Putin Minister Found Dead After Ukraine Failures
Starovoyt was found dead at his home on Monday, July 7, with a firearm nearby, RIA Novosti reported.
He was the governor of Russia's Kursk region until May 2024, when he was appointed to the transportation role by Putin.
But Ukraine's incursion into Kursk fueled scrutiny of Starovoyt's job preparing the border defenses, and his deputy is implicated in a corruption scandal related to border fortifications, The Moscow Times reported.
The Kremlin's announcement gave no reason for Starovoyt's dismissal. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov refused to comment on it.
Over the weekend, hundreds of flights were canceled or delayed at Moscow's Sheremetyevo and St. Petersburg's Pulkovo airports, and thousands of travelers faced long waits.
Other airports in western and central Russia also faced disruptions because of Ukrainian drone attacks.
This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
This article includes reporting by The Associated Press.
Related Articles
Russia Appears To Be Hiding Its Death FiguresLavrov Lists Russia Demands for Ukraine PeaceCaptive Audience: How Putin Shapes Russian OpinionsDonald Trump Threatens Russia Tariffs as Relationship With Putin Worsens
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Who is running for Governor of Pennsylvania?
(WHTM) – Pennsylvania voters will make their voices heard in 2026 for who they want to be the next Governor of Pennsylvania. Republican and Democratic Party candidates will be selected during the spring primary to run in the November general election. Here's who is running for Governor of Pennsylvania. John Ventre is once again a declared candidate for governor in 2026. Ventre previously ran for governor in 2022, but did not receive enough signatures to appear on the primary ballot. Ventre has also run multiple times for Westmoreland County Commissioner, recently finishing third in the 2023 Republican primary and appearing as a write-in vote for seven positions. Twice-elected State Treasurer Stacy Garrity (R) announced on July 9 that she will make a decision on whether to run for governor 'very soon.' A native of Athens, Bradford County, Garrity served in the U.S. Army Reserves as a Colonel and is the former Vice President of Global Tungsten and Powders Corp. in Bradford County. Garrity ran for Treasurer in 2020 and narrowly defeated incumbent Treasurer Joe Torsella (D) by less than 1%. Her victory came the same year Josh Shapiro (D) won the Attorney General's race by more than four points. In her first term as Treasurer, Garrity prioritized the Treasury's unclaimed property system, ensuring residents receive their money, military awards, or personal effects that reside in the state vault. She also supported the Money Match Program, which allowed the state's unclaimed property system to automatically return unclaimed money, up to $500, to residents. The Treasury says millions of dollars have been returned to residents in the program's first year. Garrity also banned TikTok on Treasury devices in 2022, saying, 'TikTok presents a clear danger due to its collection of personal data and its close connection to the communist Chinese government.' Garrity has also said Pennsylvania should be a leader in energy production and has called for fiscal responsibility in state spending. Last November, Garrity broke Shapiro's record for the most votes received by a state official in Pennsylvania in her re-election campaign. She called for unity in Harrisburg, saying after her swearing in, 'We must put aside disagreements and find common ground.' Following her re-election, Garrity's Treasury Department announced new investments in Israeli bonds. Garrity had previously moved to divest millions of dollars in Russian assets after the 2022 invastion of Ukraine. Garrity faced controversy after speaking at a January 5, 2021, rally in Harrisburg, telling the crowd to 'question the integrity' of the presidential election. The day after, the U.S. Capitol was attacked by many who questioned the election results. Garrity later condemned the violence at the Capitol following the attack. State Senator Doug Mastriano has publicly expressed that he is considering another run for Governor in 2026. Mastriano has served in the State Senate since 2019 representing Adams and Franklin counties. A retired Army colonel, Mastriano told abc27 in February that he believes he could win another primary after clinching the party's gubernatorial nomination in 2022 with nearly 44% support in a nine person primary. He went on to lose the general election to Josh Shapiro by nearly 800,000 votes, with Shapiro receiving more than 56% of the vote. Mastriano drew criticism throughout his gubernatorial campaign for efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election and his presence in Washington, D.C., on January 6, though Mastriano says he did not participate in the Capitol riot. Questions were also raised after a photo of Mastriano wearing a Confederate uniform in 2014 at an Army War College faculty event surfaced. The recipient of a Ph.D. in History and the author of multiple books, Mastriano also faced academic pushback on the legitimacy of his research. In the 2025 State Senate Session, Mastriano has introduced or co-sponsored legislation including the 'Save Women's Sports Act,' a vaccine exemption for members of the Pennsylvania National Guard, and the establishment of a 'Green Alert System' to notify the public of a missing veteran. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro will seek a second term in a race that will garner national attention. The first-term governor quickly rose through the ranks of Pennsylvania politics to become one of the faces of the Democratic Party. Over the past 20 years, Shapiro has served seven years in the State House of Representatives, five years as a Montgomery County Commissioner, six years as Attorney General, and is now in his first term as governor. As governor Shapiro has touted the passage of bipartisan legislation, including repealing Pennsylvania's Sunday hunting ban, expanding access to mammograms, universal free breakfast in schools, expanding ready-to-drink cocktail access, and reforming the state's unclaimed property system. In 2024, Shapiro was a finalist to run as Kamala Harris's vice presidential nominee after being a publicly ardent supporter of President Joe Biden prior to him dropping out of the race. Shapiro later acknowledged he expressed concern to Biden about his electability. In April 2025, Shapiro and his family were targeted in an arson attack on the Governor's Residence in Harrisburg while they were sleeping. The attack came hours after the Shapiro family celebrated the first night of Passover. The suspected arsonist made references to Palestine amid Shapiro's support for Israel and rejection of antisemitism. While the focus is on the 2026 gubernatorial race, Shapiro has been tapped by many as a potential candidate for president in 2028. A June 2025 Emerson College Polling survey found Shapiro to be one of the early leading candidates in the Democratic primary. Shapiro has pushed back on reports of his potential presidential ambitions, saying he is focused on being governor despite expanding his national presence. Congressman Dan Meuser announced in July 2025 that he would not run for governor despite earning an endorsement from President Donald Trump. Meuser, who represents Pennsylvania's 9th Congressional District, previously expressed interest 'My focus needs to remain on doing my job, serving my constituents and executing the plans to strengthen our country,' Meuser said in a statement on July 8. 'I am confident we will have an outstanding gubernatorial candidate,' Meuser added. 'We will defeat Governor Shapiro, and make Pennsylvania a leader among states and the best place to live.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
American Military News
21 minutes ago
- American Military News
Beijing's Growing Boldness: China's Stance On Ukraine Sparks EU Alarm
This article was originally published by Radio Free Asia and is reprinted with permission. Publicly, Beijing has presented itself as a neutral party in the war sparked by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, claiming it respects the territorial integrity of Ukraine while also highlighting the need to address Russia's security concerns. But behind the scenes, that may be changing. According to EU officials speaking to RFE/RL on condition of anonymity, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas last week that Beijing couldn't accept Russia's defeat in the war as it would free up Washington to focus on China. The remarkable admission, first reported by the South China Morning Post, came during a four-hour long discussion with Kallas in Brussels that covered an array of topics from trade practices such as state subsidies for electric vehicles, Taiwan, the situation in the Middle East and, of course, the war in Ukraine. It was during those talks that Brussels accused China of siding with Moscow and noting that the invasion of a sovereign country was against international law. Beijing allegedly voiced objections to the EU's allegations that Russia is using Chinese products and other components in its war effort before adding its fear of both potential western sanctions against Chinese financial institutions and an eventual Ukrainian victory in the conflict. Signs of Brussels' displeasure with China over the war have been piling up. In May, a classified EU report said China, including Hong Kong, is responsible for 'approximately' 80 percent of the circumventions of sanctions against Russia. The 27-member bloc has also begun targeting Chinese companies it believes are responsible for the 'undermining of Ukrainian territorial integrity and sovereignty.' In its latest sanctions package, the bloc is looking to slap asset freezes and visa bans on one Chinese businessman for repeatedly transferring goods made in the EU to Russia while those goods were subject to EU export restrictions. Two Chinese companies are also targeted for selling all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), infrared detectors, and other optical components to the Russian armed forces for use in Ukraine. Another sign of the growing concern in Brussels came from NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who recently said China and Russia present growing threats to the transatlantic alliance. Rutte told reporters during a trip to Berlin that he believes Russia and China would coordinate attacks on Taiwan and Europe to keep the West bogged down in various parts of the world at the same time. 'Xi Jinping, the president of China, before he would attack Taiwan, he will first make a call into Moscow to ask [Russian President Vladimir] Putin to keep us busy in this part of Europe,' Rutte said. China and Russia struck a so-called 'no limits strategic partnership' shortly before the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The partnership does not include a formal military alliance or a specific commitment to mutual defense, but it does involve extensive military cooperation and strategic alignment that enhances both countries' security interests. Still, Beijing publicly has been keen to distance itself from Russia's actions. Speaking after Wang's European trip, a Foreign Ministry spokesperson reiterated that 'China's position on the Ukraine crisis is objective and consistent, that is, negotiation, ceasefire and peace. A prolonged Ukraine crisis serves no one's interests.' Analysts, though, are focused on other recently spoken words by officials from Beijing. Speaking to Current Time, Russian political scientist Natalia Shevshkova noted comments from Wang after his recent European tour were a sign that Beijing has 'grown bolder' in its rhetoric to where 'it's no longer Eastern diplomacy, but rather outright, almost rude behavior.' 'China understands that if Putin is now allowed to recognize — if he's allowed to keep Crimea, if the Western community is ready to negotiate and leave some territories with Putin, then China's hands are untied too,' Shevshkova said.
The Hill
32 minutes ago
- The Hill
The spectacle presidency: How Trump governs through distraction
'President Donald Trump says there's a TikTok buyer that he'll reveal in 'about two weeks,'' read a June 29 CNN headline. The phrase 'about two weeks' has become a hallmark of Trump's communication style — an ever-moving deadline that signals action is imminent but never quite arrives. Roughly two weeks before that TikTok claim, Trump had told reporters it would be 'about two weeks' before he decided how to respond to Iran. In that case, he acted within three days. And nearly two months earlier, asked how he would respond to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump again answered, 'I'll let you know in about two weeks.' As New York Times reporter Shawn McCreesh noted before the U.S. bombing of Iran, Trump's 'two weeks' refrain has applied to everything from tax plans and healthcare to conspiracy theories and infrastructure. NPR noted that this is not a new strategy, as Trump often espoused on the two-week refrain in his first term. But this isn't just some verbal tick — it's a calculated tactic. Two weeks is a time frame that feels just around the corner but is distant enough to delay scrutiny. It generates anticipation, keeps the press guessing and monopolizes public attention. In essence, it's distraction disguised as transparency. In Trump's second term, this politics of distraction has proved remarkably effective. Despite growing evidence of policy failures and corruption, Trump has maintained his popularity by dominating headlines and reshaping narratives faster than facts can catch up. Scholar Tim Wu has explained how capitalism has increasingly come to depend on attention, monetized through advertising, misinformation and influencer content. Attention is a commodity, and Trump has mastered how to corner the market. As Mickey Huff and I argued in 'United States of Distraction,' Trump's rise is rooted in a media ecosystem shaped by the attention economy, where spectacle — not truth — wins the day. Too much of the legacy media is now fully embedded in the attention economy, following the president's every spectacle — not because it's newsworthy, but because it's engaging. And that engagement drives traffic, ratings and revenue. This creates a symbiotic loop: Trump thrives on spectacle, and the media reward it. Meanwhile, real issues — for example, Trump's misuse of government contracts in his first term or his current promotion of dubious cryptocurrency schemes — receive minimal sustained coverage. Trump is exploiting the attention economy with a politics of distraction, enriching himself while convincing supporters he's delivering on the policies they care about. Trump has long viewed governance through the lens of television, where drama and visuals take precedence over substance. During a heated exchange with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump even admitted he kept the press in the room because it made for 'great television.' His strategy follows a predictable cycle: achieve a goal, often under false pretenses, and then, just as the public begins to scrutinize it, pivot to a new, emotionally charged issue. Take April 2, dubbed 'Liberation Day' by the Trump administration. That day, Trump announced tariffs, based on formulas that may have been generated by artificial intelligence. Markets quickly tanked. For the first time in years, Trump's poll numbers on the economy dipped. In response, his team released conflicting information about a '90-day pause' on the tariffs — a claim that was later denied — further muddying the waters. As confusion mounted, Trump shifted attention to immigration and protests — two topics his administration has reliably weaponized. He deployed the National Guard to cities like Los Angeles, falsely citing 'paid protesters' opposing mass deportations. Though local officials, including the governor, mayor and police chief, insisted the protests were peaceful and did not require military intervention, Trump proceeded anyway. The resulting spectacle backfired when images of a Marine detaining a U.S. citizen — an unprecedented move — unsettled many Republican lawmakers and military veterans, who saw it as a disturbing display of authoritarianism. So, Trump pivoted again — this time, to Iran. Following an Israeli bombing of Iranian targets, Trump authorized U.S. airstrikes; the decision redirected the news cycle. Unlike in the past, though, Trump did not wait for public opinion to shift based on false claims; he bombed first. Some supporters, like podcaster Dave Smith, turned against Trump, calling for his impeachment in the wake of the bombing. Similarly, Tucker Carlson publicly rebuked the move and embarrassed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) in an interview that revealed the Texas Republican's ignorance about the country he supported bombing. Meanwhile, the administration claimed it had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program — another distortion quickly challenged by press leaks. As doubts swirled about the efficacy of the strikes, Trump pivoted once more, this time to a domestic priority: his 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' This sweeping economic bill, which includes unpopular cuts to Medicaid, has become the centerpiece of his rhetoric in recent weeks. The president went all-in on signing it by 'July 4' — another arbitrary deadline designed to generate suspense. Meanwhile, in an effort to maintain support for the bill, Trump falsely claimed that it did not cut entitlements or dramatically increase the deficit, even as independent analyses show otherwise. What will Trump use to distract the public next? And perhaps more critically, will the media keep chasing the spectacle? Nolan Higdon is a political analyst, author and host of 'The Disinfo Detox Podcast.' A lecturer at Merrill College and the University of California, Santa Cruz, Higdon is a founding member of the Critical Media Literacy Conference of the Americas and is a Project Censored national judge. His latest book is 'Surveillance Education: Navigating the conspicuous absence of privacy in schools .'
