Ugly fight between ‘radical rock climbers' and traditional owners over world-famous site
An ugly battle between traditional owners who want to ban rock climbers from the world famous Mount Arapiles in Victoria and locals has spilled over with a Nationals MP subjected to a humiliating walkout at a conference in Canberra.
Nationals MP Anne Webster has revealed she was left 'shocked' after her speech to the Australian Local Government Association exploded into controversy when she raised concerns over the cultural bans.
Mount Arapiles' traditional owners have lashed out at the Victorian Government, accusing them of consulting a 'radical rock climbing minority' over the decision to close large areas of the world-famous national park.
The stoush echoes the controversy over the decision to ban tourists climbing Uluru in 2019.
But as controversy rages over Mount Arapiles, Ms Webster's remarks prompted a group of attendees to walk out of her address in a move that has become the talk of the gathering of local councils across Australia.
'It's a conversation that I think we need to have,' Ms Webster told news.com.au.
'We are thinking around 20 walked out, and some of the council members who didn't walk out, but know the people on their council who walked out said that they are having difficulty with those members anyway.
'That's for them to deal with. I'm not engaging in that. I was giving three examples of where this is occurring, whether it's a personal business, whether it's private farming land or the Mount Arapiles situation, and people are finding it extraordinarily difficult.'
At first, Ms Webster said she didn't understand what was going on after attendees started to storm out before her speech concluded.
'It surprised me. Certainly. I was like, 'Oh, they must have somewhere else to go?' she said.
'That's what I was thinking as they were leaving.
'I certainly hadn't finished speaking. It's just one of those things, and it's certainly a good learning experience for me. I've been in the job for three weeks. Yeah, so you know a bit to learn. I think it's just, it's all about ensuring that tone is appropriate, that you give space for alternative views.
'I might have emphasised a little more clearly, for example, but this is a conversation, and different views need to be heard. I'm certainly keen to hear alternate views.'
ALGA President Mayor Matt Burnett told news.com.au that the organisation was committed to Closing the Gap between indigenous and non-indigenous Australians and that many members were passionate about the issue.
'As a proud signatory to the National Closing the Gap Agreement, ALGA supports shared decision-making at a community level,'' he said.
'Working side-by-side with other levels of government, we are committed to helping Close the Gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.'
In a letter to the Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan, Dylan Clarke, chairman of the Barengi Gadjin Land Council Aboriginal Corporation, slammed the push to hold public consultations on the Parks Victoria draft management plan.
The proposal calls for the closure of up to half of climbing routes at Mount Arapiles-Tooan State Park.
'Moving forward with an unnecessary and unprecedented consultation extension and Working group creation has the serious potential to draw into question the purposes, objectives, principles and applications of the Traditional Owner Settlement Act 2010, the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006, and the Aboriginal Heritage Regulations 2018,' Mr Clarke wrote.
'We urge you to remain steadfast during this critical time and not to deviate from the current plan due to a radical rock-climbing minority who have launched a misinformation campaign aimed at undermining cultural heritage laws.'
However, Mike Tonkins, Australian Climbing Association Victoria president warned any move to close Mt Arapiles set a worrying precedent for public land closures across the state.
The latest stand-off comes after huge public backlash to the Parks Victoria plan.
The Allan government is exploring how it can let people continue to rock climb at the world famous Mt Arapiles amid a community backlash.
'If the appalling work that led to Labor's ban on rock climbing in the Grampians and Mt Arapiles warrants sacking the Parks Victoria CEO, then the Minister has no choice to immediately scrap the ban. If these discredited rock climbing bans aren't immediately reversed, the Minister should be sacked too,' Victoria's Deputy Nationals leader Emma Kealy said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Tasmania's business lobby backing Labor's budget savings measures, as Liberals launch state election campaign
Tasmania's peak business body has formally backed Labor's strategy to fix the state's budget, calling it a "courageous" plan just weeks out from a state election. "For an opposition to put this sort of paper out three weeks before an election is fantastically courageous," Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (TCCI) chief executive Michael Bailey said. "What we're seeing from Dean Winter and Josh Willie is a plan to fix the Tasmanian budget problem that we face ourselves with at the moment." "It's clear that the government need to react to this, we need to see from the Liberal Party their plan for budget repair." Tasmanian Labor announced on Saturday its fiscal strategy which the party said would result in $1 billion in savings over the next four years and ensure all new revenue goes towards paying down debt. It also included selling the state's share in the yet-to-be-built Marinus Link undersea power cable, and taking $100 million of revenue from the Motor Accidents Insurance Board. Treasury has found the state is headed for $13 billion worth of debt by 2028. "There are some tough decisions to be made and we understand that in business, we understand we need to be part of the discussion. "We need to do better, especially in an economy like ours which is so small and so reliant on outside income the more we can really help developers move on their projects the better it'll be for all Tasmanians." Labor Leader Dean Winter said, if elected, he would establish a budget repair round table made up of business, unions and the community sector. "We know the size and scale of this problem is massive and it relies on people taking things seriously and accepting there's a problem," Mr Winter said. Treasurer Guy Barnett has described Labor's budget plan as "one giant con". "It includes sacking associate secretaries who don't exist, claiming savings from the Southern Outlet that will cease to exist after scrapping the jointly funded project, $171.5 million cuts in capital works, without saying where from, and a 10-point plan that is just a recycling of a number of policies already in existence," Mr Barnett said. "Now, he's revealed his real plan is to sell government assets, with his reckless plan to give mainlanders control of our vital Marinus power connector." The TCCI's endorsement of Labor's budget plans came as the Liberal Party officially launched its election campaign. In a speech to the party faithful in Launceston on Sunday, Liberal Leader Jeremy Rockliff said Tasmania's economy was strong and the state wanted stability. "We can deliver the services Tasmania needs because we have a strong economy; under a Liberal government our economy has grown 26 per cent over the course of the last ten years," he said. "We now have an economy that's valued at over $40 billion." "For our workers we've achieved the highest wage growth in the entire nation … we have a strong plan and it's working." Mr Rockliff used the campaign launch to make the Liberals' most significant health announcement of the campaign so far — 250 new beds at the Launceston General Hospital (LGH). He said construction would start on the northern health complex, a seven-storey, 25-bed tower in 2028. He said the new building would "future-proof" hospital services in Tasmania's north. "This means more single rooms, along with an expansion of cancer services. "This will future-proof hospital services in the north and help to attract and retain those valued health professionals." Labor's Health spokesperson Ella Haddad said the Liberals had promised the project before. "Jeremy Rockliff's big election announcement is a project the Liberals promised five years and two early elections ago," Ms Haddad said. "Tasmanians are sick of Liberal promises that never get delivered. It's time for change." The tower is part of the Liberals' 10-year, $647.5 million redevelopment of the LGH. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation acting Tasmanian branch secretary Phoebe Mansell said more beds were needed now. "We welcome additional beds, but we've been saying for some time that the access and flow and hospital grid lock problems in the Launceston General Hospital emergency department need addressing … so what happens between now and then," she said. Australian Medical Association Tasmanian president, Dr Michael Lumsden-Steel, said the project must be fit for purpose and allow for future growth. "We know the Launceston General Hospital needs significant infrastructure builds … so 250 beds will be critical," he said. "The key point here is when they go and build this new tower, it must be fit for purpose and it must also allow for projected demand … so we must get this right." Tasmanians will head to the polls on Saturday July 19.
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Newly listed terror organisation preying on ‘teenage boys'
A global network of neo-Nazi groups is trying to recruit Australian 'teenage boys', Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke says. Terrorgram is a collective that promotes white supremacist violence on encrypted social media platforms, such as Telegram. The Albanese government this week formally listed it as a terrorist organisation, with anyone found guilty of being involved with it facing up to 25 years behind bars. Mr Burke said on Sunday Terrorgram poses a 'real' threat of radicalisation to young Australians. 'This is a new form of risk,' he told Sky News. 'So effectively, now we have a disproportionate number, and if you look at where the increase is happening, is fastest – it's teenage boys.' Mr Burke said contact is usually made through online gaming platforms. 'They'll be playing with somebody who they've never met, who they presume is someone of their own age,' he said. 'They'll feel that they're building a relationship, and then that person will start to gradually try to take them down a pathway. Mr Burke said he was 'not talking huge numbers' but that 'you don't need huge numbers' to deal with a risk to civilians. 'This is a growing form of terrorism,' he said. Home Affairs has linked Terrorgram to the radicalisation of Jordan Patten, who was charged with attempting to commit a terrorist act last year. Mr Patten was allegedly plotting to kill NSW state Labor MP Tim Crakanthorp. He was a block away from Mr Crakanthorp's office in Newcastle when police arrested him. We have officially listed Terrorgram as a terrorist organisation under the Criminal Code Act 1995 (the Criminal Code). — Tony Burke (@Tony_Burke) June 26, 2025 Australia's domestic intelligence agency last year raised the terror threat to 'probable' because of deteriorating social cohesion and a spike in radicalisation among young men. The agency's chief, Mike Burgess, warned at the time people were becoming radicalised for increasingly complicated and varied reasons and that ideologies were blending. It was the first hike in a decade.
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Antoinette Lattouf's unlawful sacking exposed the power of lobbying on the Australian media
Last weekend, I wrote a piece about the news-gathering model and media literacy. It mentioned how governments, militaries, and lobby groups try to stop the media telling stories, and it wondered if news audiences would like major media outlets to talk about it more: "They might be shocked to learn about the orchestrated bullying that goes on, which is designed to discourage editors and journalists from reporting on certain topics and framing stories in certain ways, even speaking to certain people," the piece said. "Would it improve media literacy if the media wrote about these issues openly and regularly?" Then, three days later, we heard relevant news. On Wednesday, the Federal Cout ruled that the ABC had unlawfully sacked journalist Antoinette Lattouf, in December 2023, for reasons including that she held political opinions opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza. Justice Darryl Rangiah found external pressure from "pro-Israel lobbyists" had played a role in the ABC's decision. Ms Lattouf had been employed by the ABC on a small five-day contract, as a fill-in summer radio host. But Justice Rangiah found that soon after Ms Lattouf presented her first program that summer, the ABC began to receive complaints from members of the public. "The complaints asserted she had expressed antisemitic views, lacked impartiality and was unsuitable to present any program for the ABC," he wrote. "It became clear that the complaints were an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists to have Ms Lattouf taken off air." For journalism students, it's an important case study. Many of you would have discussed it in class last week. But everyone should read Justice Rangiah's judgement. It details what went on behind the scenes at the ABC when the email campaign against Ms Lattouf began, and how it contributed to a "state of panic" among some senior ABC managers (many of whom have since left the organisation). It also showed how such pressure campaigns work. Not only had pro-Israel lobbyists sent dozens of emails to the ABC calling for Ms Lattouf to be taken off air, but their complaints found their way to News Corp's The Australian newspaper, which then told the ABC it was planning to report on the fact that the ABC had received complaints (which fed the growing panic inside the ABC). That's how the game is played. After the Federal Court's ruling was published on Wednesday, the ABC's new managing director, Hugh Marks, said the ABC had let down its staff and audiences. "Any undue influence or pressure on ABC management or any of its employees must always be guarded against," he said. A large number of articles were also written about the court's ruling. Alan Sunderland, a former editorial director of the ABC, said the public broadcaster had lessons to learn from the saga. "The world these days is filled with those who seek to control, bully and pressure public interest journalism in all its forms," he wrote. "The role of senior managers is to stoutly resist that pressure, and protect journalists from it as much as possible." Paula Kruger, the chief executive of Media Diversity Australia (and a former ABC radio host), made other points. She said news audiences had to trust that news outlets were capable of telling truthful stories, but the impact that that orchestrated pressure campaign had on the ABC had "shaken trust internally and externally". "You break trust with the broader community when an interest group can go to the top of an organisation and get its way. Lobbyists skip the process that everyone else must follow," she wrote. She also raised the topic of media literacy and trust. She said we often talk about ways to improve the public's media literacy, but the decline in trust in the media should not be a problem for audiences to fix; it was the responsibility of news organisations. "Silencing one side of the story isn't success. Shutting down voices isn't 'social cohesion,'" she wrote. "But silencing and shutting down were the preferred responses of senior ABC management under pressure from pro-Israel lobbyists. We need a different approach to our most difficult conversations." That last point is worth thinking about. In last weekend's article, I made a reference to Hannah Arendt's famous 1971 essay on the Pentagon Papers. But she wrote another essay, in 1967, that deserves a reference today. In that earlier essay, Truth and Politics, Arendt famously argued that "objectivity" and "impartiality" were revolutionary concepts that helped to usher in the modern world. In fact, she left her readers with the impression that those concepts were pillars of so-called "western civilisation": "The disinterested pursuit of truth has a long history," she wrote. "I think it can be traced to the moment when Homer chose to sing the deeds of the Trojans no less than those of the Achaeans, and to praise the glory of Hector, the foe and the defeated man, no less than the glory of Achilles, the hero of his kinfolk [...] "Homeric impartiality echoes throughout Greek history, and it inspired the first great teller of factual truth, who became the father of history: Herodotus tells us in the very first sentences of his stories that he set out to prevent 'the great and wondrous deeds of the Greeks and the barbarians from losing their due meed of glory'. "This is the root of all so-called objectivity ... without it no science would ever have come into being." So, according to Arendt's logic, if we allow ourselves to be intimidated into privileging certain voices when reporting on major global conflicts, and silencing other voices, we'll be abandoning a pillar of "western civilisation". And that was the same essay in which Arendt wrote her famous line about the disorienting affect that relentless propaganda can have on the human brain. "It has frequently been noticed that the surest long-term result of brainwashing is a peculiar kind of cynicism — an absolute refusal to believe in the truth of anything, no matter how well this truth may be established," she wrote. "In other words, the result of a consistent and total substitution of lies for factual truth is not that the lies will now be accepted as truth, and the truth be defamed as lies, but that the sense by which we take our bearings in the real world – and the category of truth vs. falsehood is among the mental means to this end – is being destroyed," she said. Arendt said we could try to keep our bearings in the world — and combat such propaganda — by building and protecting "certain public institutions" that revered truth above politics. And she said an independent judiciary, the historical sciences and the humanities, and journalism were among them. But let's wrap things up. It's naive to think "the media" is always and everywhere obsessed with "the truth." There are plenty of players in the media that are motivated by other things. But consider the editors and journalists that really do try to tell the truth. As we discussed last week, there's a global multi-billion-dollar industry dedicated to capturing, controlling, and confusing the "trusted stories" the media tells every day: Different governments, militaries, multi-nationals, and lobby groups are always trying it on. The ABC was involved in a different controversy six years ago when concerns were raised internally about Adani's apparent ability to squash an ABC radio story about the economics of Adani's Carmichael mine. Readers say once they start noticing things like that about the media, it can damage their trust in the media's stories. If you spend any time on social media these days, you may have also noticed how millions of people are now teaching each other about the subtle ways in which media outlets use language and imagery to privilege certain perspectives and diminish others in their daily news reports. The type of critical media analyses you'll get in every journalism and communications degree at university has jumped out of the academy and onto peoples' phones. For example, consider the headlines below and see if you can spot the differences in language: Why is the language in the first headline so passive and vague? Why is the language in the second headline active and precise? Modern audiences are regularly engaging in that kind of media "decoding" in private now, while they're doom-scrolling, so it presents an opportunity for media outlets to start having deeper conversations with their audiences about the way things work, if they choose to. Those conversations could be uncomfortable for some. But they may lead to more truthful storytelling.
