John Robbins, Author of ‘Diet for a New America,' Dies at 77
John Robbins, an heir to the Baskin-Robbins ice cream empire who rejected the family business to advocate plant-based nutrition, environmentalism and animal rights, died on June 11 at his home in Soquel, Calif., near Santa Cruz. He was 77.
His son and collaborator, Ocean Robbins, said that the cause was complications of post-polio syndrome, which resulted in muscle weakness and other symptoms nearly seven decades after he contracted polio as a boy.
Mr. Robbins was best known for his book 'Diet for a New America,' published in 1987. The book, which is said to have sold more than a million copies, drew a link between the heavy consumption of animal-based products and the increased risk of chronic illnesses like heart disease and obesity; examined the environmental damage caused by factory farming; and raised ethical concerns about the treatment of animals in confined conditions.
The book's message, Mr. Robbins wrote, was 'that the healthiest, tastiest and most nourishing way to eat is also the most economical, the most compassionate and least polluting.'
The Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy in 1988 compared 'Diet for a New America' and its impact on the way we think about food to Rachel Carson's classic 'Silent Spring' (1962), which warned how the unlimited use of agricultural pesticides like DDT had contaminated the soil and water and threatened the health of wildlife and humans, and which helped spur the modern environmental movement.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
5 Simple Ways to Keep Your Brain Sharp Every Day
The human brain is a tricky thing. As we age, we prepare ourselves for the inevitable decline in our memory and overall cognitive function. This gradual shift is a normal, age-related change, says clinical neuropsychologist Dr. Judy Ho. 'But when we start to forget appointments constantly, repeat the same questions within a short period of time because you can't retain information you just learned or heard a few minutes ago, struggle persistently with everyday tasks that used to feel routine, or have greater difficulty maintaining focus than we ever have before, those can be signs of cognitive decline that might not be normative and might warrant a closer look.' Despite the inevitable changes that come with age, however, there are simple practices we can add to our routines to keep our brains sharp every single day—starting Lakelyn Eichenberger, PhD, gerontologist and caregiving advocate at Home Instead, an Honor Company Dr. Judy Ho, clinical and forensic neuropsychologist and professor of psychology at Pepperdine University'Stay physically active and engage in regular movement,' says gerontologist Dr. Lakelyn Eichenberger, PhD. 'Getting blood flowing is great for our brain health and can improve both mood and cognition. Pick an activity you enjoy, such as a daily walk or even dancing.' You've likely heard over and over that daily movement can do wonders for your physical and emotional well-being—that includes your brain, too. Finding one physical activity you actually enjoy will give you something to look forward to at the beginning or end of a busy day. 'During deep sleep, our brain clears out waste and consolidates memory,' Dr. Ho says. 'Poor sleep can mimic or worsen cognitive issues. Prioritizing quality sleep by having a nighttime routine or doing some reflective activities before bed can help you to unwind and allow your brain to go into a restorative phase, which encourages better quality sleep.' You can even consider doing some reading, journaling, or gentle stretches; the key is to avoid using your phone, as blue light can interfere with deep sleep. If you're a fan of The New York Times' Crossword or Wordle, you're already on the right track to boost your brain health. 'Whether it's a new language, musical instrument, or crossword puzzle habit, challenging your brain builds cognitive reserve—essentially a buffer against decline,' Dr. Ho says. 'Bonus points if you challenge yourself in an area that you aren't already accomplished at—really giving your brain a workout! This helps it to build new connections and stimulates areas of your brain that might not have as much routine stimulation from the activities you usually do.' Friendship is more than just a reminder that we're not alone—it's actually beneficial to your overall health. 'Conversation and connection stimulate the brain and reduce feelings of isolation,' Dr. Eichenberger says. Dr. Ho echoes this notion, adding that 'having regular, meaningful interactions with others helps protect against memory loss and depression.' And it doesn't mean you have to see your friends every single day. Consider calling a friend on the weekends, grabbing a quick coffee during your lunch break, or going on a short walk together, Dr. Ho suggests. These small, intentional moments have bigger payoffs than you might think. Nourishing your body also includes nourishing every organ, including the brain. 'Diets which emphasize leafy greens, berries, whole grains, and healthy fats support long-term brain function,' Dr. Ho says. 'Leafy greens are rich in folate and vitamin K, which support brain cell function. Berries are packed with antioxidants and help to reduce oxidative stress. Fatty fish are high in omega-3s, which are essential for reducing brain inflammation. Nuts contain alpha-linolenic acid and help to reduce cognitive decline. Whole grains regulate blood sugar and provide steady fuel for the brain. Olive oil is a great source of monounsaturated fats and supports healthy blood vessels. Dark chocolate in moderation contains flavonoids that may enhance blood flow to the brain.' This also covers everything from sweet to salty, so you don't have to cut out your favorite desserts. Read the original article on Real Simple
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
US supreme court rules key provision of Obamacare constitutional
The US supreme court has ruled that a key provision of 'Obamacare', formally known as the Affordable Care Act, is constitutional. The case challenged how members of an obscure but vital healthcare committee are appointed. The committee, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), is a panel of 16 volunteer health experts who determine which evidence-based preventive health services private insurance companies must cover without cost for patients. The requirement is a provision of the ACA – and one of the few instances when privately insured American patients pay nothing for healthcare. The case, 'in line with other court decisions, strengthens the control of political appointees over the bureaucracy', said Dorit Reiss, a University of California San Francisco law professor and an expert in health law and vaccine policy. Related: US supreme court rules schools must let kids opt out of LGBTQ+ book readings The case, formally called Kennedy v Braidwood Management, Inc, affirms that final decisions come by secretaries, in this case health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, a known vaccine skeptic. 'This makes it harder for Congress to isolate expert decisions from political review. So the stakes in appointing the political heads – in this case the secretary – are very, very high,' said Reiss. While the court affirms the constitutionality of the taskforce itself, it also held that members force can be removed at will by the health secretary, and that the secretary may review the taskforce's recommendations before they take effect. Kennedy used those powers only this June, when he unilaterally fired all sitting members of a critical vaccine advisory panel, and remade the panel with ideological allies. The new panel members then delivered Kennedy a victory by recommending against a vaccine preservative called thimerosal, despite a scientific consensus that the ingredient was safe. The court issued the opinion in a 6-3 ruling. The opinion was written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and joined by John Roberts, Sonya Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson. In 2020 alone, an estimated 150 million Americans benefited from the preventive healthcare provision, according to the O'Neill Institute at the Georgetown University law center in Washington DC. Although the provision requires insurers to cover a wide range of services – from annual check-ups to cancer screenings and immunizations – the case centered on the provision of Prep, or pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. A small group of plaintiffs claimed provision of PrEP violated their religious beliefs. They were represented by Jonathan Mitchell, the former solicitor general of Texas who pioneered the state's 'bounty hunter' abortion law. Their arguments were backed by Republican and conservative groups, although the specific ACA provision was defended by both the Trump and Biden administrations. Major public health groups, hospitals, disease advocacy groups and Democratic attorneys general opposed ending the provision. Although the court affirmed the constitutionality of the panel, it also affirms that any health secretary, including Kennedy, could remake the panel with allies. Related: US supreme court limits federal judges' power to block Trump orders The secretary could 'override experts' conclusions and remove things like PrEP', said Reiss. However, she added that the power was not 'absolute'. If the secretary's recommendation contravened the decision of an expert panel and there was a lawsuit, the secretary would still need to make 'a convincing case that there was a reason to deviate from the panel, if there is a lawsuit', said Reiss. That has left the Aids institute, and other groups who advocate for healthcare access for HIV and Aids patients, to say it 'celebrates' the decision while acknowledging uncertainty about the future. 'I think we have to be worried about what that means for future USPSTF decisions given what has happened with' the vaccine panel, said Rachel Klein, the deputy executive director of the Aids Institute. 'Knowing what preventive care is effective to keeping people healthy – and therefore cost-effective to cover – is crucial to helping people be as healthy as possible. That requires listening to medical and scientific experts. We hope that USPSTF will continue to be a body worthy of our trust to make scientifically sound decisions about preventive services going forward.'
The Verge
5 hours ago
- The Verge
How extreme heat disproportionately affects Latino neighborhoods
Scorching hot days tend to hit certain neighborhoods harder than others, a problem that becomes more dangerous during record-breaking heat like swathes of the US experienced over the past week. A new online dashboard shows how Latino neighborhoods are disproportionately affected in California. Developed by University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), the tool helps fill in gaps as the Trump administration takes a sledgehammer to federal climate, race, and ethnicity data resources. 'We want to provide facts, reliable data sources. We don't want this to be something that gets erased from the policy sphere,' says Arturo Vargas Bustamante, faculty research director at the UCLA Latino Policy and Politics Institute (LPPI). 'We don't want this to be something that gets erased' The Latino Climate & Health Dashboard includes data on extreme heat and air pollution, as well as asthma rates and other health conditions — issues that are linked to each other. High temperatures can speed up the chemical reactions that create smog. Chronic exposure to fine particle pollution, or soot, can increase the risk of a child developing asthma. Having asthma or another respiratory illness can then make someone more vulnerable to poor air quality and heat stress. Burning fossil fuels — whether in nearby factories, power plants, or internal combustion vehicles — makes all of these problems worse. Latino neighborhoods have to cope with 23 more days of extreme heat a year compared to non-Latino white neighborhoods in California, the dashboard shows. LPPI defined extreme heat as days when temperatures climbed to 90 degrees Fahrenheit or higher. If you've ever heard about a phenomenon called the urban heat island effect, big differences in temperature from neighborhood to neighborhood probably wouldn't come as a surprise. Areas with less greenery and more dark, paved surfaces and waste heat from industrial facilities or vehicles generally tend to trap heat. Around 1 in 10 Americans lives in a place where the built environment makes it feel at least 8 degrees Fahrenheit hotter than it would without that urban sprawl according to one study of 65 cities from last year. And after years of redlining that bolstered segregation and disinvestment in certain neighborhoods in the US, neighborhoods with more residents of color are often hotter than others. The dashboard includes fact sheets by county to show what factors might raise temperatures in certain areas. In Los Angeles County, for example, only four percent of land in majority-Latino neighborhoods is shaded by tree canopy compared to nine percent in non-Latino white neighborhoods. Conversely, impervious surfaces like asphalt and concrete that hold heat span 68 percent of land in Latino neighborhoods compared to 47 percent in majority non-Latino white areas in LA County. For this dashboard, LPPI defines a Latino neighborhood as a census tract where more than 70 percent of residents identify as Latino. It used the same 70 percent threshold to define non-Latino white neighborhoods. Latino neighborhoods in California are also exposed to twice as much air pollution and have twice as many asthma-related ER visits as non-latino white neighborhoods, according to the dashboard. It brings together data from the Census Bureau, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the state's environmental health screening tool called CalEnviroScreen, and other publicly-available sources. The Trump administration has taken down the federal counterpart to CalEnviroScreen, called EJScreen, as part of its purge of diversity and equity research. Researchers have been working to track and archive datasets that might be targeted since before President Donald Trump stepped back into office. Efforts to keep these kinds of studies going are just as vital, so that people don't have to rely on outdated information that no longer reflects current conditions on the ground. And other researchers have launched new initiatives to document the Trump administration's environmental rollbacks. The Environmental Defense Fund and other advocacy groups, for instance, launched a mapping tool in April that shows 500 facilities across the US that the Environmental Protection Agency has recently invited to apply for exemptions to air pollution limits. UCLA's dashboard adds to the patchwork of more locally-led research campaigns, although it can't replace the breadth of data that federal agencies have historically collected. 'Of course, we don't have the resources that our federal government has,' Bustamante says. 'But with what we are able to do, I think that one of the main aims is to keep this issue [at the top of] the agenda and provide reliable information that will be useful for community change.' Data like this is a powerful tool for ending the kinds of disparities the dashboard exposes. It can inform efforts to plant trees where they're needed most. Or it can show public health officials and community advocates where they need to check in with people to make sure they can find a safe place to cool down during the next heatwave.
