Plans For $2.5 Million Inner-City Development In Hastings For Vibrant Living
The Hastings District Council-owned site has been partially sold to Mike Walker Management (MWM) and plans include city housing, commercial spaces and a public car park.
Hastings Mayor Sandra Hazlehurst said the project brought the community's vision for a more vibrant, connected city centre one step closer.
"It's also a positive step towards delivering on our commitment to enable more inner city living, supported by a variation to the proposed district plan in 2019 to allow residential activity in the upper floors of city centre buildings," Hazlehurst said.
MWM director Mike Walker said the development of the former Farmers' Co-operative garage building was a unique opportunity to blend heritage and modern living in a way that brings long-term value to the community.
"Hastings has a strong identity and rich history, and we're proud to be part of a project that reflects that," he said.
"Our approach is to retain and celebrate what's already here while delivering spaces where people want to live, work and connect.
"We believe this redevelopment will be a catalyst for even more investment and vibrancy in the city centre."
Plans include strengthening and reusing the facade of the Farmers' Co-operative heritage building, terraced townhouses, new commercial tenancies and office space, and a public park and laneway connecting Queen St West to Heretaunga St West.
The project follows a four-year search by the council for the right development partner.
Demolition of the existing buildings is scheduled to begin in August 2025.
Stage one will focus on delivering a new public green space, and pedestrian laneways, and strengthening the heritage facade.
The next stage will see the development of commercial accommodation and then townhouses potentially beginning to be built as early as 2026.
An application is under way to amend the existing resource consent, originally granted in May 2023 for a three-storey, mixed-use development comprising 20 apartments.
The revised consent will allow for the development of terraced townhouses.
The council will retain ownership of the public park and laneways while divesting the land for commercial and residential use at market value.
It says the net cost of the project remains within the budget allocated in the Long-Term Plan 2024-34.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
The rates crisis – a canny view for New Zealand: Nick Stewart
Council rates increased 12.2% annually.¹ The Taxpayers' Union documents cumulative rate increases of 34.52% over three years whilst inflation totalled just 13.7%. This is systematic wealth confiscation by people who face no market discipline for their decisions, and the Hastings District Council provides a fine example of the melee ahead. Yet, Hastings is simply one example among many bad apples across NZ. Rate increases, or daylight robbery? In Hastings, ratepayers who budgeted for normal 3-4% increases got hammered with 19% in 2024-25, followed by 15% in 2025-26. That's a compound 37% increase over two years for Hastings ratepayers. An average Hastings family paying $3000 in rates now face $4300 annually – that's $1300 extracted from household budgets that could have funded children's education or emergency savings. The timing makes this especially vicious. Right as petrol prices fell 8% – providing families with a glimmer of relief – councils threw on rate increases that more than wiped out these savings. It's almost as if they calculated how much breathing room households gained … then took it. Hastings has projected debt rising from $400 million to $700m by 2030. We're witnessing a council that has grown beyond what its ratepayer base can sustain. The rider has become heavier than the horse, which spells eventual capitulation. Every private business understands that customers have a finite capacity to pay. Exceed that capacity and customers disappear. Councils operate under no such constraint. They simply send bigger bills to ratepayers who can't escape. Like the pigs in Orwell's Animal Farm, today's councillors have forgotten they're supposed to serve ratepayers – not rule them. While private-sector businesses slash costs and implement redundancies to survive, councils expand their fiefdoms with impunity. The contrast couldn't be starker. Business managers whose jobs depend on efficiency face market discipline daily. Councillors face elections every three years, where complex budget decisions get reduced to campaign slogans. Meanwhile, they enjoy inflation-plus salary increases and gold-plated job security while imposing austerity on the very ratepayers who fund them. Richardson's Democratic Solution Ruth Richardson captures the fundamental problem: councils have become 'arrogant', 'unaccountable', and 'wasteful' and 'have got to be brought to heel'. Her proposed solution cuts through the bureaucratic nonsense: cap rate increases at inflation unless ratepayers approve higher amounts through binding referenda. This isn't radical – it's basic democratic consent for taxation. An inflation cap would restore planning certainty overnight whilst forcing councils to choose between genuine necessities and bureaucratic empire-building. Critics claim this assumes ratepayers lack perfect information about 'complex' infrastructure trade-offs, but that misses the point entirely. The current system assumes councils have perfect information about ratepayers' financial capacity – an assumption that Hastings' compound 37% increase rudely disproves. When families face financial warfare dressed up as fiscal responsibility, the 'complexity' argument becomes irrelevant. Hastings, the bellwether? The upcoming Hastings mayoral election represents more than political choice – it's an opportunity for forensic examination of fiscal responsibility: every council vote recorded, every budget decision documented, and no way for candidates to escape their fiscal DNA through clever spin and newfound fiscal enlightenment. Some councillors already express concern about 'diminishing borrowing capacity' – a tacit admission that current spending is unsustainable. When the reality finally penetrates the bureaucratic bubble, it's too late for the ratepayers. This same dynamic is playing out from Auckland to Invercargill. Yes, New Zealand faces genuine infrastructure challenges. Ageing water systems, earthquake strengthening, and climate adaptation create real costs. But this reality has become the perfect smokescreen for herculean spending growth. The question isn't whether infrastructure needs exist. The infrastructure bill was always coming due. It's whether councils have used it to justify spending that extends far beyond pipes and roads – into glamour projects, consultant fees and bureaucratic expansion. Again – when the rider becomes heavier than the horse, the system collapses regardless of how noble the rider's intentions. Why can't RBNZ just drive rates down? The Reserve Bank faces an impossible choice. It cannot provide the interest rate relief the rest of us desperately need whilst councils pump 13% of total inflation into the economy. We all need to row the boat and play our part – including the public sector. A dollar is a dollar, whether it comes from a rates bill or a grocery receipt. When councils exempt themselves from inflation discipline, they force the RBNZ to keep interest rates higher for longer – crushing mortgage holders and businesses who had no say in council spending decisions. Every responsible household and business starts the year with careful financial planning. These assume government costs increase roughly in line with inflation – a reasonable expectation in a functioning democracy. The problem lies in the fact that our councils have abandoned this social contract. When rates contribute 13% of national inflation whilst representing a fraction of household spending, councils have become the primary destroyer of private planning. Families who budget carefully find their fiscal discipline rendered meaningless by public sector excess they cannot control or escape. Voters, now's your chance … Real reform requires acknowledging that councils have become the enemy of household financial stability. October's elections offer a chance to demand proven fiscal discipline, not conversion stories. The question isn't whether New Zealand can afford fiscal responsibility – it's whether families and businesses can survive another term of public sector excess. The arithmetic doesn't lie. It simply raises the question of whether voters will finally hold councils accountable for the mathematical reality they've created.
RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Local food delivery company struggling against competition
business food 36 minutes ago Getting food delivered to the door has become a huge business, and in one New Zealand town the competition between two operators has led to complaints to the Commerce Commission. Nelson's Yummi food delivery business launched a decade ago but in recent years it has struggled. Two years ago another Kiwi-owned nationwide company, DeliverEasy, Yummi began losing clients. Yummi founder George Evans spoke to Melissa Chan-Green.
NZ Herald
3 days ago
- NZ Herald
How Kiwi billionaire Peter Thiel bankrolled Hulk Hogan's lawsuit that bankrupted controversial US media company
His lawsuit against the controversial blog was secretly backed by Thiel, an early investor in Facebook as well as New Zealand's high-flying tech stock Xero, who was years earlier outed as being gay by Gawker. In 2007, Gawker published an article targeting the billionaire with the headline: 'Peter Thiel is totally gay, people'. 'Thiel, who is now open about his sexual orientation, once described the Gawker-owned site Valleywag as, 'the Silicon Valley equivalent of Al Qaeda',' the New York Times later wrote. Hogan was awarded US$140 million ($232.2m) in damages in June 2016, which saw Gawker file for bankruptcy months later. Hogan eventually reached a US$31m ($51.4m) settlement with Gawker Media. Thiel, now 57, told the New York Times in 2016 he funded Hogan as a means of going to battle with Gawker in response to their stories, saying he believed many of their targets were defenceless and unable to fight back. 'Gawker, the defendant, built its business on humiliating people for sport,' he said in a statement. 'They routinely relied on an assumption that victims would be too intimidated or disgusted to even attempt redress for clear wrongs. Freedom of the press does not mean freedom to publish sex tapes without consent. I don't think anybody but Gawker would argue otherwise.' Boella v. Gawker was the subject of a Netflix documentary, Nobody Speak: Trials of the Free Press in 2017 and a 2018 book by Ryan Holiday, Conspiracy: Peter Thiel, Hulk Hogan, Gawker, and the Anatomy of Intrigue. Thiel was born in Germany but moved to America when he was only a year old. He became a New Zealand citizen in 2011. 'I am happy to say categorically that I have found no other country that aligns more with my view of the future than New Zealand,' Thiel wrote. His citizenship became a minor national scandal in 2017 when the Ombudsman revealed that the billionaire had only spent 12 days in the country, less than 1% of the usual criteria. Benjamin Plummer is an Auckland-based reporter for the New Zealand Herald who covers sport and breaking news. He has worked for the Herald since 2022.
