Plants produce more nectar when they ‘hear' bees buzzing, scientists find
The research suggests that plants are a more active partner than previously thought in their symbiotic relationship with pollinators. The behaviour could be a survival strategy that favours giving nectar and sugar to bees over so-called nectar robbers that do not offer plants any reproductive benefits.
'There is growing evidence that both insects and plants can sense and produce, or transmit, vibro-acoustic signals,' said Prof Francesca Barbero, a zoologist at the University of Turin, who led the research.
The findings add to the 'truly astonishing' multitude of ways that plants can perceive their surroundings, including the presence of beneficial and harmful insects, temperature, drought and wind, Barbero added. In future, the team suggested, buzzing noises could be used on farms as an environmentally friendly way of enhancing the pollination of crops.
The scientists are not yet sure how the plants might be listening in. They could rely on mechanoreceptors, cells that respond to mechanical stimulation such as touch, pressure or vibrations. 'Plants do not have a brain, but they can sense the environment and respond accordingly,' said Barbero.
After observing that bees and competing insects have distinct vibrational signals that are used in mating and other forms of communication, Barbero and her collaborators set out to investigate whether plants detected these signals.
They played recordings near snapdragons of the buzzing sounds produced by snail-shell bees (Rhodanthidium sticticum), which are efficient snapdragon pollinators, comparing the plants' response to sounds produced by a non-pollinating wasp and ambient sounds.
The researchers found that in response to the snail-shell bee noises, the snapdragons increased the volume of nectar and its sugar content and showed altered expression in genes that govern sugar transport and nectar production.
This could be an evolutionary adaptation to coax the pollinators into spending more time at the flowers. 'The ability to discriminate approaching pollinators based on their distinctive vibro-acoustic signals could be an adaptive strategy for plants,' said Barbero.
While it is clear that buzzing sounds can trigger nectar production, the scientists are now looking into whether sounds from plants are being used actively to draw in suitable pollinators.
They are also testing whether the plant responses enhanced the attraction for all flower visitors – including nectar robbers – or only the best pollinators.
'Our hypothesis is that the changes in nectar we observed after treating the plants with the sounds of the best pollinators specifically increase the attraction of this particular species (Rhodanthidium sticticum),' said Barbero. 'However, to confirm this, we need to conduct choice tests to assess how different nectar concentrations attract various species.
'If this response from insects is confirmed, sounds could be used to treat economically relevant plants and crops, and increase their pollinators' attraction,' she said.
The findings were presented on Wednesday at the joint 188th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and 25th International Congress on Acoustics in New Orleans.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Girl, 3, suffers dangerous reaction after being exposed to trans dad's hormone drugs
A toddler grew breasts and began experiencing signs of early puberty after she was accidentally exposed to her transgender father's hormone therapy. The unnamed child, 3, was brought to doctors in Denmark after showing signs of extremely early puberty that had persisted for six months, including enlarged breasts and nipples and premature vaginal discharge. Her father told physicians the pair had frequent skin-to-skin contact, a key part of bonding. The parent, however, was also undergoing estrogen therapy as part of a gender transition from man to woman. The father used estrogen cream across their body, including chest, abdomen, shoulders and thighs daily. Doctors warned that the girl had been absorbing the estrogen, a female sex hormone, from the skin contact, triggering premature puberty. This set off a cascade of potentially dangerous side effects. Premature puberty in females, before the ages of eight years, can lead to a higher risk of certain cancers, including breast and endometrial cancers, mental health problems, behavioral issues, eating disorders and substance abuse. The father had used a spray containing 6.12mg of estradiol, the most potent form of estrogen, on both forearms daily. But seven months before the child was taken to the doctor, the father had switched to using a 3.75mg estradiol gel. Along with enlarged breasts and nipples as a result of the exposure, an ultrasound revealed her uterus and endometrium, or lining of the uterus, had increased to a size seen in older females. Her bone age was estimated to be 7 years old, while she was 3ft 6in tall and weighed 43lbs, the doctors reported. The average three-year-old in the US is between 2ft 10in and 3ft 4in tall and weighs around 26 to 38lbs. To treat the case, doctors asked the father to switch from rubbing in a gel to using a patch on the skin to receive estrogen. They reported that after the change was made the girl experienced a regression of breast development, and a normalization of growth speed and pelvic size. In the study, the researchers from Aalborg University Hospital said: 'Transgender persons should be thoroughly informed of the risk of transmission of transdermal hormones and be advised to wash hands, use gloves and avoid skin contact shortly after hormone application. 'Patients with children must be warned of the risk and Gender Clinics should consider the possibility of prescribing alternative routes of administration such as tablets or patches in high-risk patients.' About 1.5million Americans identify as transgender, although it is not clear how many of these are parents or use estrogen gel. Women may also use estrogen gel to combat symptoms of the menopause, although this tends to be at lower doses. In a similar case revealed in Sweden last month, a 10-month-old baby girl grew a 'micropenis' after she was exposed to her father's testosterone. Her father had been using the testosterone to boost levels of the hormone, and rubbing it into his body using a gel. He was also practicing skin-to-skin contact with his baby, leading the testosterone to be passed to the infant. Revealing the case from 2023 in a report in a journal, the team warned parents should be 'thoroughly informed' of the risks of transferring hormones to their children. They advised washing hands after the application of hormones, wearing gloves, and avoiding close contact immediately after use. In high risk cases, they added, clinics providing care for transgender patients should consider alternative treatments, such as tablets or patches.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Margaret Boden obituary
Margaret Boden, who has died aged 88, explored and extended the philosophy of psychology and artificial intelligence (AI), and led the creation and growth of the School of Cognitive Sciences at the University of Sussex, an interdisciplinary crucible in which the careers of many prominent AI researchers were forged. Central to all Maggie's work was the study of mental phenomena, such as perception, thinking, consciousness and creativity, and how they arise from what are ultimately nothing more than mechanistic interactions – either biochemical interactions within the brain, or binary digits shuffling around the circuits of a computer. She wrote 15 books, co-authored another, and co-edited several collections of essays. Her works have been translated into 20 languages. Her first book, Purposive Explanation in Psychology (1972), was revised and extended from her 1968 Harvard PhD thesis. There she first advanced the novel argument that AI programs could be viewed as a type of theoretical psychology, allowing for the rigorous study of mental processes in abstract non-living systems, with the ultimate aim of revealing principles that could help us better understand mental processing in real living beings. Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man (1977) established her reputation as an authority on AI. It was a 537-page tour-de-force critical review and analysis of pretty much all progress in AI research up to the mid-1970s, presented to the reader in entertaining and accessibly non-technical terms. It is sometimes referred to as the world's first book on AI; the only other book that might contest this claim is Patrick Winston's Artificial Intelligence textbook, published in the same year. In the closing part of her book, Maggie explored the extent to which various types of AI system could be useful to advancing our understanding of human psychology; she discussed the philosophical issues raised by advances in AI, and pondered on the potential societal significance of the increased use of AI technologies in application areas such as education, law and healthcare and in creative acts such as composing music or writing poems – all topics current today. The issue of creativity in living and artificial systems was something that Maggie returned to repeatedly over the course of her career, extending her surveys and constructively critical analyses in books published in 1990, 1994 and 2010, and again in From Fingers to Digits: An Artificial Aesthetic (2019), which she co-authored with the digital artist Ernest Edmonds. Other books include a concise summary of the work of the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget (1979), several on AI as theoretical psychology and on computer models of mind, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (1990), followed by her edited collection The Philosophy of Artificial Life (1996); and her masterful two-volume set Mind As Machine: A History of Cognitive Science (2006), spanning almost 1,700 pages. As Maggie noted with characteristic candour in the introduction to Mind As Machine, she set out to write it as a historical essay, not as an encyclopedia: it was explicitly offered as her one-person view of cognitive science as a whole. Maggie started her academic career in 1959 as a lecturer in philosophy at the University of Birmingham. After spending 1962-64 in the US as a Harkness fellow at Harvard, she moved to the University of Sussex in 1965 as a lecturer in philosophy and psychology, becoming professor in 1980, a post she held until 2002, when she was appointed research professor of cognitive science, the title she held for the rest of her life. In 1974, Maggie, her philosopher colleague Aaron Sloman, and the computer vision researcher Max Clowes, jointly initiated Sussex's Cognitive Studies Programme (CSP), a radically novel attempt to bring together psychologists, linguists, philosophers and AI researchers, to collectively work on 'the study of mind'. Over time the CSP unit attracted academics who were keen to explore research questions at the outer borders of their fields, where their areas of expertise intersected with other disciplines. By the mid-80s the CSP was widely recognised as one of the two major centres for AI research in the UK (the other was the University of Edinburgh). By then the CSP had grown so large that in 1987 it became the autonomous School of Cognitive Sciences (known internally as 'Cogs'), the first new school at Sussex since its inception, with Maggie as the founding dean. She was determined that the new school would continue the traditions of the CSP, with an inclusive and collaborative community of interdisciplinary scholars. Cogs subsequently absorbed Sussex's Computer Science Department and was renamed the School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences. In 2003, another reorganisation led Cogs to be renamed the Sussex Centre for Cognitive Science, which it remains to this day, as a group of more than 50 academics drawn from across the university's four faculties. Maggie was elected a fellow of the British Academy in 1983, and served as the academy's vice-president during 1989-91; in 1993 she became a fellow of the American Association for AI; in 2001 she was appointed OBE; and in 2017 she received the ACM AAAI Allen Newell award. The University of Cambridge's Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence and the University of Sussex have both established annual lectures in her honour. Born in London, Maggie was the only surviving child of a civil servant, Leonard Boden, and his wife, Violet (nee Dawson), whose first child, Keith, had died as an infant before Maggie was born. From City of London school for girls she went to Newnham College, Cambridge, graduating in 1958 with a prize-winning first-class degree in medical sciences: it was there that her lifelong interest in mind and brain was first sparked. She chose to study at Cambridge rather than Oxford because she preferred the light blue Cambridge colours. In her vacations, she developed a longstanding love for the Cook Islands, and spent six weeks there each year for almost 30 years: she loved the drumming and the dancing, and was for a long time a keen snorkeller. She also became an accomplished scholar of Polynesia. Maggie was brilliant, fearless, iconoclastic, warm and funny, with an unquenchable thirst for conversation and intellectual debate. She almost always dressed in purple, adorned with unusual jewellery, and purple was the predominant colour used in Cogs for brochures, technical reports and official academic gowns. I spent a decade from 1987 in Cogs, joining as a PhD student and ending up as a lecturer. Maggie was immensely supportive. She provided the launchpad, the rocket and the fuel that enabled embryonic academic careers to take off. This, as much as the insightful arguments that she advanced, will be her lasting professional legacy. Maggie married the writer and publisher John Spiers in 1967; they divorced in 1981. She is survived by her son, Ruskin, and daughter, Jehane, and by her grandchildren, Byron, Oscar, Lukas and Alina. Margaret Ann Boden, philosopher, psychologist and cognitive scientist, born 26 November 1936; died 18 July 2025
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
You're washing your socks WRONG: Microbiologist reveals how to clean yours properly – and why you should always IRON them
With so many different chores to keep up with, it can be easy to forget about washing all your odd socks. But scientists say that falling behind on the laundry could lead to more than just smelly feet. Dr Primrose Freestone, a microbiologist from the University of Leicester, warns that your feet are a 'miniature rainforest of bacteria and fungi'. Thankfully, Dr Freestone has revealed the proper method for keeping your socks clean and fresh for as long as possible. Dr Freestone told the Daily Mail that you should use water which is 'at least 60°C (140°F) with an enzyme-based detergent'. Dr Freestone says: 'The enzymes detach the bacteria from the weave of the sock fibres, and the high temperature kills the bacteria and fungi which are adapted to living at human foot temperature. 'If your washing machine cannot manage a 60°C sock-microbe-killing temperature wash, then a hot iron will do the job – especially if the steam function is used. 'This helps the iron heat to penetrate deep into the sock, which will kill any bacteria, verruca virus or athlete's foot fungus.' Even though they stay safely inside our shoes for most of the day, our feet are among the dirtiest places on our bodies. Studies have shown that feet can have anywhere from 10 to 100 million microbial cells living on every square centimetre of skin. This is because our feet are warm, dark, and humid, a combination which helps bacteria thrive. Your feet, especially between the toes, are packed with sweat glands, which keep conditions ideal for microbial growth. To make matters worse, our socks pick up dirt and bacteria from everywhere we go. Socks act as 'microbial sponges' for bacteria, fungi, and fungal spores from soil, water, pet hair, and general dust. In one study, socks had the highest bacterial and fungal counts of any piece of clothing after being worn for just 12 hours. Those microbes collected by your socks then make their homes in the comfortable environment of your feet, where they rapidly multiply. How to wash your socks according to a microbiologist Turn your socks inside out before washing. Use an enzyme-based detergent to break down sweat and skin residue. Wash at least 60°C (140°F). Iron or steam after washing to kill any remaining microbes. 'Feet can be a host for up to 1,000 different bacterial and fungal species, some of which can eat the sweat your feet produce, and their malodorous waste metabolites are what cause smelly feet, socks and shoes,' says Dr Freestone. Those bacteria range from relatively harmless residents to potentially dangerous pathogens such as Aspergillus, Staphylococcus, Candida, Histoplasma and Cryptococcus. Staphylococcus bacteria are the cause of staph skin infections, which cause blisters and painful abscesses. In serious cases, staph infections can even lead to infections such as blood poisoning and toxic shock syndrome. Aspergillus, meanwhile, is a fungus which causes the respiratory condition Aspergillosis, leading to a wheezing cough that may bring up lumps of blood. Once bacteria are growing your socks, they are unlikely to stay put. Studies in hospitals have found that slipper socks worn by patients carried microbes from the floor into beds, including antibiotic-resistant pathogens. However, the biggest infection risk from your socks is from more common skin infections. Dr Freestone says: 'You can pass on infections from dirty socks, such as verrucas, which are caused by the human papillomavirus and are highly contagious, so not washing socks and then walking on floors could infect others with your virus. 'Athlete's foot fungus also lives in socks and can spread via unwashed socks.' In addition to changing your socks every day, Dr Freestone stresses that it is very important to wash socks properly to avoid being exposed to infections. The problem is that regular laundry temperatures between 30-40°C (86-104°F) are well within the limits that microbes on your feet have evolved to survive. 'Washing socks in detergent does help clean them, but I have done lab research which shows that some residual bacteria remain in socks if the wash is not a very hot one,' says Dr Freestone. Washing at higher temperatures or going over your socks with the iron will ensure that no unwanted pathogens survive the wash. Dr Freestone adds: 'My own socks got a hot wash with an antibacterial detergent and follow-on hot ironing, and so are sparkly clean- as are my feet!' Why do towels get so smelly so quickly? Towels are the perfect home for a swarming community of bacteria and fungi. They hold many of the key ingredients for hosting microbial life - water, warm temperatures, oxygen, a neutral pH, and even food in the dead skin people leave behind after a thorough dry. The human body also boasts these ideal living conditions, which is why our bodies are host to trillions of bacteria throughout our lives. As a towel is used to dry the body, microbes sitting on the surface of the skin are deposited onto its damp, warm surface. When we smell towels, we often perceive a musty or sour odour, which is from the waste products deposited by growing communities of mould and bacteria. Don't throw a wet towel into the laundry basket, as the damp and dirt will still be an ideal place for microbes to breed. By the time you get to doing your washing, the towel and the other laundry around it may have acquired a bad smell. And it can be difficult to get your towels smelling fresh again. Instead, put the damp towel straight into the washing machine, or, if it's a while before it's getting laundered, hang it to dry first.
