Rudd's golf club meeting with Trump revealed
The informal 'pull aside' meeting occurred in the dining room of the Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach on January 11 this year.
Answers released on notice from senate estimates on Wednesday also said a diplomatic cable was produced and sent back to Canberra, which would most likely detailed the meeting.
'Ambassador Rudd has professional relationships with and has met with a range of senior Administration officials,' the document read.
The questions were taken on notice after Liberal senator James Paterson repeatedly quizzed Foreign Minister Penny Wong and officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trading during senate estimates in February. Kevin Rudd and Donald Trump had a meeting at the US President's Florida golf course, questions on notice have revealed. Credit: Supplied
Senator Paterson, who is the Coalition's finance spokesman, said the answer 'barely scratches the surface of what was originally asked in Senate estimates where they engaged in excruciating obfuscation'.
'How long was this meeting? What was discussed? Was it prearranged? Have Ambassador Rudd and President Trump spoken since?' he said.
'The Prime Minister himself publicly disclosed this meeting occurred in a radio interview and this is a critical moment in our most important international relationship.
'Australians are entitled to know what on earth happened at this meeting the government seems so sensitive about.'
Senator Michaelia Cash, the opposition's foreign affairs spokeswoman, shared Mr Paterson's view.
'The Albanese Government is being so secretive about this meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Rudd because it has now become obvious that the Ambassador achieved nothing to the benefit of Australia,' she told NewsWire.
'Mr Albanese should come clean about the meeting and its outcomes.'
Previously, Anthony Albanese had mentioned the meeting on January 17, confirming there had been 'direct contact' between the US President and Australia's top representative in Washington.
Details of the meeting between Mr Rudd and Mr Trump comes as Australia faces the potential threat of being hit with 200 per cent tariffs on lucrative US pharmaceutical exports, which totalled $2bn in 2024.
While Labor has said it aims to negotiate a complete tariff exemption, Australia currently faces levies of 50 per cent on steel, 25 per cent on aluminium, and 10 per cent on other goods, with Mr Trump also threatening 50 per cent tariffs on copper imports. Senator James Paterson demanded more answers on the meeting. NewsWire/ David Crosling Credit: News Corp Australia
On Wednesday, Nationals frontbencher Bridget McKenzie accused Mr Rudd of not 'successfully' doing his job, and described Australia's relationship with the US as 'clunky'.
'Is he successfully doing his job would be my question, because if he was, the Prime Minister would be able to pick up the phone and we wouldn't be having to be worried about reviews in AUKUS, a $2bn export industry potentially (being) at risk but we don't really know the details because we can't just pick up the phone or get the meeting,' she told the ABC. 'We've got … issues with copper, we've got issues with steel and aluminium, and we've got calls from the US to increase defence spending that we're continually ignoring.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
28 minutes ago
- The Age
US wants to know how Australia would use subs if America goes to war
Washington: The Pentagon has confirmed it is asking Australia for undertakings on how its AUKUS submarines would be used in the event of US military conflicts and for 'substantial increases' in defence spending as part of its review of the $368 billion agreement. A senior US defence official, who requested anonymity to speak freely, said the Trump administration wanted a clear idea of how Australia would deploy the nuclear-powered boats in the event of a contingency, though this was much broader than conflict with China over Taiwan. 'There's a conversation about command structure, about alignment of assets. We would want, in any scenario, a clear sense of what we can expect from Australia,' he told this masthead in an interview. 'There seems to be a hyper-emphasis on Taiwan in public reporting. But this is broader than any one particular contingency. It is about how we can reasonably expect these kinds of critical assets to be allocated across different scenarios.' This masthead can also reveal that the Pentagon's AUKUS review focuses on four areas: command structure, the US's capacity to produce the boats, posture (positioning) of the assets and Australian defence spending. Meanwhile, US Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby, who is heading the review, publicly confirmed reports that the US wanted its allies such as Australia and Japan to 'step up' and make commitments about how they would act in the event of a conflict. Loading Colby said the Pentagon was implementing US President Donald Trump's commonsense agenda of restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength. 'That includes by urging allies to step up their defence spending and other efforts related to our collective defence,' he said, noting it applied in both Europe and Asia.
Sydney Morning Herald
28 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
US wants to know how Australia would use subs if America goes to war
Washington: The Pentagon has confirmed it is asking Australia for undertakings on how its AUKUS submarines would be used in the event of US military conflicts and for 'substantial increases' in defence spending as part of its review of the $368 billion agreement. A senior US defence official, who requested anonymity to speak freely, said the Trump administration wanted a clear idea of how Australia would deploy the nuclear-powered boats in the event of a contingency, though this was much broader than conflict with China over Taiwan. 'There's a conversation about command structure, about alignment of assets. We would want, in any scenario, a clear sense of what we can expect from Australia,' he told this masthead in an interview. 'There seems to be a hyper-emphasis on Taiwan in public reporting. But this is broader than any one particular contingency. It is about how we can reasonably expect these kinds of critical assets to be allocated across different scenarios.' This masthead can also reveal that the Pentagon's AUKUS review focuses on four areas: command structure, the US's capacity to produce the boats, posture (positioning) of the assets and Australian defence spending. Meanwhile, US Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby, who is heading the review, publicly confirmed reports that the US wanted its allies such as Australia and Japan to 'step up' and make commitments about how they would act in the event of a conflict. Loading Colby said the Pentagon was implementing US President Donald Trump's commonsense agenda of restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength. 'That includes by urging allies to step up their defence spending and other efforts related to our collective defence,' he said, noting it applied in both Europe and Asia.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
US review of AUKUS incomplete as cost of defence boost revealed
The Trump administration's review of the AUKUS partnership is unfinished as its slated deadline arrives, according to Australia's acting defence minister. Patrick Conroy told the ABC's Insiders the Australian government was "engaging at the most senior levels" and was optimistic the US review would endorse the military pact. "I'm confident it will support AUKUS just as our review of AUKUS [and] the UK review found," he said. "There's been lots of speculation about what the timeframe is of the review … My last information is that the review has not been completed yet." The review, led by senior Pentagon official Elbridge Colby whose public statements about AUKUS have been mixed, was slated to be finished within 30 days, a timeframe reached this weekend which coincides with Anthony Albanese's visit to China. Despite the statements of confidence, the government is bracing for the likelihood that the Trump administration will press harder on Australia to lift its defence spending, as it did with European partners. The ABC can reveal new figures laying out the colossal budget impact of agreeing to such a request. During the election campaign, the Parliamentary Budget Office estimated the short-term boost to defence spending needed to achieve 3 per cent of GDP by 2035, as was Coalition policy, would cost $20.6 billion over the first five years and $156.4 billion over a decade. Those figures, prepared in consultation with Treasury and Defence, can be extended to suggest the even larger cost of a 3.5 per cent spend of $45.2 over five years or $287.1 billion over a decade. The government currently intends to increase defence spending to 2.3 per cent of GDP by 2035. To get to 3.5 per cent instead, the extra funding alone would triple Australia's entire foreign aid budget by the year 2029-30. Mr Conroy told the ABC the government would seek to emphasise that its aid and diplomatic spending, especially in the Pacific region, was also contributing to security. "We're making the point to everyone that both [defence and aid spending] are incredibly important," he said. "We're investing in our relationships in the region, as well as our military capability and we are increasing our defence budget significantly, $57 billion above the previous trajectory," he said. "We've made it clear that if a case is made for more capability, we'll increase more. We're not going to pluck a figure out of the air and work out how to spend it. That's what the Coalition took to the election." Mr Conroy, who is acting for Richard Marles in the defence portfolio but whose regular portfolio is defence industry, said Australia was also trying to get more value for money from defence procurement processes. "It's a challenging area for every country around the world [and] it was problematic under the last government … We've made significant reforms to how we do defence procurement," he said. "It is important that taxpayers have confidence that every single dollar goes to improving capability of the Australian Defence Force as well as supporting the 100,000 Australians who work in that industry." Mr Conroy said Australia would not "engage in hypotheticals" after a report in the Financial Times that Mr Colby was also pressing both Australia and Japan to give assurances about how they would respond in the event of a war with China over Taiwan, but emphasised Australia would make its own decisions about any conflict. "The sole power to commit Australia to war or to allow our territory to be used for a conflict is the elected government of the day," he said. "Sovereignty will always be prioritised and that will continue to be our position." Officials have also emphasised Australia's strategic focus on deterrence and opposition to the use of force. "We are being very clear that we want a balanced region where no-one is dominated and no-one dominates," he said.
