logo
"There Is a Real Opportunity Now"

"There Is a Real Opportunity Now"

Entrepreneura day ago
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is often cast as a double-edged sword - brimming with potential but shadowed by risk. In the UK, that tension is being met head-on with a distinct strategy: championing regulation not as red tape, but as a catalyst - a way to unlock innovation safely, responsibly, and at scale. For Feryal Clark, the UK's Parliamentary Under‑Secretary of State for AI and Digital Government, and the minister leading this effort, AI represents a genuine chance to revitalise overburdened public services and position the UK as a global leader in groundbreaking innovation.
While tech giants grab the headlines and global competition heats up, Clark remains focused on a more pragmatic priority. She is determined that the UK's approach to AI goes beyond just chasing innovation - aiming also to protect and enhance people's lives. And central to that, she insists, is regulation that does not suffocate the very industry it seeks to steward. "We are currently in the process of developing legislation which will prepare the UK for AI security risks. We are really keen to make sure that it also drives innovation and investment. We are ensuring we can safely use the opportunities of AI for years to come. "
The message is clear: it's about keeping the UK ahead - but not at any cost. "The UK has launched a Regulation Innovation Office to streamline regulation, cut red tape for businesses, and accelerate the introduction of new technologies to the UK market," she says. However, it's not just about what's new. Clark is quick to point to the strength of the UK's existing system. "The UK has some of the best regulators, currently delivering sector-specific regulations and tailored advice," adding that "the country is in a good place when it comes to regulation."
But with a field as fast-moving as AI, the government knows regulation has to continue to evolve. A key step, the minister says, has been the creation of a new body to help accelerate the market introduction of emerging technologies with greater efficiency. This initiative aims to create a more agile regulatory environment that keeps pace with rapid technological advancements. "It's already looking at a whole host of areas, including AI in health care and autonomous technologies," she adds.
While much of the political debate around AI focuses on geopolitics and ethics, Clark often returns to a more local lens: the impact on schools, hospitals, and overstretched councils. AI is not just the concern of Silicon Roundabout or Big Tech - it's something already changing daily life. "Everyone is looking to utilise AI in one way or another. When we look back through human history, there is no emerging technology that hasn't had a transformative impact on our economy in some shape or form. I think the same is true of AI."
Already, she notes, practical examples of AI are emerging - often away from the headlines, but deeply embedded in everyday systems. "We're already seeing AI being adopted in classrooms by teachers to help them plan lessons and personalise learning experiences for children. In healthcare it's being used to deliver new drug breakthroughs that are helping us beat diseases. And also it's supporting the work of doctors to improve patient care rather than replacing them." She highlights one case in Devon. "The hospitals are using AI to improve stroke outcomes for patients. They're using AI to work out which patients can receive targeted treatment to break down blood clots and therefore improve the quality of life."
But perhaps where she speaks most passionately is within the public sector, where she spent years before entering Westminster. She recalls her time working in local government, where colleagues endured 14 years of austerity. The relentless budget cuts left the public sector stretched thin and struggling long before she arrived. Now, she says, technology could be part of the recovery. "There is a real opportunity to support the public sector with the use of AI to take the pressure off - providing staff more time to do what they are really there to do. There are huge opportunities where AI will genuinely transform the public sector, looking towards a time where there will be no more postcode lotteries." She frames it not in terms of job losses, but job support. "I think it's important to realise that disruption doesn't necessarily have to mean negative change." Forty years ago, many of today's jobs didn't exist - and the same will be true forty years from now. The future workforce will include roles we can't yet imagine. "I think we should see it not as a replacement, but as support for the workforce - to help them do better and bring enjoyment back into their jobs." In social work, for example: "Instead of spending three or four hours typing notes and looking at the actions, they can use AI for that dictation." It will free up time, better utilised elsewhere. Reflecting on AI, Clark describes it as a general-purpose technology - one with the potential to touch and transform every corner of society.
Despite the government's ambition, the competitive global landscape is real - and crowded. But Clark insists the UK remains one of the best places to build and grow in the AI space. In the first half of 2025, UK AI start-ups attracted a record $2.4bn in venture capital (VC) - accounting for 30% of all VC funding. It signals a clear and growing appetite to invest in the UK's tech future. "We are building up our AI sector to create an environment which supports companies of all shapes and all sizes to grow whilst putting British expertise at the heart of transformative new breakthroughs."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Navigating the Raise
Navigating the Raise

Entrepreneur

time31 minutes ago

  • Entrepreneur

Navigating the Raise

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. Closing a £5m funding round in a down market is no small feat. For Charlotte Lucy Hall, co-founder of background checking platform Zinc, the process was defined not just by the financial climate, but by a set of overlapping personal and professional pressures that made the experience unique. "Deciding when to disclose my pregnancy during our first funding round was one of the toughest decisions of my life," she says. "My co-founder and I were also silently navigating a long, painful fertility journey. Balancing the intense emotional and physical exhaustion with the immense pressure to secure investment felt overwhelming at times." The backdrop was unforgiving. The economy had dipped, the tech bubble had burst, and high-profile bank collapses were unfolding mid-due diligence. "Very few firms were writing cheques, especially for first-time founders," Hall recalls. But investors ultimately bought into Zinc's mission to transform a frustrating process into something faster, more transparent, and more empowering. "Our candidate-centric solution is redefining how background checks are done across many industries with particular success in finance, healthcare and education sectors," Hall explains. "In today's competitive landscape, hiring delays can cost businesses both valuable time and top talent. We showed them that our technology gives HR and talent professionals back what matters most: their time." Zinc's traction played a key role in convincing investors to sign on. From early-stage start-ups like Marshmallow to fintech giants like Revolut and established names like Trainline, the company's client list reflected both adaptability and demand. "The Zinc solution isn't one-size-fits-all; it's tailored to each customer's unique structure and goals. But the consistent benefit for every client is easing the workload for HR teams and reducing stress for new hires during the background check process." The difficult market was only part of the challenge for Hall. She also had to navigate the delicate decision of when to tell investors she was pregnant. At the same time, she and her co-founder were dealing with a long and painful fertility journey. Balancing these personal struggles with the pressure to secure investment created a constant sense of overwhelm. Hall waited until her second trimester before sharing the news. "By then, we felt a bit more secure in the pregnancy. Thankfully, our investors were incredibly supportive - it was actually very reassuring and truly reconfirmed that we had chosen the right partner in AVP." Yet for all the concerns about external perceptions, she found the hardest part came from within. "Honestly, my own expectations were far harder to navigate than any investor scepticism," she reflects. "As founders, and especially as women, there's often this intense pressure to prove ourselves by carrying every burden simultaneously." The lesson, she says, is about pace - and permission. "Giving yourself permission to slow down when you need to, and trusting that progress doesn't always look like constant motion, is incredibly powerful. It's okay to take a breath and slow down." Hall is open about the additional challenges that came from not having a typical founder background. "No elite university affiliations or Big Tech names," she notes. "The absence of those credentials meant we faced an uphill battle for credibility, resulting in more rigorous vetting and outright rejections than we might have otherwise." Rather than attempting to compensate, Hall leaned in. "It pushed us to articulate our true differentiators: our unparalleled understanding of the problem we're solving, the clarity of our long-term vision, and our unwavering, mission-first ethos." That approach not only resonated - it helped redefine the conversation. "This wasn't about trying to fit a mould; it was about amplifying what made Zinc genuinely unique and compelling." Now, having made it through both the fundraise and early motherhood, Hall wants the ecosystem to evolve. "We need open, honest conversations - between founders, investors, and teams - about the reality of pregnancy and needing time to care for a new baby. These are natural life events that should be celebrated, not treated as taboo." Too often, she says, female founders are forced into an impossible choice. "Currently, women often can't win: judged for returning 'too soon' or for taking 'too long.' This shouldn't be a forced choice." Zinc's funding round may have concluded, but its broader significance has only just begun. It suggests that the next iteration of start-up culture - if it's going to be more inclusive - must reckon with the whole human behind the founder. And that itself could be a marker of progress. True flexibility, Hall says, must be more than a slogan. "We need a cultural shift that respects these decisions, encourages true flexibility, and provides concrete support, not just platitudes."

It's not you, it's me. ChatGPT doesn't want to be your therapist or friend
It's not you, it's me. ChatGPT doesn't want to be your therapist or friend

USA Today

time32 minutes ago

  • USA Today

It's not you, it's me. ChatGPT doesn't want to be your therapist or friend

In a case of "it's not you, it's me," the creators of ChatGPT no longer want the chatbot to play the role of therapist or trusted confidant. OpenAI, the company behind the popular bot, announced that it had incorporated some 'changes,' specifically mental health-focused guardrails designed to prevent users from becoming too reliant on the technology, with a focus on people who view ChatGPT as a therapist or friend. The changes come months after reports detailing negative and particularly worrisome user experiences raised concerns about the model's tendency to 'validate doubts, fuel anger, urge impulsive actions, or reinforce negative emotions [and thoughts].' The company confirmed in its most recent blog post that an update made earlier this year made ChatGPT 'noticeably more sycophantic,' or 'too agreeable,' 'sometimes saying what sounded nice instead of what was helpful.' OpenAI announced they have 'rolled back' certain initiatives, including changes in how they use feedback and their approach to measuring 'real-world usefulness over the long term, not just whether you liked the answer in the moment.' 'There have been instances where our 4o model fell short in recognizing signs of delusion or emotional dependency,' OpenAI wrote in an Aug. 4 announcement. 'While rare, we're continuing to improve our models and are developing tools to better detect signs of mental or emotional distress so ChatGPT can respond appropriately and point people to evidence-based resources when needed.' Here's what to know about the recent changes to ChatGPT, including what these mental health guardrails mean for users. ChatGPT integrates 'changes' to help users thrive According to OpenAI, the 'changes' were designed to help ChatGPT users 'thrive.' 'We also know that AI can feel more responsive and personal than prior technologies, especially for vulnerable individuals experiencing mental or emotional distress,' OpenAI said. 'To us, helping you thrive means being there when you're struggling, helping you stay in control of your time, and guiding—not deciding—when you face personal challenges.' The company said its 'working closely' with experts, including physicians, human-computer-interaction (HCI) researchers and clinicians as well as an advisory group, to improve how 'ChatGPT responds in critical moments—for example, when someone shows signs of mental or emotional distress.' Thanks to recent 'optimization,' ChatGPT is now able to: 'Our goal to help you thrive won't change. Our approach will keep evolving as we learn from real-world use,' OpenAI said in its blog post. 'We hold ourselves to one test: if someone we love turned to ChatGPT for support, would we feel reassured? Getting to an unequivocal 'yes' is our work.'

China's Z.ai and America's Self-Defeating AI Strategy
China's Z.ai and America's Self-Defeating AI Strategy

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

China's Z.ai and America's Self-Defeating AI Strategy

China's DeepSeek shocked the global AI community in January by building a frontier model at a fraction of Western costs. Now it has been outdone by a Chinese company subject to U.S. sanctions. It has become painfully obvious that Washington's strategy of restricting chip exports isn't working. formerly Zhipu AI, last week launched GLM-4.5, a production-level open-source model priced at 13% of DeepSeek's cost. It matches or exceeds Western standards in coding, reasoning and tool use. runs on only eight Nvidia H20 chips, which Nvidia recently gained reapproval to sell in China. That's better performance than DeepSeek with about half the hardware.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store