Over 3,700 empty council-owned homes in Ireland, Dáil told
The Government is to issue a circular to local authorities to say health and safety should be the only thing to delay empty council-owned homes being allocated to people.
Advertisement
Aontu leader Peadar Toibin told the Dail on Thursday that there were 3,779 vacant council-owned homes across Ireland based on Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to local authorities.
He compared keeping council homes empty to exporting food during a famine.
'We also FOI-ed the local authorities as to the number of local authority homes that are empty in this state,' Mr Toibin said during Leaders' Questions.
'In the jaws of the worst housing crisis in the history of the state, there are 3,779 council owned homes that are empty.
Advertisement
'Now, having empty homes in the middle of a housing crisis is akin to exporting food in the middle of a famine.'
Tanaiste Simon Harris said he agreed that council-owned homes 'lie empty for far too long'.
'I've had a lot of discussions with a lot of people who are saying 'Hang on, if only I have to get into that house. I don't need the divil and all done, I just needed to be safe and I just need to be warm.'
'That's why government intends to issue a circular to all local authorities to make it clear, health and safety should be the only grounds for the delaying of the giving out of a local authority home, not the bells and whistles.'
Advertisement
Mr Toibin also accused the Government of understating homeless figures by 892 people and of understating the housing waiting list figures by over 16,000.
Aontu leader Peadar Toibin (Brian Lawless/PA)
He said he had sent Freedom of Information requests to every local authority in the country asking how many people are homeless in their area.
He said this produced a figure of 16,472, which was above the official homelessness tally of 15,580.
He also said that when local authorities were asked how many people were on their housing waiting lists, they came back with a figure of 75,000, which is above the official government figure of 58,824.
Advertisement
'Your ability to account the number of people who are on the housing waiting list at the moment is out by the population of Tullamore,' he said.
Mr Harris said that the anomalies were likely a result of duplications, as people may engage with more than one local authority for housing needs, particularly those living at county borders.
'These figures aren't figures calculated by the government in a party political sense. These are figures calculated by the state in a robust, impartial manner,' he said.
Mr Toibin responded to say that it was not possible to be on two housing waiting lists simultaneously.
Advertisement
'There wasn't as much pirouetting and spinning at my daughter's ballet recital as I just saw there,' Mr Harris replied.
'This is far too serious to engage in conspiracy theories here.'
Mr Harris also accused Sinn Fein of being the biggest property owners in the Dail while being quizzed on whether rents would rise.
Sinn Fein's health spokesperson David Cullinane, during a press conference at the Clayton Hotel in Dublin, during the launch of their new health policy (Archive/PA)
Sinn Fein TD David Cullinane called on the government to 'stop it, scrap it' in relation to changes to rent pressure zones (RPZs).
Mr Cullinane said that the rent changes will hurt students and workers 'stuck in an ever spiralling rental trap'.
'You talk about a balance. The balance here is tipped in favour of the vulture funds and the cuckoo firms and the investors.
'More money for them, more profit for them, which is always the case under Fine Gael, who represents a cosseted, privileged class, from my perspective.
'But see, when it comes to ordinary people who have to pay increase costs on groceries, on insurance and now on rent, they're the ones who are paying the price.'
In response, Mr Harris said Sinn Fein were the largest property owner in the parliament.
Tanaiste Simon Harris speaking to the media (Liam McBurney/PA)
The Fine Gael leader quoted the party's director of finance Des Mackin, who told the Irish Times in 2020 that the party owned 40 to 50 properties across the island, with seven in Belfast.
'Don't talk to me about the privileged classes when the largest property owners and investors in this house is the Sinn Fein party,' Mr Harris said.
'The biggest property owners in Dail Eireann, the biggest property investors are Sinn Fein, so don't give me this 'We're on the side of the working people'.
'It's just a load of bull that people see right through.'
Ireland
Housing target of 41,000 'not realistic', Minister...
Read More
Mr Harris cited the Central Bank analysis that indicated the RPZ changes would have 'a positive' impact on supply and said that Sinn Fein's call for reference rents would have seen rents rise for existing tenants.
He said the government would announce next month investment in 'key enabling infrastructure' to deliver homes, including water, wastewater and energy supplies.
He also said that the government would take 'more measures to protect students' in the budget.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
San Francisco to ban RV living as mayor pledges street ‘cleanup'
San Francisco is set to ban homeless people from living in RVs by adopting strict new parking limits the mayor says are necessary to keep sidewalks clear and prevent trash buildup. The policy, up for final approval by San Francisco supervisors on Tuesday, targets at least 400 recreational vehicles in the city of 800,000 people. The RVs serve as shelter for people who cannot afford housing, including immigrant families with kids. Those who live in them say they are a necessary option in an expensive city where affordable apartments are impossible to find. But Mayor Daniel Lurie and other supporters of the policy say motor homes are not suitable for long-term living and the city has a duty to both provide shelter to those in need and clean up the streets. 'We absolutely want to serve those families, those who are in crisis across San Francisco,' said Kunal Modi, who advises the mayor on health, homelessness and family services. 'We feel the responsibility to help them get to a stable solution. And at the same time, we want to make sure that that stability is somewhere indoors and not exposed in the public roadway.' Critics of the plan, however, say it is cruel to force people to give up their only home in exchange for a shot at traditional housing when there are not nearly enough units for all the people who need help; the mayor is only offering additional money to help 65 households. Jennifer Friedenbach, executive director of the Coalition on Homelessness, says city officials are woefully behind on establishing details of an accompanying permit program, which will exempt RV residents from parking limits so long as they are working with homeless outreach staff to find housing. 'I think that there's going to be people who lose their RVs. I think there's going to be people who are able to get into shelter, but at the expense' of people with higher needs, like those sleeping on a sidewalk, she said. San Francisco, like other US cities, has seen an explosion in recent years of people living out of vehicles and RVs as the cost of living has risen. Banning oversized vehicles is part of Lurie's pledge to clean up San Francisco streets, and part of a growing trend to require homeless people to accept offers of shelter or risk arrest or tows. The proposal sets a two-hour parking limit citywide for all RVs and oversized vehicles longer than 22ft (7 metres) or higher than 7ft, regardless of whether they are being used as housing. Under the accompanying permit program, RV residents registered with the city as of May are exempt from the parking limits. In exchange, they must accept the city's offer of temporary or longer-term housing, and get rid of their RV when it is time to move. The city has budgeted more than half a million dollars to buy RVs from residents at $175 per foot. The permits will last for six months. People in RVs who arrive after May will not be eligible for the permit program and must abide by the two-hour rule, which makes it impossible for a family in an RV to live within city limits. It first cleared the board of supervisors last week with two of 11 supervisors voting no. Carlos Perez, 55, was among RV residents who told supervisors at a hearing this month that they could not afford the city's high rents. Perez works full-time as a produce deliveryman and supports his brother, who lives with him and is unable to work due to a disability. 'We don't do nothing wrong. We try to keep this street clean,' he said, as he showed his RV recently to an Associated Press journalist. 'It's not easy to be in a place like this.' Yet, Perez also loves where he lives. The green-colored RV is decorated with a homey houseplant and has a sink and a tiny stove on which Carlos simmered a bean soup on a recent afternoon. He has lived in San Francisco for more than 30 years, roughly a decade of which has been in the RV in the working-class Bayview neighborhood. He can walk to work and it is close to the hospital where his brother receives dialysis multiple times a week. Zach, another RV resident who requested being identified by his first name to not jeopardize his ability to get work, started living in the vehicle a dozen years ago after realizing that no matter how hard he worked, he still struggled to pay rent. Now he works as a ride-hail driver and pursues his love of photography. He parks near Lake Merced in the city near the Pacific Ocean and pays $35 every two to four weeks to properly dispose of waste and fill the vehicle with fresh water. He says Lurie's plan is shortsighted. There is not enough housing available and many prefer to live in an RV over staying at a shelter, which may have restrictive rules. For Zach, who is able-bodied, maintains a clean space and has no dependents, moving to a shelter would be a step down, he says. Still, he expects to receive a permit. 'If housing were affordable, there is a very good chance I wouldn't be out here,' he said. RV dwellers say San Francisco should open a safe parking lot where residents could empty trash and access electricity. But city officials shuttered an RV lot in April, saying it cost about $4m a year to service three dozen large vehicles and it failed to transition people to more stable housing. The mayor's new proposal comes with more money for beefed-up RV parking enforcement – but also an additional $11m, largely for a small number of households to move to subsidized housing for a few years. Officials acknowledge that may not be sufficient to house all RV dwellers, but notes that the city also has hotel vouchers and other housing subsidies. Erica Kisch, CEO of non-profit Compass Family Services, which assists homeless families, says they do not support the punitive nature of the proposal but are grateful for the extra resources. 'It's recognition that households should not be living in vehicles, that we need to do better for families, and for seniors and for anyone else who's living in a vehicle,' she said. 'San Francisco can do better, certainly.'
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
San Francisco to ban RV living as mayor pledges street ‘clean-up'
San Francisco is set to ban homeless people from living in RVs by adopting strict new parking limits the mayor says are necessary to keep sidewalks clear and prevent trash buildup. The policy, up for final approval by San Francisco supervisors Tuesday, targets at least 400 recreational vehicles in the city of 800,000 people. The RVs serve as shelter for people who can't afford housing, including immigrant families with kids. Those who live in them say they're a necessary option in an expensive city where affordable apartments are impossible to find. But Mayor Daniel Lurie and other supporters of the policy say motor homes are not suitable for long-term living and the city has a duty to both provide shelter to those in need and clean up the streets. 'We absolutely want to serve those families, those who are in crisis across San Francisco,' said Kunal Modi, who advises the mayor on health, homelessness and family services. 'We feel the responsibility to help them get to a stable solution. And at the same time, we want to make sure that that stability is somewhere indoors and not exposed in the public roadway.' Critics of the plan, however, say that it's cruel to force people to give up their only home in exchange for a shot at traditional housing when there is not nearly enough units for all the people who need help; the mayor is only offering additional money to help 65 households. Jennifer Friedenbach, executive director of the Coalition on Homelessness, says city officials are woefully behind on establishing details of an accompanying permit program, which will exempt RV residents from parking limits so long as they are working with homeless outreach staff to find housing. 'I think that there's going to be people who lose their RVs. I think there's going to be people who are able to get into shelter, but at the expense' of people with higher needs, like those sleeping on a sidewalk, she said. San Francisco, like other U.S. cities, has seen an explosion in recent years of people living out of vehicles and RVs as the cost of living has risen. Banning oversized vehicles is part of Lurie's pledge to clean up San Francisco streets, and part of a growing trend to require homeless people to accept offers of shelter or risk arrest or tows. The proposal sets a two-hour parking limit citywide for all RVs and oversized vehicles longer than 22ft (7 metres) or higher than 7ft (2 metres), regardless of whether they are being used as housing. Under the accompanying permit program, RV residents registered with the city as of May are exempt from the parking limits. In exchange, they must accept the city's offer of temporary or longer-term housing, and get rid of their RV when it's time to move. The city has budgeted more than half a million dollars to buy RVs from residents at $175 per foot. The permits will last for six months. People in RVs who arrive after May will not be eligible for the permit program and must abide by the two-hour rule, which makes it impossible for a family in an RV to live within city limits. It first cleared the Board of Supervisors last week with two of 11 supervisors voting 'no.' Carlos Perez, 55, was among RV residents who told supervisors at a hearing this month that they could not afford the city's high rents. Perez works full-time as a produce deliveryman and supports his brother, who lives with him and is unable to work due to a disability. 'We don't do nothing wrong. We try to keep this street clean,' he said, as he showed his RV recently to an Associated Press journalist. 'It's not easy to be in a place like this.' Yet, Perez also loves where he lives. The green-colored RV is decorated with a homey houseplant and has a sink and a tiny stove on which Carlos simmered a bean soup on a recent afternoon. He's lived in San Francisco for more than 30 years, roughly a decade of which has been in the RV in the working-class Bayview neighborhood. He can walk to work and it is close to the hospital where his brother receives dialysis multiple times a week. Zach, another RV resident who requested being identified by his first name to not jeopardize his ability to get work, started living in the vehicle a dozen years ago after realizing that no matter how hard he worked, he still struggled to pay rent. Now he works as a ride-hail driver and pursues his love of photography. He parks near Lake Merced in the city near the Pacific Ocean and pays $35 every two to four weeks to properly dispose of waste and fill the vehicle with fresh water. He says Lurie's plan is shortsighted. There is not enough housing available and many prefer to live in an RV over staying at a shelter, which may have restrictive rules. For Zach, who is able-bodied, maintains a clean space and has no dependents, moving to a shelter would be a step down, he says. Still, he expects to receive a permit. 'If housing were affordable, there is a very good chance I wouldn't be out here,' he said. RV dwellers say San Francisco should open a safe parking lot where residents could empty trash and access electricity. But city officials shuttered an RV lot in April, saying it cost about $4m a year to service three dozen large vehicles and it failed to transition people to more stable housing. The mayor's new proposal comes with more money for beefed-up RV parking enforcement – but also an additional $11m , largely for a small number of households to move to subsidized housing for a few years. Officials acknowledge that may not be sufficient to house all RV dwellers, but notes that the city also has hotel vouchers and other housing subsidies. Erica Kisch, CEO of non-profit Compass Family Services, which assists homeless families, says they do not support the punitive nature of the proposal but are grateful for the extra resources. 'It's recognition that households should not be living in vehicles, that we need to do better for families, and for seniors and for anyone else who's living in a vehicle,' she said. 'San Francisco can do better, certainly.'
BreakingNews.ie
4 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Plan to cut hospitality VAT to 9% to cost up to €1 billion for a year
A plan to cut VAT for hospitality to 9 per cent is predicted to cost up to €1 billion for a year, which is around two-thirds of the €1.5 billion tax package. The Government said that Budget 2026 will bring in €1.5 billion of tax cuts; however, the size of the package could reduce if there is a 'deterioration in the tariff landscape'. Advertisement Announcing the Summer Economic Statement, which sets out the Government's spending and tax cuts plans, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe said that increasing the tax package is not the 'right thing to do'. The Budget Day package, set to be announced on October 7th, will be €9.4 billion. This will comprise spending of €7.9 billion and taxation measures amounting to €1.5 billion. Overall spending across current capital will increase by 7.3 per cent for next year. Advertisement If the Government commits to its pledge to cut the VAT rate for hospitality, it will cost around €1 billion, Mr Donohoe said on Tuesday. 'Our Budget Day decisions could change depending on the economic environment we find ourselves in during the summer and beyond,' he added. 'It would not be right to grow the scale of our tax package with everything that we are confronting at the moment. 'Our economy, just by seeing income grow, generates between €1.3 and €1.5 billion each year. Advertisement 'If we were to have a bigger tax package than that, I don't believe it would be the right thing to do, given all we are confronting, but the exact component of what the tax package would be and the other tax measures that would be in it, I can't answer that question until Budget Day. 'I mean the Summer Economic Statement lays out the amount of money that will be available. It never lays out the detail of any one measure.' Mr Donohoe warned that the figures published on Tuesday are based on 'a no-tariff scenario' imposed by the United States. The statement does not set out how the budget will be affected by any change in tariffs, but states that the Government will 'recalibrate its fiscal strategy', adding that it will reduce the size of the package. Advertisement Mr Donohoe published the figures alongside Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers. 'Our Budget Day decisions could change depending on the economic environment we find ourselves in during the summer and beyond,' he said. He said all they can see is 'change and risk' around the uncertainty of trade, investment and politics. 'Of course, none of this is positive for the economy of the world, and by extension, therefore, for Ireland,' Mr Donohoe added. Advertisement 'This is most evident in the debates and negotiations that are underway with regard to trade, which is why us, within the European Union and the (EU) Commission on our behalf, will be redoubling our efforts to negotiate a better deal with regard to trade between the EU between now and August 1. 'Because of all of this, it's very clear that we're at a moment of significant transition to the economy of the world, and even for the economy. But notwithstanding all of this, our economy continues to grow. 'In the first quarter of 2025, our economy grew by almost 3 per cent after a year of strong growth in 2024, and where that strong performance is most evident is in the number of people at work in our country.' Mr Donohoe said it is 'very likely' that negotiations between the EU and the US will reach a conclusion in the coming weeks. However, he said the Government's intention is to be 'flexible' in its approach to Budget Day. 'Our overwhelming priority is to maintain our public capital investment, in particular the figures that will be outlined by Minister Chambers,' Mr Donohoe added. 'However, should economic or budget conditions change, we will amend other elements of budget policy to ensure we get the balance right. 'Minister Chambers and I, in consultation with the party leaders, will continue to assess that balance in the weeks ahead. 'I emphasise that point because Minister Chambers and I are very much aware that we are publishing this statement and committing to a National Development Plan at a moment of uncertainty. 'We know an antidote to some of that uncertainty is certainty regarding our investment plans, and that is what is being outlined here today. We can do so because our economy is resilient.' Mr Chambers said the Government is having to navigate 'serious economic uncertainty'. 'If there's a serious economic deterioration, we absolutely will have to revisit what we're setting out today to be responsible and agile in the context of changing our global position, and we agree on that,' he added. 'So this is very much caveated by what could happen in the coming weeks, and we won't make decisions that aren't sustainable or affordable for the Irish economy.' He added: 'While capital expenditure will increase by €2 billion in line with the National Development Plan review, this will result in total available current expenditure of €97.5 billion, and capital expenditure of €19.1 billion in 2026. 'It will be against this backdrop that budget negotiations will commence with the individual departments in the coming weeks. 'The expenditure ceilings for 2026 will facilitate a budget that will provide for enhanced public service delivery and increased capital investment in critical infrastructure under the new and renewed National Development Plan. 'At the same time, given the profound global economic uncertainty, it's crucial we moderate current spending and provide permanent and sustainable investment, as well as focusing on addressing our infrastructure deficits.'
