
'Lord of the Rings' director backs long shot de-extinction plan, starring New Zealand's lost moa
On Tuesday, Colossal Biosciences announced an effort to genetically engineer living birds to resemble the extinct South Island giant moa – which once stood 12 feet (3.6 meters) tall – with $15 million in funding from Jackson and his partner Fran Walsh. The collaboration also includes the New Zealand-based Ngāi Tahu Research Centre.
'The movies are my day job, and the moa are my fun thing I do,' said Jackson. 'Every New Zealand schoolchild has a fascination with the moa.'
Outside scientists say the idea of bringing back extinct species onto the modern landscape is likely impossible, although it may be feasible to tweak the genes of living animals to have similar physical traits. Scientists have mixed feelings on whether that will be helpful, and some worry that focusing on lost creatures could distract from protecting species that still exist.
The moa had roamed New Zealand for 4,000 years until they became extinct around 600 years ago, mainly because of overhunting. A large skeleton brought to England in the 19th century, now on display at the Yorkshire Museum, prompted international interest in the long-necked bird.
Unlike Colossal's work with dire wolves, the moa project is in very early stages. It started with a phone call about two years ago after Jackson heard about the company's efforts to 'de-extinct' – or create genetically similar animals to – species like the woolly mammoth and the dire wolf.
Then Jackson put Colossal in touch with experts he'd met through his own moa bone-collecting. At that point, he'd amassed between 300 and 400 bones, he said.
In New Zealand, it's legal to buy and sell moa bones found on private lands, but not on public conservation areas – nor to export them.
The first stage of the moa project will be to identify well-preserved bones from which it may be possible to extract DNA, said Colossal's chief scientist Beth Shapiro.
Those DNA sequences will be compared to genomes of living bird species, including the ground-dwelling tinamou and emu, 'to figure out what it is that made the moa unique compared to other birds,' she said.
Colossal used a similar process of comparing ancient DNA of extinct dire wolves to determine the genetic differences with gray wolves. Then scientists took blood cells from a living gray wolf and used CRISPR to genetically modify them in 20 different sites. Pups with long white hair and muscular jaws were born late last year.
Working with birds presents different challenges, said Shapiro.
Unlike mammals, bird embryos develop inside eggs, so the process of transferring an embryo to a surrogate will not look like mammalian IVF.
'There's lots of different scientific hurdles that need to be overcome with any species that we pick as a candidate for de-extinction,' said Shapiro. 'We are in the very early stages.'
If the Colossal team succeeds in creating a tall bird with huge feet and thick pointed claws resembling the moa, there's also the pressing question of where to put it, said Duke University ecologist Stuart Pimm, who is not involved in the project.
'Can you put a species back into the wild once you've exterminated it there?' he said. 'I think it's exceedingly unlikely that they could do this in any meaningful way.'
'This will be an extremely dangerous animal,' Pimm added.
The direction of the project will be shaped by Māori scholars at the University of Canterbury's Ngāi Tahu Research Centre. Ngāi Tahu archaeologist Kyle Davis, an expert in moa bones, said the work has 'really reinvigorated the interest in examining our own traditions and mythology.'
At one of the archaeological sites that Jackson and Davis visited to study moa remains, called Pyramid Valley, there are also antique rock art done by Māori people – some depicting moa before their extinction.
Paul Scofield, a project adviser and senior curator of natural history at the Canterbury Museum in Christchurch, New Zealand, said he first met the 'Lord of the Rings' director when he went to his house to help him identity which of the nine known species of moa the various bones represented.
'He doesn't just collect some moa bones – he has a comprehensive collection,' said Scofield.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
Thailand's viral hippo Moo Deng celebrates first birthday
Thailand's baby pygmy hippo and internet sensation Moo Deng celebrated her first birthday on Thursday, devouring a massive tropical fruit platter alongside her mother as throngs of adoring fans turned up for her four-day party. Moo Deng, whose name means 'bouncing pig' in Thai, became a global superstar last year, with images of her rosy cheeks and clumsily charming antics going viral online, inspiring fan art, merchandise, songs and memes around the world. Thousands of visitors converged on the Khao Kheow Open Zoo, 62 miles south of the capital Bangkok, taking turns to see the bouncy baby hippo during a four-day birthday bash that included a photo exhibition, a charity auction and a parade. Advertisement 4 Moo Deng celebrated her first birthday on Thursday. AFP via Getty Images 'Moo Deng has made more people know about the zoo and they travel here, generating so much income for us – which allows us to improve the zoo a lot,' said Atthapon Nundee, Moo Deng's caretaker at the zoo. The zoo served Moo Deng and her 26-year-old mother Jona a 44 pound 'birthday cake' — which was a selection of tropical fruits carved in a Thai traditional style — that was carried into her enclosure by three zoo keepers. Advertisement Some of Moo Deng's prized possessions were auctioned during the festivities, including a plastic bathtub that she had used since her birth. The tub sold for $2,150 while a cast of her footprints went for $21,426. 4 Moo Deng devoured a massive tropical fruit platter with her mother on Thursday. AP 4 Crowds attended the celebration to witness Moo Deng comp on her birthday treat. REUTERS Advertisement 4 Visitors took a photo with a Moo Deng mascot at Khao Kheow Open Zoo on Thursday. AFP via Getty Images All proceeds from the auction will go towards a wildlife conservation fund. 'I intended to get this because I love Moo Deng so much,' said Mucharim Chutimatipakorn, who won the bid for the hippo's footprint cast in the auction. 'I also want to contribute to the development of this zoo,' she said.


New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Rock band with more than 1 million Spotify listeners reveals it's entirely AI-generated — down to the musicians themselves
A fresh new rock band that quickly shot to Spotify's top ranks announced that it's actually wholly generated by artificial intelligence, just one month after its celebrated debut album earned it one million listeners. The '60s-inspired rock-and-roll band, the Velvet Sundown, revealed on Saturday that nothing about it is real after fans of the up-and-coming artists noticed there were virtually no traces of any people associated with it online. Its debut album, 'Floating on Echoes,' was released on June 5 to mass appeal online. Advertisement The most popular song in the album, pro-peace folk rock song 'Dust on the Wind,' clinched the No. 1 spot for Spotify's daily 'Viral 50' chart in Britain, Norway and Sweden between June 29 and July 1. 3 Velvet Sundown gained over 1 million listeners on Spotify. The Velvet Sundown/Facebook All the while, the one million monthly listeners who started following the Velvet Sundown had no idea they were just listening to a mass of artificial intelligence made by fake musicians. Advertisement The photos of the band shared online and featured on the album's cover were unnaturally smooth and matte and the guitarist's hand was wonky with fused fingers gripping his instrument — a classic hallmark of AI-generated images. The band's lyrics, too, were a perfect mesh of generic anti-war sentiments and other clichés like 'Nothin' lasts forever but the earth and sky, it slips away, and all your money won't another minute buy.' The faux rockstars were also pumping out new albums scarily — and inhumanly — fast, releasing two in June alone and another set for mid-July. 3 The AI band released two albums in June alone and another was set for July. Spotify Advertisement The band finally revealed its secret over the weekend. It updated its Spotify biography Saturday to reflect the AI twist, assuring that the project hadn't been trying to bamboozle its audience. 'The Velvet Sundown is a synthetic music project guided by human creative direction, and composed, voiced, and visualized with the support of artificial intelligence. This isn't a trick – it's a mirror. An ongoing artistic provocation designed to challenge the boundaries of authorship, identity, and the future of music itself in the age of AI,' the biography reads. Advertisement Some people who had seen through the band's ploy early tried to take advantage of its viral success before the truth came out. A Quebec-based web safety expert posed as a spokesperson for the Velvet Sundown under the pseudonym Andrew Frelon, which translates to hornet in French, and even slid false information to Rolling Stone magazine about his supposed clients. But the man behind the Frelon quickly confessed that he was just trying to troll people online. 3 The AI-generated images showed a microphone cord disappearing into a singer's arm, a guitarist's fingers fused together and the headstock of a Stratocaster being the incorrect shape. The Velvet Sundown/Facebook It's unclear if the Velvet Sundown will face any backlash from Spotify or any other platforms where it may be eligible for streaming revenue. Starting on July 15, YouTube announced that it would be cutting all monetization, including advertisements, for any content generated by AI. In late June, popular YouTuber announced a tool that would use AI to make thumbnails for videos. He quickly removed it after receiving backlash for supporting an artificial intelligence engine, which often requires massive amounts of energy that would steadily offset his years of environmental work and reforestation efforts.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
First the dire wolf, now NZ's giant moa: why real ‘de-extinction' is unlikely to fly
The announcement that New Zealand's moa nunui (giant moa) is the next 'de-extinction' target for Colossal Biosciences, in partnership with Canterbury Museum, the Ngāi Tahu Research Centre and filmmaker Peter Jackson, caused widespread alarm among scientists. This follows the US company's recreation of a 'dire wolf', which was essentially a genetically engineered grey wolf. But that project was probably easy compared to the latest plan to resurrect the moa. I think it's a pipe dream and there are several reasons why. Firstly, birds are harder to 'de-extinct' than placental mammals. One would need a surrogate egg to bring chicks to term, and for many moa species there are no eggs from living birds big enough to house a developing chick. In this case, artificial eggs would need to be developed. Then there is evolutionary history. From my own work and the research of others, we know the moa is most closely related to the tinamou, a small flying bird in South America. To get to the common ancestor of the moa and tinamou, you'd have to go back some 60 million years of evolution. That's a lot of time for mutations to evolve in genes controlling how moa look, that would need to be re-engineered to bring back moa traits. The evolutionary history of the palaeognath group is even deeper. Formerly known as ratites, this group includes the tinamou and lineages of living flightless birds (emu, kiwi, cassowary, rhea, ostrich) and extinct ones (New Zealand's moa and Madagascar's elephant birds). Genetically engineering a tinamou or any other birds in this group to create a moa hybrid would be challenging given this deep evolutionary timescale – certainly much harder than genetically engineering a grey wolf. And in any case, this would not recreate a moa, but merely something that may look like a moa. As one critic put it, it would not have the mauri (life force) of a moa. There are no living analogues of moa within the palaeongath group. We don't know whether birds created through de-extinction methods would function like a moa in the ecosystem. Moa are unique, even among other flightless birds, in that they had no wings – all other flightless birds still have remnant wings. As a start, any genetic engineering would need to target regions of the genome that control the expression of genes for wing formation. This could have unintended consequences. I'm involved in an ongoing project to sequence high-quality genomes of several species of moa in New Zealand to study their evolutionary history. In our conversations with tangata whenua around the country, there has been no support for de-extinction. Iwi (tribes) also want moa bone samples and all DNA extracts and sequence data to stay in New Zealand. A major question is whether Colossal has undertaken wider engagement. Ngāi Tahu is a very large iwi with lots of individual rūnanga (tribal councils) throughout the South Island. My research team has engaged with individual rūnanga, and we know they are opposed to de-extinction. I would like Colossal, Canterbury Museum and the Ngāi Tahu Research Center to disclose how widely they consulted across Ngāi Tahu. The numerous iwi at the top of the South Island are also against the de-extinction of the giant moa (or any moa) which also lived in their rohe (region). De-extinction of a giant moa would really need a South Island-wide or even national consensus before going ahead. Māori have expressed longstanding concerns about not being involved in discussions about genetic engineering and the potential of bone samples or genetic material going offshore. With this announcement, it's encouraging to see the Ngāi Tahu Research Centre is driving the project and that there are discussions around the need to restore habitat that would be suitable for moa. This is a challenge in its own right as there is little left. Parts of the eastern South Island were once covered in mosaics of open forest shrubland that were dominated by kowhai and lancewood, which have no analogue today. Even if we were to bring back an extinct species and kept individuals in a game reserve, we would need to produce enough (at least 500) to avoid inbreeding and genetic drift (random loss or retention of genes in a population). The birds would require sufficient funding for their ongoing conservation. This raises worries that money could be pulled from efforts to save living endangered species, pushing them closer to extinction. It's undeniable the genetic engineering technology Colossal is developing could have real benefits to the conservation of New Zealand's endangered species. Let's say we could genetically engineer a kākāpō so it becomes resistant to a disease. That's perhaps a project worth doing if there was widespread community support. Investing the money that goes into this project in the conservation of New Zealand's currently endangered biodiversity would, in my view, be better than bringing back moa as an ecotourism venture. This article is republished from The Conversation. It was written by: Nic Rawlence, University of Otago Read more: Return of the huia? Why Māori worldviews must be part of the 'de-extinction' debate 'De-extinction' of dire wolves promotes false hope: technology can't undo extinction Colossal Bioscience's attempt to de-extinct the dire wolf is a dangerously deceptive publicity stunt Nic Rawlence receives funding from Te Apārangi Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund.