How Air Freight Is Adapting To Global Supply Chain Challenges
The past couple of years have been a change in priorities as businesses look towards the future. Organisations have shifted their strategies from short-term solutions to address pandemic supply chain challenges to long-term security.
Uncertainties in both the economic and environmental spheres persist post-pandemic and continue to put significant strain on the supply chain. While shippers and logistics firms have been remarkably adaptable in response to these shifting dynamics, the lack of global stability presents more immediate challenges.
Issues caused by the pandemic and new obstacles from the global political climate are at the forefront of the supply chain. Businesses face many production and shipping delays, as well as unprecedented cost increases.
Poor visibility has also become a concern as businesses rapidly expand their operations to cover pandemic losses or compete in a crowded marketplace. There can be missed opportunities, damaged partnerships and lost customers if complete oversight of the supply chain is not maintained.
The compiling hurdles mean that industry leaders are investing more in solutions for the future of logistics and shipping. They identify the current challenges and outline prospective solutions for navigating the increasingly complex global trade labyrinth.
A spokesperson from AGI Global Logistics shares the primary factor behind global supply chain challenges, where 'global economic instability has led to increased costs in traditional shipping routes.'
Many other obstacles have emerged worldwide as a result of that uncertainty.
Global supply chain challenges
Global supply chain challenges persist as the logistics industry emerges from the pandemic. Adding to the recovery obstacles are widespread political unrest in key shipping regions, economic instability and extreme weather events.
The rise of AI and emerging technologies, while benefitting, have also opened new avenues of risk to the global supply chain. Cyber attacks against critical supply chain infrastructure are increasing and industry-leading organisations continue to report disruptions as a result of these intrusions.
Finally, talent gaps are also contributing to the issue due to skilled labour shortages. Many recruiters continue to struggle to source talent that adapts to the current expertise required in the global supply chain.
Over three-quarters of major European shippers reported delays and disruptions to their supply chains due to the issues above. Even the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) acknowledges the immense pressure on the supply chain due to current geopolitical, technological and environmental volatility.
Supply chains seek faster decision-making and quick adaptation to stay resilient against rising tides. Today's businesses aren't only competing for products and services but also delivery times.
Air freight solutions
Air freight is a shipping method growing in popularity due to the shifting priorities of global business. In 2024, the industry experienced an unprecedented year of growth, driven by increasing e-commerce demands and changing customer behaviours.
The core pillars that have enabled air freight to adapt to global supply chains are speed, flexibility, cost and resilience. These advantages have helped the industry to remain agile in the face of change.
The pandemic highlighted the importance of speed with ramped-up production and shipment of goods to meet global demand. Many businesses turned to air freight solutions to transport transcontinental cargo in a fraction of the time it would take for regular shipping, keeping the supply chain moving smoothly.
Speeds also enable flexibility in air freight, allowing for quick decision-making and swift action should the supply chain climate change rapidly. The ability to reach more remote destinations faster and bypass many environmental barriers has helped many organisations overcome shipping challenges.
Air freight's resilience and adaptability have come out as the leading shipping method in a changing world. The cargo can circumvent many geopolitical tensions and extreme weather events to meet demands for goods quickly, efficiently and at reduced costs.
As global supply chains continue to face current and new challenges, air freight solutions are ready to adapt. They offer businesses an avenue to reduce costs by shipping goods based on weight rather than volume, with faster transit times and fewer expensive supply chain delays.
Where business leaders have an obligation to minimise costs and drive more revenue, air freight is a supply chain solution adapting to the current status quo.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
With an uncertain future weapons supply from other countries, Ukraine shifts to building its own
United States President Donald Trump's inconsistent support for Ukraine has called into question the continued backing of the US, Kyiv's biggest arms supplier. The Trump Administration recently paused some arms transfers but then reversed course, agreeing to sell weapons to European allies, which will then give them to Ukraine. But even with greater certainty about the flow of Western weapons, it still does not match what Ukraine needs to fend off the Russian invasion. That reality has produced a fundamental shift in Ukraine's appeals to its Western allies. Rather than pleading primarily for arms, as it did early in the war, Ukraine is increasingly asking for the money to build its own weapons. The effort involves an array of both private and government-owned firms involved in making vehicles, engines, electronics, weapons, and ammunition. At the start of the war in 2022, Ukraine relied mostly on artillery, shells, and machine guns donated by Western partners. Now, it produces about 40% of the weapons used at the front, according to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and it is looking to increase that amount sharply. The most striking example of this growing self-reliance is the use of drones, now omnipresent on the battlefield and produced almost entirely in Ukraine. 'This does not bring peace of mind, but it does provide greater moral confidence that we will not be left empty-handed,' Zelenskyy said in February of Ukraine's booming defence industry. To further increase production, Ukraine needs more money, which it sorely lacks. Olena Bilousova, a defence industry expert at the Kyiv School of Economics, said Ukraine had the industrial capacity to produce US$35 billion ($58.6b) worth of military equipment annually, but was producing only up to about US$15b, and was unable to afford more. 'The funding issue is a bottleneck for our defence industry,' Bilousova said in an interview. An employee works on a vehicle at a Ukrainian Armour factory in central Ukraine. Photo / Brendan Hoffman, the New York Times Growing self-reliance - About 40% of weapons used at the front are made in Ukraine. - The drones it uses are produced almost entirely in Ukraine. - Ukraine produces more artillery systems each month than all European countries combined. - It is said to be fully self-reliant for both mortar launchers and shells. Employees work on building mortar launchers at a Ukrainian Armour factory in central Ukraine. Photo / Brendan Hoffman, the New York Times Adding to the pressure to produce more weapons is Russia's own war machinery, which has expanded greatly during the war. Russia's defence budget this year is at least US$150b, about three times as large as Ukraine's. Russia now produces three times as much ammunition in three months as all of Nato does in a year, Mark Rutte, the alliance's secretary-general, said in a recent interview. The imbalance in arms production has given Russia an overwhelming firepower advantage on the battlefield, even in domains such as drones that Ukraine once dominated. Ukrainian soldiers defending the embattled city of Kostiantynivka in the east say Russian attack drones monitor the battlefield day and night, targeting anything that moves. Graffiti left on the bombed-out train station in Kostiantynivka tells the mood. Partly erased where the station wall was blown apart, the words, in English, can still be made out: 'Not asking too much. We just need artillery shells and aviation. Rest we do ourselves.' Unable to match enemy fire, Ukraine is forced to adapt. Using feedback from soldiers on the ground, Ukrainian Armour has started producing vehicles designed specifically to evade drones on the battlefield, including a light buggy capable of racing up to 145km/h to outrun drones. Its construction is bare-bones: an open-topped metal frame, suspension, two seats — and no speedometer. 'Why would you need one?' Belbas said with a smile, as he toured the factory. The New York Times agreed not to disclose the factory's precise location because Russia routinely targets weapons-production sites in Ukraine. Ukrainian Armour also makes a large, unmanned carrier that shows the growing robotisation of the battlefield. It is, in effect, a drone mother ship, designed to transport smaller remote-controlled vehicles to the front. The smaller drones, in turn, deliver food and ammunition to combat positions, while the carrier serves as a relay station for signal transmission. Belbas said robotic vehicles were designed to save the lives of Ukraine's limited number of soldiers, sparing them from risky missions such as resupplying troops at the front. 'Also, it's about money,' he acknowledged. The Ukrainian government pays 15 million hryvnia (about US$360,000) in compensation to the family of each soldier who is killed. Producing a vehicle like this is 'five times cheaper,' Belbas said. The Novator, an armoured vehicle manufactured by Ukrainian Armour. Photo / Brendan Hoffman, the New York Times These innovations make up only a small share of the company's output. Most of its production remains focused on battlefield staples such as mortars — weapons that are reliable in all weather conditions, unlike drones. 'The mortars are like the undying classic weapons,' Belbas said as he stepped into a warehouse lined with mortars mounted on two-wheeled chassis. Last year, the company produced about 1000 mortars, roughly double the previous year's output. Early in the war, Ukrainian troops used Caesar self-propelled howitzers — big cannons mounted on heavy trucks — to pound Russian positions. Now, they have largely turned to a homegrown alternative, the Bohdana, producing nearly 20 units a month, Ukrainian officials say. Bilousova, the defence industry expert, said Ukraine now produces more artillery systems each month than all European countries combined. As for mortars, Belbas estimated that Ukraine has been fully self-reliant for both launchers and shells since last year. It is a turnaround from the start of the war, when nearly all mortar shells were imported. Kyiv has also initiated plans to develop more advanced weapons such as air-defence systems — the type of munitions that were the subject of the Trump Administration's recent flip-flop. (Trump said he did not know who had paused the weapons delivery.) These sophisticated systems are expensive to develop and build, and Kyiv cannot afford to do so on its own. Belbas said contracts with the Ukrainian Defence Ministry to produce more mortars, a far more basic weapon, went unfulfilled because of a lack of funding. To broaden its options, Kyiv recently began a new initiative, inviting its allies to host production facilities within their borders for Ukrainian weapons-makers. Under this model, Ukraine would provide the expertise, while Western partners would provide money and production sites out of reach of Russian strikes. Denmark was the first country to officially endorse the plan, in early July, and Zelenskyy said that 'more such agreements will follow'. Facing the twin threats of Russian expansionism and a diminished US commitment to Nato, Europe is also ramping up military spending and weapons production. Ukrainian officials hope that will mean leaning on Ukraine's hard-won expertise to help rearm the continent. 'Ukraine needs investment. You need skills, you need technology,' Zelenskyy told Western allies this month in Rome. 'And everything we are building now to protect Ukraine will also help protect you.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Constant Méheut Photographs by: Brendan Hoffman ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
1News
a day ago
- 1News
Ryanair mulls increased bonus for staff who spot oversized bags
The chief executive of a European budget airline says it is considering increasing its bonus for workers who identify oversized bags. Ryanair currently pays staff €1.50 (NZ$2.94) if they catch a customer bringing an oversized bag aboard one of its planes, the BBC reported. Ryanair said in a statement that it was "determined to eliminate the scourge of oversized bags which delay boarding and are clearly unfair on the over 99% of our passengers who comply with our baggage rules". Ryanair CEO Michael O'Leary told Irish radio station RTÉ that the airline is considering increasing the bonus for staff. He said the airline had already been battling with the amount of oversized baggage taken on planes. "That's one of the reasons we are so aggressive about eliminating the scourge of passengers with excess baggage," he said. ADVERTISEMENT "We are happy to incentivise our (staff) with a share of those excess baggage fees, which we think will decline over the coming year or two." Summary: The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including death of a The Cosby Show actor, vape product recalled, and how working less makes us feel better. (Source: Breakfast) He said 99.9% of passengers did follow the rules. The airline currently allows a small carry-on bag measuring up to 40cm x 20cm x 25cm and weighing 10kg, but was set to increase to 40cm x 30cm x 20cm under new minimum European Union standards. Customers can pay extra for more and bigger luggage. Passengers who bring a bag larger than the size they paid for can be charged up to £75.00 (NZ$169.57). O'Leary's comments come as the airline's profits jumped to €820 million (NZ$1.6 billion) for the April to June period, up €360 million (NZ$705 million) from a year earlier.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
China stood up to Trump and is pushing Europe, seeing more room to assert its interests
Beijing has learned that it has leverage it can use against outside pressure. It stood up to the Trump Administration's punishing trade war by demonstrating how dependent global industry was on China for its supply of critical minerals. And Beijing likely assesses that it is in a stronger position because Western unity is fracturing, analysts say, with United States President Donald Trump's 'America First' foreign policy weakening the historical bonds between Europe and the US. 'Beijing perceives that the global order is in flux,' said Simona Grano, a China expert at the University of Zurich. 'From its perspective, the US is overstretched and preoccupied with multiple conflicts around the world and domestic polarisation.' 'And with signs of division or fatigue within the transatlantic alliance, the Chinese leadership sees more room to assert its interests, not least in trade, tech and security,' Grano said. That calculation has been evident in China's approach to the summit talks on Thursday, which will include its top leader, Xi Jinping, and Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, as well as other senior European leaders. The two sides will be commemorating 50 years of diplomatic ties — the type of anniversary that ordinarily would be a chance for Beijing to showcase its partnerships. Yet each detail of the meeting appears to underscore China's view of the power dynamic. The summit is being held in Beijing even though it was Brussels' turn to host the rotating event. The meeting will only last one day, according to the EU, despite having been billed earlier as a two-day affair. Expectations for any concrete results from the summit are low. The 27-nation European bloc is caught between wanting to cut a trade deal with the US, which is putting pressure on the region to commit to taking a harder line on China, and the need to maintain stable ties with China. But Brussels has grown more confrontational with Beijing in recent years about a massive trade imbalance that amounted to more than US$350 billion last year, as well as Beijing's alignment with Russia. In a speech this month in the European Parliament, von der Leyen accused China of 'flooding global markets with cheap, subsidised goods, to wipe out competitors', and of discriminating against European companies doing business in China. She also warned that China's support for Moscow in its war with Ukraine was creating instability in Europe. She said she planned to raise these concerns with Chinese officials at the meeting in Beijing. China is unlikely to be accommodating of such criticisms at the summit, if its recent muscle-flexing is any indication. Mao Ning, a spokesperson for China's Foreign Ministry, fired back at von der Leyen, saying it was the EU's 'mindset' that needed 'rebalancing', not China's trade relationship with Europe. This year, China slowed exports of rare earth minerals to Europe, sounding alarms at high-tech firms across Europe and triggering a temporary shutdown of production lines at European auto parts manufacturers. And this month, China hit back at EU curbs on government purchases of Chinese medical devices by imposing similar government procurement restrictions on European medical equipment. Despite its combative stance, Beijing cannot afford to push Europe too far. China needs European markets to absorb the glut of electric vehicles, batteries, and solar panels its factories are making. Domestically, huge price wars have shrunk profits, prompting even Xi and other leaders to warn companies against engaging in 'disorderly and low-price competition'. And Europe's importance has only grown as the Trump Administration tries to close off other markets to China. 'Europe remains an indispensable economic partner for China. But if Beijing overplays its hand, it could find itself more isolated,' Grano said. Still, China has remained defiant when it comes to its close relationship with Russia — which Beijing considers an invaluable partner in counterbalancing the West. Europe has long complained that Beijing's purchases of Russian oil and its supplying of dual-use technologies has enabled the Kremlin to prolong its war in Ukraine. China claims neutrality over the conflict, a position that has been met with deep scepticism in the West, in part because of the closeness of China and Russia. Xi called for Beijing and Moscow to 'deepen' their ties and 'safeguard' their 'security interests' when he met Russia's Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov, in Beijing last week. And this month, China's top diplomat, Wang Yi, privately told EU officials in Brussels that it was not in Beijing's interests for the war to end because it might shift US attention towards Asia, according to a European official briefed on the talks, who spoke to the New York Times on condition of anonymity. Wang's remarks were first reported by the South China Morning Post. China has not commented on what Wang reportedly said. But Victor Gao, a former Chinese diplomat and vice-president of the Centre for China and Globalisation, a Beijing-based think-tank, argued that the assertion attributed to Wang did not make sense because China believes the US is able to project its influence in both Asia and over the fate of Ukraine at the same time. Gao was dismissive of European criticisms of China's relationship with Russia, saying that the region should essentially mind its own business and focus on improving the lives of its people. 'From the Chinese perspective, they are not qualified as a geopolitical rival,' he said. 'They think too much of themselves.' China's strategy towards Europe is essentially to divide and conquer. It saw the EU as hawkish and sought to minimise the impact of its policies while courting Europe's leading businesses, namely from Germany and France, Gao said. Hopes that Beijing will ever help Europe pressure the Kremlin to end its war have 'faded away', said Philippe Le Corre, a senior fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute's Centre for China Analysis, who is no more optimistic that Brussels and Beijing will compromise on trade. 'There is no trust between the two sides,' he said. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: David Pierson and Berry Wang ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
