Dog playground ban confirmed by Norfolk council
Aylsham Town Council requested Broadland Council consider the new rules due to locals using play areas to exercise their dogs, both on and off leads.It was suggested that dog urine and dog mess in playgrounds may leave behind traces of bacteria even once it has been cleared up, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said."People may pick up faeces within enclosed play areas, but the scientific evidence is that there is still surface contamination," warned Riley."I do not doubt this new ban will protect some children who would otherwise become seriously ill."Concerns were also raised about young children and dogs being in an enclosed space together and the increased risk of biting.
'Widespread support'
A meeting of the full council last Thursday agreed to bring in the rule change, after it was backed by a committee earlier in the month.Jan Davis, leader of the Green group, said there had been "widespread public support" for the move.A ban on dogs in playgrounds has already been implemented by other authorities, including South Norfolk Council.The new measures in Broadland will remain in place for three years, after which time they will be reviewed.A report to the council says it currently receives "relatively low" complaints of uncleared dog mess, with 44 being recorded last year.
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
3 hours ago
- Evening Standard
Heathrow delivers 'urgent' £49 billion third runway expansion plan to Government
Munira Wilson, the Liberal Democrat MP for Twickenham, said: 'The Government claims that Heathrow expansion will deliver growth. Yet the less than 0.5% growth it would add to GDP is miniscule compared to the 4% wiped off the UK's GDP by Brexit. There are also serious questions around how on earth a debt-laden Heathrow can actually finance the massive costs, and how much will end up coming from taxpayers' pockets.
Telegraph
11 hours ago
- Telegraph
Nigel Farage shouts down ‘pig-headed' Democrat
While Republicans have strongly come out against Sir Keir Starmer's online safety law, Mr Raskin struck a more even tone, telling Politico the legislation had 'some very good things' and potentially 'some problematic things'. 'I think the intervention of Democrats who don't have a dog in that fight was maybe too much for [Mr Farage] to handle, but we did want to make some general points about the freedom of speech,' he said. Mr Farage has pledged to repeal the Act if Reform wins the next election, prompting Peter Kyle, the British science and technology secretary, to accuse him of endangering children and siding with the notorious child abuser Jimmy Savile. The Reform leader has called the claim a 'disgusting' smear and claims the 'Orwellian law' will clamp down on free speech while failing to protect children. US warns UK to stop threatening tech companies The White House has warned Sir Keir to stop threatening American tech companies as a backlash mounts to the online safety law. The legislation allows the Government to impose fines worth millions of pounds on companies such as X if they fail to remove harmful content from their platforms. A senior US State Department official told The Telegraph on Thursday that they would 'monitor developments in the UK with great interest and concern'. Separately, Mr Farage added to the pressure on Mr Trump to release the Epstein files as he became the president's latest ally to call for complete transparency over the paedophile financier. Mr Trump's administration has so far refused to release all the documents it holds on Jeffrey Epstein, who died in prison after being charged with sex trafficking in 2019, prompting a backlash from supporters in the process. 'I think this is one area where Donald has sort of put himself into conflict with much of his own base,' Mr Farage told radio station LBC.
The Guardian
11 hours ago
- The Guardian
Staff fearful of reprisals if they speak up amid hospital investigation, report finds
Staff at a hospital trust where police are investigating at least 90 deaths say they face reprisals and ridicule from bosses if they raise concerns, according to a damning report. Asked to review University Hospitals Sussex, the report's authors said they 'repeatedly heard concerning examples of staff, often at a senior level, being ignored, dismissed and sometimes ridiculed when speaking up.' The report by Niche Health and Social Care Consulting said this fear of reprisals from whistleblowing could be harming patient safety. It also highlighted complaints of misogyny and failures to deal with 'unwanted romantic advances'. The review team noted a number of challenges facing the trust, including an investigation by Sussex police into possible corporate and individual manslaughter charges over allegations of medical negligence and cover-up in the general surgery and neurosurgery departments. Operation Bramber is focused on the deaths of more than 90 patients, and serious harm suffered by more than 100 others. It was sparked by the concerns of two consultant whislteblowers who lost their jobs at the trust after speaking up, first revealed in the Guardian in June 2023. The report found staff feared their careers could be hindered if they raised concerns. One said they had been told not to share data that made the trust look bad. Another said when they did raise concerns they were 'gaslit' and targeted by management. The report identified 'significant issues with psychological safety at every [staff] level' and noted that the fear of speaking up had worsened in the last year. It said staff identified as having the potential to disagree with management said they were deliberately ignored in meetings. A staff survey conducted for the review received 376 responses of which more than 300 were negative or very negative on the issue of speaking up. The responses often cited a 'fear of reprisals'. One said: 'There could be comeback which will affect your career in [a] negative manner.' Another said: 'I raised concerns. It put a target on my back. Management lied, gaslit me, would circumvent the issue, would dismiss my concerns.' A third said: 'I feel no one listens.' Staff complained that the executive team discouraged bad news and different opinions. The review identified a 'predominance of direct and authoritative leadership styles'. It added: 'We heard repeatedly that 'there is a parent-child dynamic in this organisation'.' It also found that 'incivility and poor behaviours appear to be pervasive' and there was a strong view that these were tolerated by leaders. The report did not give details of these behaviours. Last year the Guardian revealed that a consultant surgeon was promoted after allegedly assaulting resident doctors during surgery. Six senior women at the trust complained to the reviewers of misogyny, which was felt to be prevalent among consultants. Female staff said they faced eye rolling and other signs of dismissiveness from male colleagues when they spoke at meetings. They also faced pejorative references to sexuality when they took the lead. One woman claimed she 'experienced unwanted romantic advances and inappropriate comments, with no actions taken months after reporting this to various senior leaders.' Earlier this month the trust chief executive, George Findlay, announced his departure. Andy Heeps, the acting chief executive, said the trust accepted all the report's recommendations for improvement and its 'valuable insight into what we do well, where we are improving, and where there is clearly more to do'. He said: 'The authors recognise the scale of the task in completing such a huge trust merger during the Covid pandemic, and highlight a number of key improvements such as our big reductions in waiting lists and key service quality improvements. 'But they also draw attention to some fundamental issues which we've not yet succeeded in tackling – and all of these things need to change, and change quickly.'
