NA nod sought for Rs345b spending
Listen to article
The government has sought ex-post facto approval from the National Assembly for nearly Rs345 billion in additional spending incurred during the current fiscal year without prior parliamentary approval. No war-related expenditures with India were booked in the accounts.
A Rs60 billion supplementary grant was allocated for defence purposes in the outgoing fiscal year, but it was not war related. Pakistan's armed forces met war-related expenses with India from their regular approved budgets, said Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb.
The National Assembly's approval is being sought along with the new budget. While the Rs344.6 billion figure appears high, especially against the government's claim of strict expenditure control, it is still lower than in the previous fiscal year.
Under the Constitution, the federal government can approve supplementary grants for unforeseen expenditures without prior National Assembly approval. However, it must later follow the same approval process as for the new budget. Over time, this constitutional provision has been used routinely rather than exceptionally.
Details show that Rs345 billion in additional spending was incurred on unbudgeted items by diverting funds from other heads. This has not impacted the overall budget size, but the volume of these grantsmost approved by the Economic Coordination Committee of the Cabinetreflects poor budgeting and financial control.
Under the $7 billion International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailout package, the federal government has committed that – in order to ring fence the fiscal programme – no supplementary grants will be allowed beyond the approved budget, except in case of severe natural disasters. It has also pledged to seek ex-ante approval from the National Assembly for any spending exceeding budgetary appropriations.
Sources said discussions also took place at the IMF level about discouraging supplementary grants made through internal fund reallocation, to improve fiscal discipline.
The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N)-led government approved these additional grants for all kinds of expenditures, including power subsidies, the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC), armed forces, helicopter repairs, hosting the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, and discretionary spending on parliamentarians' schemes and civil armed forces' capacity building.
The single largest supplementary grant was for power sector subsidies, accounting for 37% of total additional spending. The government gave Rs115 billion in supplementary grants to pay independent power producers, while Rs308 million was allocated for structural reforms in the power sector.
An additional Rs14 billion was given to settle liabilities for solarising agricultural tube wells.
A Rs258 million grant was issued for financial compensation to families of Chinese nationals killed in a terrorist attack that Pakistani authorities attributed to foreign involvement.
The government allocated Rs59.5 billion to the armed forces in supplementary funding. This included Rs23.3 billion for Pakistan Army's counter-terrorism capacity enhancement, Rs8 billion for defence force projects, and Rs7 billion for the Jinnah Naval Base in Omara, according the finance ministry's budget book.
Additionally, Rs8 billion and Rs4 billion were allocated for the Special Security Division South and North, respectivelyunits that have existed for years and should be part of the regular budget.
The government also approved Rs5 billion for internal security duty allowances and Rs2 billion for technological upgrades at the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR).
A Rs1.3 billion supplementary grant was provided for fence maintenance along the Afghanistan and Iran borders, while Rs800 million was allocated for developing the naval air station in Turbat.
Another Rs1.8 billion supplementary grant has been allocated toward overhauling engines of VVIP aircraft, according to the finance ministry's budget documents.
The Reko Diq mining project received Rs3.7 billion in additional funds. A Rs1 billion grant was given for hosting the SCO summit, as per the budget book.
Despite some concerns, Rs2 billion was allocated to restructure Pakistan Revenue Automation Limited (PRAL) — a company and not a federal entity. An additional Rs2 billion was granted for Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) officers, and Rs1.6 billion for setting up anti-smuggling posts.
For transition accommodation of FBR officers, Rs430 million was approved, and Rs869 million was provided to enhance the organisation's operational efficiency. Despite this, the FBR has posted a record Rs1.03 trillion shortfall in tax collection for the current fiscal year, with one month remaining.
A compulsory Rs1.3 billion grant was given to the Election Commission of Pakistan for holding local government elections. Rs7.2 billion was allocated for Sindh-specific discretionary spending on small schemes and for operationalising the Green Line Bus Rapid Transit project.
The interior ministry received a Rs4.3 billion development grant for initiatives such as transforming the National Forensic Agency, building women's facilities in tribal areas, setting up check posts, and launching water supply schemes.
A Rs30 billion supplementary grant was provided for flood-affected areas of Sindh, and Rs19.2 billion was allocated for small development schemes executed by the now-defunct Pakistan Public Works Department. Sindh also received Rs9 billion in additional financial support for projects, but the finance ministry did not detail the projects.
An additional Rs7 billion was given for parliamentarians' schemes and Rs23.4 billion grant was approved for the federal Directorate of Immunisation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
SC's ruling on reserved seats strengthens hybrid system: JI
LAHORE: Chief of Jamaat-e-Islami Hafiz Naeem ur Rehman has said that the Supreme Court's ruling on reserved seats has further strengthened the hybrid system, depriving people of their democratic rights. 'The verdict is regrettable and based on a flawed interpretation of the Constitution,' he said in a statement issued from Mansoora on Sunday. The decision of constitutional bench, he said, has once again raised serious questions about the credibility of the judicial system. He added that the 26th Constitutional Amendment allowed powerful quarters to bring the judiciary under complete control. 'Ruling elites are now using courts to get favorable decisions. Jamaat-e-Islami had vehemently opposed the 26th Amendment and outrightly rejected it, while some opposition parties became a part of it.' The JI leader said had the opposition taken a principled stand, at least some credibility of the courts might have been preserved. Commenting on the implications of the verdict, he said it remains to be seen how both the government and opposition parties respond. 'Will they accept PTI's rightful seats as spoils of war or adopt a moral, principled, and democratic position by refusing to take them?' he asked. He remarked that for Pakistan's so-called political parties, democracy is nothing more than a tool for personal gain. 'Political parties must correct their direction and prioritize democratic values over personal interests. Only then can rule of law and constitutional supremacy be established in the country,' he stated. He emphasized that the people themselves must now rise for their rights through peaceful resistance—and that Jamaat-e-Islami offers the most credible platform for such a struggle. Meanwhile, Rehman expressed deep sorrow over the tragic drowning of tourists in the Swat River and extended condolences to the bereaved families. He criticized the government for failing to respond in time, saying, 'Authorities watched helplessly on TV as children and women were swept away by the current. A helicopter could have reached them from Islamabad in just 30 minutes—or even less from Peshawar. But while the ruling elite can immediately deploy helicopters and jets for personal use, the citizens of this country are left to die without help.' He held the ruling class responsible for monopolizing national resources and failing to provide even basic facilities to the common man. 'The people have been abandoned. The government has failed to protect lives,' he said. He pointed out that the PTI has been in power in KP for over 13 years, yet the Swat tragedy once again exposed its incompetence. He demanded that all illegal encroachments — especially those on riverbanks—and unauthorized hotels in tourist areas must be immediately removed to prevent future disasters. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Zardari names Dogar IHC's senior-most judge
Listen to article President Asif Ali Zardari has officially declared Justice Sardar Sarfraz Dogar as the senior-most judge of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) and confirmed the permanent transfer of Justice Dogar along with two other judges. Following the president's decision, a new seniority list of IHC judges was released through a gazette notification dated June 27, 2025. According to the notification, Justice Sarfraz Dogar, who had earlier been serving on transfer, has been placed at the top of the seniority list of the IHC. Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani has been listed second and will serve as the senior puisne judge. Justice Mian Gul Hassan Aurangzeb follows in third position, while Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, Justice Babar Sattar and Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan have been listed fourth, fifth and sixth, respectively. Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir ranks seventh, followed by Justice Saman Riffat Imtiaz in eighth place. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro, another transferred judge, is listed ninth, while Justice Azam Khan, Justice Muhammad Asif (transferred from Quetta) and Justice Inam Amin Minhas occupy the tenth, eleventh and twelfth positions respectively. The matter of confirming the permanency of transferred judges and finalising the updated seniority had been sent to the president for approval. It marks a major turn in the ongoing judges transfer case, which has seen increased legal contestation in recent weeks. However, the controversy continues to brew. Just two days before the new list was issued, five IHC judges filed a formal appeal against the Supreme Court's decision, arguing that the transfers undermined the Constitution's clear stipulations on judicial appointments and seniority. On June 27, five judges of the Islamabad High Court had filed an appeal against the Supreme Court's earlier ruling, requesting a stay on the president's implementation of that judgment. They urged the court to bar the president from acting on the decision until the matter could be fully adjudicated. The judges - Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, Justice Babar Sattar, Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan and Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz — had earlier submitted a representation challenging the basis of the transfers. They contended that a judge transferred to another high court must take a fresh oath and that their seniority should be determined from the date of their new appointment, not their original judicial service. According to the petition, this means the transferred judges should rank below the sitting IHC justices who were already part of the court. The dissenting judges had also refrained from attending Justice Dogar's oath-taking ceremony as acting chief justice of the IHC — a symbolic protest that underlined the deepening rift within the bench. The legal community now awaits the July 1 meeting of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), which is expected to take up the matter of permanent appointments of chief justices to the Islamabad, Sindh and Peshawar High Courts. The names of Justice Dogar, Justice Kayani, and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb are currently under consideration for the IHC slot.
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Will low reserves be the new normal?
EDITORIAL: That the economy is stuck in a low-growth trap is a fact. Imports are already inching up without being accompanied by a robust growth momentum. Traditionally, import pressure has been felt when growth reached over four percent; however, now after two years of stabilisation at 2-3 percent growth, a stress is already visible in the interbank market. The issue is that the economy's size is growing, as nominal GDP has increased from US$ 311 billion in FY16 to US$ 410 billion in FY25. However, SBP forex reserves today stand at US$10-12 billion compared to US$18 billion in FY16. Commodity prices, even after declining from their super cycle peak, remain higher than their FY16-18 levels. Low reserves combined with relatively higher commodity prices have created a new normal that coupled with a rising consumption demand from a young and growing population traps the economy in a cycle of low growth. The key question is why reserves are not increasing and why external funding has dried up, despite the country continuously being in IMF programmes and receiving praise from the Fund for its progress and reform commitments. Moreover, why are bilateral and market-based inflows scarce, even though international rating agencies have upgraded the country's ratings? Why is the country stuck in repeated rollovers? Recently, China approved only half of its committed funding. Other bilateral partners are merely rolling over existing loans. Commercial loans remain expensive, despite improved ratings. The finance minister has yet to start attracting capital from Chinese markets via panda bonds, and there are no discussions about issuing new Eurobonds or sukuk. No fresh loans appear imminent. Currently, the government has only empty promises for investment. At best, it can secure sovereign loans by improving perceived sovereignty internationally. Investment should ideally come from the private sector, but when local investors themselves are looking to take capital out of the country, it is unrealistic to expect foreign investors to show interest. The drain on the financial account continues, and some loans might not roll over, while capital account inflows (FDI) remain insufficient to bridge the gap. Consequently, the current account must remain balanced — if not in surplus — during FY26. Remittances cannot grow significantly, given their large existing base, and exports have limited upside potential. Conversely, import pressure is building. At current growth levels of 2-3 percent, imports are already difficult to manage. With the national tariff rationalisation policy in action, reductions in import duties are likely to drive even higher imports, thus making demand management critical. The currency is the first line of defence. The SBP has accelerated currency depreciation from five paisas a day to 15 paisas a day, with PKR/USD currently hovering around 284. The currency needs to adjust further until imports are brought under control, which implies little room remains for additional interest rate cuts. Another concern is that currency depreciation will reignite inflation expectations because fuel and energy costs are pegged to the US dollar and the interest payments on government's external debt would increase. Any corresponding increase in exports as a result of currency depreciation would at best be marginal to begin with. Thus the fragile macroeconomic recovery faces premature challenges as these trends likely to persist in FY26 as well. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
