Scots to ‘foot the bill' for Sizewell C, SNP claims
The SNP-led Scottish Government has long been against new nuclear power and has said it would block plans north of the border through the devolved planning system.
16 years ago I identified Sizewell as a site for new nuclear power.
Today I am delighted that Sizewell C has finally been given the green light.
We're delivering the biggest nuclear building programme in a generation 👇 pic.twitter.com/tOxLAU1Y7Q
— Ed Miliband (@Ed_Miliband) July 22, 2025
Speaking in the wake of the announcement, the SNP's energy spokesman at Westminster Graham Leadbitter said nuclear power was 'extortionate, takes decades to build and the toxic waste is a risk to local communities'.
'Just months ago, the Labour Government rubbished the £38 billion figure for Sizewell C, yet today Ed Miliband snuck out a statement that confirmed they've lost control of this project before spades are even in the ground,' he said.
'To make matters worse, Scots will be left to foot the bill with a levy on energy bills – you simply couldn't make it up, yet Anas Sarwar and Scottish Labour back this extortionate and wasteful plan that energy-rich Scotland will pay for through the nose.'
Mr Leadbitter also hit out at the spending of the UK Government south of the border compared to Scotland, pointing to the closure of the Grangemouth refinery with the loss of 400 jobs.
'Be it Prax refinery, British Steel or Sizewell C, when it comes to projects south of the border it seems the pot of cash never runs out,' the SNP MP said.
'Meanwhile, Grangemouth has been shut down and Westminster's fiscal regime has ruined Scottish energy jobs – Scotland isn't just an afterthought, it's barely a thought at all.
'It is absurd that energy-rich Scotland is home to fuel-poor Scots and that while energy bills go up, Scottish energy jobs are going down – that's directly as a consequence of Westminster policy, and the further squandering of cash on expensive nuclear won't change that.'
Grangemouth's closure was lambasted by the SNP (Andrew Milligan/PA)
But Mr Miliband talked up the scale and ambition of the project as he announced it, with the UK Government taking a near-45% stake.
'It is time to do big things and build big projects in this country again – and today we announce an investment that will provide clean, homegrown power to millions of homes for generations to come,' he said.
'This Government is making the investment needed to deliver a new golden age of nuclear, so we can end delays and free us from the ravages of the global fossil fuel markets to bring bills down for good.'
New Sizewell C investors include Canadian investment fund La Caisse with 20%, British Gas owner Centrica with 15%, and Amber Infrastructure with an initial 7.6%.
It comes alongside French energy giant EDF announcing earlier this month it was taking a 12.5% stake – lower than its previously stated 16.2% ownership.
The total investment, which is split between equity funding from investors and debt financing, exceeds the target construction cost of £38 billion, therefore acting as a buffer in case costs overrun.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
27 minutes ago
- Evening Standard
Ministers urged to explain plans which could re-establish Hong Kong extraditions
In a post on social media, she added: 'I urge the Government to give urgent reassurances on how this system will be safely managed and what protections will be put in place to ensure no Hong Konger, CCP critic or anyone targeted by the CCP will be extradited under the new arrangement.'
Spectator
27 minutes ago
- Spectator
The origin of the Thailand-Cambodia conflict
A border dispute between Thailand and Cambodia which goes back more than a century has once again erupted in fatal clashes, leading to diplomatic alarm and appeals for international help. There has long been a schism between the two countries over an arbitrarily-drawn, 817-kilometre border conceived by the French in 1907. The present confrontation began in May, when a Cambodian soldier was killed during an exchange of fire between Thai and Cambodian troops in a border region known as the Emerald Triangle because it also shares a frontier with Laos. Despite attempts to prevent escalation, tensions continued to rise. Troop deployments on both sides were reinforced, border crossings were restricted and Thailand threatened to cut electricity and internet links to border towns in Cambodia. There were further deaths and injuries caused by legacy landmine explosions. The mines had been left buried along the border with Thailand after years of conflict from the 1970s to 1990s, including the Vietnam war and the Cambodian-Vietnamese war which involved the brutal, communist Khmer Rouge rulers of the renamed Kampuchea. A Thai soldier lost a leg from a mine detonation on 16 July and then five more soldiers were injured from blasts. The deaths and injuries led to a huge escalation between the two countries. Thailand launched six F-16 fighter jets to the border, one of which bombed a 'military' target in Cambodia; and in a second raid, four F-16s were sent to bomb more military sites. Cambodian troops fired rockets and artillery shells, striking homes and public buildings. At least one Thai civilian was killed in Surin province, and three others, including a five-year-old boy, were injured, according to Rear Admiral Surasant Kongsiri, a Thai government spokesman. According to the health ministry in Bangkok, at least 11 civilians and one soldier have been killed in Thailand from artillery fire in the recent clashes. Twenty-four civilians and seven military personnel have been injured, the ministry said. Casualties in Cambodia are unknown. In one incident, the Thai army claims, six people were killed at a petrol station in Thailand from Cambodian rocket fire. Hundreds of people have fled their homes near the border. Thailand eventually closed its entire border with Cambodia. Each country condemned the other's aggression and refused to take responsibility for starting the new round of border clashes. In the midst of the border confrontations, Thailand's prime minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, was caught making a highly controversial telephone call to Hun Sen, the powerful former leader of Cambodia in which she denigrated the Thai army's actions on the border. She addressed Hun Sen as 'uncle'. The conversation was leaked, and the Thai prime minister was suspended. She now faces dismissal. In terms of firepower and military capability, Thailand is streets ahead of Cambodia. With more than 360,000 active military personnel, Thailand has triple the manpower. Thailand's air force is 'one of the best-equipped and trained in Southeast Asia,' according to Military Balance 2025, published by the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies. At the heart of the current border dispute is the Ta Muen Thom temple in Cambodia. The Cambodian defence ministry accused Thai soldiers of installing barbed wire around the base of the temple and flew drones across the border. Bangkok said Cambodia made the first aggressive move.
Scotsman
27 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Donald Trump isn't a lame duck yet, but US politicians are looking out for signs of a limp
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... This is the week that the Don returns to Scotland. Much like the circus coming to town, we can expect a spectacle that generates a lot of noise and, no doubt, some fury. We know how Trump's last visit here was received. Should we expect more of the same as Lewis's most notable grandson steps off Airforce One? In large measure, probably yes. Performative politics is never far from the surface in modern Scotland so brace yourself for protestors wrapped in saltires proclaiming Scottish exceptionalism. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Or maybe not. Our First Minister has apparently decided to take a more mature approach and to meet the president. Well done him. Six months on from his inauguration as US president, it is already apparent that Trump Two will be a different administration from Tump One. Gone are the days of chaos when those around the President sought to manage upwards and to head him off at the pass. This time the Whitehouse is stuffed with people who seek to deliver on his pronouncements rather than to mitigate them. Donald Trump is the only show in town until the US mid-term elections (Picture: Win McNamee) | Getty Images Praise for UK in Washington DC If that is the understanding that has informed our First Minister in meeting the president, then it is to be welcomed. Talking to senators, diplomats and lobbyists for much of this week in Washington DC has been a revelation. Firstly, though it pains me to say it, there is widespread praise here for the UK and how it has played its hand since Trump's return. Anyone holding shares in Peter Mandelson before he arrived in DC could sell today and expect a healthy return on their investment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So, for now, we are sitting pretty as others work hard to catch up. Accepting the realpolitik of today, however, is not the same as signing up for the whole Trump agenda. The revelation of a few days spent in DC is that there is a lot more politics to play out here than you would know from watching any news channel in the UK. Don't expect any early bravery from either the Democrats or what we used to think of as the mainstream Republicans. They, like everyone else here, are too busy waiting to see what the midterms bring next year. Until then, Trump is the only show in town. Vance to inherit Maga support? Let us not forget that Trump Two is a one-term phenomenon. He may not yet be a lame duck but everyone in DC is watching closely for the first signs of a limp. What comes next? Can JD Vance hold together the Maga crowd? If not Vance, then who? And what of the still-traumatised Democrats? Can they emerge from under the stairs and put up a fight? The most optimistic analysis that I heard on Capitol Hill this week has been 'this too will pass'. It may be true but no one should depend on it. The circus is coming to town. Where it goes from here is anyone's guess but the answer will affect us all.
