Coercive control victims 'are not being believed' by authorities
Nicola Hanney spoke out after new figures provided by the DPP confirm there has been just 25 successful prosecutions since legislation making coercive control a criminal offence was enacted six years ago.
This is despite separate figures which confirm more than 60,000 calls alleging coercive control were made to garda stations across the country last year alone. Pic: AlvaroOut of the 25 convictions recorded since January 2019, just two people were convicted on a sole charge of coercive control. But in these two instances, which include Ms Hanney's case, the perpetrator was originally charged with more offences.
In her critically acclaimed memoir, Stronger: What Didn't Kill Me, Made Me, Ms Hanney detailed the living hell she endured at the hands of Garda Paul Moody, who was sentenced to three years and three months in prison for coercive control in 2023.
This abuse included smashing up her apartment, threatening to take their newborn son away while she received cancer treatment and isolating her from her friends and family. Nicola Hanney. Pic: RTÉ
Ms Hanney described coercive control an 'assault on the mind', and said it is 'shocking' more perpetrators have not been convicted.
She told Extra.ie: 'I'm one of the two [where the sole charge was coercive control]. There were more charges to start, but they were dwindled down to one charge of coercive control.'
The resolute mother, who was being treated for stage four cancer at the time of her abuse ordeal, said all women 'deserve to be free'. She added: 'It's a life sentence for women, but the evidence shows they aren't being believed. Domestic abuse is not being taken seriously in the country still. Pic: Getty Images
'Two convictions [for sole coercive control] is shocking. Coercive control is an assault on your mind, it's a horrible form of abuse.'
In response to queries from Extra.ie, the Office of the DPP confirmed 'the total number of convictions recorded on our case management system for the offence of coercive control contrary to section 39 Domestic Violence Act 2018, since the enactment of the Act is 25'.
Asked how many of these were for standalone coercive control convictions, a spokeswoman confirmed: 'Just two.' Nicola Hanney. Photo: RTÉ.
In stark contrast to the low level of convictions, gardaí confirmed that provisional figures show there 'in excess of 61,000 domestic abuse-related contacts in 2024' to stations across the country.
Ms Hanney, who continues to advocate for abused women, said she is 'not surprised at all by low levels of convictions' given the stories she hears from victims.
She added: 'People are begging me for help, they feel they are not being believed and some just give up because of that.
'I can understand why women give up and live a life of hell. It's like you're being defeated all the time.'
Ms Hanney warned that, unless the justice system changes, 'women are going to take their own lives. And what about the children who are witnessing the abuse? It will have a lifelong effect on them.'
She told Extra.ie: 'It should be a human right you're protected. But my heart is broken for these women. The lack of convictions in sending out terrible message.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
WRC finds Fair City photographer was not a freelancer
RTÉ has failed to have employment rights claims by the former on-set photographer for Fair City thrown out, after the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruled, for the first time, that a supposed freelancer at the national broadcaster was actually an employee. The statutory complaints were brought by photographer, Beta Bajgart, who was previously the subject of commentary at the Public Accounts Committee when it emerged the national broadcaster was paying €60,000 per year for promotional images of the Dublin-based soap opera. Ms Bajgart's case against RTÉ under the Protection of Employees (Fixed-Term Work) Act 2003, the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997, the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994 and the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 will now proceed to a full hearing, following a preliminary ruling today. It is the first WRC case where the principles of a major Supreme Court ruling in 2023 on the distinction between employees and contractors have been applied to the position of a worker at RTÉ. The alleged misclassification of media workers as freelance contractors by RTÉ is a major legacy issue at the national broadcaster. She claims her job as a photographer on the set of RTÉ's flagship soap opera was terminated without notice on 15 December 2023. The broadcaster's lawyers had argued Ms Bajgart was not an employee, but a freelance contractor - giving the employment tribunal "no jurisdiction" her complaints. Adjudication officer Catherine Byrne noted that Ms Bajgart suffered "negative commentary" in September 2023 after attention was drawn to Ms Bajgart's role following a hearing of the Oireachtas Public Accounts committee, which had been scrutinising RTÉ's finances. In the wake of the publicity, Ms Bajgart's solicitors wrote to RTÉ asserting that she had acquired a contract of indefinite duration and was an employee, the tribunal noted. The broadcaster's director of human resources replied that RTÉ's relationship with the photographer was "not an employment relationship" but that she was "a supplier of services". Ms Bajgart was first engaged for the work as an independent contractor for a year starting in June 2011 at €750 a week. There were repeated renewals of the contract and Ms Bajgart won tender competitions in 2017 and 2019, with the rate for the job rising to €980 a week over that period, the tribunal noted. However, Ms Bajgart did not apply when the work was put out to tender again in September 2023, and ultimately ceased working on the Fair City set on 15 December 2023, when the tender process was readvertised, the adjudicator noted. Ms Bajgart gave evidence that she was interviewed for the job in 2011 and "got the contract", with "no discussion about the legal implications". She explained that she set the rate for the job based on her previous work for another production, Off the Rails. Addressing a gap in her contracts between 14 October 2018 and 21 January 2019, Ms Bajgart said she "simply continued to work" and got paid. Her barrister, Michael O'Doherty BL, who appeared instructed by Conor McCrave of Setanta Solicitors, asked if she had "consented to doing the job as an independent contractor. Ms Bajgart replied: "I wanted the job," and added that it was "never offered" to her as a position of employment. Under cross-examination from RTÉ's solicitor, Louise O'Byrne of Arthur Cox, asked Ms Bajgart whether she had done other work while engaged for Fair City. Ms Bajgart said she ran her freelance business around the Fair City shot list and that it was difficult to look for clients because she never knew when she was due on set. Ms O'Byrne also referred to a letter sent by the complainant to the Irish Times and the Irish Independent in September 2023 following remarks by Fine Gael senator Micheál Carrigy about Ms Bajgart's, in which the complainant had stated: "The photographer on RTÉ's Fair City is an independent contractor." Ms O'Byrne argued this showed the claimant "did not consider herself as an employee" of RTÉ. Mr O'Doherty said she had described herself as an independent contractor "because she did not want to upset her employer and potentially lose her job by publicly describing herself as an employee". Adjudication officer Catherine Byrne wrote that the "day-to-day reality" of Ms Bajgart's working relationship with RTÉ was "not consistent with how she was described in her contract as 'a supplier' and 'not an employee'". Ms Byrne noted that Ms Bajgart had been working 20 hours a week, part-time, for 12 years on "a series of fixed-term contracts" in a role which "contributes to the promotion and success" of Fair City. The worker had had a desk on set, "no discretion" about her level of attendance there, and could only work elsewhere three or four hours a week, and performed the work personally 95% of the time, Ms Byrne said. There were limits to Ms Bajgart's "artistic independence" and her freedom to alter her way of working in a bid to increase her earnings, with a fixed weekly rate being paid, Ms Byrne added. Ms Byrne also noted that during a period between October 2018 and January 2019, when there was no contract in place, Ms Bajgart "continued to turn up for work" and got her normal weekly rate "without any dispute". "This continuity of employment, in the absence of a contract, is indicative of a relationship of interdependence and trust, and not that of a commercial agreement," Ms Byrne wrote. "The authors of the agreements… may have genuinely believed that the working relationship with [Ms Bajgart] was that of an independent contractor, at least in the early years," she wrote. "However, it seems to me that the sustained nature of her job and the sole reliance by the respondent on the complainant to do the work, means that the legal basis of the agreement evolved from a supplier's agreement to that of an employee," she added. Ms Byrne wrote that her investigation of Ms Bajgart's status was clouded by the fact the photographer appeared to have "acquiesced" to being classified as self-employed for years - and even described herself as an independent contractor in open letters to two newspapers in 2023. "This acquiescence has no bearing on my conclusion that her relationship with the respondent was that of an employee," the adjudicator wrote.
Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Landmark ruling against RTÉ as WRC tribunal finds Fair City photographer was not a freelancer
RTÉ has failed to have employment rights claims by the former on-set photographer for Fair City thrown out, after the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruled, for the first time, that a supposed freelancer at the national broadcaster was actually an employee. The statutory complaints were brought by photographer, Beta Bajgart, who was previously the subject of commentary at the Public Accounts Committee when it emerged the national broadcaster was paying €60,000 per year for promotional images of the Dublin-based soap opera.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Data breach ‘distress' case does not need personal injuries board approval, Supreme Court rules
A man who claims he suffered from distress, upset and anxiety arising from a financial services company's disclosure of his personal data to a third party may bring a case for damages without Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB) approval, the Supreme Court has ruled. The court's ruling clarifies that claims for damages for 'emotional disturbances' which fall short of a recognised psychiatric disorder are not 'personal injury' claims, as defined by the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003. Before his appeal to the Supreme Court, Patrick Dillon's case seeking damages against Irish Life Assurance plc arising from a data breach was dismissed by the Circuit Court and High Court. The breach complained of occurred when Irish Life erroneously shared letters containing Mr Dillion's personal and financial data with a third party. Both the Circuit Court and High Court ruled Mr Dillon's case sought damages for 'personal injury', and in circumstances where Mr Dillion did not obtain PIAB authorisation before bringing the proceedings, the case should be dismissed as being frivolous, vexatious or bound to fail. READ MORE Under the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003, a party proposing to bring a case seeking damages for 'personal injury' must obtain authorisation from the PIAB. Mr Dillon's appeal to the Supreme Court was rooted in the question of whether a claim for damages for distress, upset and anxiety falls under the definition of 'personal injury' in the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003. The Act defines personal injury as including 'any disease and any impairment of a person's physical or mental condition'. In a judgment on Thursday, Mr Justice Brian Murray, on behalf of a five-judge Supreme Court panel, ruled that claims for damages for 'emotional disturbances' like distress, upset, anxiety and inconvenience which fall short of a recognised psychiatric disorder – like Mr Dillon's – is not a personal injury claim, as defined by the Act. As such, the judge found the Circuit Court and High Court were wrong to dismiss Mr Dillon's case on the basis that he had not obtained PIAB authorisation. [ Woman who left scene after knocking down pedestrian who then died avoids jail Opens in new window ] The judge noted that Mr Dillon's case is for non-material damage under the Data Protection Act 2018. This Act allows for judicial remedy, including compensation, for infringement of a data subject's rights. Mr Justice Murray noted that those who bring claims solely for mental distress, anxiety and upset – which do not require PIAB authorisation – 'cannot expect anything other than very, very modest awards'. The judge said it would be possible for a plaintiff to bring a case alleging a breach of their rights under the Data Protection Act 2018 that gives rise to a medically recognised psychiatric injury. In those circumstances, PIAB authorisation would be required to bring the case.
