EXCLUSIVE FORE! President Trump to visit Scotland (and his three golf courses) before the end of July
Donald Trump plans to visit Scotland next month for the first time since his victory in the US election, MailOnline can reveal.
The American president and his team have pencilled in the trip to visit his three Scottish golf courses before the end of July.
It comes after Mr Trump was hoping to informally meet with the King this summer at one of his Scottish residences, Balmoral or Dumfries House, ahead of an unprecedented second State Visit likely to take place in September.
It will inevitably increase speculation that the pair could meet in the summer, but it is understood that their diaries do not align.
Buckingham Palace is reported to be keen to ensure that the King, who is recovering from cancer, has some ring-fenced downtime.
MailOnline understands security services are preparing for Air Force One to fly into Prestwick Airport, in Ayrshire, in the final two weeks of next month.
A ring of steel will be thrown around the US president amid anticipated protests which could even surpass his last presidential visit in 2018.
Thousands of Scots took to the streets in Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen to oppose the former Apprentice TV star's visit during his first stint in office.
However, with tensions running high after the US military's audacious attack on Iran's nuclear capabilities, police may have to cope with a fierce backlash.
Mr Trump's Turnberry golf course in Ayrshire was vandalised by pro-Palestine protesters in March and was the site of an infamous one-woman protest by the late Scottish comedian Janey Godley, who held up a rude sign on his arrival, in 2016.
The US president will likely visit Turnberry and his controversial course in Aberdeen, Trump International, which environmentalists claim has destroyed one of the world's rarest sand dune systems.
Mr Trump may make time to check in on his new resort, the MacLeod Trump International Golf Links course, also in Aberdeenshire, which is named in honour of his Lewis-born mother, Mary Anne MacLeod.
It is set to open before mid-August.
The trip – which could be cancelled at any minute due to volatility in the Middle East and domestic US priorities – could be an opportunity for the president to heap further pressure on golf bosses to hold The Open at Turnberry.
Mr Trump has repeatedly asked Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer about hosting the tournament at the course, which he bought in 2014 for £46 million, but the organisers have yet to concede to his demands.
Eric Trump, the president's son and overseer of his golfing empire, remains optimistic. He said recently: 'Turnberry is considered to be the best golf course in the world by the players, the writers, the spectators and the entire golfing community.'
He added: 'If we get the call, and I sincerely hope we do, I promise the Royal and Ancient [the Open organisers] that we will be the best hosts The Open Championship has ever seen.'
Next month's planned visit, which will mark his first since Mr Trump was elected into office for the second time, will likely enrage his opponents.
The Scottish Greens launched a 'Dump Trump' petition after it was revealed that he would be invited for second State Visit this year, which was signed by more than 6,000 people.
The online petition said the president was not welcome in Scotland as he presents 'a clear and present danger to our climate, peace and human rights around the world'.
It is not known if Mr Trump will meet with First Minister John Swinney, who was quick to condemn the president in the wake of his heated exchange in the Oval Office with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky earlier this year.
It has been mooted that the US president could meet again with Sir Keir Starmer while in the UK – although officials have not confirmed this – and may go on to follow up with European heads of state after meeting with them at the Nato summit at the Hague in the Netherlands last week.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
39 minutes ago
- BBC News
Nigel Farage's Reform UK's rise in London 'a threat to main parties'
Is Reform UK on the rise in London?The party, led by Nigel Farage, says it has quadrupled its membership in the year since the general election, where they won five seats, including one for Farage in UK had the third-highest vote share in the country at the 2024 election - just over 14% - with half a million more votes than the Liberal Democrats. According to polling, London has a smaller share of Reform voters, but it has a higher share of people who say they would consider voting Reform in the future. Not far from the capital, Reform has control of Kent County Council, which had long been UK also has its first London Assembly member, Alex Wilson, who was elected in May 2024. London politics expert Prof Tony Travers told the Politics London programme that the party "could do very well indeed in some of the outer London boroughs, particularly I would say those that voted Leave in the Brexit referendum, so Barking and Dagenham, Havering, Bexley, Hillingdon, even Sutton".He added: "Those are the places I think they could well do a lot of damage to the incumbent parties."Laila Cunningham, a Westminster city councillor who last week defected from the Conservatives to Reform UK, told Politics London that her residents "would always point to how they were let down by the previous Conservative administration and how they wouldn't vote for them".She added: "Honesty, I think, is really lacking in politics now and I just couldn't defend their record." Cunningham said Reform UK were "serious about getting this country back on track, they're serious about cutting immigration, cutting crime, cutting waste, cutting tax and people say that's right wing but that used to be mainstream a few years ago".Deirdre Costigan, Labour MP for Ealing Southall, told Politics London that Reform UK's "key policy seems to be a massive tax cut for the rich".She added: "How are they going to pay for that tax cut? The only way of paying for that is to cut public services. So, we'll have less police on the streets of London and we won't have an NHS."Conservative London Assembly member Alessandro Georgiou told the programme that Farage "is a tax-and-spend socialist, if you take what he says". Watch the full Politics London programme on BBC iPlayer.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Support for Bilston Market traders rejected
A motion to financially support displaced market traders in Wolverhampton has been defeated. Traders said they had suffered financial loss as well as ill health since Bilston Outdoor Market relocated last year to make way for a £5.2m upgrade of the site.A plea for financial support, asking City of Wolverhampton Council to "step in immediately" was defeated at a full council meeting this week. A statement from the council said major projects were rarely completed without "some level of disruption". Anita Stanley said two traders had suffered ill health and another had quit. The Reform UK ward member for Bilston North said traders had also been informed improvements would not be completed until 2026, rather than before Christmas, as originally motion called on the council to put together a financial package to offset trader's losses, freeze rents, and issue an apology letter - but it was defeated at a full council meeting. Cabinet Member for Resident Services, councillor Bhupinder Gakhal, said the Bilston market scheme had "been shaped" by the people who use it - and the council had positive feedback from traders and residents throughout the said: "I want to be absolutely clear we will not cut back on our ambition for Bilston. I see the new market as a key development, the catalyst for even further investment in and around it."Major, multimillion-pound projects are rarely completed without some level of disruption. "We know from talking to market traders and local businesses that the current situation has created some positives and some negatives. "We will continue to listen to and work with them to make this is as pain-free as we can, whilst preparing them for the bigger prize and opportunities the scheme will create."After listening to traders' ideas in March, the council said phase two of the project would find a way of "better connecting footfall" from the bus station to the indoor market. Gakhal said the council was also announcing a £15,000 fund to increase footfall through events in the area. "I am determined to ensure that traders have a big say in how this is used but I'm clear that it will benefit both the indoor and outdoor markets and the wider town centre", he said. Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Reform the NHS, not our shopping baskets
This week, the NHS will publish its 10 Year Health Plan. The most we can expect from this exercise in Soviet-style planning is tinkering around the edges of an edifice that was erected when Joseph Stalin ruled in Moscow. By 2035, the end date of this 10-year plan, the country will almost certainly be unable to afford the NHS in its present form – if, indeed, it hasn't collapsed under the weight of its own contradictions by then. Unable to address the fundamental problems of the NHS, the dirigistes of Whitehall have come up with a new plan to direct us how to lead our lives – telling us what we should or shouldn't be allowed to choose to put in our shopping baskets. Supermarkets will be expected to cut 100 calories from the average shopping basket by limiting sales of sugary and salty snacks or other 'junk food'. Ever since Napoleon Bonaparte sneered at England as 'a nation of shopkeepers', we have worn his insult as a badge of honour. We are proud to be a people who earn our living by trade and we cherish the liberties that are the glory of a commercial society. Even those of us who are not shopkeepers are at least customers. So little does this Labour Government know the British people that it is about to resort to distinctly Napoleonic measures to punish both retailers and consumers. Yet previous attempts to control consumption have never succeeded in changing enduring patterns of behaviour rooted in human nature. It is outrageous that officials feel empowered to tell us what we can, and cannot, eat. The public is being infantilised and robbed of agency. Centuries have passed since Parliament abandoned sumptuary laws that prohibited the lower orders from imitating the luxurious dress of the aristocracy. But the bureaucratic mind is obdurate in its disdain for popular tastes in food and drink. Combined with Labour's instinct to meddle, along with its insatiable fiscal appetite, it is no surprise that, as we report today, a modern version of the sumptuary laws is about to land on an unsuspecting nation. Obesity is a genuine and growing problem, but, hitherto, all attempts to address it by fiscal means have failed. The latest obesity tax – supermarkets will be fined if they don't reduce the nation's calorie intake, and this will inevitably be passed on to consumers – now emerging from the bowels of the Health Department and the Treasury, claims to be aimed directly at our waistlines. In reality, like all its predecessors, it will target our wallets. There is a certain grim irony in the fact that this policy should have been adopted at the same time as the decision by the NHS to prescribe the weight-loss drug semaglutide (contained in Ozempic and Wegovy). It is fairly obvious that the underlying rationale of the new regulations is less about obesity than about the Government's failure to control spending. No doubt figures will be trotted out about how many lives will be saved by cutting consumption of ultra-processed foods or any other category of comestible that attracts the ire of the health bureaucrats. But the truth is that new rules are being concocted because the Government is running scared of its own MPs, who have effectively imposed a veto on cuts in welfare spending. What would genuinely make a difference to life expectancy and health outcomes would, of course, be a radical reform of the NHS, a more active population, and a reduction in the numbers wasting their lives on benefits. Rachel Reeves has just poured another £29 billion into the health service, without any clear cost-benefit calculation. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, is intelligent enough to know that he has inherited an obsolete behemoth that is crying out for root-and-branch reform. But building a new consensus for a new NHS would require the Labour Party to rethink its assumptions about the social contract, as well as the role of insurance and individual responsibility. The original 1946 NHS Act created 'a comprehensive health service designed to secure improvement in the physical and mental health of the people of England and Wales'. Today, the nation's health is not safe in the hands of a dysfunctional Labour Party that would rather do anything – even introducing an assisted-dying service – than take on the overdue task of making the NHS fit for purpose. These new directives are at best a displacement activity, at worst an act of fiscal condescension. A nation of shopkeepers deserves better than to be bossed around by its own government.
