logo
Thousands of Student Civil Rights Cases Left Adrift After Trump Guts Ed Dept

Thousands of Student Civil Rights Cases Left Adrift After Trump Guts Ed Dept

Yahoo28-03-2025
After a campus police officer grabbed student Ja'Liyah Celestine by the hair and kneed her in the face, she filed a federal civil rights complaint that alleged persistent racial discrimination against Black teens at her Texas high school.
But the complaint, brought by the 18-year-old in late October with the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights, may never get investigated.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
That's because it's one of thousands of federal civil rights complaints and investigations against school districts nationally — particularly those alleging sexual misconduct or racism — that advocates say have been left to languish by the Trump administration with little hope for resolution. As the president and Secretary Linda McMahon seek to dismantle the Education Department — with its civil rights office among the hardest hit by layoffs — attorneys say students like Celestine have lost one of their few avenues for relief.
'When we filed the complaint on Oct. 29, we knew the election was a few days out and we knew this could very well be the outcome,' said Andrew Hairston, the director of the Education Justice Project at the nonprofit Texas Appleseed, who is representing Celestine in her complaint against the Beaumont Independent School District and its police department. 'It's very difficult for Black children, in particular, who face the harms of school police, to seek any vindication of their rights.'
Related
Since President Donald Trump took office in January, civil rights attorneys at the Education Department have faced a whirlwind of directives and layoffs, throwing into uncertainty more than 12,000 civil rights investigations that stemmed from complaints by students, parents and their advocates. The Education Department and the Beaumont school district didn't respond to requests for comment.
After investigations nationwide were paused following Trump's Jan. 20 inauguration, the Education Department's staff was cut roughly in half through layoffs of more than 1,300 employees, buyouts and early retirements. When the department announced mass firings earlier this month, at least 243 civil rights office staffers were cut. Meanwhile, seven of the 12 Office for Civil Rights regional offices were shuttered, including those in Philadelphia and Dallas, Texas, where Celestine's complaint was filed.
It's a situation that civil rights advocates say has left the Education Department unequipped to carry out its functions mandated by Congress. In a lawsuit filed March 14, advocates and families accused the Trump administration of eviscerating students' access to federal civil rights remedies, with particular harm to students of color, female students and LGBTQ+ youth. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has prioritized cases tied to antisemitism complaints and has cracked down on schools that afford rights and protections to transgender students.
The lawsuit alleges the changes undermine the civil rights office's ability to process and investigate complaints and asked a judge to order that its staffing be restored to levels that allow complaints from the public to be investigated 'promptly and equitably.' Staffing changes were 'arbitrary and capricious' the lawsuit charges, because Trump administration officials 'did not articulate a reasoned basis for their decision to sabotage' the Office for Civil Rights.
'The fact that the federal government is kind of both eliminating these offices and then weaponizing what's left of them to advance a very narrow definition of discrimination is not just troubling and sad, it's also fundamentally antithetical to what democratic governance and law enforcement should look like,' said Johnathan Smith, the chief of staff and general counsel at the nonprofit National Center for Youth Law.
Related
Smith represents the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the Education Department and McMahon. They include Nikki Carter, a Black mother of three, who alleges she was barred from her children's Alabama schools in retaliation for her work as an advocate for children with disabilities. A second parent, identified only as A.W., charges they had to remove their child from school for safety reasons after the student was sexually assaulted and harassed by a classmate and the school did not adequately respond. Both parents are members of the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, a nonprofit focused on the civil rights of children with disabilities.
Carter's complaint was filed in September 2022 and A.W.'s in October 2023.
It was spring 2024 when Celestine got into a fight and campus police in Beaumont were called to the scene.
Though the civil rights complaint submitted to the Education Department by the nonprofit Texas Appleseed doesn't seek to absolve Celestine for her role in the fight, it takes aim at what happened next: A police use-of-force incident captured on video.
'Responding after the fight occurred' when the teenager was sitting passively on the floor, the complaint states, the officer with the school district police department pepper-sprayed Celestine, grabbed her by the hair and kneed her in the face.
'Such excessive force caused great harm' and was just the first form of punishment Celestine received for the fight, the complaint alleges. She was also suspended from school, placed in an alternative education program and required to complete community service — 'consequences that exceeded the nature of the incident in question,' it argues.
'This complaint does not ignore the significance of an offense such as in-school fighting,' Texas Appleseed's Hairston wrote to federal investigators. But the altercation that Celestine was involved in 'did not warrant the abuse she was subjected to.'
The issue at Beaumont is bigger than Celestine and a campus fight, Texas Appleseed contends. It 'represents a salient example of how the school-to-prison pipeline operates,' according to the complaint, and highlights how Black students at the district and nationally are disproportionately subjected to law enforcement referrals in schools.
The 12,000 civil rights investigations that were pending as of Jan. 14 ahead of Trump's inauguration were listed in an online database that hasn't been updated since. Federal civil rights investigations routinely take years to resolve and the oldest pending complaint at the time, alleging sex-based discrimination in athletics against an Oklahoma school district was opened in 2007.
After Trump's swearing-in, the Education Department paused all investigations in its civil rights office. In February, the agency ended the pause on investigations focused solely on disability-based discrimination, and then lifted the hold on sex- and race-based complaints on March 6 — just a week before the 243 OCR staffers were fired. At least 178 attorneys in the civil rights division and dozens of equal opportunity specialists were eliminated.
The Dallas regional office was among those shut down altogether, possibly relegating Celestine's case and thousands more to oblivion. Smith with the National Center for Youth Law said he's heard from fired Education Department employees who've lost access to their email accounts and all ability to communicate with families and attorneys about pending complaints.
'Unless someone is actually going to go into their email accounts and pull up those emails, those communications are lost,' Smith said. As a result, parents and school officials who are communicating with Education Department officials about pending cases are 'literally communicating into a black hole because there's no way for that information to go anywhere.'
Even if pending cases are transferred to other regional offices, Smith said, they should be considered dead on arrival.
'I just don't see how anyone can believe that there's going to be any real process or consideration of those complaints at this point,' Smith said.
While certain cases appear to be jettisoned, fired Education Department staffers who spoke to The 74 and others allege the department's civil rights division has been weaponized to pursue politically motivated investigations.
Among them is an investigation into the Denver school district for opening a gender-neutral bathroom at one of its high schools. Last week, the Office for Civil Rights found the state of Maine violated Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex-based discrimination, for allowing transgender student athletes to participate on girls' sports teams.
As the Trump administration targets diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives at schools and colleges, the Education Department opened an investigation against the Ithaca, New York, school district, charging a Students of Color United Summit designed to 'provide a safe space' and 'uplift students of color' was discriminatory against white students.
Harold Jordan, the nationwide education equity coordinator at the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, accused the Trump administration of launching 'directed investigations' to advance political agendas 'based on something they read in the newspaper' rather than from complaints filed by students attending those schools.
'This department is clearly fixated on race and reinterpreting what is racial discrimination,' Jordan said. Ideological beliefs around racial discrimination and transgender students' rights, he said 'seem to have spilled over into how they see civil rights enforcement.'
Jordan said the ACLU represents students in about 20 pending federal civil rights complaints nationally, yet 'nobody is hearing anything' from the civil rights office about the status of those investigations. Among the complaints is an allegation by seven students that Pennsylvania's Central Bucks School District engaged in a widespread culture of discrimination against LGBTQ+ students, particularly those who are transgender and nonbinary.
'Given their diatribes about gender ideology and stuff, I suspect that they're not going to be terribly sympathetic,' Jordan said. 'But we ultimately don't know, and ultimately they're supposed to follow the law and enforce the law.'
Meanwhile, at least one civil rights complainant bowed out before the Trump administration could even weigh in, said Katie McKay, an attorney at the Brooklyn law firm C.A. Goldberg where she works on cases involving sexual discrimination, harassment and assault at K-12 schools and colleges. McKay said a college student whose sexual assault case 'had been open since Obama was in office,' decided to voluntarily close the complaint after Trump was elected for a second term 'because of concerns that this administration would mishandle the case.'
'It's frustrating and sad to see that this person has been sitting with this unresolved issue for like a decade and then it's kind of this non-resolution,' McKay said. The decision to terminate the complaint was made in part on the long history of sexual assault allegations against the president himself. In 2023, a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse against the writer E. Jean Carroll in 1996.
'There's this fear that those values were going to be applied to the case,' McKay said. 'Closing out the case at least created a sense of closure on their own terms rather than letting this administration speak for them.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Tesla needs to fire Elon Musk: It's business, not politics
Why Tesla needs to fire Elon Musk: It's business, not politics

Miami Herald

time18 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Why Tesla needs to fire Elon Musk: It's business, not politics

President Donald Trump and the Republican part have ignored climate change and demonized electric vehicles (EV). The president's so-called "Big Beautiful Bill" phases out the tax credit for buying an EV with it disappearing in September. He has also repeatedly called out EVS as being unreliable and "not going very far." Before he became buddies with Tesla CEO Elon Musk, he ridiculed him and his businesses. Related: Costco has a massive labor problem nobody is talking about When Elon Musk came to the White House asking me for help on all of his many subsidized projects, whether it's electric cars that don't drive long enough, driverless cars that crash, or rocketships to nowhere, without which subsidies he'd be worthless, and telling me how he was a big Trump fan and Republican, I could have said, 'drop to your knees and beg,' and he would have done it," Trump wrote on social media. Musk, however, became a Trump advisor when he donated nearly $300 million to his election campaign. That got him appointed to lead the childishly-named Department of Government Efficiency where he gleefully harassed long-time federal workers and eliminated programs that wasted money doing things like feeding hungry people. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter It was a hard-right turn for Musk, which was and odd choice given who the buyers fro EVs. are Democrats: "On every dimension, Democrats view EVs more favorably than Republicans do," shared Pew Research. Image source: Bocsi/Bloomberg via Getty Images While many CEOs lean right, or openly embrace right-wing ideology, but it's common to step down from any leadership positions before joining the government. Woody Johnson, the owner of the New York Jets, for example, served in the first Trump administration and stepped down from his position running the team. New York is overly liberal, but Johnson separated his two live. Musk did not do that and that's a problem because the Pew data suggests that Republicans are not a real market for EVs. Environmental benefits: Democrats and those who lean to the Democratic Party are much more likely than Republicans and GOP leaners to say EVs are better for the environment than gas vehicles (69% vs. 24%).Cost to buy: A majority of both Democrats and Republicans say EVs cost more to buy than gas vehicles. But fewer Democrats than Republicans say this (65% vs. 81%).Cost to charge/fuel: Half of Democrats say EVs cost less to charge than gas vehicles do to fuel. That compares with a quarter of Very few Democrats or Republicans think EVs are more reliable than gas vehicles, but Democrats are more likely than Republicans to say this (14% vs. 5%). Half of Democrats say EVs and gas vehicles are about the same on reliability, while 34% say EVs are less reliable. Republicans are even more negative, with 69% saying EVs are less reliable. Musk's hard-right turn and eventual return to the middle, has had major consequences on Tesla. When a CEO does something that overshadows the brand, they get fired. Both Best Buy and McDonald's removed successful CEOs over inappropriate, but not illegal, relationships. Musk has done something far worse, He has made it so Tesla's (TSLA) core audience, liberals, sees the Tesla name as a sort of swear word. That has led to many existing owners adding a "I bought this before Elon went crazy" bumper sticker and new liberal customers staying away. Tesla sales dropped 13.5% in the second quarter, after also dropping in the first quarter. The company faces the Musk backlash, and concerns over its aging vehicle lineup. Musk has not hurt Tesla irreparably, but his presence makes it harder to fix the problem. About half of U.S. adults have an unfavorable opinion of Tesla, including 30% of Republicans, according to a June AP-NORC poll. Related: As shoppers ditch Shein and Temu, these stores are winning "Musk has acknowledged that his work as head of the Department of Government Efficiency and his embrace of European far-right candidates have hurt the company. But he said earlier this year that much of the sales plunge is due to customers holding off while they waited for an ugrade to Tesla's best selling Model Y. That new version has been out for months now," reported. Take Musk off the top off the masthead, and liberals can go back to saluting the brand for its social responsibility, but leave him there, and your target audience simply won't buy. That's not a political decision. It's just business. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Fox News Channel's Panel Show ‘The Five' Just Made Cable News History
Fox News Channel's Panel Show ‘The Five' Just Made Cable News History

Forbes

time19 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Fox News Channel's Panel Show ‘The Five' Just Made Cable News History

Logo at the main entrance to the FOX News Headquarters at NewsCorp Building in Manhattan. (Photo by ... More Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images) Katie Pavlich couldn't resist raving at one point during Thursday's episode of The Five that the House of Representatives' passage that same day of President Trump's domestic policy bill represented a 'big, beautiful win for America.' Appropriating the same rhetorical flourish that Trump himself popularized in reference to the nearly 900-page budget reconciliation package, Pavlich then went on to poke fun at Democrats for 'throwing a hissy fit' over their legislative loss. In response to a tweet from President Biden that was put on the screen for viewers of The Five, Pavlich continued: 'Joe Biden campaigned on being a moderate and governed like a far-left lunatic, essentially, and a lot of this bill takes back a number of things that he implemented during his term.' That kind of sharp commentary, mixed with rapid-fire hot takes about the day's news from a rotating panel of hosts, is the simple formula that Fox News Channel's 5 p.m. talk show has parlayed into cable news dominance. And enough viewers keep tuning in to the show to hear panelists break down the news that it's not only become a ratings juggernaut for Fox — The Five also just made television history in the second quarter of this year: It's now the first non-primetime program ever to finish as the most-watched cable news offering for 15 consecutive quarters. The Five, Fox News' ratings giant Look even closer at the second quarter ratings data, and the trend gets even more interesting: At a time when CNN just saw its worst quarter in history in terms of viewership in the key demo, the parent network of The Five just finished its second highest-rated second quarter in history among weekday total day viewers, behind only 2020's coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Fox News now owns 62% of the total day cable news audience and 63% in primetime. Both CNN and MSNBC, meanwhile, not only saw double-digit declines in their audiences during the quarter, according to Nielsen data — those two networks are also set to be spun off by their respective parent companies, while The Five alone grew its viewership in the 25-54 demo 52% year-over-year. It's hard to overstate just how crucial the show has become to Fox's daily program schedule. In the second quarter, The Five also surpassed a slew of major broadcast programs, with Nielsen estimates revealing that The Five outperformed everything from the CBS Evening News to NBC's Law & Order, and CBS' NCIS: Origins — programs that boast a much larger reach in terms of broadcast households. Yet despite being available in far fewer homes as those broadcast giants reach, The Five consistently outranked them, delivering an average of 3.9 million total viewers and 410,000 viewers in the key 25-54 demo. Those numbers reveal two important facts: The Fox talk show is capturing not only traditional cable news audiences but also viewers in the younger, more sought-after demographic. And it's still doing so almost 15 years after its debut. The fact that the show has seen a steady number of guest hosts cycle on and off the panel over the years is also further evidence that the formula itself is strong enough to keep viewers coming back. Considering the fact that when The Five originally premiered in July 2011 it was as a replacement for Glenn Beck's show and only meant to run during the summer, the show's success is all the more remarkable. It quickly outperformed expectations, winning its time slot and scoring a permanent renewal just a few months after its debut. Since then, the ratings trend line for The Five has only really flowed in one direction — up and to the right.

Minerals for peace? How to make the Rwanda-DRC deal stick.
Minerals for peace? How to make the Rwanda-DRC deal stick.

The Hill

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Minerals for peace? How to make the Rwanda-DRC deal stick.

A U.S.-brokered peace deal, signed on June 27 between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, will link economic integration and respect for territorial integrity with the promise of Western investment. It is a mineral deal first, an opportunity for peace second. Making the deal work will depend on continued monitoring by the U.S. government and support from Congress. The deal aligns squarely with U.S. strategic interests and President Trump's ethos for a transactional foreign policy. The carrots offered to both the Congolese for their minerals and to Rwanda, a potential processing hub, may get the two to the table. Yet from my experience in the region, I believe a sustainable peace can only be delivered if accountability for human rights violations committed by all sides is out front. For while this deal represents the most practical opportunity in years to end abuses against civilians in eastern Congo, it fails to address the impunity that drives so much conflict. The region's mineral wealth, which includes cobalt, coltan, gold, tin, and tungsten, is an invisible driver of both opportunity and destruction. Armed groups financed by the pillaging of these resources have long perpetuated the conflict. Grave abuses have been committed by the M23 rebel group, which controls key parts of eastern Congo, and the Rwandan government forces that support them. For its part, the Congolese government should account for abuses by its own troops and allied militia. Without an end to this conflict, the foreign investment, mining operations and other actors looking to benefit from the minerals deal may not be spared from the violence, lack of rule of law and continuing injustice. For years, Rwanda has backed the M23, fueling violence and instability. This latest incursion has been brutal as they have committed widespread abuses, including summary executions, shelling displacement camps and forcibly recruiting children. The fighting earlier this year between M23 and the Congo forces displaced hundreds of thousands of people and exacerbated a long-running humanitarian crisis. Our research shows that these attacks are often carried out with the direct coordination of Rwandan forces, which provide the weapons. For the Trump administration's momentum to turn into tangible progress, Rwanda must first be held to the principles it agreed to in April, including to withdraw its troops from the Democratic Republic of Congo and rein in the M23, which should no longer remain in a position to terrorize civilians in key towns and cities. Its attacks against civilians need to end. Compliance should be verified by independent international observers aware of the Rwandan government's pattern of denial and duplicity. Pressure to adhere to the key principles of the deal will not come from inside Rwanda. The ruling party is intolerant of dissent both at home and abroad. Pressure is needed from Rwanda's partners. The U.S. should be ready to further sanction Rwandan officials implicated in abuses and publicly call out the government when it sidesteps key provisions of the deal. The Congolese government also needs to clean its own house. Its continued support for its allied militia will undermine the deal. Over the course of this crisis we have also documented the Congolese army's coordination with and support for the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda, some of whose fighters and commanders were responsible for the 1994 Rwandan genocide. This needs to end. Congo should dismantle this group once and for all. Ethnic divisions remain explosive in the region. The Congolese government should make good-faith efforts to rein in hate speech that threatens to incite violence. The U.S. Congress can help improve the chances of success and sustainability of the U.S.-brokered deal with the Congo and Rwanda since the signing by directing that U.S. investment in any infrastructure or security support must be contingent on the full withdrawal of Rwandan troops from Congo and an end to Congolese support for abusive groups. Congress should also signal support for investigations into serious crimes and to ensure international monitoring and compliance with the agreement. Anything less risks betraying the promise of a real, lasting peace for eastern Congo as well as for a reliable stream of minerals, untainted by rights abuses, for the United States. Lewis Mudge is the Central Africa director at Human Rights Watch.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store