logo
Battle of the Bots: Google Gemini vs ChatGPT in 2025

Battle of the Bots: Google Gemini vs ChatGPT in 2025

The artificial intelligence landscape has transformed dramatically over the past few years, and 2025 marks a pivotal moment in this evolution. Two titans stand at the forefront of this revolution: Google's Gemini and OpenAI's ChatGPT. These AI powerhouses have been locked in an intense competition that's reshaping how we interact with technology, work, and even think about problem-solving.
But here's the million-dollar question: which one deserves your attention and investment? As we navigate through 2025, the choice between these AI giants isn't just about picking a chatbot—it's about selecting a digital companion that could fundamentally change how you approach daily tasks, creative projects, and professional challenges.
Think of it like choosing between two incredibly skilled assistants. One comes with Google's vast knowledge base and seamless integration across all your favorite Google services. The other brings OpenAI's pioneering approach to conversational AI and creative problem-solving. Both are exceptional, but they each have their own personality and strengths.
Google Gemini emerged as Google's most ambitious AI project, designed to compete directly with ChatGPT while leveraging Google's decades of search expertise and data processing capabilities. Unlike many AI models that felt like add-ons to existing services, Gemini was built from the ground up to be a comprehensive AI assistant.
Gemini's secret sauce lies in its deep integration with Google's ecosystem. Imagine having an AI that doesn't just answer your questions but can also pull information from your Gmail, schedule meetings in your Google Calendar, and even help you find that document you saved in Google Drive last month. This isn't just convenience—it's a complete reimagining of how AI can work within your existing digital life.
The model was trained on an enormous dataset that includes not just text but also images, code, and audio. This multimodal approach means Gemini can understand and respond to different types of input in ways that feel more natural and intuitive than traditional text-only AI models.
Google has packed Gemini with features that showcase its commitment to practical, everyday AI assistance. The model excels at understanding context across multiple conversations and can maintain coherent discussions about complex topics over extended periods.
One of Gemini's standout features is its ability to process different types of media simultaneously. You can upload an image, ask questions about it, and receive detailed explanations or analysis. This capability extends to understanding charts, diagrams, and even handwritten notes, making it incredibly versatile for students, professionals, and creative individuals.
The AI can also generate images, edit photos, and even create simple videos based on text descriptions. This multimodal approach means you're not just getting a text-based assistant—you're getting a comprehensive creative partner.
Perhaps Gemini's biggest advantage is how seamlessly it works with Google's suite of applications. Whether you're using Gmail, Google Docs, Google Sheets, or YouTube, Gemini can enhance your experience by providing intelligent suggestions, automating routine tasks, and helping you find information more efficiently.
For instance, if you're working on a presentation in Google Slides, Gemini can suggest relevant images, help you refine your content, and even assist with speaker notes. This level of integration makes it feel less like you're using an AI tool and more like your existing Google services have suddenly become much smarter.
ChatGPT didn't just enter the AI conversation—it started it. OpenAI's flagship model has undergone significant improvements since its initial release, and by 2025, it represents the culmination of years of refinement and innovation in conversational AI.
OpenAI's approach to AI development has always been methodical and research-focused. They didn't rush to market with a half-baked product. Instead, they spent years perfecting their language models, gathering feedback, and iterating based on real-world usage. This patience has paid off, as ChatGPT has become synonymous with AI assistance for millions of users worldwide.
The company's commitment to safety and responsible AI development has also set them apart. They've implemented robust safeguards to prevent misuse while maintaining the model's usefulness and creativity. This balanced approach has helped build trust among users who might otherwise be skeptical of AI technology.
ChatGPT in 2025 is a far cry from its earlier versions. The model has been fine-tuned to handle a vast array of tasks, from writing and editing to coding and mathematical problem-solving. What makes ChatGPT particularly impressive is its ability to understand nuance and context in ways that feel genuinely conversational.
ChatGPT's language processing capabilities are truly remarkable. The model can understand implied meanings, pick up on subtle cues, and respond in ways that feel natural and human-like. Whether you're discussing complex philosophical concepts or asking for help with a simple task, ChatGPT adapts its communication style to match your needs and preferences.
The AI also excels at maintaining context across long conversations. You can reference something you mentioned earlier, and ChatGPT will remember and build upon that information. This contextual awareness makes interactions feel more like conversations with a knowledgeable friend rather than exchanges with a computer program.
One area where ChatGPT truly shines is in creative and analytical tasks. The model can write compelling stories, compose poetry, generate marketing copy, and even help with complex data analysis. Its ability to approach problems from multiple angles and provide creative solutions has made it invaluable for professionals across various industries.
The AI's coding capabilities are particularly noteworthy. ChatGPT can write, debug, and explain code in multiple programming languages, making it an excellent companion for developers and students learning to code. It can also translate between programming languages and help optimize existing code for better performance.
When it comes to choosing between Gemini and ChatGPT, performance is often the deciding factor. Both models have their strengths, but they excel in different areas depending on the specific task at hand.
In terms of raw speed, both Gemini and ChatGPT deliver impressively fast responses. However, there are subtle differences in how they handle different types of queries. Gemini tends to be slightly faster when processing multimodal inputs, likely due to its architecture being optimized for handling multiple types of data simultaneously.
ChatGPT, on the other hand, often provides more detailed responses, which can sometimes result in longer processing times. However, this extra time usually translates to more comprehensive and nuanced answers. It's like the difference between a quick summary and a thorough analysis—both have their place depending on what you need.
Both models have made significant strides in accuracy and reliability, but they approach factual information differently. Gemini benefits from Google's vast knowledge base and search capabilities, which can provide more up-to-date information on current events and rapidly changing topics.
When it comes to factual accuracy, Gemini has a slight edge due to its connection to Google's search infrastructure. This means it can access more recent information and provide citations for its claims. However, ChatGPT has implemented robust fact-checking mechanisms and is generally very reliable for established knowledge and concepts.
Both models occasionally make mistakes, but they've both improved significantly in acknowledging uncertainty and providing caveats when they're not completely confident in their responses. This transparency helps users make informed decisions about how to use the information provided.
For creative tasks, ChatGPT often takes the lead with its ability to generate original, engaging content. The model excels at creative writing, brainstorming, and thinking outside the box. Gemini is no slouch in this department either, but ChatGPT's training and optimization seem particularly well-suited for creative endeavors.
However, Gemini's multimodal capabilities give it an advantage when creative tasks involve visual elements. If you need an AI that can both generate ideas and create accompanying images or visual content, Gemini might be the better choice.
The user experience can make or break an AI assistant, regardless of how powerful the underlying technology might be. Both Gemini and ChatGPT have invested heavily in creating intuitive, user-friendly interfaces that make AI accessible to everyone, not just tech enthusiasts.
ChatGPT's interface is clean, simple, and focused primarily on text-based conversations. This simplicity is both a strength and a limitation. It makes the platform incredibly easy to use for newcomers, but it might feel limiting for users who want more advanced features or customization options.
Gemini's interface is more complex, reflecting its broader range of capabilities. While this might seem overwhelming at first, the additional features and options can be incredibly valuable once you become familiar with them. Google has done an excellent job of organizing these features in a way that doesn't feel cluttered or confusing.
Both platforms offer excellent mobile and desktop experiences, but they each have their own approach. ChatGPT's mobile app provides a streamlined experience that's perfect for quick questions and conversations on the go. The desktop version offers the same functionality with a larger screen for more comfortable extended use.
Gemini's integration across Google's ecosystem means it can appear in various contexts where you're already working. This contextual availability can be incredibly convenient, as you don't always need to switch to a dedicated AI interface to get assistance.
Cost is often a crucial factor when choosing between AI platforms, especially for businesses and individual users who plan to use these tools regularly. Both Gemini and ChatGPT offer different pricing tiers designed to accommodate various needs and budgets.
Both platforms offer generous free tiers that provide access to core functionality. ChatGPT's free version gives you access to the base model with some limitations on usage and features. The premium version removes these limitations and provides access to more advanced capabilities and faster response times.
Gemini's free tier is also quite robust, especially considering its integration with other Google services. The premium versions offer additional features like priority access, advanced multimodal capabilities, and increased usage limits. For users already invested in the Google ecosystem, Gemini's premium features might provide better value.
For businesses and organizations, both platforms offer enterprise-grade solutions with additional security, compliance, and management features. These enterprise versions typically include dedicated support, custom integrations, and enhanced data protection measures.
The choice between enterprise offerings often comes down to existing infrastructure and specific business needs. Companies already using Google Workspace might find Gemini's enterprise solution more appealing, while organizations looking for a standalone AI solution might prefer ChatGPT's enterprise offering.
Understanding how these AI assistants perform in real-world scenarios can help you make a more informed decision about which one suits your specific needs and workflow.
In professional settings, both Gemini and ChatGPT have proven invaluable for various tasks. ChatGPT excels at content creation, copywriting, and strategic planning. Many marketing professionals use it to generate ideas, create content calendars, and even write entire campaigns.
Gemini's strength in professional environments lies in its ability to work seamlessly with existing Google Workspace tools. If your team already uses Gmail, Google Docs, and Google Sheets, Gemini can enhance productivity by automating routine tasks and providing intelligent suggestions within these familiar interfaces.
Both AI assistants have revolutionized how students and educators approach learning and teaching. ChatGPT is particularly effective at explaining complex concepts in simple terms and providing step-by-step guidance for problem-solving. Its ability to adapt its communication style makes it an excellent tutor for learners of all levels.
For content creators and marketers, the choice between Gemini and ChatGPT often depends on the type of content being created. ChatGPT excels at long-form writing, storytelling, and persuasive copy. Its understanding of narrative structure and emotional appeal makes it invaluable for creating engaging content.
Gemini's multimodal capabilities make it ideal for content creators who need to work with both text and visual elements. The ability to generate, edit, and analyze images alongside text content can streamline the creative process significantly.
Researchers and developers have found both platforms useful for different aspects of their work. ChatGPT's analytical capabilities and coding assistance make it valuable for technical research and software development. Its ability to process and synthesize information from multiple sources can accelerate literature reviews and hypothesis generation.
Gemini's access to current information through Google's search capabilities makes it particularly useful for research that requires up-to-date data. The ability to quickly fact-check information and find relevant sources can be invaluable for academic and professional research.
Looking ahead, both Google and OpenAI have ambitious plans for their respective AI platforms. Understanding these future developments can help you make a decision that will serve you well in the long term.
OpenAI continues to focus on improving ChatGPT's reasoning capabilities and expanding its integration with third-party services. The company has hinted at plans for more specialized versions of ChatGPT designed for specific industries and use cases. They're also working on improving the model's ability to learn from individual users' preferences and adapt its responses accordingly.
Google's roadmap for Gemini emphasizes deeper integration with its existing services and the development of more sophisticated multimodal capabilities. The company is also exploring ways to make Gemini more proactive, anticipating users' needs and providing assistance before being asked.
Both companies are investing heavily in safety and ethical AI development, ensuring that their platforms remain beneficial and trustworthy as they become more powerful and widespread.
The choice between Google Gemini and ChatGPT ultimately depends on your specific needs, existing workflows, and personal preferences. If you're deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem and value seamless integration with your existing tools, Gemini might be the better choice. Its multimodal capabilities and access to current information through Google's search can be incredibly valuable for many users.
On the other hand, if you prioritize conversational quality, creative capabilities, and don't mind using a standalone AI tool, ChatGPT might be more suitable. Its superior language understanding and creative prowess make it excellent for writing, brainstorming, and complex problem-solving tasks.
For many users, the best approach might be to try both platforms and see which one feels more natural and useful for their specific use cases. Both offer generous free tiers that allow you to explore their capabilities without any financial commitment.
Consider your primary use cases: Are you looking for help with creative writing and brainstorming? ChatGPT might be your best bet. Do you need an AI that can work seamlessly with your existing Google tools and handle multiple types of media? Gemini could be the perfect fit.
The battle between Google Gemini and ChatGPT in 2025 isn't really about declaring a single winner—it's about recognizing that both platforms represent remarkable achievements in AI technology, each with its own strengths and ideal use cases. ChatGPT continues to lead in conversational quality and creative tasks, while Gemini excels in multimodal processing and ecosystem integration.
As we move forward, the competition between these platforms will likely drive continued innovation and improvement, benefiting all users regardless of which platform they choose. The future of AI assistance is bright, and both Gemini and ChatGPT are helping to shape a world where intelligent digital companions make our work more efficient, our creativity more boundless, and our daily tasks more manageable.
Whether you choose Gemini, ChatGPT, or decide to use both for different purposes, you're participating in one of the most exciting technological revolutions of our time. The key is to experiment, explore, and find the AI assistant that best complements your unique needs and working style.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mattel's AI deal raises fears of ‘real damage' to kids
Mattel's AI deal raises fears of ‘real damage' to kids

Miami Herald

time24 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Mattel's AI deal raises fears of ‘real damage' to kids

I don't allow my children to play video games. They don't have smartwatches, iPads, or smartphones. And yet, nearly every child in my son's class has either a phone or a smartwatch. Is it hard to say no and explain that he can't have something every other kid has? Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Honestly, no - only because we believe that's the right thing to do. I am not trying to be too strict or rigid. I support providing them with basic knowledge of technology, but there should be balance. Related: TSA bans these common children's toys from airplanes They should be able to play - really play - outside in the mud, or inside with simple non-electric toys. It's then they actually use their mind, start to be creative, and feel the excitement of creating or discovering something new. "Playing is essential for human brain development, much more than cognitive functioning. Much more important than learning facts. It's play that helps the brain develop. We know that this is a scientific fact," explains Gabor Mate, a Canadian physician and an expert on trauma, addiction, stress, and childhood development. Today it seems harder than ever to foster kids' healthy development, as we are surrounded by technology. And toy producers keep pushing upgrades that seem not only unnecessary, but sometimes even scary. Barbie maker Mattel (MAT) has been making toys for 80 years, during which it has become one of the leading global toy manufacturers, and the creator of franchises cherished by kids and families around the world. On June 12, the toy giant unveiled a strategic partnership with OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT. The idea behind the collaboration is to "bring the magic of AI to age-appropriate play experiences, with an emphasis on innovation, privacy, and safety," reads the press release. Related: Iconic toy store chain closing stores once again This begs the question - is there such a thing as safe interaction between a child and a chatbot? I sincerely doubt it. "Each of our products and experiences is designed to inspire fans, entertain audiences, and enrich lives through play," Mattel Chief Franchise Officer Josh Silverman said. "AI has the power to expand on that mission and broaden the reach of our brands in new and exciting ways. Our work with OpenAI will enable us to leverage new technologies to solidify our leadership in innovation and reimagine new forms of play." Entertain, inspire, excite, bring new forms of play? Do children really need new forms of play? More Retail: Huge retail chain suddenly closing hundreds of storesMajor retailer scores huge benefit from Joann bankruptcyHome Depot, Target, Ulta and more strike back at retail crime From my experience, you can just give children a little bit of sand, water, small branches, and some rocks. It would make them more than happy, playing for hours. More importantly, it would force them to be creative and develop their own exciting games. I am not alone in my concerns about the idea of ChatGPT-powered toys. Child welfare experts and advocacy groups such as Public Citizen are starting to warn about the potential dangers of this collaboration, writes The Independent. "Children do not have the cognitive capacity to distinguish fully between reality and play," Public Citizen Co-president Robert Weissman stated. Weissman noted that risks include "real damage" to children, undermining social development and impacting the their ability to form peer relationships. Even adults have been known to have dangerous "relationships" with AI chatbots. Why? Aarhus University Psychiatry Professor Søren Dinesen Østergaard explains that "the correspondence with AI chatbots such as Chat is so realistic that one easily gets the impression that there is a real person at the other end." Now imagine the still-developing child's brain in that position. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently said his company focuses on safety measures to protect vulnerable users. Related: Wendy's adds old-school toys to take on McDonald's Happy Meal Another important question for parents and caregivers: Is it worth it? Are there any actual benefits of ChatGPT-powered toys for children, or just potential risks? What's more, if simple iPads and smartphones are known to threaten children's development, what about a more powerful toy? Remember, playing is an important part of growing up and helps your child explore the world. While Mate did not comment on Mattel or its OpenAI collaboration, he talked about the general dangers of children's dependence on technology. "We've deprived our children of play. This [showing smartphone] is not play," Mate said. "These kids with their iPads at one year old have been robbed of their capacity to play. And the companies design these gadgets to make these kids addicted." Mate concludes with the words of his friend, an endocrinologist, saying, "What we have here is hacking of the American mind." There are still no details on exactly how OpenAI's technology will be integrated into Mattel's new toys, but hopefully, it ends up being one of those experiments that gets scrapped before it even starts. Related: Classic toy store chain files Chapter 11 bankruptcy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

The New Corporate Memo: Let AI Ease The Pain
The New Corporate Memo: Let AI Ease The Pain

Gizmodo

time40 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

The New Corporate Memo: Let AI Ease The Pain

A troubling new trend is crystallizing in the tech industry. A company at the forefront of AI development lays off thousands of its human employees, then encourages them to seek comfort from the very technology supplanting them. It's the automation of suffering, and it's happening now. This week, Matt Turnbull, an Executive Producer at Xbox Game Studios Publishing, became a case study. Following Microsoft's decision to cut thousands jobs from its gaming division, Turnbull took to LinkedIn. With what seems like good intentions, he encouraged former employees to turn to AI tools like ChatGPT and Copilot to manage the emotional and logistical fallout. 'These are really challenging times, and if you're navigating a layoff or even quietly preparing for one, you're not alone and you don't have to go it alone,' his post began. 'I know these types of tools engender strong feelings in people, but I'd be remiss in not trying to offer the best advice I can under the circumstances.' He continued: 'I've been experimenting with ways to use LLM AI tools (like ChatGPT or Copilot) to help reduce the emotional and cognitive load that comes with job loss.' AI Is Not in the Memo, but It Haunts Every Layoff at Xbox The message landed with a surreal thud. Microsoft, which just ended your employment, was now outsourcing your emotional support to a bot. The July layoffs hit Xbox Game Studios. Alongside the job cuts, Microsoft announced that ambitious titles like Perfect Dark and Everwild are being canceled, and at least one studio, The Initiative, one of Microsoft's newer, high-profile studios, is being closed entirely. In his now deleted post captured by Aftermath, Turnbull even offered prompt templates to help the newly unemployed start their conversations with the AI. These folks are absolute sociopaths. — Julien Eveillé – THRESHOLD 30% OFF (@PATALOON) July 4, 2025 He categorized the prompts like a self help guide for the digital age: Career Planning Resume & LinkedIn Help Networking & Outreach Emotional Clarity & Confidence The message is clear: AI is your new therapist and outplacement service, rolled into one. Where a hefty severance package from a large corporation once included connections to human career coaches, AI now appears to be the cheaper, more scalable solution. While the prompts themselves may be useful, the gesture feels hollow coming from a leader at the company responsible for the layoffs. This is a stark redefinition of corporate care: outsourced, AI assisted, and quietly depersonalized. It's a chilling reframing of the social contract, where even empathy is routed through software. This is the tech world's cynical feedback loop. The same industry obsessed with automating jobs is now positioning its products as the cure for the emotional damage it inflicts. Microsoft, which has invested over $13 billion into OpenAI, has a direct financial stake in this solution. When an executive at a Microsoft owned studio promotes ChatGPT or its own Copilot as the first resource for the unemployed, it blurs the line between genuine concern and brand alignment. Empathy becomes a use case. Trauma becomes another customer journey. Traditionally, outplacement services offered a human touch. As LLMs become more powerful, the corporate pressure to automate post layoff support will only grow. A chatbot can rewrite your resume, coach you for interviews, and talk you down from a mental spiral, at least in theory. But what gets lost in that shift? What happens to the human dignity of grief, reflection, and real connection during a time of professional crisis? Even Turnbull acknowledged the tension in his post: 'No AI tool is a replacement for your voice or your lived experience. But at a time when mental energy is scarce, these tools can help get you unstuck faster, calmer, and with more clarity.' Turnbull's post isn't an isolated incident; it's a flare signaling a major cultural shift in tech, where recovery is being privatized, individualized, and automated. There's a strange, unnerving optimism embedded in all this: the belief that you can prompt your way out of pain. But pain isn't a productivity issue. And a layoff isn't a user experience problem. If the only support a worker receives is from a chatbot trained on the internet's vast archive of trauma, we are witnessing the dawn of something much darker than a downturn. We are seeing the first wave of algorithmic grief management, sanctioned by the very forces that deemed human workers disposable in the first place.

Pixel 10 Pro's new display tackles eye strain, but it's not the leap I wanted
Pixel 10 Pro's new display tackles eye strain, but it's not the leap I wanted

Android Authority

time2 hours ago

  • Android Authority

Pixel 10 Pro's new display tackles eye strain, but it's not the leap I wanted

Robert Triggs / Android Authority Google Pixel 10 rumors are coming thick and fast these days as we close in on the launch date in just a few months. Last week, we learned the upcoming phone's Pro models will likely ship with a 480Hz PWM display — a first for the Pixel series. High PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation) rates aren't new to smartphone displays; we've already seen phones boasting thousands of Hz. The Xiaomi 15 Ultra offers a 1,920Hz PWM rate, the OnePlus 13 clocks in at 2,160Hz, and the HONOR Magic 7 Pro tops out at a whopping 4,320Hz PWM. Even the budget-friendly Nothing Phone 3a manages 2,160Hz PWM. Is high display PWM important when buying a phone? 0 votes Yes, I want high PWM. NaN % No, it doesn't matter. NaN % It matters, but it's not the deciding factor. NaN % Not sure, I'd never thought about it. NaN % The Pixel 10 Pro and Pro XL won't match these heavyweights, but a bump to 480Hz will at least put them on par with the brand's closest rivals in the US, Apple and Samsung. In that sense, it's a significant move — but what does all this PWM stuff even mean, and should you actually care? What does PWM have to do with displays? C. Scott Brown / Android Authority If you know a bit about displays, you've likely come across Hz and refresh rate, which measures how many times per second (in Hz) the screen updates. 120Hz looks smoother than 60Hz, for example. PWM is also measured in Hz, but it's unrelated to how quickly your content refreshes. Instead, the PWM rate controls the brightness of the thousands of individual LEDs lighting up your fancy OLED display. Going back to some basic electronics: applying 0 V turns an LED off, while applying the maximum allowed voltage makes it shine at full brightness. There are two ways to achieve a brightness that isn't zero or full. The most intuitive is to scale the voltage somewhere between off and max. However, this isn't always practical for mobile displays, due to the LEDs' temperamental on-threshold voltage, the wasted power from maintaining an intermediate DC level, and the complexity of managing precise voltages across millions of sub-pixels. This isn't a problem for older LCD-type displays, where direct current dimming can easily control the entire backlight in one go. Kamila Wojciechowska / Android Authority Instead, displays control LED brightness using rapid on–off pulses. Each LED toggles hundreds or thousands of times per second, so quickly that your eye perceives a steady brightness rather than flicker. This is achieved efficiently with a clock driver embedded in the display controller, and it's far more power-friendly since little energy is wasted — crucial for mobile devices. The end result is equivalent from a brightness perspective, as the average output of these on–off pulses matches what a constant dimmed level would produce. If you're curious, recording slow-motion video on your phone camera can often reveal PWM flicker, appearing as rolling bands across the screen. That said, several phones now use a hybrid approach to dimming. For example, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Xiaomi 14T Pro offer 'DC dimming' at high brightness levels well above the on-threshold, then switch back to PWM at lower brightness settings. Here, DC dimming really means dropping the drive current in one shot rather than true per-pixel scaling. Display PWM rates tell you how fast the OLED lights flicker on and off. OK, so now this begs the question: why do different smartphones have different PWM rates? Well, each display panel comes paired with its own driver IC. Higher‑end panels often include driver chips capable of much higher PWM frequencies right out of the factory, but even high-end panels don't always race to the biggest possible numbers. Even with the same display driver chip, manufacturers can tweak their PWM clock settings in firmware to hit specific targets — trading off PWM rate against overall power draw (including switching losses vs peak brightness), regulator overhead, BOM cost, and sometimes the precision of contrast and gamma control. Very high PWM frequencies, for example, can reduce the number of available brightness steps, slightly affecting smooth gradients and tonal transitions. These trade-offs are balanced differently depending on each brand's priorities for battery life, display quality, and eye comfort. Why do PWM refresh rates matter? Robert Triggs / Android Authority Here's the catch: what if your eyes or brain can actually detect that flicker from a low PWM rate? Well, this is very much a real issue, often called PWM sensitivity. It affects everyone differently — some people not at all, others might eventually feel eye fatigue, and the unlucky can end up with migraines or nausea. If you're susceptible, PWM sensitivity is most often noticed when viewing a device in a dark environment at low display brightness. That's because at lower brightness levels, PWM dimming runs at a low duty cycle: the LEDs spend most of their time turned off, only pulsing on for brief moments to emit just enough light. Combined with a dimly lit room, these short bursts might not register as visible flicker, but the nerves in your eyes — and ultimately your brain — can still pick up on them. PWM flicker can cause eye fatigue, headaches, and even nausea in some people. There's no exact science on the ideal PWM frequency, partly because there are so many variables when it comes to individual sensitivity, environment, and how any modulation is implemented. For many people, 480Hz doesn't cause any noticeable issues, and phones have been getting away with 240Hz without triggering a wave of returns. However, a growing body of research suggests that these comparatively low values can still trigger unwanted physiological responses in a sizable portion of the population. As such, opting for a 1,000Hz or 2,000Hz display generally pushes you further away from potential harm, and these phones are obviously the better choice for anyone who has experienced fatigue or worse from their devices. But do sufferers continue to benefit from ever-higher values like 4,000Hz? That's less certain, as there's bound to be a law of diminishing returns. Even so, bigger numbers are generally 'safer' from an eye health perspective, and there are no real downsides from the standpoint of display quality. PWM speed is important, but it's not the only thing to considder. As with most things, there are additional nuances at play. PWM display waveforms don't have to be sharp on–off pulses; advanced driver ICs can shape the modulation to ease eye strain. Gradual ramping up and down (like a sawtooth or triangle wave) is an effective alternative that aims to reduce PWM's adverse effects without simply cranking up the frequency. Likewise, most smartphones use multi-phase PWM, ensuring the entire display isn't off at the same time to help average out the luminance your eyes detect. Then there are the aforementioned DC-dimming firmware tricks that let brands advertise 'flicker-free' or 'low-flicker' modes for enhanced eye comfort, even though they still rely on PWM at low brightness. Of course, the best solution is probably to have a bit of everything. Just keep in mind it's not always a clear-cut case of bigger numbers being better — though it certainly doesn't hurt to have a higher PWM display in your next phone. Whether the Pixel 10 Pro's new display does enough here is still very much up for debate. Pixel takes yet another half measure Paul Jones / Android Authority PWM rate certainly isn't the be-all and end-all of what makes a great display, but for some consumers, it's a hugely important buying factor. While eye-fatigue features are staple technologies across the industry, some major manufacturers still fall short when it comes to tackling the specific discomfort caused by low-frequency PWM at dim brightness levels. Historically, Google's Pixel series has made no meaningful strides to address these concerns. Thankfully, the Pixel 10 Pro and Pro XL look set to offer a slight reprieve with their jump to 480Hz — a welcome improvement that finally starts to close the gap. Still, it's hard to ignore that this advance only brings Google in line with what's already become a baseline elsewhere, and remains far from the highest standards now possible. The Pixel 10's 480Hz upgrade would be welcome, but is still behind the curve. Perhaps more frustrating is that this upgraded display is expected to be exclusive to the Pro-tier models, meaning anyone eyeing the standard Pixel 10 — or a future Pixel 10a — will be left waiting yet again. For many, this won't be a dealbreaker. But for those sensitive to display flicker or simply hoping to minimize long-term eye strain, Google's cautious step forward may feel like too little, too late. In the end, it's a positive move, but one that highlights how much more could still be done. Here's hoping it won't take another generation or two before these improvements become standard across the entire Pixel lineup.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store