Primark promotes Houston to chief customer and digital officer
Matt Houston has been promoted to the role and is now accountable for the 'end-to-end customer brand', uniting its Customer and Digital teams 'into one integrated function'. He was previously group strategy and digital director and will continue to serve on the Primark leadership team.
Although Primark has yet to introduce a full e-commerce capability, the retailer has been steadily building its click & collect offer across the UK estate.
And Houston was fundamental in bringing the service to all its British stores. He's also been responsible for growing the digital marketing team and relaunching Primark's customer website.
Primaryk said the alignment 'will ensure a clear, consistent brand experience across all channels and customer touchpoints -- keeping the customer firmly at the heart of everything at Primark'.
Eoin Tonge, interm CEO at the retailer, said: 'Bringing together our customer and digital teams creates a stronger, more integrated function that will unlock new opportunities for the Primark brand and play a key role in driving our international growth. Matt's deep understanding of our business model, combined with the experience he brings from leading the Digital team, will help us build even stronger connections with our customers, creating value and accelerating growth'.
Houston added that this 'is a great opportunity to strengthen how we show up as one brand across every touchpoint. I'm looking forward to building on the strong foundations already in place to deepen customer engagement and help drive the next phase of growth for Primark.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
2 days ago
- LeMonde
'If a dictator issued a call for tenders to reopen gulags, some consulting firms would be ready to bid'
The British daily Financial Times revealed in early July that Boston Consulting Group (BCG), a major consulting firm, had carried out an assignment for an American security company, commissioned by an Israeli think tank, on the "reconstruction of Gaza." The study discussed the displacement of 500,000 Palestinians and assessed proposals – if one dares call them that – to make to Gazans, weighing which would be most effective: $9,000 in cash or $5,000 and four years of rent. A plan conceived without the residents, for a reconstruction without the survivors, billed at several million dollars. BCG apologized, fired those responsible, and gave up its fee. That might have been enough, if not for the countless deaths, horrors and suffering. We could pretend to forget the McKinsey controversy in the United States, in which the consulting firm recommended increasing opioid dosages to drive up prices. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), this resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of people from overdoses. Once again, the firm expressed its "deep" regrets and, in 2024, reached a settlement of nearly a billion dollars to avoid litigation. Those fond of calculations will appreciate the irony. We could settle for these acts of contrition. A moment of nausea, before moving on. But it would be more useful to ask what makes these scandals possible. Like all businesses, consulting firms have "processes." No one is staffed on a project without approval. No new client is accepted without a risk analysis. No work is done outside the rules of deontology. Poorly known codes These rules do exist: Some firms refuse to work for the sex, gambling, or tobacco industries, others avoid certain countries. All of them establish "Chinese walls," supposedly protecting against conflicts of interest. But unlike regulated professions (lawyers or certified public accountants) or those with formal codes (like journalists), these rules are rarely published and often little known even to the consultants themselves. Everything depends on self-regulation.
LeMonde
2 days ago
- LeMonde
Cognac drags down LVMH's spirits division
The engine driving cognac sales has yet to regain full speed. LVMH acknowledged it in its half-year results, published Thursday, July 24. Moët Hennessy, its wine and spirits division – of which British company Diageo owns 34% – reported an 8% drop in revenue to €2.58 billion. This marks a further slide after an 11% decline over 2024, to €5.9 billion. The blow was even harsher for recurring operating profit, which fell by one-third to €524 million in the first six months of 2025. The group, led by Bernard Arnault, explained the disappointing performance due to "weak demand for cognac" and "the impact on customers of trade tensions weighing on key markets in the US and China." The US and China accounted for 80% of sales of the prized Charente region spirit, whose leading brand is Hennessy. Across the Atlantic, LVMH – and major competitors such as Pernod Ricard, owner of Martell, or Rémy Cointreau, known for its Rémy Martin brand – were caught off guard. After the post-Covid-19 boom, the wave of inflation disrupted consumer behavior. They suddenly became more cautious about spending just as spirits groups continued to raise their prices. The drop-off was abrupt. Chinese customers also adopted a wait-and-see attitude, troubled by their country's economic slowdown. After trade battles On top of this new consumer mindset, fierce trade battles compounded the problem. Since early 2024, cognac has been ensnared in a conflict between Europe and China. The sector breathed a sigh of relief in early July. Although Beijing decided to impose 32% tariffs on European wine-based spirits, most companies that agreed to set a minimum price – in effect, a price increase ranging from 12% to 16% – were granted exemptions. LVMH benefited from this agreement. Likewise, Rémy Cointreau revised down the impact of Chinese tariffs on Friday, July 25, from €40 million to €10 million. Conversely, the impact in the US would rise from €25 million to €35 million.
Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
Immigration is "killing Europe", says Trump
Upon his arrival in Scotland for a five-day trip, US President Donald Trump declared that immigration is "killing Europe". Responding to a question from a reporter on migration, he said that "on immigration, you'd better to get your act together. You're not going to have Europe anymore." He continued to say that "You've got to stop this horrible invasion that's happening to Europe. Some people, some leaders have not let it happen. They're not getting the proper credit." He did not name the leaders he had in mind, however, in order not to "embarrass" the others. The US President is set to meet with EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen during his visit, as well as British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Von der Leyen had said they would "discuss translatlantic relations", in a week when negotiations have intensified ahead of 1 August, a deadline set by Trump from when he said will impose 30% tariffs on EU imports. EU member states meanwhile approved a llist of countermeasures of their own if no deal is reached. For his part, Trump said on Friday that reaching a deal with the EU on trade would be "the biggest deal of them all if we make it." 'Stop the windmills' The US president also took the opportunity to take aim at wind energy, saying Europe should "stop the windmills, you're ruining your countries... ruining your beautiful fields and valleys, and killing your birds." Trump has on multiple occasions expressed an intense dislike for wind turbines, recently saying "'I don't want windmills destroying our place.' The Trump Organisation, whose assets are currently in a trust run by is children, was ordered to cover the Scottish government's legal costs after the golf course it owns in Aberdeenshire unsuccessfully sued over the construction of a nearby wind farm, arguing in part that it hurt golfers' views. While in Scotland, Trump will visit a golf course in Aberdeenshire ahead of its opening on 13 August, and another near Turnberry. His family owns both golf courses.
