
Trump delivers on campaign promises while liberal media cries he's 'destroying democracy'
That's how the New York Times puts it, and there is ample reporting to back that up.
But I would add this bit of perspective.
When Joe Biden came into office, he was widely portrayed as making important, progressive, reforms. He was depicted as undoing the damage of Trump's first term. He was one of the good guys.
(Biden was also derided as too old for the job and mentally declining, and shielded from the press, and botching the border, but his heart was seen as being in the right place.)
When Trump won a second term, he was immediately viewed as a human wrecking ball.
He's been absolutely aggressive, taking on elite law firms, Ivy League universities and the media, winning big settlements from two of the three broadcast networks, ABC and CBS. He's sealed the border, backed stronger tactics by ICE agents, and slapped even longtime allies with sky-high tariffs–all of which he had promised during the campaign.
But most in the media have portrayed this as moving backwards, undoing important reforms and damaging the country. They have slid back into the familiar role of the Resistance.
The framing is that Trump is destroying democracy, ruining the economy, yadda yadda yadda. He is one of the bad guys. Never mind that he won the popular vote.
Trump is undoing what Biden did, as Biden did after Trump's first term, and that is a catastrophe.
The president also successfully bombed Iran's nuclear sites, and despite the debate over how much of a setback that was, most Democrats and media people refused to credit him, or did so grudgingly.
(At the same time, Trump and his Justice Department also bungled the Jeffrey Epstein case, refusing–after a big buildup–to release anything, on grounds that there was no client list and that the convicted pedophile did commit suicide in prison.)
On Sunday's Mediabuzz, Sarah Bedford, investigations editor of the right-leaning Washington Examiner, called it "a huge PR disaster for the Trump administration. There's no way for them to spin their way out of this."
I've been trying to figure out why this is striking such a deep chord among MAGA loyalists, rather than being a two-day story, and this is my take.
The no-need-to-release-anything about this "creep," as Trump calls him, is a proxy for a broader sentiment that the rich and powerful always get away with things. They protect each other. They're never held accountable for actions that would sink the rest of us.
I've been trying to figure out why this is striking such a deep chord among MAGA loyalists, rather than being a two-day story, and this is my take.
The no-need-to-release-anything about this "creep," as Trump calls him, is a proxy for a broader sentiment that the rich and powerful always get away with things. They protect each other. They're never held accountable for actions that would sink the rest of us.
From the New York Times: "On matters big and small, Mr. Trump has hit the rewind button. At the broadest level, he has endeavored to reverse the globalization and internationalism that have defined U.S. leadership around the globe since World War II, under presidents of both parties. But even at a more prosaic level, it has become evident that Mr. Trump, 79, the oldest president ever inaugurated, simply prefers things the way he remembers them from his youth, or even before that."
In the well-reported piece, Peter Baker says Trump wants has called into question fluoride in water, flu vaccine and car safety standards.
"He has made clear that he wants to return to an era when 'Cats' was the big hit on Broadway, not 'Hamilton;' when military facilities were named after Confederate generals, not gay rights leaders; when coal was king and there were no windmills; when straws were plastic, not paper; when toilets flushed more powerfully; when there weren't so many immigrants; when police officers weren't discouraged from being rough on suspects; when diversity was not a goal in hiring or college admissions or much of anything else–all to save America from "radical left lunatics."
You may or may not agree with this analysis, but there's little question that Donald Trump wants to hit the time machine and return the country to a time when he was growing up, or even decades before that.
That, after all, is why we have elections.
Footnote: President Trump posted this, seemingly out of the blue:
"Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship. She is a Threat to Humanity, and should remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her. GOD BLESS AMERICA!"
I don't think he has the power to do this to a natural-born American citizen. And I don't think he will. But even if he did, wouldn't it have to be tied to some kind of national security threat? Rosie, with whom he's been feuding for years?
She has hit back, probably thankful for the publicity:
"The president of the usa has always hated the fact that i see him for who he is – a criminal con man sexual abusing liar out to harm our nation to serve himself – this is why i moved to ireland – he is a dangerous old soulless man with dementia who lacks empathy compassion and basic humanity."
Zero evidence that he has dementia, of course. But why go there?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
6 minutes ago
- New York Post
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang can resume AI chip sales to China after Trump meeting
Nvidia will resume sales of its H20 AI chips to China after CEO Jensen Huang met with President Donald Trump in the White House last week in an effort to convince him to remove export controls that had hamstrung the company. The Trump administration has assured Nvidia that licenses to export the chips will be granted, ending months of halted shipments that had severely impacted the company's access to one of its largest markets, according to a statement from the firm. The news sent Nvidia's stock soaring more than 5% in pre-market trading. Last week, the chipmaker became the first public company in history to surpass a $4 trillion market valuation. Daniel Ives, senior analyst at Wedbush Securities, hailed the development on Tuesday as 'a watershed moment for Nvidia, the AI Revolution thesis, and the overall US tech industry,' called the decision 'a monster win for the Godfather of AI Jensen and Nvidia.' 4 Nvidia will resume sales of its H20 AI chips to China after CEO Jensen Huang met with President Trump in the White House last week, the company said. REUTERS He added that the green light will likely propel Wall Street's growth estimates for Nvidia 'meaningfully over the coming years with China back in the fold.' In April, Nvidia had paused shipments of the H20 chips — leading to $4.5 billion in inventory write-downs and an estimated $2.5 billion in lost projected sales. The company halted sales of the chips after the Trump Administration implemented a licensing requirement as part of the president's 'Liberation Day' trade moves. The halt not only impacted revenue but gave Chinese rivals an opening in the race for AI dominance. 'This is all a game of high-stakes poker between Nvidia and the Trump Administration,' Ives wrote in a note to clients. 'There is only one chip in the world fueling the AI Revolution and it's Nvidia. That is clearly understood both in the Beltway and Beijing — it's the new gold or oil in this world.' The H20 chip was originally engineered to comply with earlier US export controls on China. With export licenses now expected, the company anticipates a significant boost in revenue during the second half of 2025. In May, Reuters reported that Nvidia was preparing to launch a new AI chip in China, based on the RTX Pro 6000D, priced significantly lower than the H20 due to its weaker specifications and simpler manufacturing requirements. 4 Huang meets with Trump at the White House on April 30. REUTERS The chip would be part of Nvidia's latest generation of Blackwell-architecture AI processors. China generated $17 billion in revenue for Nvidia in the fiscal year ending January 26, accounting for 13% of the company's total sales, according to its latest annual report. Nvidia has been pushing to re-integrate China into its supply chain, though Huang's visit drew scrutiny in both countries. A bipartisan group of US senators recently sent a letter to Huang urging him not to meet with Chinese companies connected to military or intelligence bodies. During his visits, Huang said the world has reached an inflection point where AI has become a fundamental resource, like 'energy, water and the internet.' He emphasized Nvidia's support for open-source research, foundation models, and applications that 'democratise AI' and empower emerging economies. 4 A senior analyst called the decision 'a monster win for the Godfather of AI Jensen and Nvidia.' REUTERS 'General-purpose, open-source research and foundation models are the backbone of AI innovation,' he told reporters in Washington. 'We believe that every civil model should run best on the US technology stack, encouraging nations worldwide to choose America.' Investor enthusiasm reflects Nvidia's dominant grip on the AI hardware market, where it commands an estimated 97% share of the GPU accelerator segment. GPU accelerators are powerful computer chips that help speed up complex tasks like training artificial intelligence systems. 4 The news sent Nvidia's stock soaring more than 5% in pre-market trading. Last week, the chipmaker became the first public company in history to surpass a $4 trillion market valuation. Getty Images They work alongside regular processors to handle the heavy lifting of AI computations — similar to a turbocharger in a car engine. Nvidia makes most of these chips, which is why it plays such a big role in the AI boom. Meanwhile, rival chipmakers such as AMD and Intel are expected to introduce their own offerings to meet Chinese demand for AI computing, putting additional pressure on regulators and global suppliers alike. The Post has sought comment from the White House.


CNBC
9 minutes ago
- CNBC
Russia shrugs off Trump's threat of 'very severe tariffs'
President Donald Trump may have expected a Russian shudder of fear to greet his threat of "very severe tariffs" on the country if it didn't agree a ceasefire in Ukraine. Instead, his comments appear to have prompted a collective public shrug. Calling Trump's statements "very serious," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday that Russia needs "time to analyze" them. But investors in the Russian capital who had been gearing up for tougher measures instead embraced a 50-day grace period on tariffs set by Trump on Monday and the Moscow Stock Exchange was up by 2.7% after it opened Tuesday morning. Oil prices also fell by more than $1 after the announcement, hinting that investors don't think Trump will follow through on his threat to impose the tariffs. Trump "did not announce any immediate anti-Russian measures or the confiscation of illegally blocked Russian assets," Leonid Slutsky, a prominent nationalist politician, said on Telegram Tuesday, adding that the president was trying to balance Western support for Kyiv while avoiding a confrontation with the Kremlin. Trump announced the levies along with the shipment of new weapons to Ukraine during a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the White House on Monday. His comments came as a bipartisan bill co-sponsored by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) made its way through Congress. If passed, it would seek to impose 500% tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil and gas. Praising Trump's announcement, Graham and his bill's co-sponsor, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn) said in a statement that "the ultimate hammer to bring about the end of this war will be tariffs against countries, like China, India and Brazil, that prop up Putin's war machine by purchasing cheap Russian oil and gas." However, Konstantin Kosachev, the Deputy Chairman of the Russian Federation Council, the upper house of the country's parliament, said Graham's bill made "no sense." In 50 days, "how much can change both on the battlefield and in the mood of those in power both in the U.S. and in NATO?" he added. And former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, a hardliner who frequently issues over-the-top threats, called Trump's threat a "theatrical ultimatum" in a post on X. "We're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days, tariffs at about 100%," Trump said, without providing further details. After the announcement, a White House official said Trump's threat of 100% tariffs was referring to Russian goods, as well as secondary sanctions on other countries that buy its exports. The president's comments signal a marked shift in tone over his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, for whom he has long shown admiration. "I've known him for a long time. We've always gotten along well," Trump said back in March. Many Western countries have have cut most of their own financial ties to Moscow during since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of its smaller neighbor, triggering the first major land war in Europe since World War II. Still, buyers of Russia's crude oil like China and India have continued financing Moscow's war chest with hundreds of billions of dollars through business with the world's third-largest oil producer. "It's about tariffs on countries like India and China that are buying their oil," Matt Whitaker, the U.S. ambassador to NATO told reporters Monday after Trump's announcement. "And it really is going to, I think, dramatically impact the Russian economy." Trump's threats of secondary tariffs are "never going to go anywhere" as long as he is unwilling to impose costs on Moscow directly, Keir Giles, a senior fellow at the London-based Chatham House think tank, told NBC News Monday. The tariffs also risk upending delicate China-U.S. trade talks, according to Liu Baocheng at Beijing's University of International Business and Economics. The "unilateral imposition of punitive trade creating new and unnecessary complications," Baocheng said, adding that the 100% secondary tariffs intended to pressure Moscow could instead "severely backfire by undermining global economic stability and fragmenting international cooperation." Most concerning, Baocheng added, was that the threat comes at a delicate juncture in U.S.-China trade relations, where secondary tariffs on Chinese companies or sectors that import Russian goods "would seriously damage the fragile momentum of dialogue." Trump's tariff agenda has also raised the stakes for India, which has been negotiating a trade deal with Washington to see tariffs on goods from India drop below 20%. India's External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar told reporters Tuesday that his country had "been in touch" with Graham over its concerns and interests on energy and security. Elsewhere, Europe's chief negotiator Maroš Šefčovič told reporters in Brussels on Monday that a 30% tariff on European goods would have a "huge impact on trade." "It will be almost impossible to continue trading as we are used to in a transatlantic relationship," Šefčovič said.


Washington Post
13 minutes ago
- Washington Post
France holds Bastille Day military parade that, years ago, inspired Trump
PARIS — The City of Light decked itself out in red, white and blue on Bastille Day for the yearly military parade and fireworks show that commemorates the French Revolution and the history of the Republic — and which inspired President Donald Trump to stage his own military procession. About 7,000 people, plus 200 horses, marched down the Champs-Élysées in Paris on Monday as more than 100 aircraft flew overhead in an elaborate display of France's military strength, global alliances and strategic priorities.