Exiting ‘fast-fashion loop' made affordable
A fashion collaborative has set out to challenge the harm caused by fast fashion by making environmentally friendly clothing in New Zealand — with a catch.
Precious Collaborative founder Wānaka-based Claire O'Connell said what set the collaborative apart was the two prices for the sustainable Celtic Collection items.
The first price is called the true price, which reflects the true cost of making each piece of clothing.
The gift price is a subsidised cost which allows people to buy higher quality clothing without the burden of price.
"The gift price is aimed at people who want to try to get out of this fast-fashion loop, but can't afford high-quality garments, because unfortunately that's what fast fashion takes advantage of is cost."
The website states "all we ask of you is that you pay what you can afford".
"If you genuinely want to change your fashion consumption habits, buy better and less frequently, but if price is a real barrier, then pay the subsidised gift price."
Sales of a coat designed by award-winning New Zealand designer Liz Mitchell help to subsidise the gift prices of the collection, with a third of the profit going to helping fund the gift prices.
Mrs O'Connell had been working on the idea for five years.
The collaborative's website was launched in December.
The clothing is made in New Zealand and using as much material from New Zealand as possible.
Sustainability was also important. Garments are made of 100% wool and organic hemp.
Mrs O'Connell said the basic problem she was trying to address with the collaborative was fast fashion, which she said was toxic.
A lot of people buying fast fashion were getting blamed for the problem which was unfair as they were only buying what they could afford and high-quality ethical fashion was out of reach for most.
"They're buying crap because that's what they can afford."
There had already been feedback from people buying garments at the gift price.
"A number of people saying 'thank you so much because there is no way I would be able to afford a garment like this'," she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Rental frustrations drive tenant match-making app
Flatly co-founder Quinn McCarthy. PHOTO: SUPPLIED Three friends are setting out to make flat-finding and flatmate- or tenant-finding a much easier experience. Christchurch-based Quinn McCarthy, who lived in Queenstown for three years till his rental was put on Airbnb and he couldn't find another, has co-created a free house-sharing app, myflatly — the website's and the Instagram account's @myflatly McCarthy's journey originated when he tried to find new flatmates through Facebook and was overwhelmed by hundreds of desperate flat-hunters at the same time as he was busy at work. He says Flatly was born out of this frustration and is "aiming to revolutionise the long-term rental market". Starting up in Queenstown and Christchurch, it's designed for both people looking for a rental and for existing tenants and landlords looking to fill a room or rooms. "The housing conversation is often about affordability and availability, but the flatmate search itself is chaotic, overwhelming and unregulated," says McCarthy, who's started Flatly with Christchurch-based Tawanda Sunguni and UK-based Veerain Patel. "Our biggest hope is we can start targeting some of those people who are sitting on the fence with a room; they might be on a mortgage or something, but listing on Facebook is just too much of an effort, right? "They don't want to deal with 200 people." McCarthy says they want to build up their house-sharing solution with extra information, like, for example, a guide on average rentals. His particular gripe is landlords/head tenants charging, say, $200 extra for a couple as against an individual — "that's just straight price-scalping". As for his own situation, "I wouldn't be opposed to moving back down [to Queenstown] if all the stars aligned". "It's an ironic thing because I wouldn't have done this if I didn't have to leave."
Techday NZ
a day ago
- Techday NZ
Milford enhances research with Bloomberg RMS Enterprise adoption
Milford, the New Zealand-based specialist investment firm, has adopted Bloomberg's enterprise-level Research Management Solutions (RMS Enterprise) to improve research production and workflows. The move expands Milford's utilisation of Bloomberg's suite of buy-side solutions, aimed at streamlining processes across the entire investment cycle. With RMS Enterprise in place, Milford intends to enhance automation in its research operations, facilitate efficient sharing of insights among teams, and simplify sustainable investment research efforts. Through RMS Enterprise, Milford will combine market data with internal information across various asset classes, increasing transparency and efficiency within its investment process. The solution enables the research team to generate content using both structured and unstructured data, while also supporting research analytics and the deployment of scoring models. Milford already utilises Bloomberg's PORT Enterprise for portfolio and risk analytics, which offers advanced risk and return attribution models. By integrating RMS Enterprise and PORT Enterprise, Milford can automate the creation of analyst model portfolios—improving oversight by analysts and enhancing the evaluation of research ideas. Integrated workflows The adoption of RMS Enterprise will benefit Milford's broader investment team by integrating with other Bloomberg Terminal workflows. Team members will be able to access and discover relevant research content more easily using Bloomberg's search and analytical tools. RMS Enterprise also features a comprehensive administration suite that supports collaboration across the organisation and can be configured to integrate with proprietary in-house systems where required. "We are pleased to adopt Bloomberg's Research Management Solutions to enhance our research capabilities. The smooth and easy integration with both the Bloomberg Terminal and our existing technology solutions enables us to streamline our processes and efficiently share and manage research across teams." Wayne Gentle, Chief Investment Officer and Executive Director at Milford, provided this comment regarding the adoption of Bloomberg's RMS Enterprise. Vendor perspective "As the macro-economic environment remains unpredictable and drives further market volatility, today's leading buy-side firms rely on the efficient use of first-class research to generate alpha. We are delighted to provide Research Management Solutions to Milford to streamline and enhance their investment cycle and workflows so they can continue to deliver actionable insights to their end investors." Ben Pool, Sales Manager for New Zealand and Australia at Bloomberg, outlined the value the firm sees in supplying research solutions to Milford under current economic conditions. Research capabilities Bloomberg's research offerings aim to transform investment research and analysis processes for clients by providing access to consistent, high-quality data and analytics, both from Bloomberg and other content partners. Its solutions can be implemented across individual desktops or enterprise-wide to help optimise research production and facilitate distribution of insights within organisations and to counterparties. PORT Enterprise, Bloomberg's premium offering currently used by Milford, is employed by more than 750 clients. It provides sophisticated portfolio risk and return attribution capabilities, including enhanced customisation and batch reporting. Clients also have access to Bloomberg's Multi-Asset Class (MAC3) fundamental risk factor models, which feature advanced risk forecasting tools such as Tracking Error volatility, Value-at-Risk (VAR), and scenario analysis. Both RMS Enterprise and PORT Enterprise are components of Bloomberg's integrated buy-side solutions, which are designed to offer technological support throughout the front-to-back investment lifecycle. Milford manages over NZD $27 billion in funds across New Zealand and Australia and serves over 150,000 direct investors and financial advisers across the two countries. The company has historically emphasised active fund management, employee ownership, and investing alongside its clients.
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
An Economy Of Genocide: Israel And The Albanese Report
It makes for stark and dark reading. The report for the UN Human Rights Council titled From economy of occupation to economy of genocide makes mention of 'corporate entities' who have been enriched by 'the Israeli economy of illegal occupation, apartheid and now genocide.' Authored by the relentless Francesca Albanese, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, it is unflinching in its assessments and warnings to companies doing business with Israel. What makes the investigative undertaking by Albanese useful is its examination of the corporate world and its links to the colonial, settler program of removing and displacing a pre-existing population. The machinery of conquest of any state necessarily involves not only the desk job occupants in civilian bureaucracies and high-ranking military commanders, but those in the corporate sector, eager to make a profit. 'Colonial endeavours and associated genocides,' writes Albanese, 'have historically been driven and enabled by the corporate sector. Commercial interests have contributed to the dispossession of Indigenous peoples of their lands – a mode of domination known as 'colonial racial capitalism'.' Eight private sectors come in for scrutiny: arms manufacturers, tech firms, building and construction entities, those industries concerned with extraction and services, banks, pension funds, insurers, universities and charities. 'These entities enable the denial of self-determination and other structural violations in the occupied Palestinian territory, including occupation, annexation and crimes of apartheid and genocide, as well as a long list of ancillary crimes and human rights violations, from discrimination, wanton destruction, forced displacement and pillage to extrajudicial killing and starvation.' Advertisement - scroll to continue reading Central to the multifaceted economy of genocide, the report charges, is the military-industrial complex that forms 'the economic backbone of the State.' Albanese cites a stellar example: the F-35 fighter jet, developed by US-based Lockheed Martin, in collaboration with hundreds of other companies 'including Italian manufacturer Leonardo S.p.A, and eight States.' Since October 2023, the process of colonisation and displacement has assumed an air of urgency, aided by the private sector. In 2024, US$200 million was advanced for 'colony construction'. Between November 2023 and October 2024, 57 new colonies and outposts were established 'with Israeli and international companies supplying machinery, raw materials and logistical support.' Examples include the maintenance and expansion of the Jerusalem Light Rail Red Line, the construction of the new Green Line, encompassing 27 kilometres of new tracks and 50 stations in the West Bank. The infrastructure has proven to be invaluable in linking the colonial project to West Jerusalem. Despite some companies withdrawing from the project 'owing to international pressure', an entity such as the Spanish/Basque Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles has been a keen participant, along with suppliers of excavating machinery (South Korea's Doosan and Sweden's Volvo Group), and providers of materials for the light-rail bridge (Germany's Heidelberg Materials AG). Beyond the structural and physical program of construction and displacement, all designed to extinguish any semblance of self-determination on the part of the Palestinians, come other features of the colonial project. A prominent feature of this, Albanese notes, is that of 'surveillance and carcerality'. Repressing Palestinians has become a 'progressively automated' affair, with tech companies feeding Israel's voracious security appetite with 'unparalleled developments in carceral and surveillance devices', some of which include closed-circuit television networks, biometric surveillance, advanced tech checkpoint networks, drone surveillance and cloud computing. Palantir Technologies Inc., a specialist in software platforms, comes in for a special mention. 'There are reasonable grounds to believe Palantir has provided automatic predictive policing technology, core defence infrastructure for rapid and scale-up construction and deployment of military software, and its Artificial Intelligence Platform, which allows real-time battlefield data integration for automated decision making.' With the report released, the dance of dissimulation began. Lockheed Martin told the Middle East Eye that foreign military sales were not their preserve as far as accountability or cause of concern was, a lofty, business-like attitude unshackled from a moral compass. Such sales took place between governments, meaning that the US government would be best placed to answer any questions. Hand washing and deferrals of guilt is a private sector speciality after all. In a more direct fashion, both Israel and the United States have continued their 'Hate Albanese' campaign, boringly reiterating old accusations while adopting novel interpretations of international law. Given the obvious loathing of international human rights conventions by Israeli officials and their US backers, this is decidedly rich, even more so given such jurisprudence as that of the International Court of Justice's Advisory Opinion of July 2024, and the International Criminal Court arrest warrants for Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (These developments figure prominently in Albanese's assessment.) According to the ICJ, all States were under an obligation to 'cooperate with the United Nations' on ensuring 'an end to Israel's illegal presence in the Occupied Territory and the full realization of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination'. Israel's continued presence in the OPT was illegal. 'It is a wrongful act of a continuing character which has been brought about by Israel's violations, through its policies and practices, of the prohibition on the acquisition of territory by force and the right to self-determination of the Palestinian people.' From Israel came the view that the report was 'legally groundless, defamatory and a flagrant abuse of [Albanese's] office.' A June 20 letter to UN Secretary-General António Guterres from the Trump administration obtained by The Washington Free Beacon took issue with Albanese's supposed record of 'virulent antisemitism and support for terrorism', bitchily sniping at her legal qualifications. Little is actually mentioned of international law in the bilious missive by US Ambassador Dorothy C. Shea, acting representative to the UN, other than a snotty dismissal of UN General Assembly resolutions and advisory opinions by the International Court of Justice as lacking any binding force 'on either States or private actors'. Shea claims Albanese 'misrepresented her qualifications for the role by claiming to be an international lawyer despite admitting publicly that she has not passed a legal bar examination or been licensed to practice law.' A fabulous accusation, given the surfeit of allegedly qualified legal members working in the Israeli Defense Forces and other offices executing their program of displacement, starvation and killing. The accusations against various corporate entities, notably over 20 US entities, were 'riddled with inflammatory rhetoric and false accusations', making such daring claims of 'gross human rights violations', 'apartheid' and 'genocide'. These charges, ventured through letters of accusation, constituted 'an unacceptable campaign of political and economic warfare against the American and worldwide economy.' It comes as little surprise that the security rationale – one that says nothing of the Palestinian right to self-determination, let alone rights to life and necessaries – marks the entire complaint against Albanese's apparent lack of impartiality. 'Business activities specifically targeted by Ms. Albanese contribute to and help strengthen national security, economic prosperity, and human welfare across the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe.' Just don't mention the Palestinians.
