Harnessing Public-Private Partnerships: A Strategic Path To Achieve India's Net Zero Goals, Water Security
India is an emerging economy where Green House Gas (GHG) emissions are set to increase, albeit from a low base, in pursuit of its development and poverty eradication goals. India's historical cumulative emissions from 1850 to 2019 amount to less than 4 per cent of cumulative carbon dioxide emissions of the world from the pre-industrial era, despite being home to 17 per cent of the world's population. Hence, India's contribution for global warming has been minimal and even today its annual per capita emissions are only about one-third of the global average .
During the 26th session of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (COP 26) in November, 2021, India announced its target to achieve net zero by 2070. India's long-term low-carbon development strategy is based on the principles of equity and climate justice and the principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities.
Water conservation is essential to India's net-zero ambitions, given its deep influence on the environment and society. As a country largely dependent on agriculture, industry, and domestic use, India is confronting significant water scarcity issues that are worsened by climate change and rising population.
Large parts of India are already close to a crisis as the taps are running dry. The subcontinent, paradoxically blessed with abundant rainfall, faces one of the gravest water shortages of any large economy. Insights from Water Research Institute of India (WRI) and NITI Aayog reveal that India ranks 13th among 17 countries facing extreme water stress. Over the past decade, major urban centres such as Delhi, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, and Chennai have repeatedly grappled with acute water shortages. Further, between 2017 and 2021, power plants in India lost 8.2 TWh of generation due to water shortages equivalent to the energy consumption of 1.5 million homes over five years.
The reasons are not elusive. They lie in decades of groundwater overextraction, haphazard urban growth, population explosion, poor infrastructure, and the creeping, often overlooked, consequences of climate change.
According to the World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report 2025, the impact of this crisis falls heaviest on the shoulders of the marginalised, urban poor, and industry-reliant regions, where water scarcity is not just inconvenient but economically calamitous.
Sustainable water conservation and management are crucial for climate change adaptation and also play a key role in lowering carbon emissions. Renewable Energy generation and Green Hydrogen production that significantly contribute to GHG emission reductions by displacing fossil fuel in hard to abate sectors also are heavily reliant on water availability. By prioritising measures for water efficiency, India can advance its goal of achieving net zero emissions. In such a scenario, the private sector can become key partners for the Government and act as co-stewards of this water conservation movement.
Water is No Longer Just an Environmental Risk. It is a Strategic One
Once pushed down to the appendices of CSR reports, water has now moved to the top tier of corporate concern. It has become a strategic variable that is central to supply chain stability, ESG ratings, and most importantly investor trust. Further, many strategies of the private and public sector corporates for achieving their net zero targets are directly or indirectly connected to water management. India's policy regime is also gradually catching up. SEBI's Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) framework now obliges companies to disclose their water usage and risks. Yet regulation alone cannot repair aquifers or replenish rivers. What is needed is a transformation in how businesses engage with water, starting with how they value it.
Innovation, Community & Collaboration
Across the globe, large corporates are setting ambitious sustainability goals—ranging from net-zero commitments to circularity targets. Amazon, for instance, has made significant progress in clean energy adoption, becoming the world's largest corporate purchaser of renewable energy. Its operations are increasingly powered by wind and solar farms, including new projects in India. The company has also undertaken robust waste management efforts—cutting down single-use plastics in packaging and promoting reusable delivery options in key markets.
Water, too, is emerging as a crucial frontier in this sustainability journey. Businesses are beginning to shift from being consumers of water to custodians of it. This new water ethic rests on three foundational pillars: operational efficiency, ecosystem replenishment, and collaborative governance.
On efficiency, technology is making the invisible visible. Smart metering, leak detection systems, and real-time water monitoring are enabling companies to reduce usage and minimise waste.
On ecosystem replenishment, Private Sector's water stewardship efforts are exemplified through projects such as lake restoration projects in Bengaluru's Yamare Lake and Hyderabad's Sai Reddy Lake, by Amazon in collaboration with SayTrees. These lakes—considered vital lifelines for their respective cities—had long suffered from neglect, sedimentation, and flood risks due to urban sprawl. The restoration, once complete, is expected to replenish over 570 million litres of water annually, tripling their storage capacity and revitalising the surrounding ecosystem. This aligns with Amazon's broader goal of becoming a water-positive company in India—returning more water to communities than it consumes.
The third pillar is collaborative governance, which determines whether these efforts scale. Coca-Cola India is a strong example—replenishing over 200% of the water it uses through joint projects with NGOs and government agencies. These include the rehabilitation of local water bodies and community infrastructure, contributing directly to the fulfilment of SDG 6: Clean Water and Sanitation.
Crucially, the government is creating an enabling environment. Flagship programmes such as the Jal Shakti Abhiyan, Atal Bhujal Yojana, and the Catch the Rain campaign are revitalising traditional water systems, promoting aquifer recharge, and encouraging citizen participation. The convergence of public initiatives and private sector innovation offers a compelling case for blending capital with credibility—and for redefining how sustainability goals are met.
Water, once considered an operational input, is now being recognised as a shared resource—essential to climate resilience, community well-being, and long-term business continuity. When companies take on the responsibility not just to conserve, but to restore and replenish, they become true partners in sustainable development.
Culture of Water Accountability is the Next Corporate Imperative
Water sustainability can no longer be seen as a philanthropic gesture or a regulatory checkbox. It must become embedded in the architecture of enterprise, reflected in capital allocation by both public and private enterprises, boardroom discourse, and operational design. A clear ecosystem where public and private enterprises come together for a common cause is the need of the day.
This is about mitigating risk and pre-empting disruption. It is also about building trust with communities who live with the consequences of corporate choices. And above all, it is about recognising that the most valuable asset any company holds in a warming world is not its brand equity or its patents. It is its social licence to operate.
top videos
View all
Prioritising water conservation supports India's net-zero objectives by enhancing agricultural sustainability, encouraging eco-friendly industrial practices, and advancing social equity. By understanding the linkages between water, energy, and emissions, India's focus on conserving water can play a vital role in reaching its overall climate and environmental targets. India's water future will not be shaped solely by climate change. It will be written in boardrooms, and through partnerships. The question is no longer whether business should lead. It is a clarion call for public and private sector to come together.
Namrata Mukherjee is former Chief of Party, USAID South Asia Regional Energy Partnership (SAREP). Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
About the Author
Namrata Mukherjee
Namrata Mukherjee is Former Chief of Party, USAID South Asia Regional Energy Partnership (SAREP).
tags :
carbon emissions Net Zero target
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 06, 2025, 14:07 IST
News opinion Harnessing Public-Private Partnerships: A Strategic Path To Achieve India's Net Zero Goals, Water Security
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
EVs versus hybrids: Niti Aayog enters the chat
Federal think tank Niti Aayog is examining the lifecycle emissions of electric, hybrid and conventional vehicles to determine which technology is the cleanest, two people aware of the matter said. The move comes at a time when automakers have crossed swords on providing hybrids the same incentives as pure EVs. The study, which began earlier this month, is likely to be completed over the next few months, the people cited above said on the condition of anonymity. Varying incentives for EVs and hybrids across states have sparked an intense lobbying in state capitals, even as the Centre remains neutral to technologies in the quest for clean mobility. 'The need for such a study arose as contrasting claims emerged after some studies claimed EVs are more harmful when the entire supply chain and recycling are taken into account," one of the two people cited above said on the condition of anonymity. Green tussle While Maruti Suzuki India and Toyota Kirloskar, which manufacture hybrid models, say they deserve clean mobility incentives, Tata Motors and Mahindra and Mahindra say they should be reserved for the zero-emission EVs they make. EVs have no tailpipe emissions; however, in 2023, a study by the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, showed that their manufacturing, usage and scrapping emit more greenhouse gases than the same processes for hybrid or fossil fuel-based study also said EV charging required coal-fuelled power, adding to EVs' overall carbon vehicles run on a mix of fossil fuels and a battery, and strong hybrids do not have a charging port like EVs and plug-in hybrids. The Niti Aayog study will take into consideration the full life-cycle analysis (LCA) for all types of vehicles. 'That means all vehicles – two wheelers, three-wheelers, four-wheelers, public and cargo transport, everything – and it will also look at all fuel powertrains," said the first person cited above. State moves The Union environment ministry is assisting the study by holding meetings with various stakeholders, the second person added. Email queries to the NITI Aayog and the environment ministry went unanswered. Mint reported on 22 July that while the Centre has maintained its stance of supporting all forms of clean mobility, some states have put their weight solely behind EVs. In a recent amendment to its state EV policy, Chhattisgarh removed incentives for hybrid vehicles. On 22 July, the Delhi government also deferred the enforcement of its controversial EV policy to March 2026, according to a report by news agency PTI, citing transport minister Pankaj Singh. An earlier draft of the Delhi EV policy had proposed equal incentives for hybrids and electric vehicles. 'Analysing use cases of vehicles, as well as the location of the vehicles is critical in an LCA,"said Gurudas Nulkar, professor and director, Centre for Sustainable Development, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics. 'The results from an LCA of a vehicle in Delhi will be very different from that in, say, Pune. That is because of the location of the two cities—w dDelhi is located in a flat region, while Pune is at the foothills of the Western Ghats. These diverse geographies will impact fuel efficiency." Lifecycle emissions Experts also said an LCA includes the emissions of extraction and transport of crude oil in the case of fossil fuel vehicles, as well as emissions in mining of critical minerals for hybrid and electric vehicles. The LCA of a vehicle where its components are imported will be different from that of a vehicle where parts are sourced locally, said Nulkar, an expert in industrial sustainability and environmental management. 'Similarly, different use cases for vehicles will yield varying results. There may be some cases with hybrids coming on top, and some with electric vehicles coming on top. The data used for most LCAs is secondary data, but it is very important to vet that data with physical visits, for instance, to manufacturing locations."
New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
India mounts major pushback against Trump's GM crops playbook
NEW DELHI: India is firm on its stance against importing genetically modified (GM) crops from the US, sources in the government said. It has been our stated position for long and it remains so, said a top government source. Import of GM crops has been a bone of contention between the two countries during the trade negotiations. With the government now making its stance clear, the Trump playbook will find full resistance on GM crops. The US is pressing India to allow imports of GM crops such as soybean meal and distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) for animal feed. Initially, the India did not strongly oppose the idea of some tariff cuts on farm goods or even selective GM imports. However, after facing strong domestic resistance, India seems to have hardened its position as far as GM imports are concerned. A Niti Aayog report had suggested a 'strategic opening for US imports' for broader export gains. It proposed importing GM soybean seeds, crushing them at coastal facilities, selling oil domestically and exporting soymeal (with GM traits) to avoid domestic contamination. But experts panned it citing weak regulatory oversight. Another major area of difference between the two countries is imports of animals fed on animal-derived feed — for example, butter from cows fed meat — due to deep religious sensitivities. India prohibits such animals and it considers this policy non-negotiable.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
International Court of Justice climate change news greenhouse gas emissions
The story so far: In a landmark announcement, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Wednesday (July 23, 2025) said countries and territories are obligated to combat climate change through efforts to the best of their capabilities. In a unanimous advisory opinion, the ICJ said rising temperatures and extreme weather events, caused because of human-induced climate change, lead to biodiversity loss and while risking human life and health. According to the ICJ, it is the responsibility of the states to protect the earth's climate systems and environment from anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and limit global warming. What is an advisory opinion? An advisory opinion of the ICJ is non-binding legal advice delivered by the international court, requested by the United Nations or its specialised agencies on specific matters. The ICJ advisory opinion is usually a reflection of what is required to be done under international law. Despite being non-binding, these opinions carry 'legal weight and moral authority', according to the UN. What are the particulars of the opinion? The ICJ opined that it is the duty of states to prevent environmental harm under customary international law and that states must reduce GHG emissions and protect the rights of present and future generations. Climate change poses an 'urgent and existential threat,' the court said. Its opinion relies heavily on observations of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), an international scientific body under the UN that collects and organises evidence of climate change. The Court emphasised that based on due diligence, countries are required to reduce their GHG emissions and support vulnerable nations. The due diligence does not end at adoption of measures but also includes 'a certain level of vigilance in their enforcement and the exercise of administrative control'. It also noted that the Nationally Determined Contributions, which are country-level en route to attaining net-zero emissions, fall under the principle of due diligence and that member states should ensure these goals represent their 'highest possible ambition'. The parties also have an obligation to do their best to achieve these targets. According to the ICJ, climate action is not based on any one law but is rather a mix of international law provisions like the UN charter, and international treaties like the Kyoto Protocol, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and the Paris Agreement, among others, and that they should influence the actions that member states take to protect the environment. These three international agreements are legally binding. Although the opinion noted that it's not the court's responsibility to establish individual responsibility for damage to climate systems, it added the legal consequences arising from a breach of international agreements can lead to assurances and guarantees that such acts will be stopped and not repeated, as well as full reparations to affected states. Countries and territories are also obligated, under international human rights law, to protect climate systems and other parts of the environment, the court said. The ICJ also recognised the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment in its opinion. 'UN climate negotiations have struggled over the last three decades to decisively address climate change, but the ICJ's opinion will empower courts to hold states accountable for weak climate action, and support vulnerable countries in pushing for climate justice through lawsuits and negotiations,' Lavanya Rajamani, professor of environmental law at the University of Oxford, said. How did the ICJ deliver this opinion? The UN General Assembly formally requested the ICJ's opinion on March 29, 2023, including on the obligations of states under international law to protect the environment mainly from GHG emissions, and the legal consequences of failing to do so. The seeds of this discussion were however sown years ago, when a group of law students from the University of the South Pacific launched a campaign in 2019 for climate justice advisory opinion from the ICJ. This led to the formation of Pacific Island Students Fighting Climate Change, a grassroots youth movement. The World's Youth for Climate Justice joined forces with the movement in 2020. In 2021, Vanuatu – a small island developing state in the South Pacific Ocean – said it would lead a diplomatic process to build support among nations for a UNGA resolution seeking an ICJ climate justice advisory opinion. Vanuatu has been disproportionately threatened by climate change and has led multiple global efforts to address the effects. In 2022, more than 1,500 civil society organisations joined Vanuatu's diplomacy efforts for an ICJ advisory opinion. What's the opinion's legality? While an advisory opinion is legally non-binding, it can still influence judicial decisions and executive action. 'The advisory opinion can help in the development of international environmental law, especially when it comes to obligations of states and consequences of breach of law,' environmental lawyer Ritwick Dutta said. 'At present, international environmental conventions are weak on legal consequences of harm and violation. Further, the advisory opinion, by highlighting the interconnection between climate change treaties and other environmental convention such as Convention on Biological Diversity and UN Convention on Law of the Sea, might force the U.S. to finally ratify these treaties which they have evaded for years.' What does the opinion mean for India? The opinion talks extensively about protecting climate systems rather than only focusing on carbon emissions. 'This move beyond 'carbon obsession' would mean that measures to deal with climate change must be in consonance with protection of climate systems – river, grasslands, forest, oceans well as rights of both human and nature,' Mr. Dutta said. 'The narrow focus on climate led to judicial decisions in India such as the one on the great Indian bustard, where the Supreme Court highlighted the need to promote renewable energy to meet climate goals but undermined biodiversity conservation. 'As I see it, the fight against climate change will be now on holding the state and private entities liable for breach of its obligation to prevent harm to humans as well as the environment in totality.' Although historically India hasn't contributed significantly to GHG emissions, it is currently the third-largest emitter of greenhouse gases. It also continues to use coal as its primary source of energy but has ambitious plans to transition away. India is committed to reaching net-zero emissions by 2070. 'India's official position is that it will move away from coal to cleaner modes of generating electricity. Therefore, the ICJ's opinion is not contrary to the stand of India in coal,' according to Mr. Dutta. 'In an affidavit filed before the Supreme Court in M.K. Ranjitsinh v. Union of India, the Ministries of Power, Environment, and New and Renewable Energy had categorically taken the stand the dependence of coal is against both the economic interest of the nation as well has adverse impact on health of the citizens.' The opinion doesn't imply that the use of fossil fuels should stop but that its use should be rationalised by focusing on energy efficiency and by cutting subsidies, 'especially when it comes to those who are not poor,' Mr. Dutta added. 'Despite its low per capita emissions and substantial energy access challenges, as a major carbon emitter with growing energy demands, India will undoubtedly face intensified pressure to ramp up its ambition and accelerate its transition away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy,' Harjeet Singh, a climate activist and founding director of the Satat Sampada Climate Foundation, said. 'The ICJ's nuanced approach to differentiated responsibilities, which may question the static nature of 'developed' or 'developing' status based on current circumstances, directly challenges India's traditional standpoint of limiting its climate responsibilities based solely on historical classifications.' 'This demands a careful recalibration of India's global climate diplomacy. However, it is crucial to remember that the primary and overriding responsibility for the climate crisis, including the obligation for significant emission reductions and financial support, unequivocally remains with developed nations due to their disproportionate historical emissions and greater capabilities,' Mr. Singh added.
