State senator introduces urgent bill to ban controversial farming tactic before it spreads — here's why experts say it can't wait
The bill, introduced in mid-April, is sponsored by Monica R. Martinez in the state Senate and by Tony Simone in the Assembly. If passed, the legislation would outlaw aquaculture that aims to raise any species of octopus for human consumption. It would also prohibit the business sale, possession, and transport of farmed octopuses in the state.
While there are no such octopus farms in New York at present, the state would join California and Washington in preemptively banning the practice, according to World Animal News.
In March 2023, the BBC reported that the world's first octopus farm had been proposed in Spain, to the great concern of scientists and animal advocates. The proposal raised a number of environmental and ethical concerns.
For one, as WAN noted, because octopuses are carnivorous and "require a high volume of food, about three times their own body weight," overfishing for feed is a risk of commercially farming the creatures.
Commercial farming practices could also introduce pollutants and otherwise disrupt delicate marine ecosystems, per WAN.
The ethical questions involved are serious as well. Octopuses are curious, highly intelligent, exceptionally skilled creatures. In captivity, they're notorious for breaking out of aquarium tanks. The BBC reported that a 2021 study led to the animals "being recognised as 'sentient beings'" in the United Kingdom's Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act. Attempting to contain them in the sort of system typical of a commercial farm would likely border on cruelty and could lead to concerning behavior.
The new bill comes after a pair of laws, also sponsored by Martinez, were passed by the NY legislature to restrict animal trafficking and assign stricter punishments for animal cruelty. If passed, the octopus farming ban would result in a daily fine of $1,000 per offense, according to WAN, and the fines would be collected by the Department of Environmental Conservation.
The bill is still in its early stages. Next, it needs to pass through the Environmental Conservation Committee before ultimately it can be brought to votes in the Senate and the Assembly.
Should the U.S. government ban all products tested on animals?
Absolutely
No way
Only certain kinds of products
Let each state decide
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
What Today's Leading Philosophers Have To Say About Conscious AI
TOPSHOT - A robot using artificial intelligence is displayed at a stand during the International ... More Telecommunication Union (ITU) AI for Good Global Summit in Geneva, on May 30, 2024. Humanity is in a race against time to harness the colossal emerging power of artificial intelligence for the good of all, while averting dire risks, a top UN official said. (Photo by Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP) (Photo by FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP via Getty Images) It is an illusion. Consciousness, that is. Earlier this month, leading experts in the realm of the mind gathered in Heraklion, Crete, for the International Center for Consciousness Studies (ICCS) annual conference. The topic for this year was Artificial Intelligence and Sentience. All the participating philosophers, psychologists, neurosurgeons, cognitive scientists and entrepreneurs agreed; the matter at hand is no longer just a subgenre of science fiction. According to David Hulme, CEO of Conscium, a machine consciousness research group and consultancy based in London, we have approximately five years before AI becomes a fully autonomous conscious agent. Given the numerous ethical questions associated with machine consciousness, Hulme and Conscium are as invested in the guiding principles of the research as the research itself. Their principles are readily available as an open letter on their website. The general public seems to agree about the imminence of conscious AI. Clara Colombatto, a University of Waterloo psychologist specializing in the perception of other minds, presented a series of empirical studies conducted to gauge the public perception of AI consciousness. In these tests, ChatGPT-4 is the constant used as AI. The results suggest that Hulme may actually be too generous in his timetable; 57-67% of those surveyed believe that ChatGPT is already conscious to some degree. Ok, so what? Does this mean that we must brace ourselves for a Matrix-like world? The computer scientist Roman Yampolskiy, author of Artificial Superintelligence: A Futuristic Approach, thinks so. Unlike today's cybersecurity, for example, where you can manually rectify a problem (e.g., banks issue a new credit card in cases of fraud), there will be no way out when a problem arises with conscious AI. Once it becomes conscious, it is already uncontrollable. The creation and implementation of conscious AI would then have to be perfect, which according to Yampolskiy is impossible. However, Yampolskiy would be the first to admit he is further down the doom-scale than most. Others are more hopeful; the philosopher and entrepreneur Dmitry Volkov, co-founder of the ICCS and CEO of Social Discovery Group (SDG), a global investment firm, believes the 2013 Spike Jonze film Her is a more apt prediction. This is why ten years later Volkov founded the girlfriend app Eva AI, an 'ideal AI partner who listens, and is always in touch with you.' The idea for Eva AI came out of data analysis from SDG, one of the first players in the online dating market. Many of the users were not always willing to meet but still desire communication. The Eva AI mission statement, according to Volkov: 'We are trying to solve the problem of loneliness from the other end, not from the Tinder attraction side.' This is where AI may be surprisingly effective. Volkov points out, 'when you disclose emotionally invaluable information with some other person, that has a real positive impact. But if you disclose it to humans or AI, it actually does not matter. "And we found early on [in our research] that emotional disclosure to AI has an even bigger positive impact. [The users] are discussing with a degree of honesty that is higher than if they were discussing with their brother or mother, because sometimes your brother or mother is your biggest judge.' The ethical implications of Eva AI are vast, but Volkov thinks it can be a tool for tenderness. 'If we develop an AI that is both capable of loving and capable of being loved, then it is sort of a solution. We don't kill or torture the ones we love, even if they are inferior to us…So the project that we are engaged in is actually trying to build an AI that is not the smartest thing in the world but has the emotional intelligence that's high enough to understand your feelings.' Much of the conversation on conscious AI centers around ethics. The cognitive philosopher Andy Clark, who was honored at the ICCS conference for his contributions to the study of consciousness, calls the ethical implications of AI 'the burning question.' Volkov has a theory why. 'Ethics,' he says, 'comes very naturally. We are social beings, and for us, it is very important to be able to differentiate between the good and the bad.' On the other hand, he believes that 'philosophers actually created the problem of consciousness. Most people get it when they put enough effort, but it's not coming naturally.' Clark and the rest of the ICCS mainly focused on the metaphysical problems of defining and fine-tuning the concept of consciousness during their time in Crete. In a 1994 lecture, the Australian philosopher Dave Chalmers first articulated the hard problem of consciousness. This became the seminal 1995 paper 'Facing Up To The Hard Problem of Consciousness.' In very general terms, the hard problem questions the explanatory gap between the physical wiring and firing in the brain and the subjective experience of what it is like to be you. How can something purely physical (the body/brain) give way to something nonphysical (subjective experience)? In order to fully understand consciousness and what it may mean for AI, the hard problem must be solved. Importantly, it can be solved. There is a concept of consciousness, it is intrinsic to the subject, and it cannot be explained in purely physical terms. This is the realist view of consciousness. As it turned out, Chalmers was all but alone in this view at the ICCS conference. Most belonged to the illusionist camp. Chalmers even quipped that the Center ought to be called the Illusionist Center for Consciousness Studies. Illusionism as a philosophy of mind is spearheaded by the English philosopher Keith Frankish. Frankish and the illusionists believe the hard problem is asking a bad question. Consciousness can be explained in purely physical, functional, and causal terms. It is simply a series of complex predictive, reactionary, and informational processes or models. There are some thinkers, such as English neuropsychologist Nick Humphrey, that have issues with the name 'illusionism' itself. But a key aspect of the theory is that the subjective experience central to realism still seems to exist. In other words, human consciousness is an illusion. Looking past these semantic disagreements, illusionism appears to be the leading view in the current philosophy of mind landscape. And yet the illusionists do not always see eye to eye. Unlike Volkov, the philosopher Katarina Marcincinova of the Kempelen Institute of Intelligent Technologies in Slovakia was fearful of the possibility of AI (functional) consciousness, opining it will be 'highly dangerous and ethically problematic.' For example, she worries about counterfeit people pretending to be human. Still, Marcincinova believes the illusion of our consciousness is essential; it allows us to create a sense of purpose for life, the world, and ourselves. Whether it is ethics or metaphysics, it is clear that the rise of artificial intelligence has pushed the work of philosophers to the forefront. According to Andy Clark, this is where philosophy ought to be. 'The generality of philosophy is key. It gives you the tools to think a little bit more clearly about any problem, and we need to think about what AI is offering.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Experts issue warning after making horrifying discovery in cows' digestive systems: 'The situation is extremely dangerous'
Experts issue warning after making horrifying discovery in cows' digestive systems: 'The situation is extremely dangerous' Bovines, such as cows and buffalo, are facing a serious issue with plastic in India, which is an indicator of an ongoing worldwide problem for other animals and people. What's happening? Veterinarians and other officials in India have reported that cows, bulls, and buffaloes, especially stray ones not under a person's care, have been consuming massive quantities of plastic, often from food waste in plastic bags discarded along roadsides, according to the Pune Times Mirror. The outlet reported that 250 to 300 surgeries are performed every year to remove plastic from animals' digestive systems in the Pune district. When cattle consume plastic, it remains in their stomachs, which have four chambers, for 8-10 hours, swelling over time and causing the animals to stop eating. That impacts fertility, dairy production, and their well-being. "The situation is extremely dangerous for livestock health," Dr. BL Gaikwad, an assistant commissioner of the Maharashtra animal husbandry department, said, per the Times Mirror. One farmer said surgeons removed 10 kilograms (22 pounds) of plastic from one of their dairy cattle. Why are animals ingesting plastics important? Plastic pollution is a pervasive issue for animals across the world, being consumed by a wide variety of land animals, including elephants, hyenas, zebras, tigers, and camels, according to Other plastic waste can cause injury, like loss of limbs, or containers can get stuck on animals' heads, costing them time. It's not just land animals; millions of tons of plastic waste also make their way into the ocean. And if that many animals are ingesting plastic on a large scale, there's also the concern of microplastics for animals and people. Microplastics, the tiny microscopic pieces of plastic that break down from larger pieces, have been found in all parts of the human body, from the brain to the reproductive system, per CNN. What's being done about animals ingesting plastic? According to the Times Mirror, the Indian Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change has enforced a ban on single-use plastics "that are of low utility and generate excessive waste," as well as a ban on the manufacture, import, storage, sale, and use of bags below 120 microns (think of thin take out bags). You can make your own impact by reducing your use of plastics, such as avoiding single-use plastics when you buy health and beauty products or food as well as in other areas of your life. Do you think Americans use too much plastic? Absolutely Only in some states We're getting better We're doing fine Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Congressional committees push back on Trump's proposed NOAA budget cuts
Lawmakers from both parties have so far rejected steep cuts to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) proposed by the Trump administration and reiterated their support for a fully staffed National Weather Service (NWS) during recent committee meetings, which included key appropriations markup sessions. While the House and Senate spending bills for fiscal year 2026 are still in the early stages of the legislative process, initial drafts indicate bipartisan pushback against the significant cuts outlined in the administration's budget proposal, released earlier this year. For fiscal year 2026, which begins Oct. 1, the Trump administration proposed cutting NOAA's budget by roughly 25%, including the elimination of its research division, the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR) and making major reductions to other key offices such as the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), the world's largest provider of weather and climate data. MORE: After Texas flood, elected leaders say cuts to FEMA, NOAA could affect weather response The budget proposal stated, "The FY 2026 budget eliminates all funding for climate, weather, and ocean Laboratories and Cooperative Institutes. It also does not fund Regional Climate Data and Information, Climate Competitive Research, the National Sea Grant College Program, Sea Grant Aquaculture Research, or the National Oceanographic Partnership Program." The House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies advanced a spending bill with bipartisan support last week that would fund NOAA at levels mostly in line with budgets of previous years. The fiscal year 2026 Commerce, Justice, Science appropriations bill provides roughly $5.8 billion to NOAA in 2026, a 6% decrease from the previous year. However, it restores a majority of funding for NOAA's Operations, Research and Facilities (ORF) account, which includes OAR. While specific spending details have not yet been released, this would likely spare many critical research labs and climate institutes from potential cuts. During the July 15 markup session, Subcommittee Chairman Hal Rogers, R-Ky., expressed his support for the National Weather Service, emphasizing the recent toll of devastating flooding hitting the country. "Flooding has inflicted much pain on this nation over the last few months," he said. "From my district in Kentucky to Texas, now is the time to ensure the National Weather Service is equipped with the funding it needs to warn and protect our citizens." MORE: Senate considers Neil Jacobs, 'Sharpiegate' scientist, as NOAA administrator At the start of the markup session, Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., the subcommittee's ranking Democrat, voiced concerns over both the proposed NOAA budget and recent staffing and funding cuts at the National Weather Service. "Weather forecasts are not waste, fraud and abuse," she said. "I ask my colleagues, did anyone come to your town halls and complain that the National Weather Service has too many meteorologists? Too many people issuing advisories, watches and warnings on severe storms?" DeLauro also cited concerns from Bill Turner, Connecticut's state emergency management director, who said the situation is "a very fragile house of cards right now, and we need them to continue… It really could be catastrophic in a lot of ways for our state if they go down that path of stopping the National Weather Service and their functionality." The bill now advances to the full committee for a markup on Thursday, July 24. The Senate's version of the bill allocates approximately $6.14 billion to NOAA for fiscal year 2026, just below the $6.18 billion approved for 2025. While this represents a modest overall decrease, the Senate Committee on Appropriations voted to boost spending for the agency's Operations, Research and Facilities (ORF) account, adding $68.7 million. The increase means more available funding that could go to key offices such as OAR, NWS and NESDIS (National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service). MORE: Hurricane season is here and meteorologists are losing a vital tool for forecasting them The current Senate bill explicitly signals support for NOAA's mission, including weather and climate research. "The Committee strongly supports Climate Laboratories and Cooperative Institutes for their critical role in delivering high-quality weather information and driving economic benefits across the United States," the bill states. The bill also addresses staffing concerns at local NWS offices across the country and provides additional funding to ensure they become fully staffed. The bill's authors write, "Insufficient staffing levels risk compromising public safety and the NWS's mission to protect lives and property. The Committee provides an additional $10,000,000 for Analyze, Forecast and Support and urges the NWS to prioritize recruitment, retention, and training initiatives to ensure all weather forecast offices (WFOs) are fully staffed." While introducing the bill, Jerry Moran, R- Kan., chairman of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Science and Justice, said, "NOAA, and particularly the National Weather Service, is a hugely important component of what this bill funds, and this bill recognizes that importance." He added that the bill "fully funds the National Weather Service" and "eliminates any reduction in the workforce." However, Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, raised concerns that the bill still gave too much discretion to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to determine the staffing levels needed to fulfill the agency's mission and statutory obligation -- "the Office of Management and Budget which clearly made the judgment that the National Weather Service has too many human beings working," Schatz said. He introduced an amendment that would have required the administration to maintain full-time staffing at levels in place as of Sept. 30, 2024, but it was rejected along party lines. The Senate Committee on Appropriations approved the Fiscal Year 2026 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act on July 17 by a vote of 19-10. MORE: How job cuts at NOAA could impact weather forecasting What does the Trump Administration want to cut? The administration's budget proposal calls for eliminating the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR) as a NOAA Line Office, with several of its functions transferred to the National Weather Service and the National Ocean Service. OAR leads NOAA's weather and climate research and develops many of the forecasting tools meteorologists rely on to produce timely and accurate forecasts. The proposed budget would include shutting down NOAA's nationwide network of research labs and cooperative institutes. Among them is the Global Systems Laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, where the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model, a critical tool in modern weather forecasting, was first developed more than a decade ago. The HRRR model helps meteorologists track everything from severe thunderstorms to extreme rainfall to wildfire smoke. The Global Monitoring Laboratory, also based in Boulder, oversees operations at Mauna Loa Observatory on Hawaii's Big Island. This observatory has maintained the world's longest continuous observation of atmospheric carbon dioxide and has been crucial to our understanding of how human-caused greenhouse gas emissions fuel global warming. NOAA's Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory (AOML) in Miami, Florida, plays a vital role in operational hurricane forecasting. The lab develops cutting-edge tropical weather models that have significantly improved forecast accuracy in recent decades. National Hurricane Center (NHC) forecasters set a record for forecast track accuracy in 2024, according to a NOAA report. NHC issued 347 official forecasts during the 2024 Atlantic hurricane season, and its track predictions set accuracy records at every forecast time period. MORE: DOGE now has access to NOAA's IT systems; reviewing DEI program, sources say Who will lead NOAA next? Earlier this month, during a confirmation hearing, Dr. Neil Jacobs, President Donald Trump's nominee to head NOAA, said he supports the administration's proposal to significantly cut the agency's budget arguing the reductions could be achieved by shifting work from research to operations without impacting "mission essential functions." Jacobs also said if confirmed, he would "ensure that staffing the weather service offices is a top priority," adding that, "It's really important for the people to be there because they have relationships with the people in the local community. They're a trusted source." NOAA's 2025 budget costs Americans less than $20 per person this year. ABC News reached out to NOAA for comment, but did not immediately hear back.
