Budget 2025: Invest In Our Children And Whānau - The Foundation Of Our Future
Belinda Himiona Chief Executive of Te Pai Ora SSPA says despite soaring demand across the social sector, Budget 2025 fails to address chronic underfunding to support children and whānau.
While it is positive to see investment for Oranga Tamariki social service contracting, learning support, strengthening the safety of the care system and redress for survivors, social investment initiatives and an increase for Māori and Pasifika Wardens.
'The challenge for the government is to match its investment rhetoric by being brave to invest comprehensively in the services that our sector has consistently shown improves lives. Community must have a revitalised role with services devolved to community, iwi and hapū.'
Belinda cautions, 'There are clear indications that things are not ok in Aotearoa.'
Lest we forget – recently:
• UNICEF ranked NZ towards the bottom of all of its Child Wellbeing indicators of 36 OECD countries [source: Report Card 19 Fragile Gains - Child Wellbeing at Risk in an Unpredictable World, UNICEF]
• Reports of concerns for children to Oranga Tamariki rose 35% in the last year alone with more than 95,000 reports of concern made [source]
• Concerningly in the last year most child outcomes have worsened across poverty, violence, education achievement, mental health [source: State of the Nation 2025, Salvation Army]
Rather than choosing to respond comprehensively, the decision in this Budget to invest in youth justice and truancy programmes is short-sighted. Investment in early intervention is the most impactful. It is critical to understand that these decisions will disproportionately harm Māori and their whānau.
We can't keep waiting for early investment, it is needed now in:
• Interventions for children and whānau at risk
• Poverty reduction and whānau support
• Fair pay that recognises the value the social sector workforce brings
'Governments choose where to invest. There are trade-offs. Once you improve the lives of whānau you set the foundation for all our future.'
ABOUT SOCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS TE PAI ORA O AOTEAROA | www.sspa.org.nz
Te Pai Ora SSPA is a membership-based organisation, representing more than 250 non-profit, community-based social service organisations from around Aotearoa New Zealand. Our member organisations are diverse, including small rural organisations, Iwi and kaupapa Māori service providers, Pacific providers, and large national children's organisations. Our member organisations provide life changing and often life-saving services and support in their communities.
Te Pai Ora SSPA's full members are funded by government to deliver social services in our communities every day, with a predominant focus on children, rangatahi, families and whānau. Our affiliate members are organisations that deliver social services for these people, and organisations and individuals working in areas aligned to the interests of children, young people, whānau or communities.
Te Pai Ora SSPA's vision is that Aotearoa New Zealand's community-based social services are sustainable, making a positive impact every day in our communities and hapori, supporting children, young people and whānau to thrive now and into the future. Te Pai Ora SSPA works to strengthen Aotearoa New Zealand's social sector through advocacy and engagement, learning and development, relationships and sector leadership.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Regulatory Standards Bill Could Be Barrier For Māori Housing
The Ministry of Housing and Urban Development has warned that the Regulatory Standards Bill could stymie progress in enabling papakāinga, or Māori housing, documents show. A ministry official also flagged concerns the legislation could make it harder for ministers to do their jobs, and warned the reach of the proposed law - and the minister-appointed board - seemed "disproportionate to the authority of Parliament". Regulations Minister David Seymour rejected the criticism, saying the ministry should be "leading the charge to cut through this bureaucracy so more homes can be built". The Regulatory Standards Bill is non-binding on Parliament but proposes a set of principles MPs and officials would have to consider when designing regulation. It also would set up a board, appointed by the minister, to examine current and future laws' consistency with those principles, as well as requiring regular reviews of all regulations. In its feedback, the housing ministry raised concern about the potential for individual property rights to be elevated over and above collective rights. "...the lack of provision for collective rights/rangatiratanga and the indicated shift towards Individual rights, in a way that is not currently in New Zealand's constitution, could impact the way we can develop policy and legislation with significant negative impacts on Māori housing outcomes," it said. The ministry said one of the proposed principles - dealing with taxes, fees, and levies - could hinder progress on Māori-led housing projects. "If this principle is imposed over regulation, we are concerned it could be misaligned with the current approaches to whenua Māori, lead to greater fragmentation of land/whenua Maōri, be a barrier to pooling resources for collective good and further entrench the negative housing outcomes that currently exist." The government in May announced plans to make it easier to consent papakāinga. However, funding for the Whai Kāinga, Whai Oranga housing fund has also been cut. In a statement to RNZ, a spokesperson for Seymour said if the Regulation Standards Bill had been in place years ago, it could have prevented "much of the pointless red tape" that slows down building and consenting. "New Zealand faces a serious housing crisis. Anyone who has tried to build a home knows the delays and costs caused by red tape," the spokesperson said. "I'd have thought the Ministry for Housing would be leading the charge to cut through this bureaucracy so more homes can be built." An FAQ document prepared by Seymour's office also rejected the idea that the bill would favour individual rights over collective ones, saying it preserved the status quo "that collective Parliamentary law can trump all individual rights to personal autonomy and possessions". The document did not specify, however, how individual property rights would be considered compared to collective property rights by officials operating under the new regime. The housing ministry also warned that requiring reviews of all secondary legislation in reviews - without exemption - would add to the government's workload. To that, Seymour was unapologetic: "We're aware the public service doesn't like this law. Yes, it makes more work for them, justifying laws that interfere in people's lives. Here's the thing: If the public service think being required to justify their laws is a faff, imagine what it's like for the public they have to serve who are obliged to follow them." The ministry also made the case that the Treaty of Waitangi "should be featured as a relevant consideration" among the principles. But the FAQ, from Seymour's office, said the Treaty was excluded because the bill was focused on the quality of regulations, not Treaty obligations. "As with compliance with international obligations, legal obligations under Treaty settlements are a given. A central part of the RSB is to protect existing legal rights from unprincipled appropriation," it said. The ministry also said the ability for the proposed Regulatory Standards Board - appointed by the Regulations Minister, currently Seymour - to carry out reviews of regulations ahead of agencies' own regular reviews of legislation "would not be the most effective use of the board's time". Seymour has previously defended the extra cost and workload, saying the cost was about 2 percent of the policy work currently done across the government. "If it costs $20 million just to check the regulations, imagine the cost to all the poor buggers out there who have to comply with all this crap," he said. Concerns raised by official over 'disproportionate' powers In preparation for providing feedback on the Cabinet paper in October, an MHUD official warned that giving the Regulation Minister power to set the terms of regulatory reviews could interfere with the work of other ministers. "The power of the Minister of Regulation to initiate regulatory review and set terms of reference gives considerable power and will affect the ability of a portfolio minister to advance their work," the official said. "There should be elements of mutual agreement, or consultation required, or some detail about the threshold for the Minister to initiate a review (eg requiring an Order in Council)." The official also questioned whether a board chosen by the minister should have so much influence, saying it seemed "disproportionate compared to the authority of Parliament". They pointed out there was already a process - through the Regulatory Review Committee and the Legislation Act - that allowed MPs to examine regulations if concerns were raised. In response, Seymour's spokesperson said the bureaucrats "may want to familiarise themselves" with a set of rules, known as Legislative Guidelines, which departments are already required to follow, including the principles of property rights, individual liberty, and the rule of law. "The only difference is that under the Regulatory Standards Bill, these principles would become Parliamentary law, not just Cabinet guidance that some departments clearly ignore."
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Pacific-Māori marriages lead new identity wave
By Aui'a Vaimaila Leatinu'u , PMN Gerardine Clifford-Lidstone Photo: Supplied Pacific people who marry outside their heritage often choose Māori partners, according to a Ministry for Pacific Peoples (MPP) investigation into this increasingly shared identity among these populations. According to MPP's ongoing Insights Briefing , which aims to deepen the understanding of Māori and Pacific identity, there are around 90,000 people who identify as both Māori and Pacific in Aotearoa. "We also found that when Pacific people marry outside of [their culture], they will marry a Māori first," Gerardine Clifford-Lidstone, the Secretary for Pacific Peoples at MPP, told Khalia Strong on Pacific Mornings . "While we're different, there's also a lot of similarities. What I've found, as I've gone around talking to various iwi leaders, is that…we want these populations to be counted. "There are so many that have said, 'my moko [grandchild] is part Tongan, part Māori, and they speak both Māori and Tongan'. Others say, 'I know someone in my whānau, who's part Cook Island, part Māori, and they want to learn their Cook Island whakapapa' because they've been raised entirely with a Māori worldview." Clifford-Lidstone emphasised the significance of understanding these identities, saying that by 2043, nearly 40 per cent of New Zealand's population will identify as Māori or Pacific, which will impact workforce demographics, cultural experiences, language, and genealogical ties moving forward. "It's been a really fun and insightful process to participate in. The consultation's open for one more week, 9 July. I really encourage people who identify as both Māori and Pacific to participate." The MPP is facing nearly $36 million in funding reductions under Budget 2025, following a previous cut of $26m. Despite this, key policy priorities have been retained, with some new initiatives introduced. For example, the Tauola Business Fund ended and the Tupu Aotearoa employment programme scaled back, while funding for the Pacific Business Trust and Pacific Business Village continues. Despite a tighter budget, Clifford-Lidstone says major initiatives continue, including the Pacific Languages Strategy, Toloa STEM scholarships, and Pacific Media Innovation funding. "Then we've got our housing initiatives. So, the building of affordable homes, a programme as part of that called Our Whare Our Fale, which is looking at 300 homes in Porirua. Then the Financial Capability Programme. You may have seen in Budget 2025 some new money for Pacific Wardens," she says. "These really wonderful mātua and volunteers from our community who support the work of a range of agencies, particularly police, engaging with the community and ensuring that we are in a safe environment. We've still got a lot of work underway there on top of our policy programme." On the legacy Dawn Raids programme, she says the funding will remain until the 2026 to 2027 period, with the Vaka of Stories project helping to capture community narratives. Clifford-Lidstone adds that they have two years to complete specific deliverables, some of which have already been completed. She acknowledges the concerns around the planned cancellation of the nationwide Census survey, emphasising the importance of evidence-based data for delivering targeted services. Clifford-Lidstone says the Pacific community's pace of growth and change is rapid. "Our data and insights team have a formal agreement with Statistics New Zealand to work together on census planning and data standards. So, we're going to be working really closely with them to keep an eye on that particular issue. "We do want our communities to be accurately reflected and to be participating. That participation will change a little bit given that it's on admin data, we need the quality of that admin data to be good. So, that's a role that we will be playing." -This article was first published by PMN .
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
Red Carpet Being Rolled Out To Potential Candidates
Bay of Plenty Regional Council is rolling out the red carpet to the community this July, as nominations open for the upcoming local body elections. The Regional Council is seeking nominations to fill its 14 seats across the region – including its three Māori constituency seats. Toi Moana Acting Chief Executive Reuben Fraser says this is the opportunity for those members of the community who have a passion for regional issues to take the stage. 'We're rolling out the red carpet and asking our community to take the spotlight for these elections,' Mr Fraser says. 'Being a regional councillor is about making the decisions that help define the future for our community – decisions that help us direct and then deliver on the work in our plans and policies. 'Our councillors are one of the vital links between the organisation and our community, so it's important that the makeup of our council reflects our communities.' Nominations for the upcoming elections open on Friday 4 July, before closing on 1 August at 12pm. Voting papers will be sent out from 9 September, with postal voting closing at 12pm on 11 October. 'While the job isn't always an easy one, it is an incredibly rewarding one,' Mr Fraser says. 'As a councillor you're helping shape our region's future through every conversation you have with your community, and at every meeting you attend and represent them at.' The best place to start for anyone thinking about standing, is to watch the recording of the recent Candidates Information Webinar says Mr Fraser. 'This year we recorded this event and have made it available on our website – so if you missed it, you haven't missed the opportunity to find out a bit more about what it means to stand for Council and be a Councillor.' Mr Fraser says the recording will give people a broader understanding of not only the role of a Regional Councillor, but also some of the rules around campaigning and the elections process. All information about the elections, including the nomination form, is available at
