Prevent programme missed chances to intervene with Southport killer, review told
A report assessing Rudakubana's closed referrals to the programme years before he went on to murder three girls, and attempted to kill eight others and two adults, found too much focus was placed on the absence of a distinct ideology.
Solicitor Chris Walker, who represents the girls' families, said that opportunities to intervene were lost because referrals to other agencies who could have helped Rudakubana were not followed up.
He and the families expect the public inquiry into the atrocity to establish whether a different handling of the case would have led to a different outcome, adding that 'real change needs to come in order to prevent other families going through what my clients face'.
The review, looking at lessons learned from the cases of MP Sir David Amess ' murderer Ali Harbi Ali and Southport murderer Rudakubana, said 'intensive' efforts have been made to improve processes, but the 'jury is out' on some of the changes.
Independent Prevent commissioner David Anderson KC has recommended the deradicalisation initiative should remain open to those with no fixed ideology in his report published on Wednesday.
Lord Anderson said: 'A huge amount of effort has already gone into making Prevent a stronger programme than the one which failed to deal in 2014 with the future killer of Sir David Amess.'
A blizzard of further initiatives has followed the Southport murders of last summer. Though it is too early for all of these to be fully evaluated, taken together they will reduce the chances of such failings being repeated.
'But more needs to be done. It has to be clear that people with a fascination with extreme violence can be suitable subjects for Prevent, even when they have no discernible ideology.'
He added: 'In the longer term, I believe that Prevent could work better as part of a comprehensive violence prevention and safeguarding strategy.'
The report recommended for a Cabinet Office task force to be set up to explore the possibility of formally connecting Prevent to a broader violence prevention and safeguarding system.
It comes as the commissioner for the Commission for Countering Extremism, Robin Simcox, told the Commons' Home Affairs Committee that if Prevent shifted its focus towards taking on more cases of those with interests in extreme violence, it would mean the system 'isn't really a counter-terrorism programme any more'.
He told MPs on Tuesday it would be a 'pretty fundamental shift in what Prevent is', adding: 'Prevent better brace itself for an awful lot of referrals.'
Meanwhile, the interim Prevent commissioner's report also called for the body to 'up its game in the online world, where most radicalisation takes place'.
Lord Anderson's report said that approaches to understanding organised terrorist activity from the last two decades are 'insufficient' for understanding digital movements of self-radicalised extremists, whose online behaviours are 'increasingly difficult to detect and interpret'.
Speaking at the Home Affairs select committee on Tuesday, Lord Anderson said the average age of a person referred to Prevent is now 16 years old, and 40% are aged 11-15 so they are 'dealing here with digital natives'.
The report concluded: 'Wider decisions loom on how Prevent can be better tailored to the online world inhabited by so many of its subjects; how best to deal with those whose ideology amounts to little more than a fascination with extreme violence; and whether Prevent should ultimately be embedded in a more general violence reduction strategy.'
Lord Anderson detailed that he heard evidence from across the country of a large increase in Prevent referrals in the first quarter of this year following the publicity of Rudakubana's case.
He added that reactions to popular Netflix series Adolescence on the theme of 'incels' may have also encouraged more referrals.
Latest figures on Prevent referrals for 2023-2024 included in the report show 36% of 6,921 cases were made up of concerns of vulnerability but no ideology or counter-terror risk, followed by 19% extreme right wing and 18% for conflicted ideology.
'Lord Anderson is right that lessons must be learned and we call upon the government and authorities to ensure they do more than simply paying lip service,' Mr Walker added.
Harbi Ali's case was also deemed to be closed too early after 'problematic' assessments, before he went on to kill veteran MP Sir David seven years later.
Lord Anderson's report found that lessons 'must continue to be learned' from the failure to stop two killers.
Radd Seiger, adviser and spokesperson for the family of Sir David, said they are 'deeply upset' and 'frankly offended' by the way Lord Anderson's report has been handled by the Home Office.
He said the family were given 'next to no notice' of the timing or advance sight of the report, adding media leaks were a further insult to the family.
Mr Seiger said they also received a 'dismissive' letter from the Home Secretary, which he said was designed to 'protect the government following its failings' and not support them.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the government will 'immediately act' on findings made by Lord Anderson.
In a written statement, she said Prevent thresholds will be clarified in guidance for frontline workers who have a duty to refer individuals to Prevent, so they understand those fascinated with extreme violence or mass casualty attacks should be referred to the counter-terror programme.
She said this work will be completed by the end of September.
The Home Secretary also said work will continue to look at how Prevent connects with wider violence prevention and safeguarding efforts, and officials will work with tech companies to boost efforts to tackle online radicalisation.
Ms Cooper said: 'Whilst we must look immediately at how Prevent works alongside wider safeguarding mechanisms to stop further missed opportunities, we also look forward to the outcome of the first phase of the Southport Public Inquiry, led by Sir Adrian Fulford, which will publish its findings later this year.'
Responding to the report, Counter Terrorism Policing (CTP) senior national coordinator for prevent and pursue, Deputy Assistant Commissioner Vicki Evans, added: 'We will now carefully reflect on the report and its recommendations, and continue to work alongside the government, Security Services, wider policing and other partners to ensure that systems designed to keep the public safe from harm do exactly that.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's visit to Scotland will cost millions of dollars, report says
Donald Trump 's five-day golf trip to Scotland is estimated to cost US taxpayers nearly $10 million. The visit, officially designated as a 'work trip,' includes stops at his golf courses and the opening of a new course near Aberdeen. Estimated expenses cover Secret Service overtime, the operating costs of Air Force One and Marine One, and the transportation of vehicles. Trump is also scheduled to meet with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Scotland's First Minister John Swinney. The trip is expected to incur substantial costs for Scottish taxpayers due to a major police operation and anticipated protests.
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: Two in every five phones thefts across Europe happen in the UK as government battles to get to grips with rise in county lines snatcher gang chaos
Two in every five phone thefts across Europe happen in the UK, new figures claim, as the government attempts to grapple with county line gangs turning to phone snatching. And harrowing figures show London is at the centre of the snatching chaos, with one in every six phones nabbed across the continent happening in the capital, according to American insurance firm, SquareTrade. After surveying data across its 12 European markets, it found despite Brits only accounting for 10 percent of their customers on the continent, they made up 39 percent of all phone loss claims. Nearly half of phone theft in the UK happened in London, according to the gadget insurance firm, with Birmingham following in second place. Phone snatching incidents also occurred more frequently in summer months and Christmas, aligning with busier travel months, shopping periods as well as festivals. Britain has become 'leading country for missing devices in Europe', the company told The Times, with claims of phone theft has quadrupling since June 2021. Latest statistics from the Crime Survey for England and Wales also indicated 'theft from a person' rose by half in the last year to 483,000 incidents, with the most common object snatched in the category being mobile phones. In 2024, 70,371 phones were stolen in London alone, and in 2020, around 20,000 phone thefts were reported, however, due to a lack of reporting from victims, the figures are likely to be higher. Last September, the Home Office promised to crackdown on phone thefts by increasing patrols in the most at risk areas, while adding Operation Opal, the national police intelligence unit, would also be honing in on crooks. Phone thefts are estimated to cost Londoners and its visitors at least £ 70million, according to the Metropolitan Police. The mayor of London, Sir Sadiq Khan was also accused by City Hall Conservatives of 'virtually ignor[ing the problem, even though he remained adamant he was continuing to support the force with 'record funding' to tackle the epidemic. The most stolen devices were iPhones, SquareTrade reported, with claims on average totalling to £1,200. The iPhone 15 Pro Max was the most commonly stolen device, with the iPhone 16 Pro Max coming in second place, followed by the Galaxy S24 Ultra. Kevin Gillan, the managing director, of Square TradeEurope, told The Times: 'July creates a perfect storm — festivals, holidays, and crowded spaces increase the risk of theft. London is especially vulnerable, and the UK now leads Europe in phone theft claims.' It comes as county lines gangs have turned to snatching phones instead of dealing drugs to feed a growing £70m a year epidemic. Gang members are grooming vulnerable young people to steal mobiles on Britain's streets due to unprecedented overseas demand and softer sentences for those who are caught. Stolen phones are being shipped abroad in bulk and sold around the world, a police chief warned, with some 80 per cent of the 80,000 phones stolen every year in London ending up overseas. A Mail investigation tracked down a phone stolen from an estate agent on the capital's famous Baker Street across the globe to a high-rise block in Hong Kong, where it sat alongside hundreds of thousands of other handsets. And a police chief in charge suggested the likes of Apple and Google had the gift to stop the trade by making a phone worthless after being taken. At least 230 phones were stolen every day on average in the UK last year - twice as many as five years ago and rising all the time. London is the epicentre, making up roughly 75 per cent of phone thefts, but it is clear the problem is nationwide, with every major force recording thousands of stolen phones every year.
Sky News
9 minutes ago
- Sky News
Hackers prove age verification systems on pornography sites can be bypassed in seconds
Ethical hackers have shown Sky News how new age verification systems can be bypassed on pornographic websites in a matter of seconds. On Friday, toughened rules came into force that mean companies hosting adult content online must block under-18s using "highly effective age verification". That could include AI tools that use pictures to estimate someone's age, bank or ID checks, or more technical solutions using browser cookies. But hours later, two ethical hackers demonstrated just how simple it is to get around the measures designed to protect young people on the internet. Using widely available technology, Chris Kubecka and Paula Popovici quickly accessed numerous pornography sites without ever verifying their ages. Their devices were running standard software, and the tricks they used were simple. This, Ms Kubecka said, showed the systems will not be effective at stopping under-18s from accessing explicit content online. The simplicity of their method was confirmed by multiple viewers, who contacted Sky News to say they had also managed to bypass the systems. One viewer said it had taken him "less than 30 seconds". 3:53 Although Sky News has verified the methods used by Ms Kubecka and Ms Popovici, we won't give details or name any software used. Some of the explicit websites they checked had not turned on any age verification, despite declaring in June that they would. In response to our findings, Ofcom said these checks "will help stop young children from stumbling across porn". The regulator added: "While the new rules have only been in place for a matter of hours, we will be actively assessing compliance to make sure platforms have age checks in place and that they are highly effective. "Companies that fall short can expect to face enforcement action." 1:36 A spokesperson for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology told Sky News: "We expect these laws to be robustly implemented by tech companies. If they fail to do so, the regulator is ready to take severe enforcement action, including tough fines." There is also a risk that age verification could push users towards more dangerous corners of the internet in search of pornography. By 10am on Friday, data suggested an extra 66,000 internet users in the UK had begun using the dark web. Ms Kubecka fears this number may only increase. "That is one of the concerns that I have because I don't want illegal or extreme content being normalised in our teens," she said. 1:22 Google Trends data shows searches for online tools to help people bypass age verification have surged, too. Ofcom told Sky News it had been clear that sites "must not encourage or direct users to get around age checks". "People should be aware that children and adults who use [certain software] to bypass age checks will not benefit from the wider protections offered by our online safety rules." Despite those warnings, in the days running up to the rules being enforced, advertising data shows companies were targeting UK users and promoting tools that could bypass the verification. "Platforms have clear legal obligations and must actively prevent children from circumventing safety measures, including blocking content that promotes ... workarounds targeting young users."
