logo
Could Mexico sue SpaceX? Debris from Starship rocket explosion prompts investigation

Could Mexico sue SpaceX? Debris from Starship rocket explosion prompts investigation

USA Today10-07-2025
SpaceX's Starship exploded for the most recent time last month. Now, Mexico is threatening legal action for potential pollution it could have caused.
Billionaire Elon Musk's aggressive approach in developing SpaceX's massive Starship rocket from South Texas has led to spectacular fiery explosions time after time after time.
Now, it seems the United States' neighbors south of the border are reaching the end of their patience.
During a recent news conference, Mexico's president indicated that a lawsuit could be forthcoming if investigators determine that Musk's spaceflight company has contributed to undue pollution and marine life die-off in the country.
The announcement comes after SpaceX's Starship, which the company is developing for human spaceflight, exploded in a fiery blaze last month. The mishap occurred as the giant spacecraft was being prepared for an engine test ahead of its next launch.
While no one was injured, the explosion did cause debris to fall in the area of SpaceX's test site in South Texas near the U.S.-Mexico border.
Here's what to know about SpaceX's Starship, including the recent explosion and Mexico's ensuing legal threats.
Why did SpaceX Starship rocket explode?
On June 18, Starship unexpectedly exploded while SpaceX was preparing for an upcoming flight test. No one was hurt in the incident, which occurred as the Starship spacecraft was standing alone on the test stand prior to being mounted on top of the rocket booster.
The mishap, which SpaceX later referred to on its website as "a sudden energetic event," completely destroyed the spacecraft and ignited several fires that caused damage in the area surrounding the test stand.
While SpaceX is investigating the mishap, Musk said in a post on X that preliminary data suggested that a pressurized tank failed at the top of the rocket.
Why is Mexico threatening to sue SpaceX?
About a week later, Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum announced she is considering taking legal action against SpaceX.
'We are reviewing everything related to the launching of rockets that are very close to our border,' Sheinbaum said at a news conference on Wednesday, June 25, as reported by multiple outlets, including the New York Times and Al Jazeera.
The announcement comes as Mexican officials are conducting a review of potential environmental damage in the Mexican state of Tamaulipa after debris from the exploding spacecraft rained down on its beaches.
If SpaceX violated any international laws, 'we will file any necessary claims,' Sheinbaum said.
The governor of Tamaulipas, Américo Villarreal Anaya, said authorities were examining whether 'the internationally required distances are being respected in order to have these types of facilities, so that there is no risk to urban centers,' according to reporting from the Times.
Elon's legal troubles: Advertisers want Elon Musk's X Corp lawsuit out of Wichita Falls in Texas
SpaceX: 'No hazards to the surrounding area'
SpaceX claimed on its website that the Starship explosion posed "no chemical, biological, or toxicological risks" to the surrounding inhabited areas. The assertion is one that the company reiterated on social media site X when news broke of Sheinbaum's comments.
"As previously stated, there are no hazards to the surrounding area," SpaceX wrote in a June 26 post. "And as is the case before any test, a safety zone was established around the test site and was maintained throughout the operation."
SpaceX also blamed trespassers for hindering recovery teams' efforts to retrieve debris.
What is Starbase?
The explosion occurred while SpaceX was prepping Starship for its next launch from the company's Starbase headquarters, located about 23 miles from Brownsville and about 180 miles south of Corpus Christi.
Starbase, which Texas voters in Cameron County approved in May to become its own town, has also attracted some of its own controversy. Earlier in June, commissioners with the city of Starbase voted unanimously to close several of the city's public streets to outsiders, angering longtime residents and property owners.
Environmentalists have long opposed rocket testing at Starbase in Texas
The mishap and threats of legal action also come amid growing outcry among environmental activists over how SpaceX's operations are potentially decimating regional ecosystems.
The South Texas Environmental Justice Network, which has long opposed Musk and his space program, most recently issued a statement in May condemning the Federal Aviation Administration for approving SpaceX's request to increase its Starship flight tests.
SpaceX has long refuted accusations that its rocket launches pose threats to wildlife or the environment.
What is SpaceX's Starship rocket?
Starship, regarded as the world's largest and most powerful launch vehicle ever developed, towers over SpaceX's famous Falcon 9 rocket – one of the world's most active – which stands at nearly 230 feet.
SpaceX is developing Starship to be a fully reusable transportation system, meaning both the rocket and vehicle can return to the ground for additional missions.
The Starship, standing nearly 400 feet tall when fully stacked, is due to play a pivotal role in the years ahead in U.S. spaceflight as NASA eyes a return to the moon and Musk has dreams of the first humans reaching Mars.
What other times has Starship exploded?
But the next-generation spacecraft has yet to reach orbit on any of its nine uncrewed flight tests, which began in 2023 and are visible to the public from nearby South Padre Island.
For three tests between June and November 2024, Starship flew halfway around the world at a lower suborbital trajectory before reentering Earth's atmosphere and splashing down as planned in the Indian Ocean.
Those flights have been followed by a series of setbacks after Starship's first three tests of 2025 all failed to repeat the successes of previous demonstrations.
Before the latest explosion in June, Starship's most recent demonstration came May 27 when the spacecraft spun out of control roughly halfway through its flight and disintegrated in a fireball. Though Starship was unable to achieve its most important objectives, the distance the vehicle traveled far surpassed the previous 2025 flights in January and March, when Starship exploded within minutes.
SpaceX is planning to increase the number of Starship launches after receiving key regulatory approval to conduct 25 flight tests a year. Just four Starship test missions were conducted in 2024.
Eric Lagatta is the Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at elagatta@gannett.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla must pay $243 Million over fatal autopilot crash
Tesla must pay $243 Million over fatal autopilot crash

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Tesla must pay $243 Million over fatal autopilot crash

Tesla Inc. was told to pay $243 million in a lawsuit over a 2019 Autopilot crash in Florida that killed a young woman and seriously injured her boyfriend, the first significant court loss for the automaker in litigation related to its driver-assistance technology. A jury in Miami federal court found Friday that Tesla was 33% to blame for the collision. A Tesla Model S ran a stop sign at a T intersection in the Florida Keys and rammed into the couple's parked Chevrolet Tahoe while they were standing next to it. Jurors issued their verdict after less than a day of deliberations following a three-week trial. The jury determined that the Tesla S driver was primarily responsible for the crash and that Tesla should pay $42.5 million to compensate the victims for their losses. The panel also ordered Tesla to pay $200 million in punitive damages, but the company said it expects that figure to be reduced by the court. Tesla had argued the driver was entirely at fault because he was distracted when he dropped his mobile phone on the floorboard. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' Tesla said in a statement. 'We plan to appeal given the substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.' The Miami suit is one of a handful of crash cases that have gone to trial and the verdict tarnishes Tesla's near-perfect record in court. The electric-vehicle maker prevailed in two previous trials in California over Autopilot-related crashes and has struck confidential accords to resolve several cases that blamed defective technology for deadly accidents. The verdict comes as Tesla Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk faces enormous investor pressure after the company's stock has been battered, first by his close affiliation with President Donald Trump, and then by his dramatic falling out with the president. Musk has staked Tesla's future in part on autonomous driving as the company is launching a robotaxi business. But when Tesla recently announced disappointing second-quarter earnings, Musk warned that the company is in for a few 'rough quarters' as incentives like the EV tax credit go away in the US. At trial, the jury heard testimony from the driver of the Model S, family members of the woman who died, company engineers and various outside experts who discussed whether Autopilot played a role in the collision. George McGee, the driver of the Model S, had engaged his vehicle's driver-assistance system while traveling home from work. In the moments before the collision, data obtained from the vehicle showed that he had pressed the accelerator to 17 miles (27.4 kilometers) per hour over the posted speed limit, leading him to override the vehicle's adaptive cruise control before he went off the road. McGee testified that he had been on hold on with American Airlines trying to modify an upcoming flight. He said his phone fell and he was looking for it just before the crash. As his car left the road, McGee said he felt the texture of the road change under his tires and he remembered 'jamming on the brakes.' During questioning, he told jurors that he knew he was completely responsible for operating the car, but that he expected Autopilot to assist him in the event he made a mistake. 'In that case, I do feel like it failed me,' he said, according to a transcript of his testimony. The family of Naibel Benavides Leon, the woman who was killed, reached a confidential settlement with McGee in 2021 in a separate lawsuit. Lawyers for the estate of Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, argued Tesla's Autopilot encourages complacency and that the company and Musk have overstated the system's capabilities, leading drivers to be overconfident in its abilities. They also alleged that Tesla failed to add safeguards to ensure the software was only available on roadways where it was designed to be used and features to monitor the attentiveness of drivers. 'Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries, holding Tesla and Musk accountable for propping up the company's trillion-dollar valuation with self-driving hype at the expense of human lives,' Brett Schreiber, lead attorney for the crash victims, said in a statement. Tesla, as it has in other cases, blamed driver error for the collision. Lawyers for the company argued repeatedly that McGee was an aggressive driver with a history of speeding, and that he took his eyes off the road and his hands off the wheel despite warnings in the owners' manual that drivers must stay engaged. The company has maintained there were no defects in its software and that Autopilot operated exactly as designed. Throughout the trial, Tesla defense attorney Joel Smith said no driver-assistance technology on the market in 2019 would have been able to prevent the crash. The automotive industry categorizes automation systems in vehicles from Level 0 to 5, based on what features are available. Level 0 features simply pass on information to the driver, like sounding a warning when you're driving out of a traffic lane. Tesla's Autopilot is classified as Level 2 because it requires constant driver input and supervision. Mekelburg writes for Bloomberg.

2026 Tesla Cybertruck Review, Pricing, and Specs
2026 Tesla Cybertruck Review, Pricing, and Specs

Car and Driver

time2 hours ago

  • Car and Driver

2026 Tesla Cybertruck Review, Pricing, and Specs

Overview The Tesla Cybertruck is perhaps the most polarizing vehicle on the road, both in its design and in the statement it makes, being the norm-busting brainchild of the brand's ever-controversial CEO. But whether you give Cybertruck drivers a thumbs-up or a dirty look, there's much to appreciate about the product itself. This full-size electric pickup currently comes in three specs, all of which top 300 miles of range and boast clever maneuverability-aiding steer-by-wire and rear-wheel-steering systems. The lineup-topping tri-motor Cyberbeast is also the quickest truck out there, with a 60-mph sprint time of just 2.6 seconds. And while that stainless-steel shell needs different kinds of care than your average car paint, it's highly dent-resistant and recognizable from afar. Expert Tip: If splotchy fingerprints on your fridge bother you, steer clear of the Cybertruck. The Rivian R1T, on the other hand, comes with a normal coat of paint, and depending on the trim and powertrain, it's nearly as quick and capable as the Tesla. What's New for 2026? Tesla doesn't really do model-year updates. Instead, it introduces, deletes, and revises features at will and often without warning. So, who knows? A rear-wheel-drive model—called the Cybertruck Long Range—arrived mid-year in 2025. No changes have been announced for 2026, though the in-bed range extender we expected is officially dead. Pricing and Which One to Buy The price of the 2026 Tesla Cybertruck starts at $72,235 and goes up to $102,235 depending on the trim and options. Long Range $72,235 All-Wheel Drive $82,235 Cyberbeast $102,235 0 $25k $50k $75k $100k $125k $150k $175k If you're buying a Cybertruck because you like the way it looks, the base model is all you need, and it gets the best range of the lot. If you're after a performance machine or an off-roader, the Cybertruck AWD makes sense. It's significantly less expensive than the Cyberbeast but still plenty quick and capable. This content is imported from Third party. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site. EV Motor, Power, and Performance EV Motors: 315-hp single-motor (Long Range), 593-hp dual-motor (AWD), 834-hp tri-motor (Cyberbeast) 315-hp single-motor (Long Range), 593-hp dual-motor (AWD), 834-hp tri-motor (Cyberbeast) Drivetrain: Rear-wheel drive, all-wheel drive The Cybertruck Long Range propels only two wheels with a single motor at the back. The dual-motor AWD model's propulsion system generates a combined 593 horsepower. Those looking for mind-bending performance will want the Cyberbeast, which features a trio of motors making a combined 834 horses. The Cybertruck AWD and Cyberbeast have an adjustable air suspension that can raise or lower the EV on the fly to provide up to 16 inches of ground clearance. Add that to the truck's 35-degree approach and 28-degree departure angles and the Tesla pickup could prove to be a formidable off-road machine. On the road, the big Cybertruck feels more agile than expected. We drove a Cyberbeast and found its combination of rear-wheel steering and variable-ratio steer-by-wire tech made for easy maneuvering in urban environments. 0–60-MPH Times C/D 60-mph Tests: 2.6 seconds (Cyberbeast), 3.9 seconds (All-Wheel-Drive) In Comparison: The tri-motor Cyberbeast's 2.6-second 60-mph time makes it quicker than the quad-motor Rivian R1T, which needed 3.0 seconds to get to the same speed. View Photos Tesla Towing and Payload Capacity The dual- and tri-motor Cybertrucks have a maximum towing capacity of 11,000 pounds, while the single-motor rear-driver is rated to tug 7500 pounds. Payload varies by model and tire choice, but an all-terrain-shod Cybertruck AWD can haul the most, carrying 2500 pounds in its six-by-four-foot composite cargo bed. Range, Charging, and Battery Life C/D Range Test: 250 miles (Cyberbeast) 250 miles (Cyberbeast) Claimed EV Range: 320-325 miles The Tesla Cyberbeast's battery capacity is approximately 122.4 kWh. Tesla claims the Long Range model can recoup 147 miles in 15 minutes when hooked up to a Supercharger. In the same timeframe, the AWD model can restore 136 miles while the Cyberbeast adds back 128. In our testing, it took 50 minutes to charge the Cyberbeast's battery from 10 to 50 percent. The electric truck's driving range varies with the number of motors, but Tesla estimates that the single-motor Long Range will travel up to 366 miles per charge, while the dual-motor AWD and tri-motor Cyberbeast will go 325 miles and 320 miles, respectively. Those numbers are pretty optimistic: In our hands, the Cyberbeast covered just 250 miles—70 miles short of Tesla's claim. That said, we've noticed similar quoted-versus-real-world range discrepancies among other electric trucks we've tested. Fuel Economy and Real-World MPGe Since the Cybertruck is technically considered a heavy-duty pickup truck by the EPA's standards, Tesla isn't required to report fuel-economy figures to the government agency. We observed 55 MPGe in mixed driving with the Cyberbeast. Interior, Comfort, and Cargo First Row: Those who thought the Tesla Model 3's interior was minimalistic will relive that reaction when they see the Cybertruck's spartan cabin. The base model boasts heated front seats and one touchscreen, while the other two have seat heating and ventilation, plus a second screen for rear-seat passengers. Second Row: Headroom is surprisingly generous in the rear seat given the truck's dramatically sloped roofline, but riders over six feet tall may find it snug. Cargo Capacity: In our testing, we found that the truck's front trunk (frunk) holds just one carry-on suitcase, but the interior will fit 22 with the rear seats folded. The Cybertruck's cargo bed offers 121 cubic feet of volume, and inside the bed is a hidden underfloor storage compartment that's large enough to fit an additional suitcase. View Photos Tesla Infotainment and Connectivity Infotainment: 18.5-inch center touchscreen and 9.4-inch rear touchscreen 18.5-inch center touchscreen and 9.4-inch rear touchscreen Connectivity: Bluetooth Bluetooth Audio Systems: 7-speaker stereo (standard), 15-speaker stereo (optional) Every Cybertruck has a big 18.5-inch touchscreen mounted in the center of the dashboard. In the Cybertruck AWD and Cyberbeast, there's also a 9.4-inch touchscreen on the back of the center console for rear-seat passengers. SiriusXM satellite radio is included, as is a Wi-Fi hotspot, but drivers hoping for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto will be disappointed as those features do not appear in any Tesla model. Safety and Driver-Assistance Features Every Cybertruck comes standard with Tesla's controversial Autopilot driving feature. The brand's Full Self-Driving system is optional. Neither system yet enables fully autonomous driving, something Tesla has long promised. The company also provides other, more basic driver-assistance technology. Standard Safety Features: Adaptive cruise control, lane-centering assist, blind-spot monitoring Adaptive cruise control, lane-centering assist, blind-spot monitoring Optional Safety Features: Automatic lane changing, advanced parking tech For information about the Cybertruck's crash-test results, visit the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) websites. Warranty and Maintenance Coverage Tesla provides a comprehensive warranty on its current models, however it doesn't include any complimentary maintenance. Limited Warranty: four years or 50,000 miles four years or 50,000 miles Powertrain Warranty: eight years or 150,000 miles eight years or 150,000 miles Battery-Components Warranty: eight years or 150,000 miles eight years or 150,000 miles Complimentary Maintenance: none C/D Test Results and Specs We test every vehicle we can. Data in the chart below may be for a different model year if the model remained unchanged from when we last tested it. Specifications Specifications 2024 Tesla Cybertruck Beast Vehicle Type: front- and rear-motor, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door pickup PRICE Base/As Tested: $101,985/$121,985 Options: Foundation Series (20-inch Cyber wheels with 35-inch tires, White décor, off-road light bar, premium accessories, Powershare home backup, Powershare mobile adapter, universal wall connector, Full Self-Driving capability, lifetime premium connectivity), $20,000 POWERTRAIN Front Motor: permanent-magnet synchronous AC, 276 hp, 320 lb-ft Rear Motor: induction AC, 284 hp, 544 lb-ft Combined Power: 834 hp Combined Torque: 740 lb-ft Battery Pack: liquid-cooled lithium-ion, 123.0 kWh Onboard Charger: 11.5 kW Peak DC Fast-Charge Rate: 250 kW Transmissions: direct-drive CHASSIS Suspension, F/R: control arms/control arms Brakes, F/R: 13.8-in vented disc/14.0-in vented disc Tires: Goodyear Wrangler Territory RT LT285/65R-20 123/120H M+S TO DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 143.1 in Length: 223.7 in Width: 80.0 in Height: 68.5–76.6 in Passenger Volume, F/R: 62/57 ft3 Front Trunk Volume: 7 ft3 Underbed Storage Volume: 3 ft3 Curb Weight: 6901 lb C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 2.6 sec 100 mph: 6.9 sec 1/4-Mile: 11.0 sec @ 119 mph 130 mph: 14.5 sec Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec. Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 2.8 sec Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 1.5 sec Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 1.8 sec Top Speed (gov ltd): 131 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 176 ft Braking, 100–0 mph: 367 ft Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.75 g C/D FUEL ECONOMY AND CHARGING 75-mph Highway Range: 250 mi DC Fast-Charge Time, 10–90%: 50 min C/D TESTING EXPLAINED More Features and Specs

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store