logo
‘Hacktivist' targets Columbia University, steals data of over 2 million students and employees

‘Hacktivist' targets Columbia University, steals data of over 2 million students and employees

Hindustan Times03-07-2025
Columbia University has confirmed a massive cyberattack which compromised sensitive data of over two million students, applicants, and staff, per New York Post. Officials believe the incident, which knocked out key systems offline for hours, was the work of a politically motivated 'hacktivist.' FILE - Students sit on the front steps of Low Memorial Library on the Columbia University campus in New York City, Feb. 10, 2023. (AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey, File)(AP)
The lone attacker exfiltrated a 1.6-gigabyte trove of personal records, including Social Security numbers, citizenship status, salaries, university IDs, and even admissions decisions, reported Databreach.com.
The attacker accessed 2.5 million admission applications, including financial aid information and sensitive demographic data spanning decades, the report added.
The attacker, reportedly, contacted the publication directly and claimed the breach was part of an effort to expose the use of affirmative action in admissions: a practice struck down by the US Supreme Court in 2023.
The breach happened on June 24, when Columbia's servers were taken offline for several hours, reported the news agency AP.
Screens on campus displayed bizarre images, including one of President Donald Trump on a dormitory television, the report added. Columbia University begins investigation
Officials of Columbia University, meanwhile, claimed that the hack was highly targeted and that they have begun a probe with cybersecurity experts.
'We immediately began an investigation with the assistance of leading cybersecurity experts and, after substantial analysis, determined that the outage was caused by an unauthorized party. While the investigation is ongoing, we have restored our operations,' the university said in a statement.
It added, 'We now have initial indications that the unauthorized actor also unlawfully stole data from a limited portion of our network. We are investigating the scope of the apparent theft.'
The university, in a statement, added that the hacker seemingly intended to acquire specific admissions documents to back their political cause, the report added.
The hacker allegedly spent two months infiltrating the university's systems and eventually gained access to protected servers, reported Databreach.com
Columbia University added that its Irving Medical Center remained unaffected and no further malicious activity was detected since the breach.
'We have not observed threat actor activity on our network since June 24 and will continue to monitor closely for further unlawful activity in our systems,' the varsity added. Columbia University to notify affected persons
The university, in its statement, added that it will share its findings with the university community and persons whose personal information was compromised. Reportedly, in an email to their staff and students, they said the attack may raise concerns across the community, and the team was working toward answers.
Reportedly, the cyberattack took place at a sensitive moment since tensions are high between the federal government and Columbia University. The Trump-led administration recently revoked over $400 million in grants, citing the school's handling of antisemitism on campus. FAQs:
Q: What kind of data was stolen by the Columbia University hacker?
A: Social Security numbers, citizenship status, university IDs, admissions decisions, employee salaries, and financial aid records.
Q: Was the Irving medical center affected?
A: Columbia University confirmed that Irving Medical Center was not impacted.
Q: Who was behind the attack on Columbia University's servers?
A: A self-proclaimed hacktivist, who remains anonymous, claimed responsibility. They said their motive was to find evidence of affirmative action practices at Columbia.
Q: Will individuals be notified?
A: Columbia University says it will inform affected individuals as the investigation continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anne Burrell suicide: Officials confirm cause of death; mention at least 4 drugs in report
Anne Burrell suicide: Officials confirm cause of death; mention at least 4 drugs in report

Hindustan Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Anne Burrell suicide: Officials confirm cause of death; mention at least 4 drugs in report

Anne Burrell, beloved Food Network chef and TV personality, died by suicide, officials confirmed in a report on Thursday. People cited sources to report that the New York City medical examiner's office noted that the 55-year-old took a combination of at least four drugs before she was declared dead on June 17. Anne Burrell died by suicide, the New York medical examiner's office confirmed on Thursday(Andy Kropa/Invision/AP) According to the publication, Burrell's cause of death is specified as 'acute intoxication due to the combined effects of diphenhydramine, ethanol, cetirizine, and amphetamine'. Under the manner of death section, the examiner's office confirmed - 'suicide'. At the moment, Burrell's family has not reacted to the cause of death report. This comes weeks after police were called to Burrell's address before 8 AM on June 17. Officers found an unresponsive woman who was soon pronounced dead. Burrell was on TV screens as recently as April, making chicken Milanese cutlets topped with escarole salad in one of her many appearances on NBC's 'Today' show. She faced off against other top chefs on the Food Network's 'House of Knives' earlier in the spring. 'Anne was a remarkable person and culinary talent — teaching, competing and always sharing the importance of food in her life and the joy that a delicious meal can bring,' the network said in a statement. Burrell was born Sept. 21, 1969, in the central New York town of Cazenovia, where her parents ran a flower store. She earned an English and communications degree from Canisius University and went on to a job as a headhunter but hated it, she said in a 2008 interview with The Post-Standard of Syracuse. Having always loved cooking, she soon enrolled in the Culinary Institute of America, for which she later taught. She graduated in 1996, spent a year at an Italian culinary school and then worked in upscale New York City restaurants for a time. She was survived by her husband, Stuart Claxton, whom she married in 2021, and his son, her mother and her two siblings. 'Anne's light radiated far beyond those she knew, touching millions across the world,' the family said in a statement released by the Food Network. (With AP inputs)

SC order on T domicile policy not applicable for AP, says official
SC order on T domicile policy not applicable for AP, says official

Time of India

time44 minutes ago

  • Time of India

SC order on T domicile policy not applicable for AP, says official

1 2 Vijayawada: The recent Supreme Court order, which found fault with Telangana's domicile policy on govt quota medical seats through NEET, will not be applicable for Andhra Pradesh, according to Dr NTR University of Health Sciences officials. While the domicile policy in Telangana mandates that a student must have pursued classes 9 to 12 in the state to be eligible for govt quota medical seats, Andhra Pradesh govt has earmarked 15% of seats under the "unreserved category" for non-locals in the state. "Students in Telangana have been facing admission issues under state quota through NEET as 100% seats are reserved under local category. AP has two categories under which 85% of seats across institutions reserved for locals, and 15% of seats unreserved for local/non-local students across two regions — Sri Venkateswara University and Andhra University," explained Hari Prasad, assistant registrar at Dr NTR University of Health Sciences. Telangana also removed admissions under the sports quota, which further aggravated the issue, he added. Elaborating further, he said students should have completed four consecutive years of study (classes 9 to 12) to be defined as 'local candidates' in Telangana and become eligible for admissions under state quota. "For students who complete junior and senior intermediate studies from neighbouring states, AP has the provision of 15% unreserved category seats, allowing them to attain admission even under non-local category into medical courses through NEET," Hari Prasad clarified. Students/candidates who have resided in the state for a total of 10 years, excluding their periods of study outside the state, or either of whose parents have resided in the state for a total of 10 years excluding periods of employment outside the state, will also be eligible to be defined as local candidate in AP, he said.

Three years after Roe reversal, most Americans still support legal abortion, poll finds
Three years after Roe reversal, most Americans still support legal abortion, poll finds

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Three years after Roe reversal, most Americans still support legal abortion, poll finds

Three years after Roe v. Wade was overturned, about two-thirds of US adults still support legal abortion in most or all cases, a new AP-NORC poll finds, reflecting steady opinions despite growing state-level restrictions and political divides read more Abortion-rights activists demonstrate against the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade that established a constitutional right to abortion, on Capitol Hill in Washington, June 30, 2022. File image/AP Three years after the Supreme Court opened the door to state abortion bans, most US adults say abortion should be legal — views that look similar to before the landmark ruling. The new findings from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll show that about two-thirds of US adults think abortion should be legal in all or most cases. About half believe abortion should be available in their state if someone does not want to be pregnant for any reason. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD That level of support for abortion is down slightly from what an AP-NORC poll showed last year, when it seemed that support for legal abortion might be rising. Laws and opinions changed when Roe was overturned The June 2022 Supreme Court ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade and opened the door to state bans on abortion led to major policy changes. Most states have either moved to protect abortion access or restrict it. Twelve are now enforcing bans on abortion at every stage of pregnancy, and four more do so after about six weeks' gestation, which is often before women realize they're pregnant. In the aftermath of the ruling, AP-NORC polling suggested that support for legal abortion access might be increasing. Last year, an AP-NORC poll conducted in June found that 7 in 10 US adults said it should be available in all or most cases, up slightly from 65% in May 2022, just before the decision that overruled the constitutional right to abortion, and 57% in June 2021. The new poll is closer to Americans' views before the Supreme Court ruled. Now, 64% of adults support legal abortion in most or all cases. More than half the adults in states with the most stringent bans are in that group. Similarly, about half now say abortion should be available in their state when someone doesn't want to continue their pregnancy for any reason — about the same as in June 2021 but down from about 6 in 10 who said that in 2024. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Adults in the strictest states are just as likely as others to say abortion should be available in their state to women who want to end pregnancies for any reason. Democrats support abortion access far more than Republicans do. Support for legal abortion has dropped slightly among members of both parties since June 2024, but nearly 9 in 10 Democrats and roughly 4 in 10 Republicans say abortion should be legal in at least most instances. Fallout from state bans has influenced some people's positions — but not others Seeing what's happened in the aftermath of the ruling has strengthened the abortion rights position of Wilaysha White, a 25-year-old Ohio mom. She has some regrets about the abortion she had when she was homeless. 'I don't think you should be able to get an abortion anytime,' said White, who calls herself a 'semi-Republican.' But she said that hearing about situations — including when a Georgia woman was arrested after a miscarriage and initially charged with concealing a death — is a bigger concern. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Seeing women being sick and life or death, they're not being put first — that's just scary,' she said. 'I'd rather have it be legal across the board than have that.' Julie Reynolds' strong anti-abortion stance has been cemented for decades and hasn't shifted since Roe was overturned. 'It's a moral issue,' said the 66-year-old Arizona woman, who works part time as a bank teller. She said her view is shaped partly by having obtained an abortion herself when she was in her 20s. 'I would not want a woman to go through that,' she said. 'I live with that every day. I took a life.' Support remains high for legal abortion in certain situations The vast majority of US adults — at least 8 in 10 — continue to say their state should allow legal abortion if a fetal abnormality would prevent the child from surviving outside the womb, if the patient's health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy, or if the person became pregnant as a result of rape or incest. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Consistent with AP-NORC's June 2024 poll, about 7 in 10 US adults 'strongly' or 'somewhat' favor protecting access to abortions for patients who are experiencing miscarriages or other pregnancy-related emergencies. In states that have banned or restricted abortion, such medical exceptions have been sharply in focus. This is a major concern for Nicole Jones, a 32-year-old Florida resident. Jones and her husband would like to have children soon. But she said she's worried about access to abortion if there's a fetal abnormality or a condition that would threaten her life in pregnancy since they live in a state that bans most abortions after the first six weeks of gestation. 'What if we needed something?' she asked. 'We'd have to travel out of state or risk my life because of this ban.' Adults support protections for seeking abortions across state lines — but not as strongly There's less consensus on whether states that allow abortion should protect access for women who live in places with bans. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Just over half support protecting a patient's right to obtain an abortion in another state and shielding those who provide abortions from fines or prison time. In both cases, relatively few adults — about 2 in 10 — oppose the measures and about 1 in 4 are neutral. More Americans also favour than oppose legal protections for doctors who prescribe and mail abortion pills to patients in states with bans. About 4 in 10 'somewhat' or 'strongly' favour those protections, and roughly 3 in 10 oppose them. Such telehealth prescriptions are a key reason that the number of abortions nationally has risen even as travel for abortion has declined slightly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store