Harvard faculty who fear school's destruction urge Trump deal
WASHINGTON - Mr Kit Parker is used to being an anomaly on Harvard University's campus. The physicist – an Army Reserve colonel who served in Afghanistan – is a long-time critic of the school's hiring practices and what he sees as liberal biases.
For months, he has urged the university to address criticisms from the White House, even as the vast majority of his colleagues applauded
Harvard's decision to resist President Donald Trump's efforts to reshape higher education.
These days, in Mr Parker's telling, he finds himself less isolated as Harvard confronts the harsh realities of a sustained fight with the US government.
Three months after university President Alan Garber struck a defiant tone by vowing not to 'surrender its independence or its constitutional rights,' an increasingly vocal group of professors across schools including engineering, law and medicine say Harvard should reach a deal.
Faculty such as Mr Parker and Mr Eric Maskin, an economics and mathematics professor who won a Nobel Prize in 2007, want Harvard to resolve the clash with Mr Trump before punishing financial penalties cause irreparable damage to the school and the US. They and other faculty agree that reform is needed to address issues including antisemitism, political bias and academic rigor. Harvard declined to comment on negotiations with the Trump administration.
The stakes for
Harvard will be in focus on July 21, when a federal judge in Boston will hear arguments on whether the Trump administration illegally froze more than US$2 billion in research funding, as the university claims.
In a sign that the Trump administration is not running out of ways to challenge the school, government agencies in July threatened Harvard's accreditation and subpoenaed data on its international students.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Priority for singles, higher quota for second-timer families to kick in from HDB's July BTO exercise
Singapore New home owners in Singapore find kampung spirit on BTO Telegram groups
Singapore Witness stand not arena for humiliation in sex offence cases, judge reminds lawyers
Asia Japan PM's future in doubt after election debacle
Business Bigger, quieter, greener: High-volume low-speed fans see rising demand in warming Singapore
Business DBS hits record high above $47; CDL up after director Philip Yeo announces resignation
Singapore What would it take for S'pore to shed the dirty image of its blue recycling bins?
World Gaza civil defence says Israeli fire kills 93 aid seekers
Just last week, Mr Garber warned the combined impact of the federal government's actions could cost the school as much as US$1 billion annually – a figure that takes into account federal research cuts, a higher endowment tax and the government's continuing attempt to ban it from enrolling foreign students. Mr Garber said that the school will continue to slash expenditures and that a hiring freeze will remain in place.
'There's a point at which the grant cuts destroy Harvard as a leading university,' said law professor Mark Ramseyer. 'That point is far below US$1 billion. So we were already fully in the disaster zone.'
Faculty members like Mr Parker, Mr Maskin and Mr Ramseyer – all members of the Council on Academic Freedom at Harvard, a campus group that says it supports free inquiry, intellectual diversity and civil discourse – remain a minority in the wider Harvard community.
In a survey of professors in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, 71 per cent said they believed Harvard shouldn't try to reach an agreement with the Trump administration. The poll was conducted by the student newspaper in April and May, and less than a third of some 1,400 professors it was distributed to responded, meaning it might not be a representative sample of views overall. FAS houses 40 academic departments.
An alumni group called Crimson Courage continues to urge Mr Garber to fight, and many students would find a settlement unpalatable. 'Standing strong is not merely an operational exercise: it is a moral imperative,' Crimson Courage said last month in a letter to Mr Garber and the board that oversees the university. 'The world is watching and needs Harvard's leadership and courage now.'
The splits hint at the delicate position Harvard's leadership is in after months of standing up to the Trump administration, including by suing the government for cutting off federal funding and to prevent a ban on international students.
In the hearing on July 21 in the federal funding case, Harvard is poised to argue the administration's freeze violated its First Amendment rights and failed to follow proper procedures under civil rights law. But the administration argues that Harvard failed to address antisemitism, and the US acted properly under federal law in terminating funding.
Harvard has said it is working to combat antisemitism with steps like updating its rules on use of campus spaces, reviewing its disciplinary processes and funding projects aimed at bridging campus divisions.
For Mr Garber and the Harvard Corporation, the powerful governing body led by Ms Penny Pritzker, striking a deal quickly would offer significant benefits.
Students are set to start returning to campus in a matter of weeks, so reaching a settlement before then would potentially allow the school to provide a measure of clarity to international students before the start of the academic year. If funding were restored as part of an agreement, it could also end months of uncertainty for researchers.
Mr David Bergeron, a former acting assistant secretary at the Department of Education in Barack Obama's administration, pointed to another advantage for Harvard of arriving at an agreement soon.
'There are fewer faculty and students around in the summer to object,' Mr Bergeron said.
Now that the school has become an avatar for resistance to Mr Trump's efforts to transform higher education, a settlement will be perceived by some key constituencies as a capitulation.
Ms Bertha Madras, a professor at Harvard Medical School since 1986, said that she thinks some of the changes that could stem from an agreement would benefit the university – even if she thought Mr Trump's tactics for achieving them were aggressive.
'This new reality calls for institutional pride to yield to negotiations,' said Ms Madras, a professor of psychobiology, adding that she sees 'an opportunity for timely self-examination and fast-track reforms.'
Mr Maskin, who is one of seven co-presidents of the Council on Academic Freedom, holds a similar view.
'There are plenty of things that Harvard could be doing and should be doing. To go ahead and do them is not caving. It's making the university better,' Mr Maskin said.
Still, it's not clear how much progress Harvard and the Trump administration have made toward a deal.
While President Trump said last month that Harvard was close to a 'mindbogglingly' historic deal, Bloomberg News later reported that talks between the administration and the school had stalled. Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in July that the administration was 'negotiating hard' with both Harvard and Columbia University.
'I think we're getting close to having that happen. It's not wrapped up as fast as I wanted to, but we're getting there,' she added. BLOOMBERG

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
25 minutes ago
- Business Times
Vietnam sees Trump tariffs cutting up to a third of US exports
[HANOI] Vietnam estimates its exports to the US could decline by as much as a third if higher tariffs announced by US President Donald Trump take effect, an internal government assessment shows. Tariffs of 20 to 40 per cent would slash export revenue by up to US$37 billion, and hit the majority of Vietnam's key industries, including electronics, machinery, garments, footwear and furniture, according to a document prepared for Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh's advisory council and seen by Bloomberg News. That figure assumes that firms in Vietnam would bear the full cost of the tariffs, according to a source familiar with the estimates, who added it's likely importers would need to cover some of that burden. The tech industry would face the biggest hit, with an estimated decline in exports of about US$15 billion, the document shows, stating that the tariffs pose 'a direct risk to the sustainability of the electronics supply chain'. Vietnam's total exports to the US amounted to about US$120 billion last year, according to official data. The report was dated Jul 11, just over a week after Trump announced a trade deal with Vietnam, and was compiled by a research unit of Chinh's advisory council. Vietnam has still not officially confirmed the tariff rates announced by the US president, and neither country has published official term sheets on the deal. Vietnam's Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately respond to a request for a comment. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Trump said that the US will impose a 40 per cent tariff on goods that are transshipped through Vietnam, a move largely aimed at curbing the re-routing of Chinese goods through the South-east Asian nation. That's put Vietnam in a tough position, given China is its biggest trading partner and main source of imported components used in goods such as AirPods and phones that are exported to the US. There's no clarity from the US on how it will determine transshipped goods and how the 40 per cent rate would be applied. The internal document from Vietnam contains some surprisingly direct language stating how the US tariff policy is aimed at reining in China. Trump was using it as a tool 'to restrain China's 'galloping' development and rebuild its position', the report said. Vietnam's leaders were caught off guard by Trump's declaration and have been seeking to lower the tariff rate, Bloomberg News reported previously. Since then, Trump has announced trade deals with Indonesia, the Philippines and Japan, and sent dozens of tariff letters to trading partners ahead of an Aug 1 deadline when higher US duties kick in. Trump had initially threatened to hit Vietnam, an export powerhouse that last year had the world's third-biggest trade surplus with the US, with a 46 per cent tariff, among the highest of its major trading partners. To address US concerns around so-called rules of origin of goods, Vietnam's trade ministry has taken greater steps to protect the 'Made in Vietnam' brand and toughen up trade fraud regulations. Under new draft guidelines released by the ministry, clearer rules will be set to determine the specific content of products and their origin. The guidelines include measures to assess the value-added content contributed by Vietnam and where the main production stages have been performed. It will also establish an inspection system and penalties for incorrect labelling. The internal document highlights the challenges facing Vietnamese companies in interpreting the deal. More effort is needed to 'clarify how the localisation proportion is calculated, and to persuade the US to factor in the share of imports from the US and other clearly sourced markets when determining origin', it says. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
South Korea weighs US investment pledge to trim auto tariff
[WASHINGTON] The US and South Korea have discussed creating a fund to invest in American projects as part of a trade deal, similar to an agreement Japan struck on Tuesday (Jul 22) with US President Donald Trump, sources familiar with the matter said. The scope of the discussions was not immediately clear, but the US has been seeking pledges totalling hundreds of billions of US dollars. The talks remain fluid, the sources said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss details of the negotiations. Japan's deal saw the country agree to backstop a US$550 billion fund in exchange for dropping a threatened 25 to 15 per cent tariff. The discount also applied to automobiles, an important export for the Asian country's economy. The South Korea talks are similarly focused on reaching a 15 per cent tariff rate, including for autos, one of the sources said. The deal may also include a pledge by South Korea to purchase more goods in key sectors, one of the sources said, again echoing the Japan pact, which included an agreement to purchase Boeing planes and agriculture products. The White House declined to comment. The South Korean trade ministry also declined to comment. Trump has threatened to impose a higher general tariff of 25 per cent starting Aug 1, in addition to the existing levies on vehicles, vehicle parts and steel that are straining ties between Seoul and Washington. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up A Korean trade delegation is in Washington this week for talks, according to the Asian nation's finance ministry, and Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo is set to meet with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer as part of those discussions. However, a planned '2+2' dialogue that was scheduled for Jul 25 with Yeo and Finance Minister Koo Yoon-cheol alongside Greer and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was postponed and will be rescheduled, the Korean side said. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has suggested a US$400 billion figure in talks with South Korea, one of the sources said. Lutnick presented that same number to Trump as part of talks with Japan but the US president eventually negotiated the fund up to US$550 billion. Japan's economy is more than double the scale of South Korea, making equal US dollar-value pledges a tall order for Seoul. Some South Korean companies have already made significant investment pledges in the US. The chairman of Hyundai Motor visited the White House in March to announce a US$21 billion investment plan that includes an expansion of vehicle production in Georgia and a new steel plant in Louisiana. The deal with Japan threatens to create a competitive advantage for that country's automakers if Seoul is unable to reach a similar agreement. 'This really puts a lot of pressure on South Korea. If they can get 15 per cent, I'm sure they'd be thrilled, but they are in a different position than Japan,' said William Chou, deputy director of the Japan Chair at the Hudson Institute, a conservative think tank. That notion was echoed by the White House on Wednesday. 'We are in a situation where, for example, German cars are going to be at a disadvantage now, to Japanese cars, because it's a 25 per cent tariff on German cars. Same thing with Hyundais from South Korea,' White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said on Wednesday on Bloomberg Television. Navarro said the Japanese deal was best interpreted as the president 'doing a synergistic whole deal with the rest of the world'. 'This is just one part of that chess game,' he said. Trump, speaking at an artificial intelligence event earlier Wednesday, suggested that he would not go below 15 per cent as he sets so-called reciprocal tariff rates – while also indicating he would reward nations that removed trade barriers on US exports. 'The tariff is very important, but the opening of a country, I think, can be more important if our businesses do the job that they are supposed to be doing,' Trump said. 'Such openings are worthy of many points in tariffs.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Trump to visit Federal Reserve on Thursday, ramping up pressure on Powell
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump, a robust critic of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, will visit the central bank on Thursday, the White House said, a surprise move that escalates tension between the central bank and the administration. Trump has lambasted Powell repeatedly for not cutting US interest rates more aggressively, calling him a 'numbskull' on Tuesday and musing publicly about firing him. The Republican president nominated Powell to be Fed chair during his first term but has soured on his pick over disagreements about interest rates and the economy. Between Trump's stints in office, Democratic President Joe Biden nominated Powell for a second term. Adding fuel to Trump's ire, White House officials have accused the Fed of mismanaging the renovation of two historic buildings in Washington, D.C., suggesting poor oversight and potential fraud. White House deputy chief of staff James Blair said this week that administration officials would be visiting the Fed on Thursday but did not say the president would join. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In a schedule released to the media on Wednesday night, the White House said Trump would visit the Federal Reserve at 4 pm (2000 GMT) on Thursday. It did not say whether Trump would be meeting with Powell. A Federal Reserve official did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Initial market reaction was subdued, with the yield on benchmark 10-year Treasury bonds steady at 4.387 per cent in Asian hours and the dollar weakening slightly. Trump's public criticism of Powell and flirtation with firing him have previously upset financial markets and threatened a key underpinning of the global financial system - that central banks are independent and free from political meddling. Typically US presidents refrain from commenting on Fed policy altogether in deference to the bank's autonomy, but Trump, whose governing style blasts through political norms, has not followed that example. Since returning to office in January, Trump has attacked institutions from law firms to universities to media organisations in an effort to reshape US society in line with his vision. He has used the same verbal sledgehammer against the Fed, pressuring Powell to cut rates and blaming him for not stimulating the economy further. Trump has said he would like the Fed to cut its benchmark interest rate as low as 1 per cent from the current 4.25 to 4.50 per cent target range to reduce government borrowing costs. This would allow the administration to finance rising deficits expected from his spending and tax-cut bill. But a Fed policy rate that low is typically a sign of a country in economic trouble. REUTERS