UBT flays Sena over Durgadi temple visit curbs on Eid
During Bakr Eid, Muslim worshippers gather in large numbers to pray at the fort's Idgah section. Consequently, Hindu devotees are restricted from entering the Durga temple located at the fort's front to maintain peace. On Saturday, police prevented both Sena factions from crossing the barricades near the fort.
The Sena UBT's up neta Vijay Salvi criticised Shiv Sena, noting that while the Ghanta Naad movement was initiated by Anand Dighe in 1982, with deputy CM Eknath Shinde leading it for many years, the state administration has now been restricting devotee entry despite his positions as CM and deputy CM showing duplicity on Hindutva."
Sena MLA Vishwanath Bhoir also criticised the administration for the restrictions on temple entry.
— Pradeep Gupta
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
3 minutes ago
- Mint
Hari Hara Veera Mallu controversy: Pawan Kalyan addresses HHVM boycott calls, ‘Please, go ahead'
Hari Hara Veera Mallu (HHVM), a historical epic by Krish and Jyothi Krisna, was released in theatres on July 25, with paid premieres on July 22. Starring Pawan Kalyan, Nidhhi Agerwal and Bobby Deol, it got mixed reviews but opened with a strong box office collection. However, since the premiere, hashtags like #BoycottHHVM and #DisasterHHVM trended online. At a success meet in Hyderabad, Pawan Kalyan addressed the negativity. The Deputy CM of Andhra Pradesh asked, 'Is this a Quit India movement?' 'I've been seeing negativity around Hari Hara Veera Mallu and boycott calls for the film. Please, go ahead,' he said. 'I come from a small place in Nellore. It's great that I am where I am today. I don't know my worth. However, the confirmation of my success comes from people when they want to boycott my films,' he added. The Communist Party of India (Marxist) has strongly opposed Hari Hara Veera Mallu. According to the political party, Pawan Kalyan's movie spreads anti-Muslim ideas using a made-up story. CPIM State Secretary Srinivasa Rao said no such person existed in history. Rao blamed actor Pawan Kalyan for sharing fake tales instead of facts. The party wants cinemas to clearly say the film is fiction. Nevertheless, the movie already has a disclaimer that it is fictional. Hari Hara Veera Mallu started strong at the Indian box office on July 23. It was powered by Pawan Kalyan's solid fan base. Even though the film got poor to mixed reviews, it set a new record for his best opening day ever, beating Vakeel Saab from 2021. Advance bookings were huge. Premiere shows alone brought in ₹ 12.7 crore. The total box office collection on Day 1 reached around ₹ 45 crore, according to Great Andhra. However, other reports claim that the Telugu movie opened with ₹ 60 crore. If true, it puts HHVM right at the top of this year's Telugu box office after Gamechanger. As per Sacnilk, the Ram Charan starrer minted ₹ 61.1 crore on Day 1. Meanwhile, HHVM shows were packed in the morning on Day 1. Afternoon and evening saw a drop. However, night shows again brought in big numbers, the publication added.
New Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
From suffering to citizenship: Gujarat government grants citizenship to 185 Pakistani refugees
The crowd erupted in chants of 'Bharat Mata Ki Jai' as Sanghvi said, 'Keep smiling... from now on, you are citizens of India.' Linking their plight to the religious persecution in Pakistan, Sanghvi did not mince words. He said, 'When you hear the stories of these people -- Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists -- you cannot hold back tears. A few lost their husbands, others lost their homes to flames. And yet they endured. I salute their strength.' He contrasted India's pluralism with Pakistan's oppression, saying, 'India is a land where every religion is respected. If the world truly wants to witness human rights in action, they must look at India, especially Gujarat.' He also raised a sharp question: 'Why is there no global outrage over the atrocities on minority Hindus in Pakistan?' Amid emotional moments, newly naturalised citizens shared their stories of pain, resilience, and pride. Bhavanaben Maheshwari, originally from Pakistan and now living in Rajkot, said, 'I faced a lot of hardships there. But today, after years of struggle, I proudly call myself an Indian.' Another recipient, Champa Khambhala from Morbi, echoed the sentiment: 'Life in India is far better than in Pakistan, where Hindus can't even celebrate festivals freely.' With her voice trembling, she added, 'Many of my family members are still stuck in Pakistan. I hope they, too, get the chance to unite with us in India someday.' The ceremony wasn't just about documents it marked a loud and clear message about India's stance on human dignity, national belonging, and justice for persecuted minorities.
Scroll.in
33 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Why US court rejected Hindu group's claims that caste discrimination cases violate religious freedom
The decision of a US federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit challenging California state's authority to prosecute caste discrimination cases has been welcomed by civil rights groups. US District Judge Dale Drozd of the Eastern District of California on July 18 rejected arguments from a Hindu advocacy group that enforcing such cases violates religious freedom. He said that the Hindu American Foundation, a non-profit that says it advocates for Hindus in the United States, lacked standing to challenge the California Civil Rights Department's high-profile lawsuit against the technology conglomerate Cisco Systems, which alleges workplace caste discrimination against a Dalit engineer. 'This is a historic win,' said Karthikeyan Shanmugam of the Ambedkar King Study Circle, which has collected numerous testimonies showing how caste consciousness and discrimination are manifested in the Indian diaspora. 'It affirms that caste discrimination is a civil rights violation and cannot be shielded by claims of religious freedom,' Shanmugam said. Roja Singh, President of Dalit Solidarity Forum, said that 'the decades-long campaign of caste-based oppression in the US is finally being confronted'. Singh added: 'This ruling by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California affirms that caste discrimination violates civil rights and cannot be ignored. It marks a critical step toward ensuring that caste-oppressed communities can live and work with safety, dignity, and equality.' Paradoxical position The judge rejected the HAF's claim that the state's anti-caste enforcement violated their religious freedom, noting that the foundation simultaneously argued that caste discrimination is not an integral part of Hindu beliefs. 'Plaintiffs cannot persuasively maintain that there 'exists some conflict between one of [their] religious convictions and a challenged governmental action' precisely because they contend that caste discrimination is not one of their religious convictions,' the ruling noted. The judge described it a 'standing conundrum,' asking, 'How can appellants be injured by a policy prohibiting conduct that they have no intention to engage in?' The court also questioned the HAF's claim to represent Hindu Americans across the country. While the foundation pointed to 815 donors and 5,000 subscribers to its advocacy platform as evidence of its support base, the judge stated the organisation was trying to represent 'a community significantly larger and more diffuse than those found appropriate' for bringing such a lawsuit. The HAF's legal challenge centres on California's 2020 lawsuit against Cisco Systems, when it allegedly failed to protect a Dalit employee from harassment by his Brahmin colleagues. The lawsuit claimed the engineer 'was expected to accept a caste hierarchy within the workplace where he held the lowest status within a team of higher-caste colleagues, receiving less pay, fewer opportunities, and other inferior terms and conditions of employment'. When the engineer opposed the treatment, supervisors allegedly retaliated by reducing his role, isolating him from colleagues and assigning him tasks that were 'impossible to complete under the circumstances'. The state dropped its case against the two individual Cisco supervisors, Sundar Iyer and Ramana Kompella, in 2023, but continues to pursue its lawsuit against the company. Anti-caste measures The development also comes amid a growing battle over caste discrimination in American institutions, with Hindu advocacy groups mounting organised opposition to the introduction of anti-caste measures. Since the Cisco lawsuit was filed in 2020, anti-caste groups have pushed to add caste as a protected category in anti-discrimination policies across the United States. Seattle became the first city to ban caste discrimination in February 2023, while dozens of universities including Harvard and Brown have updated their policies to explicitly prohibit caste-based discrimination. However, the HAF scored a major victory in 2023 when California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed legislation that would have made California the first state to ban caste discrimination. The bill had passed both houses of the state legislature with overwhelming support – the Assembly voted 31-5 to approve the measure sponsored by Democratic state senator Aisha Wahab. But Newsom rejected the bill, arguing that existing anti-discrimination laws already covered caste-based discrimination. The HAF has repeatedly stated that policies against caste discrimination are unfair to Hindu Americans. On its website, the foundation states. 'California's actions blatantly violate the rights of Hindu Americans.' The organisation contended that California 'has asserted that the caste system is 'a strict Hindu social and religious hierarchy,' and therefore an integral part of Hindu teachings and practices' = a characterisation it says is false. The HAF argues this makes 'all Hindus suspect in the eyes of the general public' and 'encourages widespread discrimination against hiring or promoting of Hindus'.
