Ukraine's surprise attack shows it may take a ‘major drone strike' to change US defense policy, experts say
Ukraine's surprise Sunday attack on Russian offensive weapons caches may be a good time for the U.S. to reflect on its own weaknesses, should one of its adversaries attempt a similar strike.
Col. Seth Krummrich, a retired Army Special Forces commander and vice president at the Virginia-based security firm Global Guardian, warned that the U.S. remains vulnerable to drone attacks.
"Interestingly, it is not a technological gap, it is a policy/authority process to engage and deny drone attacks," Krummrich said.
"I assess it will take a major drone strike in the U.S. to change policy."
Drone Activity Near Trump-bedminster, Army Arsenal Spurs Nj Flight Restriction: Faa
Even civilian operations have a tough time getting approval for drone-interception-authority protections, the NFL excepted, he said.
Read On The Fox News App
"Ukraine proved how easy it is to hide a drone swarm in a truck bed, get close to the target, then swarm and destroy targets in a minute or two.
"Drones are cheap and easy to lethally modify. This know-how is readily available to all State and non-state enemy actors."
America's best snipers will have trouble downing a target moving at 35mph, as quadcopter-drones can reach, according to Krummrich.
He noted the panoply of threat-groups that could harness drone warfare, from China and North Korea to homegrown threats like Antifa and environmental extremists -- and laid out how a villainous actor could carry-out a strike on a sporting event from 1,000 miles away with proper planning and orchestration.
Gen. David Grange, a retired veteran of the 101st Airborne, recently returned from Ukraine where his Osprey Relief Foundation team of elite military vets conducted a "point-of-need" assessment and supply delivery to field hospitals and the like.
Grange said Ukraine's use of drones is a "textbook example of asymmetric warfare" – jargon depicting the proverbial David v. Goliath scenario.
"If a similar drone-based attack were launched on U.S. soil, it would be extremely difficult to intercept once set forth in motion, much like the events of 9/11," Grange said.
The general estimated that there are 3,000 gang members, terrorists and/or sleeper agents of hostile nations already stateside – and drone actions would be inexpensive and difficult to detect at present.
But, the feds are aware there are vulnerabilities and actively working to prepare for a potential scenario, he added:
"It's not a matter of complacency — it's a matter of catching up to a rapidly evolving threat landscape."
Bedminster Drafts Vip Security Plan After Trump Assassination Attempt
Last year, civilians and officials alike appeared flummoxed by repeated sightings of suspicious drones in the Mid-Atlantic – including near the U.S. Army garrison at Picatinny Arsenal in Dover, N.J., and President Donald Trump's nearby golf club.
Several "spy balloons" allegedly launched by China crossed over the Arctic, Great Plains and sandhills in 2023. One balloon was downed and recovered off the Grand Strand, while remnants of another were scooped up in Lake Huron.
Grange said the New Jersey situation was a "critical wake-up call."
"Incidents like that underscore the importance of shifting from reactive posture to proactive deterrence," he said.
"We're not starting from zero, but we are in a race to close the gap between emerging threats and our ability to counter them."
The idea of an impenetrable North America is not sustainable, he said – warning not to panic but instead to surgically address those vulnerabilities.
"Solving this challenge will require an all-hands-on-deck approach: federal, state, and local governments must work hand-in-hand with private industry, research institutions, and technology developers to close the gaps in our homeland defense posture," Grange said, adding the Ukraine-Russia conflict illustrates "the new face of warfare."
At a December hearing, House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Counterterrorism Chairman August Pfluger, R-Texas, warned that, "in the wrong hands, drone technology can negatively impact American national security while disrupting critical infrastructure."
"We must secure our skies from unauthorized aerial systems, but most importantly the homeland from foreign adversaries."
Pentagon brass testified NORTHCOM would've downed any drone that appeared to pose any imminent physical threat.
Kelly Siegel, CEO of National Technology Management, a Michigan-based cybersecurity firm, told Fox News Digital the Ukraine operation reminds us that more than three-quarters of all drones are made in China.
Drone and cyber-related threats to the homeland overlap, he said.
"Just like drones have rapidly become critical weapons, causing about 65% of Russian battlefield losses, cyber threats evolve at lightning speed. Staying disciplined and ahead of emerging tech is vital."
Russia has already disrupted American-supplied guided weapons by electronically jamming them – an example of something that mirrors current threats to U.S. critical infrastructure and security systems, he added.
In response to the concerns, a defense department official told Fox News Digital the Pentagon "routinely conducts threat assessments as the operational environment continues to evolve."
"Our objective is to enable tailored response options to protect our service members and installations. Specific implementation details are not disclosed for operational security reasons."
Israel, a key U.S. ally, is known for its "Iron Dome" missile defense system – backed by more than $2 billion in U.S. funding. The system has played a crucial role in intercepting rocket attacks from Hamas and other malign actors.
The U.S. currently lacks a similar system, though Trump proposed what he calls a "Golden Dome" system.
Canada can join the "Golden Dome" for $61 billion, or become the 51st state and join for free," Trump quipped Friday on Truth Social.Original article source: Ukraine's surprise attack shows it may take a 'major drone strike' to change US defense policy, experts say
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
30 minutes ago
- CBS News
Sen. Mark Warner warns that if Trump administration can pressure University of Virginia president to resign, "they can do it anywhere"
Sen. Mark Warner, Democrat of Virginia, on Sunday condemned what he described as an "outrageous" pressure campaign by the Trump administration amid a federal investigation into the University of Virginia, which led to the resignation of its president, Jim Ryan. "This is the most outrageous action, I think, this crowd has taken on education," Warner told "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." "We have great public universities in Virginia. We have a very strong governance system, where we have an independent board of visitors appointed by the Governor. Jim Ryan had done a very good job; just completed a major capital campaign." Ryan announced Friday that he would step down at the end of the next academic year. Sources familiar with the matter told CBS News that his resignation was submitted to resolve Trump administration demands related to a federal investigation into the school's efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusions. "For him to be threatened, and literally, there was indication that they received the letter that if he didn't resign on a day last week, by five o'clock, all these cuts would take place," Warner said Sunday. When asked if the threat was explicit, Warner said, "It was that explicit." Warner described the pressure as personal rather than policy-driven. "You're shocked it's coming- personal attacks are coming out of this administration?" he asked. "This federal D.O.E. and Department of Justice should get their nose out of University of Virginia. They are doing damage to our flagship university. And if they can do it here, they'll do it elsewhere." In his resignation letter, Ryan warned of the potential risks of resisting the administration's demands. "Hundreds of employees would lose jobs, researchers would lose funding, and hundreds of students could lose financial aid or have their visas withheld," Ryan wrote. His resignation came amid an investigation that targeted DEI efforts across multiple universities, with UVA's president coming under intense scrutiny from the Department of Education and Department of Justice, according to CBS News reporting. Warner acknowledged the difficult choice Ryan faced. "At the end of the day, I understand that, with so many things at stake, that the idea, and I think Jim Ryan laid it out, that he was going to make his personal job more important than these cuts. But, boy, that shouldn't have been the choice." Warner also warned that other public universities could face similar scrutiny. The DOJ is also probing the University of California system's hiring practices, investigating whether efforts to boost faculty diversity violate federal anti-discrimination laws. "They want to take on public universities the way they have now taken on the Ivies," Warner said. "This is going to hurt our universities. Chase away world-class talent. And frankly, if we don't have some level of academic freedom, then what kind of country are we?" Most prominent among the Ivy League schools targeted by the Trump administration has been Harvard University. IIn June, the Trump administration moved to block new international students from enrolling at Harvard, accusing the university of failing to report disciplinary records and calling it "no longer a trustworthy steward" of international programs. A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order and later extended it, describing the administration's actions as unconstitutional retaliation. The administration also revoked Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification, froze research funding, and pressed the university on DEI policies and campus protests. Harvard has sued, calling the actions politically motivated and a threat to academic freedom.

Engadget
an hour ago
- Engadget
Trump claims a 'very wealthy' group will buy TikTok without revealing who
The unending saga between President Donald Trump and TikTok may finally get some closure. In an interview with Fox News ' Maria Bartiromo, the US president announced that there's a buyer secured for TikTok. "We have a buyer for TikTok by the way," Trump said in the interview. "I think I'll need probably China approval and I think President Xi [Jinping] will probably do it." When asked to identify the buyer, Trump only cryptically revealed that it was a "group of very wealthy people," which would be announced in "about two weeks." Your Yahoo privacy setting is blocking social media and third-party content You can Allow your personal information to be shared and sold. Something went wrong. Try again. You can update your choice anytime by going to your privacy controls, which are linked to throughout our sites and apps. This page will now refresh. The uncertain fate of TikTok began when Trump signed an executive order to extend a deadline to ban the app from US-based app stores. The initial extension came shortly after Trump took office for his second term in January and was later pushed back another 75 days to April. The decision was delayed once again in June, but for an extra 90 days instead, for a new mid-September deadline. As the future of TikTok remains in a state of uncertainty, Trump said the extensions were "no big deal" during the interview with Fox News . More than 170 million active US users are awaiting a final decision on TikTok, which is developed by the Beijing-based ByteDance that's facing pressure to either sell its app or have it banned due to data privacy and "national security" concerns.

Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
At least 71 killed in Israel's attack on Tehran's notorious Evin Prison, Iranian judiciary says
DUBAI — At least 71 people were killed in Israel's attack on Tehran's Evin Prison, Iran's judiciary said Sunday about the notorious lockup where many political prisoners and dissidents have been held. Judiciary spokesperson Asghar Jahangir posted on the office's official Mizan News agency website that those killed on Monday included staff, soldiers, prisoners and members of visiting families. It was not possible to independently verify the claim. The Israeli bombardment, which came the day before the ceasefire with Iran took hold, hit several prison buildings and prompted concerns from rights groups about the safety of the inmates. It remains unclear why Israel targeted the prison, but it came on a day when the Defense Ministry said it was attacking 'regime targets and government repression bodies in the heart of Tehran.' The news of the prison attack was quickly overshadowed by an Iranian attack on a U.S. base in Qatar later that day, which caused no casualties, and the announcement of the ceasefire. Jahangir did not break down the casualty figures but said the attack had hit the prison's infirmary, engineering building, judicial affairs and visitation hall, where visiting family members were killed and injured. On the day of the attack, the New York-based Center for Human Rights in Iran criticized Israel for striking the prison, seen as a symbol of the Iranian regime's repression of any opposition, saying it violated the principle of distinction between civilian and military targets. Over the 12 days before a ceasefire was declared, Israel claimed it killed about 30 Iranian commanders and 11 nuclear scientists, while hitting eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites. More than 1,000 people were killed, including at least 417 civilians, according to the Washington-based Human Rights Activists group. In retaliation, Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were intercepted, but those that got through caused damage in many areas and killed 28 people. Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, said in a Saturday letter to United Nations officials that the international body should recognize Israel and the U.S. 'as the initiators of the act of aggression' against Iran and that their targeting of a sovereign country and its people should require 'compensation and reparation.' 'The Security Council should also hold the aggressors accountable and prevent the recurrence of such heinous and serious crimes to enable it to maintain international peace and security,' Araghchi said in the letter obtained by the Associated Press. At the same time, advocates have said that Iran was legally obligated to protect the prisoners held in Evin, and criticized authorities in Tehran for their 'failure to evacuate, provide medical assistance or inform families' following the attack. Jahangir said some of the injured were treated on site, while others were taken to hospitals. Iran had not previously announced any death figures, though on Saturday it confirmed that top prosecutor Ali Ghanaatkar — whose prosecution of dissidents, including Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi, led to widespread criticism by human rights groups — had been killed in the attack. He was one of about 60 people for whom a massive public funeral procession was held Saturday in Tehran, and he was to be buried at a shrine in Qom on Sunday. While both Israel and Iran have been adhering to the truce, Iranian officials raised suspicions Sunday about whether the other side would continue to keep its word. Abdolrahim Mousavi, the chief of staff for the Iranian armed forces, said in a conversation with Saudi Arabia's defense minister that Iran is prepared if there were to be another surprise Israeli attack. 'We did not initiate the war, but we responded to the aggressor with all our might, and since we have complete doubts about the enemy's adherence to its commitments, including the ceasefire, we are prepared to give them a strong response if they repeat the aggression,' Mousavi said, according to Iranian state TV agency IRNA. Meanwhile, a lot remained unclear about the status of Iran's nuclear program, which incited the initial Israeli attack. President Trump claimed that the U.S. strikes 'obliterated' the program, though preliminary American intelligence reports are inconclusive. Iranians say Trump is exaggerating. Rafael Mariano Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. atomic watchdog, told CBS' 'Face the Nation' in an interview that aired Sunday that Iran's capacities remain but it is impossible to know the timeline or access the full damage to the program unless inspectors are allowed in, which Iranian officials have suspended since the U.S. bombardment. 'It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage, first of all. And secondly, Iran has the capacities there, industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again.' Rising and Amiri write for the Associated Press.