logo
CNBC's The China Connection newsletter: The hidden drag on China's economy

CNBC's The China Connection newsletter: The hidden drag on China's economy

CNBC4 days ago
Falling real estate prices are the elephant in the room when it comes to China's economy.
From June 2023 to June 2025, the average price per square meter for secondhand apartments in 100 major cities fell by 13%, according to CNBC's calculations of data published last week by China Index Academy, a research firm. Beijing and Shanghai saw similar double-digit price drops.
It's a bitter pill to swallow for homeowners hoping to reap a profit. The past decades of skyrocketing property prices saw many in China splurge on new properties before they were even built or completed, which fueled a speculative bubble — followed by the high-profile defaults of Evergrande and other developers.
Now even as authorities have tried to address the financial risks, the property market is far from rebounding.
"The market is in the process of bottoming, but not yet at its bottom," Zhu Ning, author of "China's Guaranteed Bubble," said Monday. He noted the real estate market has resumed its decline after some stabilization over the past several months.
Zhu expects prices to drop by another 20% to 30% over the next two to three years before the market stabilizes. In the meantime, he said, "policymakers have to be patient" and can try using zoning or other methods to generate construction demand related to public housing.
Officials from China's housing ministry recently visited Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces to inspect the local real estate market, and called for greater stabilization efforts, state media said Friday. The report also called for the construction of safer and higher-quality homes.
Since late September, China's top leaders have set a new tone by calling for a halt to the decline in the real estate sector.
Previously, Beijing had focused on curbing financial market risk by cracking down on developers' high reliance on debt for growth, starting in 2020. However, coupled with the impact of the pandemic, developers have struggled to complete construction on pre-sold apartments, further eroding consumer confidence.
Several homebuyers who bought apartments from a little-known developer in Tianjin, near Beijing city, told CNBC last year they had been promised the units would be delivered in 2019. So far, there's been no word on construction progress.
Despite the troubles plaguing China's property market, a bright spot has emerged.
China Jinmao Holdings ramped up its land purchases for development since late 2024 and saw sales rise by 21% in the first five months of 2025 versus the year-ago period, Fitch analysts noted in a June 30 report. That contrasts with a 10.8% drop for the top 100 Chinese homebuilders, according to the report.
"Local governments are prioritizing smaller, higher-quality projects to meet upgrader demand, resulting in smaller plots and much higher unit land costs in major cities," Fitch said, noting that governments in smaller cities have significantly reduced the supply of land to developers.
Even as the sight of many empty storefronts in Beijing reflects the overall economic slowdown, a drive across China's sprawling capital reveals a handful of high-end residential property developments in the pipeline.
It's a similar sight in Shanghai and Hangzhou, where Hong Kong developers Kerry Properties and Shui On Land are among those building upscale, centrally located apartments, says Qin Gang, founder of a Beijing-based consultancy that translates to Ode & Song Cultural Industry. That's according to a CNBC translation of his Mandarin-language remarks.
He said the targeted buyer isn't the average family, but a household with an existing home, now looking to upgrade to a unit in a better location. "Right now developers are fighting for this [kind of] customer."
In contrast, "the people with middle income who could have bought houses, their income has now gone down, or they've lost their jobs," Qin said.
The impact of the property slump has continued to weigh on consumer sentiment.
"Property is key to consumption," Larry Hu, chief China economist at Macquarie, said in a report Friday. "Falling home prices have led to a negative wealth effect on consumption, as housing accounts for 60-70% of household wealth."
He cautioned in a report Friday that better-than-expected 6.4% growth in May retail sales from a year ago was supported by one-off sales promotions and government subsidies.
China, in the last several weeks, also banned alcohol from government meals and released stricter rules on how much officials can spend on work-related travel — 40 yuan ($5.57) for dinner — which has encouraged a culture of frugality.
Retail sales are expected to slow to 5.6% in June from a year earlier, according to a Reuters poll. China's National Bureau of Statistics is scheduled to release the data Tuesday.
Consumption is not the only area of impact. Real estate and related industries, such as construction, once accounted for more than a quarter of China's economy.
"Being the largest and most important industry of China for so long, the real estate market adjustment has a long-lasting and profound impact on the Chinese economy," Zhu said. The "real estate sector slump substantially reduces local governments' fiscal revenues."
That cash crunch has, in turn, pushed many local authorities to collect more taxes or find other ways to extract money from businesses.
It's a perfect storm of events weighing on China's economy, even without a trade war.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent joins 'Squawk Box' to discuss the current budget deficit, how strong growth can assauge deficit fears and much more.
KPMG's Irene Chu talks about Hong Kong's booming IPO scene, and how the city is benefitting from US-China uncertainty, as well as Beijing's favorable regulatory environment.
Guoli Chen, professor of strategy at INSEAD, says that Beijing making AI a national strategic priority allows market forces to push the initiative and productivity to the next level, and that small and medium-sized Chinese companies have been very willing to try to capture value from AI adoption.
Starbucks China attracts bids valuing it at up to $10 billion. About 30 interested buyers have submitted non-binding offers for Starbucks' business in China, valuing it up to $10 billion, three people familiar with the deal process told CNBC. The company is evaluating the offers, deal structure proposals and post-sale value creation pitches before shortlisting potential buyers.
Hong Kong IPO pipeline on track to surpass Wall Street this year. PwC projected up to 100 initial public offerings in Hong Kong this year, with total fundraising to exceed $25.5 billion. That would make the city the world's largest listing destination this year, surpassing the Nasdaq and the New York Exchange.
Baidu bolsters competition in AI chatbots. Chinese tech giant Baidu has bolstered its core search platform with artificial intelligence in the biggest overhaul of the product in 10 years. Analysts told CNBC the move was a bid to keep ahead of fast-moving rivals like DeepSeek, rather than traditional search players.
China's central bank ramps up gold purchases. The People's Bank of China has added to its official gold reserves for eight consecutive months, with the latest official data showing an increase of 70,000 troy ounces of bullion in June.Stocks listed on mainland China and Hong Kong fell after Trump ruled out a deadline extension on tariffs set to kick off on Aug. 1.
Mainland China's CSI 300 dropped 0.18%, while Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index — which includes major Chinese companies — slipped 1.11% as of 3:50 p.m. local time. The mainland benchmark is up 1.6% for the year to date, data from LSEG showed.

July 14: Trade data for June
July 15: Retail sales, industrial production and investment data for June
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk is no Ross Perot
Elon Musk is no Ross Perot

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

Elon Musk is no Ross Perot

The comparisons flood in. Elon Musk launches his 'America Party,' and every pundit reaches for the same tired parallel. Another Ross Perot. Another billionaire maverick. Another third-party earthquake waiting to happen. Wrong. Completely wrong. Musk represents everything Perot opposed. Where Perot stood for fiscal discipline, Musk embodies corporate welfare. Where Perot championed American manufacturing, Musk built his fortune on government funding and Chinese batteries. Where Perot offered genuine outsider credentials, Musk carries the stench of establishment cronyism. The surface similarities deceive. Both men possess massive wealth. Both nurse grudges against sitting presidents. Both promise to shake up the system. The differences run deeper than the Delaware River. Perot emerged from genuine business success. He built Electronic Data Systems from nothing. He created real value, real jobs, real innovation. His wealth came from solving actual problems, not gaming government handouts. Musk built his empire on taxpayer subsidies. Tesla survived on government credits. SpaceX feeds off NASA contracts. His companies consume public money like a Vegas slot machine consumes quarters. He represents the opposite of Perot's self-made independence. The timing exposes another crucial difference. Perot entered politics during America's economic malaise. Recession gripped the nation. Deficits soared. Voters craved fiscal responsibility. His message matched the moment. Musk launches his party during economic recovery. Stock markets reach record highs. Unemployment stays low. His fiscal responsibility message lands like a lead balloon in a helium factory. More importantly, Perot possessed something Musk lacks entirely: credibility on his core issue. When Perot talked about budget deficits, people listened. He had never taken government handouts. He understood business efficiency. He could legitimately claim outsider status. Musk talking about government waste sounds like a meth addict lecturing about sobriety. His companies gorged themselves on federal subsidies for decades. He personally benefited from programs he now claims to oppose. The hypocrisy stinks from orbit. The political landscape has also shifted dramatically since 1992. Perot faced two establishment candidates, the president, George H.W. Bush and his Democratic challenger Bill Clinton. Voters hungered for alternatives. The third-party lane stretched wide and inviting. Today's political map offers no such opening. Trump already occupies the anti-establishment space. He owns the outsider brand, despite being president. Musk cannot out-populist the master populist. The media environment has transformed beyond recognition. In 1992, Perot could command television attention through sheer novelty. Cable news was young. Social media did not exist. A billionaire buying airtime could reach millions of uncommitted voters. Now everyone screams into the digital void. Attention spans shrink by the nanosecond. Musk's X antics already overexpose him. His brand suffers from overexposure, not invisibility. Perot also offered policy substance beneath the theatrics. His deficit charts bored audiences, yet they conveyed serious proposals. He understood complex economic issues. His solutions made mathematical sense, even if they were politically unrealistic. Musk offers conspiracy theories and vanity projects. His policy knowledge barely scratches the surface. He confuses tweeting with governing. He mistakes social media engagement for political support. The coalition mathematics doom Musk from the start. Perot drew votes from both parties roughly equally. His appeal crossed traditional lines. Fiscal conservatives and government skeptics existed in both camps. Musk's potential supporters cluster overwhelmingly on the right. He cannot build a truly bipartisan coalition. Democratic voters despise him. His only hope lies in cannibalizing Republican support. This creates a fatal strategic problem. Every vote Musk gains likely comes from Trump's column. He cannot expand the anti-establishment coalition because he lacks cross-party appeal. He can only divide it. The structural barriers have hardened since Perot's time. Ballot access requirements have increased. Campaign finance laws favor established parties. The debate commission now excludes third parties more effectively. Perot qualified for the presidential debates in 1992. Those appearances legitimized his candidacy. Current rules make such inclusion nearly impossible. Without debate access, third parties wither in obscurity. The fundamental character differences matter most. Perot, for all his quirks, projected competence. He ran a disciplined campaign. He stayed on message. He treated politics seriously. Musk treats everything as a game. He changes positions hourly. He picks fights on social media. He lacks the temperament for sustained political combat. Perot understood American voters. He spoke their language. He shared their concerns. He offered real solutions to real problems. Musk lives in a Silicon Valley bubble. He mistakes X for reality. He confuses online engagement with electoral support. He fundamentally misunderstands the American electorate. The comparison insults Perot's legacy. He may have been eccentric, demanding and difficult, but he changed American politics permanently. He forced both parties to address fiscal responsibility. He proved that third parties could compete. Musk offers nothing comparable — no serious policy agenda, no coherent vision, no sustainable coalition. His proposed new party is just another billionaire's vanity project disguised as political reform. The America Party will follow the same trajectory as Musk's other attention-grabbing schemes — media frenzy, gradual reality, ultimate failure. John Mac Ghlionn is a writer and researcher who explores culture, society and the impact of technology on daily life.

Warren Buffett and Bill Gates once gave the secret to their success in 1 word. They gave the exact same answer
Warren Buffett and Bill Gates once gave the secret to their success in 1 word. They gave the exact same answer

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Warren Buffett and Bill Gates once gave the secret to their success in 1 word. They gave the exact same answer

Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. World-renowned billionaires Warren Buffett and Bill Gates were once asked about their secret to success. The one word answer they both gave? Focus. For Buffett and Gates, that focus started young. Gates was obsessed with coding as a teenager. That passion led him to co-found Microsoft and become the seventh wealthiest person on the planet, according to the Forbes real-time billionaires index. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to this $1B private real estate fund. In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how Buffett, meanwhile, has been investing since the ripe age of 11. He's now known as one of the most successful investors of all time, ranking as the fifth wealthiest billionaire according to Forbes. In an interview with CNBC, Buffett explained how his focus differed from Gates. 'While he was focused on software, I was focused on investments,' he said. 'It gave me a big advantage to start very young — there's no question about it.' Even if you're long past your teenage years, it's not too late to get focused. Here are three ways to refine your investing strategy to emulate Buffett and Gates's wealth-building success. The best time to start investing was yesterday. The second best time is now. Even if you didn't start investing when you wished you did, that's all the more reason to start today. Compound interest is another reason to invest sooner rather than later. Buffett once described earning compound interest — interest you earn based on your personal contributions and the interest you've already earned — as the ability to snowball your wealth. Remember, the more time you have to earn interest, the bigger the rewards you'll see. Starting small today can pay dividends tomorrow. Read more: Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — Buffett is famously a proponent of value investing, which involves buying stocks that are trading below their intrinsic value. He would look for companies with long-lasting earning potential, consistent earnings, good cash flow and a low amount of debt. Value investing can apply outside of the stock market too. For instance, you can use this strategy to invest in real estate: buying undervalued properties to earn long-term returns. And new investing platforms are making it easier than ever to diversify your investments by tapping into the real estate market. Homeshares gives accredited investors access to the $34.9 trillion U.S. home equity market, which has historically been the exclusive playground of institutional investors. With a minimum investment of $25,000, investors can gain direct exposure to hundreds of owner-occupied homes in top U.S. cities through their U.S. Home Equity Fund — allowing you to invest directly into the untapped value of residential properties without the headache of buying, owning or managing them yourself. With risk-adjusted target returns ranging from 14% to 17%, Homeshares can provide an effective, hands-off way to invest in owner-occupied residential properties across regional markets. If you're not an accredited investor, crowdfunding platforms like Arrived allow you to enter the real estate market for as little as $100. Arrived offers you access to shares of SEC-qualified investments in rental homes and vacation rentals, curated and vetted for their appreciation and income potential. The platform makes it easy to fit these properties into your investment portfolio regardless of your income level. Their flexible investment amounts and simplified process can help you take advantage of an inflation-hedging asset class without any extra work on your part. Arrived is even backed by another world-class investor, Jeff Bezos. It's likely you'll see both gains and losses through the lifetime of your investment portfolio. The question to ask yourself is: How can I turn my investing blunders from the past into successes in the future? Even investing greats like Buffett have made mistakes over time. At the 1997 Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholders meeting, he admitted to making 'mistakes of omission' where he had the opportunity to invest in attractive businesses, but failed to act. Not everyone has the investing knowledge to jump on those kinds of opportunities. To gain an advantage, you may want to consider working with a professional financial adviser who can translate investing into something you can better understand. is an online platform that connects you with vetted financial advisors best suited to help you develop a plan for your new wealth. Just answer a few quick questions about yourself and your finances and the platform will match you with an experienced financial professional. You can view their profile, read past client reviews, and schedule an initial consultation for free with no obligation to hire. You can view advisor profiles, read past client reviews, and schedule an initial consultation for free with no obligation to hire. Here are the 6 levels of wealth for retirement-age Americans — are you near the top or bottom of the pyramid? This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Car insurance in America could climb to a stunning $2,502/year on average — but here's how 2 minutes can save you more than $600 in 2025 Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Money doesn't have to be complicated — sign up for the free Moneywise newsletter for actionable finance tips and news you can use. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Seaport Entertainment mulling offers for 250 Water St. vacant lot
Seaport Entertainment mulling offers for 250 Water St. vacant lot

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Seaport Entertainment mulling offers for 250 Water St. vacant lot

All summer eyes are on Seaport Entertainment Group, which is mulling offers for its valuable 1.1-acre vacant lot at 250 Water St., even as it grapples with losses at the Seaport's Tin Building. After Howard Hughes Corp. spun off SEG last summer, it wasn't clear what the new owners would do with 250 Water St., a short stroll from the Seaport's busy Pier 17, where HHC spent years planning and winning city approvals for a new, mixed-use project. 3 A rendering of the proposed Seaport Tower at 250 Water St. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill 3 Original design of 250 Water Street featured two tall towers on a podium base. Howard Hughes Corporation/SOM We predicted in January that SEG, which is not in the development business, would put the site up for sale. Two months later, they tapped JLL to sift offers, Crains reported. Seaport CEO Anton Nikodemus said in a conference call that more than 130 'potential buyers or partners' expressed interest. Now, sources told Realty Check, they've winnowed the list down to three or four, but no names have yet emerged. SEG didn't respond to multiple requests for comment. Meanwhile, SEG just took what it called an 'administrative step' to 'complete the process' of a plan it announced in January to 'internalize food and beverage operations at many of our wholly-owned and joint venture-owned restaurants.' The publicly traded company announced on June 30 it 'terminated' the Tin Building management agreement with Jean-Georges Vongerichten's Creative Culinary Management Company. 3 Chef Jean-Georges Vongerichten. Tamara Beckwith Vongerichten Management CEO Lois Freedman explained to us, 'What was more a management agreement now is a licensing agreement.' SEG earlier said it took a $33 million loss on the Tin Building in 2024. Although a small section was closed off, it remains open and its House of the Red Pearl restaurant remains a hot Chinese destination.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store