
PETER VAN ONSELEN: Wait, what did Albo just say? Unsettling quote proves PM has become a mouthpiece for China - as mysterious power struggle in Xi's palace puts world at risk of WAR
With each passing press appearance, the Prime Minister looks less like a leader navigating a complex bilateral relationship, and more like a compliant visitor reciting his host's lines.
Take his response to the latest flashpoint: Chinese military exercises skirting Australian waters, which defence officials here say pose a risk to our personnel.
When asked whether Beijing had asserted a right to operate so close to our coastline, and whether Australia had sought better lines of communication to avoid future incidents, Albanese's reply was telling: 'President Xi said that China engaged in exercises just as Australia engages in exercises.'
That's not an explanation, it's an endorsement. A Chinese official couldn't have put it better, from their perspective.
This isn't careful diplomacy, it's parroting Beijing's preferred narrative while sidestepping the serious strategic implications for Australia.
Albo didn't challenge the characterisation, but nor did he signal any unease at the situation. He certainly didn't defend the principle of Australian sovereignty, which he's done repeatedly when countering US requests for higher defence spending.
Instead, he lent credibility to a line that serves China's interests -- not ours.
While the PM makes carefully stage-managed appearances while in China, the Middle Kingdom's domestic politics appear anything but stable.
Rumours are swirling that Xi Jinping's grip on power is fraying. Another senior figure, Defence Minister Li Shangfu, has vanished from public life, apparently purged in an escalating internal power struggle.
Analysts are increasingly unsure whether Xi is consolidating control or flailing in the face of growing dissent inside the Communist Party's ranks.
Whichever it is, the risks of turmoil are clearly rising. Beijing's military posture over Taiwan has only grown more aggressive in recent times, with Western analysts now openly warning of miscalculations that could tip into open conflict.
Against this backdrop, what does Albo offer? Deference. He walks the halls of Chinese power, echoing lines that downplay its provocations. He dodges hard questions about trade coercion, cyberattacks and political interference.
The trip, of course, is being spun as a diplomatic success - but only if 'success' means avoiding offence to the Chinese Politburo.
And, as if to confirm how well he's sticking to the script, China's state-controlled China Daily newspaper is lavishing praise on Albanese.
When an authoritarian regime publicly congratulates a visiting democratic leader, it usually means the latter left his principles at the airport.
What we're seeing is part of a larger pattern. This is a Prime Minister who governs by hedging: on tax reform, on climate ambition, on anything politically fraught. In foreign policy that risk-averse instinct translates into ambiguity.
But ambiguity, when misapplied risks becoming appeasement. And right now our PM isn't just being careful, he's being co-opted.
Australia faces an increasingly unpredictable power in its region, one led by a man who may no longer be as unchallenged as he once seemed.
The risk of conflict is therefore rising.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
New laws set to protect penalty rates and overtime pay for millions of Aussie workers
Australian workers who rely on award wages would have their rights to penalty rates and overtime pay protected under one of the new federal parliament's first bills. The legislation would prohibit award-earning employees from accepting penalty rate reductions in exchange for a higher base rate of pay if it would leave them worse off. New employment minister Amanda Rishworth earmarked the bill in Canberra on Saturday as the first off the rank for the returning Labor government. If passed, it will amend the Fair Work Act to provide stronger protections for the roughly 2.6million people whose pay is set by an award. An award is a legally mandated minimum rate of pay for workers within certain industries or occupations. People covered by awards are more likely to work on a part-time or casual basis and be women or under 35 years of age. In justifying the legislation, Rishworth said there were cases before the Fair Work Commission she feared could reduce worker's overall pay. 'What's become clear is there is a number of cases on foot which are trying to roll in penalty rates or reduce penalty rates in an unfair way,' she said. 'And so, what's become clear is that we need added legal protection to make sure penalty rates and overtime are protected in our award system.' She appeared alongside retail workers who said penalty rates were a crucial component of their overall pay packages. Retail worker Liarne said she earned about $6.35 an hour in penalty rates, about $7,500 over the course of a year. 'That's really important because it helps me pay for rent, groceries, school fees and the care of my animals, which I love dearly,' she said. 'Penalty rates are really important.' Another retail worker, Daniel, said his penalty rate earnings - about $85 per week - allowed him to foot the bill for necessities and lifestyle expenses. 'Generally, I find living on six to $700 a week is a struggle, whether you've got a partner to rely on or not,' he said. 'Penalty rates honestly makes a huge difference, and without it, I'd have to work more. See my family less, see my dog less, see my friends less. 'Just not go to the movies, not ever have a holiday. It's a myriad of things that would affect me.' Rishworth said employers in the retail, clerical and banking sectors had applied to the Fair Work Commission to 'trade away' penalty rates of lower-paid workers. The announcement could add to the grievances likely to be aired by business groups at the productivity summit to be hosted at Parliament House in August. Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox told the A ustralian Financial Review there was a 'dark irony' in Labor's attempts to fast-track the bill at a time when productivity talks loomed. Despite ongoing efforts to negotiate with the government over the proposed reforms, Mr Willox said there was 'obvious concern that it could further reduce workplace flexibility, especially at a time when we are already seeing rising national unemployment and the private sector clearly in job-shedding mode'. Labor will only need support from the Greens to secure a majority for the bill which it expects to sail through parliament soon after it resumes on Tuesday.


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
China vows tougher action against smuggling of strategic minerals
SHANGHAI, July 19 (Reuters) - China vowed on Saturday to step up a crackdown and toughen law enforcement against smuggling of strategic minerals seen as vital to national security and critical for development. The remarks by the commerce ministry came a day after the state security ministry accused foreign spy agencies of having tried to "steal" rare earths and pledged to crack down on infiltration and espionage targeting the critical sector. The world's largest supplier of dozens of strategic minerals, China began imposing export curbs in 2023 on supplies vital to sectors ranging from chipmaking and the energy transition to defence. The commerce ministry remarks, describing smuggling and export of strategic minerals as a severe problem to be combated, came at a meeting of officials responsible for export control coordination and other government bodies. "Cases of smuggling by a small number of criminals for their own selfish interests and collusion between domestic and foreign parties are still occurring," it said in a statement. Evasive methods such as false declarations and third-country transshipment were taking on increasingly covert forms, it added, urging government bodies to prevent illegal outflows of strategic minerals and related technologies. China has adopted a "zero-tolerance" approach to smuggling and export of strategic minerals, which it will fight with a heavy hand, through special efforts to toughen law enforcement, the ministry said. In May China said it would strengthen controls on the entire supply chains of strategic mineral exports while tightening its grip on materials deemed crucial to national interest. Earlier, Beijing launched a special campaign to tackle smuggling of strategic minerals such as gallium, germanium, antimony, tungsten and some rare earths.


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Japanese-first' Sanseito party goes into election leveraging unease about foreigners
A disillusioned Japanese electorate feeling the economic pinch goes to the polls on Sunday, as a rightwing party promoting a 'Japanese-first' agenda gains popularity, with fears over foreigners becoming a major election issue. Birthed on YouTube during the Covid-19 pandemic spreading conspiracy theories about vaccinations and a cabal of global elites, the party, Sanseito, has widened its appeal ahead of Sunday's upper house vote – railing against immigration and dragging rhetoric that was once confined to Japan's political fringes into the mainstream. Polls show the party may only secure 10 to 15 of the 125 seats up for grabs, but it is further eroding the support of prime minister Shigeru Ishiba's shaky minority government, which is increasingly beholden to opposition parties as it clings to power. Analysts say a heavy defeat for the ruling Liberal Democratic party (LDP) will likely cost Ishiba his job, while a strong showing by the emergent Sanseito could shake up Japan's political landscape. Sanseito's message has resonated in Japan, where global inflation and a devalued yen have pushed up costs, particularly for food, after decades of almost flat prices. Rice prices in Japan near doubled in the year to June, sparking a political crisis and leading to the resignation of a cabinet minister. Wages have failed to keep pace, and the sense of a sluggish economy but comfortable lifestyle has given way to a cost-of-living squeeze and growing pessimism about the future. Those on lower incomes are hardest hit, and it is from there that Sanseito is drawing much of its support. 'Many of its followers are first-time voters – the disaffected who feel the mainstream parties have nothing to offer them,' says Michael Cucek, an expert in Japanese politics at Tokyo's Temple University. In its manifesto, Sanseito calls for a return to traditional family values, repealing the LGBT Understanding Promotion Act, 'protecting Japan's unique cultural heritage', curbing immigration, and paying universal monthly child benefits of 100,000 yen (£500/US$670) while stopping welfare payments to non-Japanese. 'Anti-foreign sentiment that was considered maybe taboo to talk about so openly is now out of the box,' said Jeffrey Hall, a lecturer at Tokyo's Kanda university who has studied Japan's rightwing politics, pointing to Sanseito's online following, appeal among young men and warnings about immigration eroding indigenous cultures. The party's leader, Sohei Kamiya, a former supermarket manager and English teacher, says he has drawn inspiration from US president Donald Trump's 'bold political style'. He has drawn comparisons with rightwing, anti-immigration parties in Europe, such as Germany's AFD and Reform UK. 'In the past, anyone who brought up immigration would be attacked by the left,' Kamiya told Reuters this week. 'We are getting bashed too, but are also gaining support.' The concern over foreign residents comes after Japan recently loosened its relatively strict immigration policies in response to a worsening labour crunch caused by its shrinking and ageing population. The number of foreign-born residents hit a record of 3.8 million in 2024, although that is still just 3% of the total population, a tiny fraction compared with numbers in the US and Europe. With nearly every sector short of workers, most Japanese people accept the need for more labour from overseas. Nevertheless, a large influx of outsiders into a relatively homogenous nation that values cultural conformity has triggered some disquiet. Exacerbating such concerns is misinformation spread on social media, including false claims that a third of welfare recipients are foreigners. The feelings of undecided voters like Tetsuya Kataoka reflect some of the ambivalence towards foreigners. A shortage of workers at his Tokyo company means he has to take on extra shifts as a driver, and he accepts that Japan needs more immigrants to maintain its economy. 'But I'm struggling financially, and when people hear that foreigners are getting welfare – even if it's only a small percentage of them – they wonder why it's being paid to them instead of cutting our taxes,' says Kataoka. Speaking at the Foreign Correspondents' Club of Japan on 3 July, Kamiya said his party was not in favour of extreme nationalism or protectionism, and was aiming for 'global harmony and mutually beneficial international economic relations but not excessive free trade or disregard for national sovereignty'. Kamiya – who won the party's first seat in 2022 after having gained notoriety for appearing to call for Japan's emperor to take concubines – faced a backlash early in this year's campaign for branding gender equality policies a mistake, as they encourage women to work and keep them from having children. He has since appeared to tone down some controversial ideas formerly embraced by the party. His election manifesto, for example, includes plans to cut taxes and increase child benefits – policies promoted by a raft of opposition parties that led investors to fret about Japan's fiscal health and massive debt pile. Electioneering on Friday in Gifu, central Japan, Kamiya said the party was now aiming for more than triple of its original target of six seats on Sunday: 'With 20 seats, we can submit bills with budgets. Please give us 20 seats.' Cucek thinks it will more likely be in the 10 to 15 range, but that Sanseito will still be able to influence policy. The LDP and other centre-right parties have already reacted to its rise with promises of stricter treatment of foreigners. As well as spelling the end of Ishiba's premiership, Cucek believes that a crushing electoral defeat combined with the desertion of conservative voters to Sanseito would be a 'shake-up that itself will destabilise the LDP', potentially ending the hegemony it has enjoyed since its founding in 1955. With Reuters