 40km north-west of Rockhampton, Greenleaf Renewables' $1bn Moonlight Range Wind Farm Project would have been able to power about 260,000 homes, using 88 260-metre turbines. It also included a grid-scale battery.
The project was granted conditional approval by Queensland's State Assessment and Referral Agency in December last year.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
But in January the planning minister, Jarrod Bleijie, called the 450-megawatt project in for reassessment, and then denied it approval last week.
The unprecedented decision by Bleijie – who is also the deputy premier – left many warning it would adversely affect the state's clean energy sector.
'Effectively, they're sending the signal that Queensland is closed for clean business,' the Queensland Conservation Council's senior campaigner, Stephanie Gray, said.
The Queensland Renewable Energy Council warned that the decision risks undermining confidence among developers, investors, and suppliers across all infrastructure sectors, not just renewable energy.
Its CEO, Katie-Anne Mulder, called on the state government to 'clarify how this decision does not set a precedent for other projects that have received state government approvals'.
The Labor leader, Steven Miles, accused the premier, David Crisafulli, of having an 'ideological hatred of renewables'.
'They do not like renewables, and that's why they are cancelling these projects. But ultimately, every Queenslander will pay a price through higher power bills,' he said.
Bleijie said a local council and about 88% of local residents who made submissions through the planning process opposed the Moonlight Range windfarm.
Bleijie said he cancelled the project out of concern about planned clearing of native vegetation and a lack of off-site workers' accommodation.
The windfarm would have required clearing about 434 hectares (1,072 acres) of regulated vegetation in an area that has been 'heavily impacted by historical land clearing, primarily for cattle grazing', according to its environmental impact statement.
Greenleaf Renewables has been contacted for comment.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Gray called on the state government to expedite planning for the state's renewable energy zones, to restore certainty.
'We want renewable energy projects to drive a balance in our energy mix,' Crisafulli said on Monday.
'They have to treat communities with respect and decency, and they have to be there for the long term in supporting those communities.'
The LNP member for Mirani, Glen Kelly, said the voices of regional Queenslanders 'who host these projects in their back yard' were 'finally being heard'.
'Under Labor, local residents affected by these projects had no say, and concerns around the impacts on their communities were ignored,' he said.
Earlier this month, Bleijie sponsored legislation which would make it more difficult for renewables proponents to win environmental approval. The LNP claims the legislation will establish a level playing field between green project and mining proposals.
The government also plans to extend the life of Queensland's coal fleet 'indefinitely', according to the premier, and review the state's emissions reduction target.
The LNP has also signalled a much more lenient attitude towards resource projects. The resources minister, Dale Last, told parliament earlier this year: 'I have been saying to the gas companies in this state: 'I'll sign. You drill.''
The windfarm's cancellation comes weeks after the government announced a plan to cut funding for the Queensland Environmental Defenders Office from $500,000 to zero, breaking an election promise.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Real estate agent exposes the mistake many young Aussies are making - and it could have drastic consequences in the future
A pair of glamorous real estate agents have urged home buyers to act decisively, warning that waiting for the 'perfect moment' could mean missing out altogether. Christina and Natasha Pincevic, aged 30 and 24 respectively, founded CMP Real Estate in Gledswood Hills, about 60km southwest of Sydney, in 2022. Christina highligted a mistake that she saw many young buyers make. She said too many buyers focus on trying to time the market instead of recognising genuine opportunities when they arise. 'My grandfather had this old photo, an elderly man hunched over with a cane. The caption read: "The young man who waited for the price of real estate to come down". I've never forgotten it,' she says. 'In this industry, the ones who sit back waiting for the "perfect time" usually end up watching from the sidelines, priced out, outpaced, and outplayed.' Instead of trying to guess the market, Ms Pincevic advises buyers to focus on their finances, long-term goals, and the quality of the opportunity in front of them. The agent said borrowers waiting for a rate cut may be making life harder for themselves, warning it will also increase competition. 'Rate cut or not, if you're waiting around for the 'perfect moment', you'll miss it. Smart buyers don't try to time the market, they move when the numbers work, the location's right, and the opportunity stacks up,' she said. 'So if you're in a position to buy now, get your pre-approval in place and be ready to act fast. Real estate doesn't reward hesitation - it rewards action. And if you're waiting for the market to get easier… you'll be waiting a long time.' She said many first-home buyers do everything right, except take the final step. 'Young families and first-home buyers are still active, but they tend to be more cautious. They research carefully but often hesitate, and in this market, hesitation can mean missing out,' she explained. 'Ultimately, the buyers making the biggest impact aren't always those spending the most, they're the ones ready to act quickly.' Her advice to first-time buyers? Be prepared and know what you're working with. 'First-home buyers need to get a clear handle on their finances before letting emotions take over,' she said. 'It's important to speak with a broker early, understand your borrowing capacity, and explore any government incentives you may be eligible for. Right now, there are several support options designed to help buyers get into the market. 'The key is preparation, the right property will come along, but if your finances aren't in order, you could miss the opportunity.' Ms Pincevic said western Sydney is experiencing rapid growth spurred by the construction of the new international airport - due to be completed in 2026. The Western Sydney International Airport will operate on a 24-hour schedule, unlike Kingsford Smith - the city's current airport in Mascot - which closes at 11pm and opens at 6am each day due to noise restrictions. 'Western Sydney's boom is being driven by one major catalyst, the new airport. It's not just a runway, it's triggering billions in infrastructure, jobs, and development across the region,' Ms Pincevic said. Suburbs like Badgerys Creek, Austral, Edmondson Park and Leppington are firmly on her radar. 'You've got roads, rail, industrial, commercial and retail all coming in, and buyers are getting in early while they still can,' she explained. In a market that never sits still, Ms Pincevic's advice is to be proactive. 'Stay informed, stay ready, and don't wait around for someone else to tell you it's time. Because by the time the moment looks perfect, the best opportunities are often long gone,' she urged. NAB is forecasting national dwelling prices to rise by 3.3 per cent by the end of 2025, following a strong post-Covid surge in 2024, when prices jumped 9.7 per cent. Recent CoreLogic data shows a surge in Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth, with all three cities recording strong growth over the last 12 months. In contrast, Sydney's market has been more subdued, with house prices edging up 1.7 per cent and unit prices rising just 0.2 per cent. Melbourne has seen an annual rise of 0 per cent for houses and 1.5 per cent for units.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Ed Miliband would let a turbine farm destroy Brontë country. We need net zero, but at what cost?
Nowhere does landscape marry passion quite so much as in Yorkshire's Wuthering Heights. The tempestuous Pennine contours and tumbling streams perfectly frame Emily Brontë's turbulent romance. Wild storms and dark gullies echo the cries of Heathcliff, Cathy and sexual jealousy. From moorland peaks to the historic Brontë village of Haworth below, the scene is unspoilt. I cannot think of any British government for half a century that would have dreamed of destroying this place. Yet the energy secretary, Ed Miliband, apparently wants to do so, with the largest onshore windfarm in England, the Calderdale Energy Park. He clearly regards this unique landscape as the perfect spot for 41 giant wind turbines, each no less than 200m tall. Their height would top Blackpool Tower by 40m. This is near unbelievable. The glorious Pennine Way, which traverses the area, would be reduced to a stroll through an industrial park visible for miles around, one of roads, depots and servicing trucks. The Saudi-backed firm behind the scheme, Calderdale Wind Farm Ltd, only recently agreed not also to coat the surface peat in solar panels. At the end of this month, a demonstration of about 500 protesters will re-enact Kate Bush's ballad Wuthering Heights on Penistone Hill, immediately overlooking Haworth. They follow a parliamentary petition of 15,000 signatures and cries for help from defenders of the moor's site of special scientific interest and various other now-enfeebled landscape protections. The arguments Miliband uses for onshore wind power are familiar. Even though Britain's contribution to net zero can only be negligible, he wants to show willing. He and Keir Starmer take a peculiar delight is deriding opponents of their renewable projects as nimbys. To them, the defenders of Yorkshire's moors are fuddy-duddy romantics deaf to global salvation and to Britain's need for growth. The language in which we conduct these debates matters. Yes, renewable energy is a good idea and the world needs to move in that direction. But as soon as the general is reduced to the particular, judgments have to be made and compromises reached. Many argue that the cost of Britain's net zero – a political ambition rather than a plausible target – contributes towards UK households paying some of the highest energy bills in the world. The basis of these bills, and Miliband's unrealised pledge to reduce them, is a series of near-incomprehensible algorithms. We pay huge subsidies to renewable companies and pour money into reckless nuclear plants. The present government does nothing to curb the construction industry, one of the biggest emitters of carbon at 25% of the nation's total. The environmental audit committee protested in 2022 that not a single government measure had aimed to curb this, and there has been no action since then. The reason is simple. This government equates construction with growth, which takes precedence over net zero. The Treasury imposes VAT on all building conversion and retrofitting, yet it exonerates carbon-intensive new building completely. In effect the British taxpayer is subsidising global heating. The hypocrisy is blatant. Clearly a judgment should be made as to where, if anywhere, onshore wind turbines should be located. They are peculiarly intrusive, imposing their presence, their height and their motion on their surroundings. I have seen them sited in industrial zones and brownfield areas, to which it is hard to take exception. I have also seen them wreck rural Northamptonshire and they are about to deface the mountains of mid-Wales. The obvious place for them is offshore on the shallow shelf around the British Isles. There they are less intrusive and less controversial. But since onshore is cheaper, Miliband has reversed the previous policy bias against it and is eager to get building. He dismisses opposition as self-interested, and has removed any power that local councils might use to oppose him. Unless we rediscover a language to discuss the beauty of place, we cannot conduct this debate. Money will always do the talking. When town and country planning was formalised in the 1940s, it was on the basis of a consensus that certain landscapes were beautiful and should enjoy protection. When town conservation areas were introduced in 1967, the same consensus applied. There was an assumption of aesthetic value that has obtained ever since. It is plain that it no longer does so. I am not aware of the present government having ever deigned to mention beauty with regard to the environment, built or natural. That a foreign conglomerate can honestly expect to be subsidised by the British taxpayer to wreck the Pennine Hills suggests a cabinet with no idea what merits protection and what does not. I would like to see how Miliband's Camden neighbours would react if he proposed a field of 200m turbines on the slopes of his local beauty spot, Parliament Hill Fields. He might argue that the turbines should be cheap to build and need few pylons to get to market. He might say Camden has a duty to save the world, and might even knock a hundred quid off local energy bills, as he has suggested elsewhere. But I imagine Miliband's Hampstead backyard would erupt as never before. If he then gave way to them, what would be his argument? I rather wish Miliband would indeed try a turbine park in Parliament Hill Fields. We might learn a lot. Simon Jenkins is a Guardian columnist
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
A military exercise drawing together 19 nations and 35,000 forces begins in Australia
The largest-ever war fighting drills in Australia, Exercise Talisman Sabre, is underway and expected to attract the attention of Chinese spy ships. Talisman Sabre began in 2005 as a biennial joint exercise between the United States and Australia. This year, more than 35,000 military personnel from 19 nations, including Canada, Fiji, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, South Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga, and the United Kingdom, will take part over three weeks, Australia's defense department said on Sunday. Malaysia and Vietnam are also attending as observers. The exercise will also take part in Papua New Guinea, Australia's nearest neighbor. It is the first time Talisman Sabre activities have been held outside Australia. Chinese surveillance ships have monitored naval exercises off the Australian coast during the last four Talisman Sabre exercises and were expected to surveil the current exercise, Defense Industry Minister Pat Conroy said. 'The Chinese military have observed these exercises since 2017. It'd be very unusual for them not to observe it,' Conroy told the Australian Broadcasting Corp. 'We'll adjust accordingly. We'll obviously observe their activities and monitor their presence around Australia, but we'll also adjust how we conduct those exercises,' Conroy added. Conroy said the Chinese were not yet shadowing ships as of Sunday. The exercise officially started on Sunday with a ceremony in Sydney attended by Deputy Commanding General of U.S. Army Pacific Lt. Gen. J.B. Vowell and Australia's Chief of Joint Operations Vice-Adm. Justin Jones. The exercise, showcasing Australia's defense alliance with the United States, started a day after Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese began a six-day visit to China, where he is expected to hold his fourth face-to-face meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing on Tuesday. Albanese said Chinese surveillance of Talisman Sabre would not be an issue raised with Xi. 'That would be nothing unusual. That has happened in the past and I'll continue to assert Australia's national interest, as I do,' Albanese told reporters in Shanghai Monday. Albanese also noted that while he had visited the United States as prime minister five times, he had only been to China twice. The Australian leader has been criticized at home for failing to secure a face-to-face meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump. 'I look forward to a constructive engagement with President Trump. We have had three constructive phone conversations,' Albanese said.
