logo
Bad Nanny review: Incredible story of fraudster Samantha Cookes skilfully told in excellent documentary

Bad Nanny review: Incredible story of fraudster Samantha Cookes skilfully told in excellent documentary

Irish Times12-05-2025
Gaslighting, fake illnesses, real pregnancies – and a trail of deception leading from Yorkshire to
Kenmare
. The first episode of the excellent two-part documentary Bad Nanny (RTÉ One, Monday) takes off like a true crime podcast on rocket boots as it tells the incredible story of Carrie Jade Williams, aka
Samantha Cookes
– a serial fraudster who posed as a terminally ill author when she moved to Kenmare, Co Kerry.
Seemingly sweet and harmless, the chirpy Englishwoman was in her element in small-town Ireland. 'If I met her today, I'd still like her. She has that personality,' says one former acquaintance. 'She's very likable. She's a people person. You would go, 'she's lovely'.' Those qualities allowed her to deceive her neighbours, her landlord – even RTÉ's Documentary On One, which greenlit
a radio doc
about her trip to Los Angeles for experimental surgery for her terminal Huntington's disease, her regular updates about her health having made her a minor star on TikTok.
But Carrie Jade Williams was not terminally ill – and
her backstory was a tissue of fraud
extended to university and earlier. In Shrewsbury in England, an old college friend recalled how bubbly and friendly his pal 'Sam' had been. Until, that is, he asked for his money back after she claimed to have booked tickets for a weekend away.
Confronted by her friend, the mask fell away. 'She went from the bubbly girl to being really horrible.' When a tutor advised the friend to dig deeper, he discovered she had been convicted of defrauding a couple by posing as their surrogate parent.
READ MORE
One twist follows another. Cookes's first child had been removed from her by social services in the UK and entrusted to the care of the father. Then she became pregnant again. She turned up pregnant in Edenderry, Co Offaly, where she ran a camp for kids and hoodwinked locals into paying for a non-existent weekend in Disneyland.
[
Serial fraudster Samantha Cookes's funding applications considered by Arts Council on 'artistic merit'
Opens in new window
]
However, the most disturbing aspect of the documentary concerns her work as a nanny in Tullamore, Co Offaly, where she bonded with Layla and her daughter, Charlie. 'I was 10 turning 11,' says Charlie. 'She was genuinely a big ball of fun, everything up my alley.' Once again, lie followed lie, and after 'Lucy', as the family knew her, faked a fainting fit in Tesco in Maynooth, Co Kildare, Layla's mother went through the nanny's belongings.
'There was a little index card notebook and I just started to read,' Layla recalls. I just went, 'Who have we had looking after our children?''
This horribly gripping case has also been the subject of an RTÉ podcast. But the unsettling story translates readily to the screen and Bad Nanny skilfully weaves together Cookes's many deceptions to tell the hard-to-believe tale of a woman whose forked tongue allows her to move freely around Ireland and Britain and whose ultimate superpower was her ability to be nice to strangers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jimmy Guerin criticises Connolly over nomination of Gemma O'Doherty for 2018 election
Jimmy Guerin criticises Connolly over nomination of Gemma O'Doherty for 2018 election

Irish Times

time6 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Jimmy Guerin criticises Connolly over nomination of Gemma O'Doherty for 2018 election

Independent councillor Jimmy Guerin, the brother of Veronica Guerin, has said presidential hopeful Catherine Connolly made a 'grave error' over her willingness to nominate journalist Gemma O'Doherty to enter the 2018 president election. During that election, Mr Guerin dismissed allegations made by Ms O'Doherty that the State was involved in the 1996 murder of his sister Veronica, the prominent crime journalist, describing them at the time as hurtful, offensive and 'disgusting'. People seeking to run for the presidency must secure nominations from 20 Oireachtas members or four local authorities. Ms O'Doherty – who sought to enter the 2018 presidential election race running on an 'anti-corruption' platform – was unsuccessful in her attempt to win enough nominations. READ MORE She subsequently became involved in far-right and anti-immigration activism. Ms Connolly was among a number of Oireachtas members who indicated they would support Ms O'Doherty's bid to get on the ballot paper in 2018. At a press conference this week Ms Connolly said she did not regret making the nomination, saying Ms O'Doherty 'had done some good work as an investigative journalist'. The Galway West TD added: 'I didn't know her personally, but I knew her role, and I gave her a nomination when the time came. That didn't mean I was supporting her.' She also said: 'My judgment call was right at the time. Do I regret what's happened in relation to her? Absolutely. Do I support her in any way? Not at all.' [ Who is Catherine Connolly? The outspoken left-wing campaigner running for president Opens in new window ] Mr Guerin, a representative on Fingal County Council, said he sought to contact all Oireachtas members in 2018, asking them not to help Ms O'Doherty secure a nomination. He told The Irish Times he was 'most disappointed' that when Ms Connolly 'was questioned about her role in supporting the nomination of Gemma O'Doherty, she didn't take the opportunity to acknowledge she made a serious, grave error'. He also said: 'I think her failure to do that shows me that in my opinion she's not a person suitable to be running for office, let alone to be elected to it.' Ms Connolly said in response that to the best of her knowledge she had never received correspondence from Mr Guerin on the matter. She said she undertook 'a comprehensive search' of office records and it revealed only one email received from Mr Guerin in relation to a different issue. Ms Connolly said: 'It is possible that such an email could have been lost amongst constituency and parliamentary inquiries, which is highly regrettable if that is the case.' She added: 'Had I been aware, I certainly would have taken the gravity of Mr Guerin's concerns into account and carefully considered same before making my decision at that time. My thoughts continue to be with Mr Guerin and his family.' Mr Guerin said he accepted it is possible Ms Connolly did not get the email or did not see it and he could 'understand how emails could go to constituency or spam'. He also said: 'Judging by the number of Oireachtas members who contacted me at the time it was well known amongst Oireachtas members – and amongst many members of the public – our views and our objections to Gemma O'Doherty receiving support' from local authorities or Oireachtas members. Brian Meehan, from Crumlin, was convicted in 1999 of Ms Guerin's murder after a trial before the non-jury Special Criminal Court. John Gilligan, who led the gang that killed Ms Guerin, was tried for, but acquitted of, her murder. In a statement Ms O'Doherty made criticisms of Ms Connolly and Mr Guerin as well as The Irish Times and suggested this publication could do some 'proper journalism'. She contended that someone who is 'anti-corruption' has 'no chance' of being selected to run in a presidential election. Ms O'Doherty repeated her allegations of State involvement in Ms Guerin's murder.

Barrister's standing to bring case for Islamic Cultural Centre must be clarified, judge tells court
Barrister's standing to bring case for Islamic Cultural Centre must be clarified, judge tells court

Irish Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Barrister's standing to bring case for Islamic Cultural Centre must be clarified, judge tells court

A High Court judge has said he wants to be satisfied that a barrister acting in a challenge to a new board of the company running the Islamic Cultural Centre of Ireland has the required status to do so. Mr Justice David Nolan said he was not prepared to hear the case relating to control of the Al Maktoum Foundation CLG, which owns the centre in Clonskeagh, Dublin, until barrister Joseph Sallabi, who says he is in-house counsel for the company, satisfies the court as to his legal standing to bring the case and that he is employed by the foundation company. The judge adjourned the matter to next week for clarification on his standing from the legal services providers' watchdog, the Legal Services Regulatory Authority (LSRA). The dispute arose over what Mr Sallabi told the court was the unlawful appointment of new directors to the foundation company. READ MORE Mr Sallabi brought the case on behalf of Meath-based consultant, Dr Abdel Basset Elsayed, who said he has been a director of the foundation company since 2012 but says the purported appointments of four new directors to the board were invalid and did not follow the requirements of the company's constitution. The new directors, who are notice parties in the case, dispute the claims and argue Dr Elsayed cannot bring the case as he does not have instructions on behalf of the board. There are five notice parties: Ahmad Tahlak, Hesham Abdulla Al Quassim, Khalifa Aldaboos, Mohamed Musabeh Dhahi and Zahid Jami, all of Roebuck Road, Clonskeagh. The court previously heard the mosque and school at the centre have closed and that the matter required an urgent hearing. The case came before Mr Justice Nolan on Friday when Lyndon MacCann SC, for the notice party directors, said his side did not accept Mr Sallabi's claim that he had instructions from the company which has its own law firm who have not given him instructions. Mr Sallabi said their case alleges that there has been fraud in company law in the way in which the only other board member at the time called a meeting, excluding Dr Elsayed, and set up a new board. He said the company was essentially stolen. Mr Justice Nolan said he was concerned about Mr Sallabi's legal standing to bring the case as it is disputed that he was in-house counsel, that he was acting on the instructions of Dr Elsayed alone and would only be able to present the case if he had instructions on behalf of the company. He was concerned about the fact he claimed to be in-house counsel when he had his own business in Dublin and was acting as in-house counsel for another party. He was also concerned that Mr Sallabi said he was paid to act in cash by Dr Elsayed. Mr Sallabi later in the day provided the judge with material which he said showed he received payments for his work which he lodged in his account as coming from the company. However, the judge said he wanted to hear from the LSRA next week and if they said they cannot help, then so be it. He refused Mr Sallabi's request to join the Attorney General to the case in relation to his standing rather than the LSRA as counsel said the LSRA had told him it does not give legal advice. The judge said he would not do so because the Attorney General only acts in the public interest and this was a private interest matter. Mr Sallabi also asked the judge to recuse himself because counsel felt 'you did not handle it fairly and you clearly favour the other side'. The judge gave him liberty to bring a recusal application. When Mr Sallabi said 'full impartiality', the judge said counsel did not understand the issues before the court and it was not the case the court had made any decision. He added he had to be satisfied as to Mr Sallabi's legal standing and from what he had seen made him very worried about his standing. Earlier the judge said while he had been told this case involved fraud he was 'not sure which way the fraud runs and I will wait and see'. He also said he thought Mr Sallabi was 'out of your depth' and his client should consider that he needed some help as he was 'someone so young in practice'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store