Council to consider using AI to cut costs and improve service
The local authority will embark upon an AI transformation assessment, including commissioning an AI partner, so it can gain a 'clearer understanding' of how the technology can make the organisation more efficient.
This process aims to support the development of a business case that will outline 'the scale of opportunity' and priorities for building on Millie, which launched in November and has attracted mixed feedback.
The state of play was set out in a report on the council's transformation and change programme, which also confirmed a 'working relationship' with Derby City Council to share best practice with the leadership board on Wednesday.
It said: 'Based on Millie's success so far and the learning established from the AI innovation being progressed by Derby City Council (and other authorities across the UK), it is planned to progress an AI transformation assessment across the council over the coming months, which will involve, as a first step, commissioning an AI partner via an appropriate procurement route.
'Through a series of stakeholder engagement, workshops, data analysis, financial validation solution demonstrations and trials, this AI transformation assessment will give the council a clearer understanding of how AI solutions can enhance efficiency, reduce costs and improve service delivery.
'This critical initial assessment stage will support the development of a full business case that is intended to be brought back to a future board for detailed consideration later in the year.
'The business case will provide a clear understanding of the scale of opportunity and the key priorities for building on the success of Millie and progressing the council's sector-leading development of AI capability.'
Councillor Graeme Clark, a Labour representative for Paisley Northeast and Ralston, said at the meeting: 'I'm glad that this council has committed to using AI as part of its services, as part of the transformation assessment.
'Do we have an estimate of the savings that AI may bring to the council through that commitment?'
Council chief executive Alan Russell responded: 'That business case process will help us understand your question.
'I would be slightly uncomfortable committing to even an indication of that at the moment.
'It's a rapidly developing area, and I think the opportunities will continue to grow.
'The report does note that we are working closely with Derby City Council down south, who are a bit further ahead in the journey than us.
'I think that's very helpful. They've been very accommodating and open to working with us in partnership.
'They're maybe about a year or so ahead of us in that journey, they do have AI transformation as a key part of their transformation programme, which is looking to deliver several million pounds of efficiency savings, and they're well down the road on that.
'But no two organisations are the same, and we need to understand how it will work for Renfrewshire and, in terms of our circumstances, how we deliver services here.
'I've got no doubt it does provide the potential to deliver a step change in how we use that technology and how it supports the workforce to do all of our jobs better and support delivery of better outcomes.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds dismisses 'daft' wealth tax - 'be serious'
It is the first time a Government minister has explicitly ruled out a wealth tax since plans to cut disability benefits were gutted, leaving Chancellor Rachel Reeves with a battle to balance the books The Business Secretary has hit out at "daft" demands for a "magic wealth tax" to plug holes in the public finances. Jonathan Reynolds rubbished speculation that Chancellor Rachel Reeves could balance the books after U-turns on disability benefit cuts and winter fuel with a levy on the wealthiest Brits. Ms Reeves has refused to rule out a tax on wealth, which has been backed by Labour figures, including former leader Lord Neil Kinnock and Wales's First Minister Eluned Morgan. But Mr Reynolds dismissed the idea and told supporters to "be serious", in comments likely to anger some on the Labour left where support is growing for the move. It is the first time a Government minister has explicitly ruled out a wealth tax since Keir Starmer was forced to gut his plans to cut disability benefits last month. The Chancellor has been left to make up the shortfall, while battling sluggish growth and higher than expected borrowing. Experts believe she may be forced to put up taxes in the autumn if she wants to avoid making cuts to public services - triggering calls for a new tax on wealth. But Mr Reynolds told GB News: "This Labour Government has increased taxes on wealth as opposed to income - the taxes on private jets, private schools, changes through inheritance tax, capital gains tax. "But the idea there's a magic wealth tax, some sort of levy... that doesn't exist anywhere in the world. "Switzerland has a levy but they don't have capital gains or inheritance tax. "There's no kind of magic (tax). We're not going to do anything daft like that. "And I say to people: 'Be serious about this.' The idea you can just levy everyone... What if your wealth was not in your bank account, (what if it was) in fine wine or art? "How would we tax that? This is why this doesn't exist." The Chancellor recently told the Mirror that ordinary workers won't see their VAT, income tax or national insurance contributions rise. And Ms Reeves signalled a lack of enthusiasm for a dedicated wealth tax, saying she had already asked the wealthiest and businesses to pay more in last year's Budget, which included a £40billion tax raid to fund cash-strapped public services like hospitals and schools.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
IMF warns Rachel Reeves will have to raise taxes or make cuts such as axing the pensions triple lock and means-testing NHS services
faces having to take drastic action on spending unless she abandons her pledge not to hike taxes on 'working people', the IMF warned today. The international body highlighted the 'difficult decisions' facing the Chancellor in its latest assessment of the UK's position. The report pointed to medium-term pressures from the aging population, suggesting that unless more revenue is raised the pensions triple lock could have to be axed, or NHS services means-tested. The verdict came as Ms Reeves desperately hunts for options to increase taxes as she faces an estimated £30billion black hole in the public finances at the Autumn Budget. Labour has ruled out increasing income tax, employee national insurance or VAT. The tax burden is already set to hit a new high as a proportion of GDP after the last Budget imposed a £41billion increase - the biggest on record for a single package. The IMF praised Ms Reeves for committing to stick to her fiscal rules, and suggested her plans struck a balance between 'supporting growth and safeguarding fiscal sustainability'. The watchdog also commended reforms to curb benefits costs. However, since the assessment was penned the government has humiliatingly dropped the proposals in the face of a Labour revolt. The report said: 'While the UK has scope to raise revenue, which is lower than in some G7 peers, its revenue ratio is close to a post-WWII high. 'Unless the authorities revisit their commitment not to increase taxes on 'working people,' further spending prioritization will be required, to align better the scope of public services with available resources. 'The authorities have already embarked on this process through recent reforms to incapacity and disability benefits, but other avenues for savings need to be considered. 'In particular, the triple lock could be replaced with a policy of indexing the state pension to the cost of living... 'Access to public services could also depend more on an individual's capacity to pay, with charges levied on higher-income users, such as copayments for health services, while shielding the vulnerable. There may also be scope to expand means testing of benefits.' Ms Reeves said: 'Today's IMF report confirms that the choices we've taken have ensured Britain's economic recovery is underway, and that our plans will tackle the deep-rooted economic challenges that we inherited in the face of global headwinds. 'Our fiscal rules allow us to confront those challenges by investing in Britain's renewal. 'We're committing billions of pounds into improving transport connections, providing record funding for affordable homes, as well as backing major projects like Sizewell C to drive economic growth. 'There's more to do, and that's why we're slashing unnecessary red tape and unblocking investment to let British businesses thrive and put more money in working people's pockets.'
Reuters
44 minutes ago
- Reuters
Artificial Intelligencer: Why AI's math gold wins matter
July 24 (Reuters) - This was originally published in the Artificial Intelligencer newsletter, which is issued every Wednesday. Sign up here to learn about the latest breakthroughs in AI and tech. At the Reuters Momentum AI conference, opens new tab in Silicon Valley last week, I heard two phrases over and over from Fortune 500 executives: "human in the loop" and "flat is the new up." They reflect a cautious but ambitious strategy: While nearly every company still keeps humans working alongside AI, the early impact is already showing that companies are growing revenue without hiring more people. What's changed? The nature of work within organizations. The first cuts are already hitting outsourced labor. Employees are shifting to higher-value work, such as handling complicated tasks and reviewing AI's output. Revenue per head is on the rise, or as some say, 'flat headcount is the new up.' Despite the narrative that 2025 will be the year of the AI agent, truly agentic workflows still seem distant for complex use cases. In fact, some executives still view AI models as just pattern matchers, not true reasoners. Researchers at Google and OpenAI would beg to differ, as I learned after speaking with them following both labs' gold medal wins at this year's International Mathematical Olympiad. I believe this is an exciting milestone for the reasoning paradigm that AI models are striving to advance. Scroll down to read why this matters. Email me at opens new tab or follow me on LinkedIn, opens new tab to share any feedback, and what you want to read about next in AI. Our latest reporting in Tech & AI Exclusive-Blackstone drops out of group bid for TikTok US White House to unveil plan to push US AI abroad, crackdown on US AI rules Trump administration seeks pathway for US companies to export AI chips Nvidia CEO's China charm offensive underscores rock star status in key market AI models with systemic risks given pointers on how to comply with EU AI rules TSMC posts record quarterly profit on AI demand, but wary about tariffs How AI won math gold AI crossed a threshold that even caught the best researchers by surprise. For the first time, an AI from Google DeepMind won a gold medal at the International Mathematical Olympiad, the world's most elite high school math competition. OpenAI, which did not officially participate in this year's IMO, said its model also achieved gold-medal performance, based on solutions graded by external experts using IMO guidelines. While it's tempting to see this as just another headline in AI's relentless march, I spent time speaking with the minds behind these models—some of whom are former IMO medalists themselves—to understand how we got here and what these wins reveal about the frontier of AI. The main takeaway? The reasoning abilities demonstrated by models like DeepMind's Gemini Pro and OpenAI's o1 series have endless possibilities. This win is also a testament to the classic recipe for model improvement: high-quality data and huge amounts of compute. While neither lab revealed the full details of their methods, both demonstrated the power of thinking for longer. Since last year, top AI labs have shifted focus from scaling up pre-training and increasing model sizes to using test-time compute to give models more 'thinking time'. OpenAI described how its model tackled each problem dozens of times simultaneously, using consensus and multi-agent strategies to aggregate the best solutions. DeepMind, meanwhile, employed its 'Deep Think' technique, enabling Gemini to explore many solution paths at the same time, synthesize ideas, and generate rigorous, human-readable proofs. In what researchers dubbed a 'paradigm shift,' DeepMind's AI has gone from needing expert human translation just a year ago to solving five of six IMO problems in natural language this week. This breakthrough directly challenges the long-held skepticism that AI models are just clever mimics, predicting the next word. Math, requiring multi-step, creative proofs, has become the ultimate test of true reasoning, and AI just passed. We don't know exactly how much parallel computation went into solving each question, but OpenAI told us it was 'very expensive.' After all, the models were given about 4.5 hours—just like human contestants—to work through each set. This highlights how today's most intelligent models demand vast compute resources, helping explain AI labs' insatiable appetite for chips like Nvidia's GPUs. And as these methods expand into other domains—coding, science, creative writing—the computational demands will continue to grow. Both labs also credit their breakthroughs to high-quality data: step-by-step, annotated proofs, not just final answers. DeepMind, in particular, pointed to new reinforcement learning techniques that reward not just correctness, but the elegance and clarity of a proof. So what does this mean for the future? The 'can AI reason?' debate may be settled—at least for domains as challenging as Olympiad mathematics. The ever-growing emergence of true thinking capabilities inside AI models has the potential to transform many domains as researchers crack the code on math and move on to new frontiers. DeepMind is already working to put its system in the hands of mathematicians and, soon, the wider public. OpenAI says it's using what it's learned from this model to train others, but this particular capability won't be included in the upcoming GPT-5 release this summer. Chart of the week You're probably reading this AI newsletter because you're already an AI user, which will put you in the basket of 61% of Americans who have welcomed AI into their lives. The rest, a solid 39%, remain unconvinced, according to a report from Menlo Ventures, opens new tab. The top blocker? Good old-fashioned human connection. About 80% of non-adopters say they'd rather deal with a person than a machine, especially for important decisions. In fact, 53% say they want accountability and oversight from another human, not just a digital assistant who always gives instant responses. Other top hurdles include data privacy worries (71%), skepticism about AI's usefulness (63%), and a healthy distrust of the information AI serves up (58%). So, while the bots may be ready, the humans are holding out for more trust, transparency, and—let's face it—a bit more humanity.
