
The No. 1 biggest communication mistake most people make, says public speaking expert who's coached billionaire CEOs
Most people make the same communication mistake at work, says author and public speaking consultant Bill McGowan: They lean too much into corporate jargon, using "bland, boring" words and phrases in an attempt to seem smart and memorable.
Saying you want to "socialize an idea with your colleagues to strengthen cross-functional collaboration," instead of just saying you want to work together to solve a problem, confuses people and sounds really inauthentic, says McGowan, who's coached a variety of celebrities, CEOs and politicians including Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos and Kim Kardashian.
"Typically, people who are jargony and speak in a very corporate way, because that's what they have learned through osmosis, aren't going to connect with [others]," says McGowan, author of the book "Speak, Memorably: The Art of Captivating an Audience."The same goes for when you're giving a speech or presentation: Big words and corporate phrases don't enhance what you're saying, McGowan says. They actually make it more difficult for your audience to follow along, he adds.
"One of the biggest mistakes people make is when they go to create their content for a speech or a presentation, they [sit] down at a laptop first and write it out," he says. "Unless you work in TV or radio, stylistically, you're probably writing for the eye. You're not writing for the ear. And there's a big difference between the two."
Writing for the eye tends to include "longer, flowier, prosier" phrases and parenthetical clauses, says McGowan. "And it's not really how we talk. It's not how we talk across the dinner table."
In your day-to-day speech at work, focus on using active voice instead of passive voice, communications experts Kathy and Ross Petras wrote for CNBC Make It on April 2: "Instead of saying: 'Sales have continued to maintain their upward trajectory in the current quarter,' say, 'Sales increased this quarter.'"
If you ever feel the need to fill a conversational lull by contributing a thought, think twice: Tactful silence can sometimes make other people think you're smarter, according to 2019 research conducted by Erik Schleef, an English linguistics professor at the University of Salzburg.
Just choose your moments of silence wisely, the Petrases wrote: Telling a joke during an important meeting can make you look silly or unserious, but having no questions or thoughts to add during a team brainstorm can make you appear uninterested.
And for your next presentation, instead of spending hours writing specific talking points, prepare a more bare-bones outline, McGowan recommends.
"It can be as minimal or as extensive as you like," he says. Then, record yourself giving a speech on the fly, using only your outline for guidance. "Don't worry if it's full of starts and stops and mistakes. What you're going for is recording the natural way you would say it."
Afterward, transcribe your recording. Clean up your mistakes, but keep the style and tone. This helps you sound more casual and conversational, reflecting how you instinctively express yourself, says McGowan.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: The Social Security Fairness Act restored the benefits Americans worked for
To the editor: The Social Security Fairness Act does not give windfall benefits to government workers who did not pay into the system, as contributing writer Veronique de Rugy stated ('Social Security is headed for a cliff. When will voters care?,' June 26). It restores the amount of the monthly benefit the worker receives in their monthly payment (eligibility determined by the worker paying into Social Security for the required 40 quarters) that was cut because the worker also worked for a government entity long enough to draw a pension. I started working at 16 years of age and for the next 19 years, I had Social Security deductions taken from every paycheck. Like many working people, those deductions reduced my take-home pay, but we knew the money would be returned later via our monthly benefit upon retirement. When I applied for Social Security I was notified that due to the pension I was going to receive from my county employment, my monthly Social Security benefit was going to be cut by 50%. For the last nine years I received only half of the Social Security benefit I earned by contributing 19 years of deductions. Thanks to this legislation, which had bipartisan support, Americans are getting the benefits they worked for. Joy Rockport, Valley Glen .. To the editor: Before earning a clear credential in secondary English in 2002, I logged 25 years in the private sector. I give my heartfelt thanks to the Biden administration for recognizing that government workers deserve to benefit from their contributions. I sleep better knowing my retirement will be boosted by an extra $1,800 a month. It seems only fair. Melissa Mazzei, Los Angeles .. To the editor: Several questions arise: First, is it possible that this column exaggerates the peril? As a financial professional, I have witnessed many inaccurate estimates firsthand. Second, why is the role of income inequality neglected? The enormous layer of cream at the top that contributes nothing to the Social Security system is surely worth mentioning. Even a small increase to the Social Security taxable wage base would likely have a huge impact on the projected shortfall. Finally, the headline lays the blame at the feet of the voters. To her credit, de Rugy's column discusses congressional inaction. Much of the public is very busy, many working multiple gigs to pay their bills. Members of Congress are paid to legislate responsibly and to take courageous stands. I ask the author: Have you correctly identified the problem? Susan Wolfson, Glendale .. To the editor: According to my Social Security statement, if I am collecting $4,350 a month in Social Security today, my surviving spouse and minor children can collect up to $5,900 a month, or 36% more than what I am getting while alive. No wonder Social Security is headed for a cliff. Cap the survivor benefit to what the deceased was receiving and limit the duration. Andrew Ko, Glendale


CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Here's how China just proved it can shut down auto production around the world
China dominates the world's production and processing of rare earth elements, which are used in all kinds of things: sports equipment, national defense, and each of the roughly 16 million cars sold in the US every year. The Asian country suddenly restricted exports in early April 2025. The move sent shockwaves through the auto industry which can't build cars without these minerals. CNBC Dove in to see how we got here, and how the auto industry might find its way out.

Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
I downsized from a house in Nevada to a 104-square-foot studio outside of Paris. It helped me focus on what matters in life.
In my mid-30s, I still couldn't afford to live alone in the US. I was sharing an 1,800-square-foot, two-bedroom, two-bath house in Nevada with a roommate, spending $3,300 to $5,000 on my monthly bills. As a writer and university adjunct English professor, I earned less than $2,000 a month and cleaned houses in my spare time to cover the rest. This left little time to realize my dream of writing a book. I realized couldn't achieve my goal in the US; the cost of living was simply too high. It was time for a change. I'd spent time in Europe while earning my Master's degree in London. On weekends I'd travel to France with friends and had seen how the cost of living could be much cheaper there. So, when I had the opportunity to continue to teach online and increase my freelance writing work, moving to France felt like the best way to cut costs. In France, my place was smaller but was everything I wanted I moved into an apartment in a small city about 40 minutes by train from Paris. It's everything I wanted, and my rent was cheaper — €650 (about $740), including utilities. I was finally saving money. Plus, it felt like a dream to write on my couch with my neighbor's violet blooming wisteria visible through my white-curtained French windows framed by ancient wooden beams. While my French apartment was certainly smaller — only 104 sq. ft. — than the space I had in the US, the layout was better. Blending the kitchen and living room, the vaulted ceilings enabled a spacious bedroom loft with a skylit window and enough space for a reading chair. While I sacrificed five times the kitchen counter space I had in Nevada, the whole kitchen took me only 10 minutes to clean, saving me hours a week. I slashed my monthly expenses In France, I saved anywhere from $1,700 to $3,200 a month on expenses, and I typically spent $1,600 to $1,800 a month to cover all my living costs, including rent. A lot of my savings came from cheaper rent and no longer having a car. I paid $20 a month to store my car in the US and no longer spent the $475 a month it cost in gas and insurance. If I wanted to go somewhere in France, I used public transportation, which costs about €50 to €80 ($57 to $91) a month. I could afford to slow down and still save on dining out French bakeries offered pain au chocolat (chocolate croissants) for €1.80 ($2.09), while delicious dinners like boeuf bourguignon ranged from €12 to €17 ($13 to $18), a bargain next to my favorite $25 twelve-inch pizza in Nevada. A glass of house wine back home could cost $12 to $15. Most brasseries, a sophisticated version of a cheap bar, have happy hours starting at 5 p.m., where a glass of wine often cost €5 ($5.80). My life naturally slowed down as I delighted in spending hours with friends unbothered, knowing the evening would only dent my pocket a little. I was finally free to finish my book Even though I worked remotely, I slowed down my lifestyle by syncing my rhythm with the numerous French holidays when I could, and scaled down to 30 hours a week to add time to work on my book. In France, the pressure to grind had less of a draw. I saved more than time and money by embracing the French lifestyle of "joie de vivre," which encourages enjoyment over expense. The shift in mindset empowered me to finally focus on self-enrichment and my creative goals rather than chasing a lavish American lifestyle. The lack of financial pressure lowered my stress and granted me the extra time I needed to complete the final draft of my book.