Search for armed suspect who fled traffic stop underway in Beaver County
According to Beaver County dispatchers, police tried to initiate a traffic stop along Virginia Avenue in Rochester Township at 2:15 p.m. A male suspect took off on the foot.
Police are still searching for that suspect. They have moved to the Pulaski Township area.
Shortly before 3:30 p.m., an alert was sent to residents from New Brighton police saying they were searching for an 'armed Black male with dreads who was wearing a black hoody.
Anyone who sees the suspect is asked to call 911. He should not be approached.
Channel 11′s Rich Pierce is at the scene. Tune in to Channel 11 News at 6 p.m. for the latest details on the search effort.
Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
17 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Parents of man shot and killed by Colorado officer after scuffle sue
Taushica Carter, whose son Rashaud Johnson was fatally shot during a confrontation with a police officer in Aurora, Colo., speaks at a news conference in Denver on Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2025. Thomas Peipert/AP In this image taken from provided police body camera footage, Officer Brandon Mills aims a gun at Rashaud Johnson in Aurora, Colo., May 12, 2025. (Aurora Police Department via AP) AP DENVER (AP) — The parents of a man who was shot and killed by an officer after the two had scuffled are suing the officer and accusing police in the Denver suburb of Aurora failing to end a pattern of racially discriminatory policing. The lawsuit, announced Tuesday, said Officer Brandon Mills shot Rashaud Johnson, 32, twice in the chest on May 12 when he posed no threat. Mills held him at gunpoint as Johnson bled on the ground, waiting about five minutes for another officer to arrive without trying to help, the lawsuit said. When the other officer arrived, Mills told him Johnson did not have a gun but said Johnson had tried to disarm him several times, according to police body camera footage. Mills put a single hand on one of Johnson's wounds after the officers handcuffed him, the lawsuit said. Advertisement Article continues below this ad The lawsuit said Johnson, who was Black and a standup comedian, was having a mental health crisis when he was killed at a vast remote airport parking lot near where he lived. Employees had called 911 five times over about two hours asking for police to check on Johnson as he walked barefoot on the lot's hot pavement, according to the lawsuit and information previously released by police. Mills responded alone after the employees reported that Johnson was 'trying to fight them.' Johnson did not respond to Mills' questions and rushed toward the officer, according to body camera footage. Mills swung his baton and then fired his Taser before they ended up on the ground in a struggle, the footage showed. Johnson pulled one of Mills' spare ammunition magazines from his belt, the lawsuit said. After Mills pushed Johnson off him and ordered him to move back, Mills pulled out his gun and said he would shoot Johnson if he didn't get on the ground. Johnson stood still, not far from the lot's fence, before he slowly began walking toward Mills, according to the footage. Mills then shot him from about 15 feet (5 meters) away. District Attorney Brian Mason has not yet decided whether the shooting was justified or criminal charges should be filed following an investigation by other area law enforcement agencies, his spokesperson, Christopher Hopper, said. The Aurora Police Department is reviewing the shooting, city attorney Pete Schulte said. Advertisement Article continues below this ad 'Like any critical incident, there are important facts that will be revealed by these investigations that are not depicted in a single body camera video. Now that this lawsuit has been filed my office will defend the city and the officer in this case,' Schulte said. Mills could not be located for comment. An email message sent to the union representing Aurora police officers was not immediately returned. At a May 29 press conference on the shooting, Aurora police Chief Todd Chamberlain said that 'the absence of a weapon does not mean there is an absence of danger.' Johnson's mother, Taushica Carter, said that as a military veteran, she has trouble understanding how someone who took an oath to uphold the law killed her only child. 'Someone who thought they were God, basically, took my baby's life,' she said at a news conference with her lawyers, tears running down her face. His father, Christopher Johnson, said he wanted people to know that his son was not a troublemaker and had parents who loved him. 'We want his memory to be positive and the community to understand the loss that did not have to happen,' he said.
Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Prince Harry 'Devastated' as Charity Probe Concludes: 'Damaging Dispute'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Prince Harry took aim at a charity watchdog that cleared him of bullying following a "damaging dispute" after a rival was allowed to continue on as chair. Harry and a number of trustees in March dramatically quit Sentebale, a charity that helps children with HIV and AIDS in southern Africa that the prince cofounded with Prince Seeiso of Lesotho. The move was heartbreaking for the prince because it was set up partly in memory of Princess Diana and was, according to a source who spoke to Newsweek, "his life's work." However, there had been a major rift with Sophie Chandauka, Sentebale's chair, who had been asked by the trustees to step down, and the argument was set to explode into public consciousness after Chandauka sued the charity in March. Prince Harry, center, poses with Sentebale charity chair Sophie Chandauka, right, at The Saxon Hotel in Johannesburg, South Africa, on October 3, 2024, months before their "damaging dispute" exploded into public consciousness. Hector Mujica, head... Prince Harry, center, poses with Sentebale charity chair Sophie Chandauka, right, at The Saxon Hotel in Johannesburg, South Africa, on October 3, 2024, months before their "damaging dispute" exploded into public consciousness. Hector Mujica, head of economic opportunity at is pictured on the left. Morefor Sentebale The Charity Commission launched a regulatory compliance case, examining the allegations and counter-allegations on both sides. Now the regulator has dismissed some major criticisms made by Chandauka, including of bullying and "misogynoir," or racism targeting Black women. But the watchdog did have criticisms for both sides over the "damaging dispute" that played out in public and imposed on the charity what it described as "a Regulatory Action Plan to address governance weaknesses." Prince Harry responded to the ruling by taking a swipe at the Charity Commission's report, with a spokesperson saying it "falls troublingly short in many regards," while Chandauka pointed to Sentebale's optimistic future. In essence, now that the dust has settled, Harry has swerved the most damaging allegations against him but must still face the reality he has lost control of one of his most personal projects, built to keep alive his mother's legacy as an advocate for HIV and AIDS patients. A source told Newsweek: "Prince Seeiso and Prince Harry are absolutely devastated by what Sophie has effectively done, which is a hostile takeover of this charity. "It's a charity that Seeiso and Harry set up 19 years ago and certainly in Harry's adult lifetime it's been his life's work." What the Charity Commission Says At the conclusion of its case, the commission found no evidence of "widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity." That is a blow for Chandauka, who accused Harry of "harassment and bullying at scale" in a Sky News interview in March. And she said in an earlier statement that month: "Beneath all the victim narrative and fiction that has been syndicated to press is the story of a woman who dared to blow the whistle about issues of poor governance, weak executive management, abuse of power, bullying, harassment, misogyny, misogynoir—and the cover-up that ensued." The commission did say though, that it "acknowledged the strong perception of ill treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally." There was also no evidence of "'over-reach' by either the chair or the Duke of Sussex as patron." The commission criticized the charity on some technical points, including a lack of clarity about the delegation of roles to the chair and processes for managing complaints—not to mention the high-profile public nature of the argument between the two sides. David Holdsworth, chief executive of the Charity Commission, said: "Passion for a cause is the bedrock of volunteering and charity, delivering positive impact for millions of people here at home and abroad every day. "However, in the rare cases when things go wrong, it is often because that very passion has become a weakness rather than a strength. "Sentebale's problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity's reputation, risk overshadowing its many achievements, and jeopardising the charity's ability to deliver for the very beneficiaries it was created to serve." Prince Harry Spokesperson's Statement in Full A spokesperson for Prince Harry said in a statement to Newsweek: "The Charity Commission has today announced its findings. "Unsurprisingly, the Commission makes no findings of wrongdoing in relation to Sentebale's Co-Founder and former Patron, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex. They also found no evidence of widespread bullying, harassment or misogyny and misogynoir at the charity, as falsely claimed by the current Chair. "Despite all that, their report falls troublingly short in many regards, primarily the fact that the consequences of the current Chair's actions will not be borne by her—but by the children who rely on Sentebale's support. "Sentebale has been a deeply personal and transformative mission for Prince Harry, established to serve some of the most vulnerable children in Lesotho and Botswana. "For 19 years, its dedicated staff and steadfast supporters have provided vital care to over 100,000 young people across southern Africa, including young people living with HIV/AIDS and those facing mental health challenges. "As custodians of this once brilliant charity, Prince Seeiso [of Lesotho], Prince Harry and the former Board of Trustees helped grow Sentebale from the seed of an idea to—like its namesake—a flowering force for good. "With the original mission of Sentebale firmly in mind—and in honour of the legacy he and Prince Seeiso began—The Duke of Sussex will now focus on finding new ways to continue supporting the children of Lesotho and Botswana." What Sentebale Said After Charity Commission Findings Chandauka said in a statement released to Newsweek: "I appreciate the Charity Commission for its conclusions which confirm the governance concerns I raised privately in February 2025. "The experience was intense, and it became a test of our strategic clarity and operational resilience." "The unexpected adverse media campaign that was launched by those who resigned on 24 March 2025 has caused incalculable damage and offers a glimpse of the unacceptable behaviours displayed in private," she continued. "We are emerging not just grateful to have survived, but stronger: more focused, better governed, boldly ambitious and with our dignity intact." Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on X, formerly Twitter, at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek's The Royals Facebook page. Do you have a question about King Charles III and Queen Camilla, Prince William and Princess Kate, Meghan and Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@ We'd love to hear from you.
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
Tennessee inmate executed without deactivating defibrillator said he was in pain during lethal injection
An inmate executed by Tennessee without deactivating his implanted defibrillator said he was hurting badly shortly after the lethal injection began, according to several witnesses. Byron Black was put to death despite uncertainty about whether the device would shock his heart when the lethal chemicals took effect. His attorney said they will review data kept by the device as part of an autopsy. Black died at 10:43 a.m., prison officials said. It was about 10 minutes after the execution started and Black talked about being in pain. Asked for any last words, he replied, 'No sir.' Black looked around the room as the execution started, lifting his head off the gurney multiple times, and could be heard sighing and breathing heavily. All seven media witnesses to the execution agreed he appeared to be in discomfort. Throughout the execution, a spiritual advisor prayed and sang over Black, at one point touching his face. 'Oh, it's hurting so bad,' Black said, as he lay with his hands and chest restrained to the gurney, a sheet covering up past his lower half, and an IV line in his arm. 'I'm so sorry. Just listen to my voice,' the advisor responded. Black was executed after a back-and-forth in court over whether officials would need to turn off his implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, or ICD. Black, 69, was in a wheelchair, suffering from dementia, brain damage, kidney failure, congestive heart failure and other conditions, his attorneys have said. The nonprofit Death Penalty Information Center said it's unaware of any other cases with similar claims to Black's about ICDs or pacemakers. Black's attorneys said they haven't found a comparable case, either. Black was convicted in the 1988 shooting deaths of his girlfriend Angela Clay, 29, and her two daughters, Latoya Clay, 9, and Lakeisha Clay, 6. Prosecutors said he was in a jealous rage when he shot the three at their home. At the time, Black was on work-release while serving time for shooting Clay's estranged husband. Clay's sister said Black will now face a higher power. 'His family is now going through the same thing we went through 37 years ago. I can't say I'm sorry because we never got an apology,' Linette Bell, Angela Clay's sister, said in a statement read by a victim's advocate after the execution. Black's lawyer said the execution was shameful. 'Today, the state of Tennessee killed a gentle, kind, fragile, intellectually disabled man in a violation of the laws of our country simply because they could,' attorney Kelley Henry said. In mid-July, a trial court judge agreed with Black's attorneys that officials must have the defibrillator deactivated to avert the risk that it could cause unnecessary pain and prolong the execution. But Tennessee's Supreme Court overturned that decision Thursday, saying the other judge lacked authority to order the change. The state disputed the lethal injection would cause Black's defibrillator to shock him and said he wouldn't feel them regardless. Henry said Black's defense team will carefully review autopsy results, EKG data from Black and information from the defibrillator to determine what exactly happened during the execution. The lethal injection protocol is still being challenged in court. The attorney said she was especially concerned about Black's head movement and complaints of pain because the massive dose of pentobarbital used to kill inmates is supposed to rapidly leave them unconscious. 'The fact that he was able to raise his head several times and express pain tells you that the pentobarbital was not acting the way the state's experts claim it acts,' Henry said. Prison officials did not comment on witnesses and Black's attorney saying he appeared conscious or his complaints of pain. It was Tennessee's second execution since May, after a pause for five years, first because of Covid-19 and then because of missteps by state corrections officials. Twenty-eight men have died by court-ordered execution so far this year in the United States, and nine other people are scheduled to be put to death in seven states during the remainder of 2025. The number of executions this year exceeds the 25 carried out last year and in 2018. It is the highest total since 2015, when 28 people were put to death. Black had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, which is a small, battery-powered electronic device that is surgically implanted in the chest. It served as a pacemaker and an emergency defibrillator. Black's attorneys have said a doctor can send it a deactivation command without surgery. The legal case also spurred a reminder that most medical professionals consider participation in executions a violation of health care ethics. In recent years, Black's legal team has unsuccessfully tried to get a new hearing about an intellectual disability they say he's exhibited since childhood. People with intellectual disabilities are constitutionally barred from execution. His attorneys have said that if they had delayed a prior attempt to seek his intellectual disability claim, he would have been spared under a 2021 state law. That is because the 2021 law denies a hearing to people on death row who have already filed a similar request and a court has ruled on it 'on the merits.' A judge denied Nashville District Attorney Glenn Funk's attempt to get Black a new hearing. Funk focused on input from an expert for the state in 2004 who determined back then that Black didn't meet the criteria for what was then called 'mental retardation.' But she concluded that Black met the new law's criteria for a diagnosis of intellectual disability.
