£400k cost of ScotGov Euro 2028 ticket tout ban that 'won't work'
Although the exact number of matches Scotland will host is yet to be finalised by the governing body of European football UEFA, Hampden Park will be the sole Scottish venue for the tournament. The nation hosted four matches at Euro 2020.
But for Scotland to co-host Euro 2028 as part of a joint UK and Ireland championship, the Scottish Government will have to bring in new commercial rights protections over and above that which already exists in law.
The bill will temporary ban the ticket touting - or the unauthorised sale of tournament tickets above face value cost for profit.
Under the proposed new laws touts who resell tickets for the Glasgow matches could face fines of up to £20,000.
But it will not prevent people from outwith Scotland trading in the tickets - with enforcement action only possible for those briefs that are touted within the country.
It has further emerged that the rules would allow UEFA to continue to resell tickets through its own platforms.
Euro 2028Finlay Swan, associate solicitor at Holmes Mackillop in his examination of the bill seen by ministers said it will not go far enough to sustain the integrity of the event and fails to target the "true culprits - the international faceless syndicates bulk-buying tickets with a view to profit".
Katy Clark, Scottish Labour's shadow community safety minister said there should be a blanket ban on ticket touting.
READ MORE by Martin Williams
Why does ScotGov have to bring in a ticket tout ban to get a few Euro 2028 football matches?
ScotGov raises 'doubt' on CalMac getting new ferry contract from October
Council warned of law breach over failure to help sick Leighton's Law toddler
'Stretched to breaking': Nation loses 800 officers since formation of Police Scotland
'Mismanagement': Public cost of Ferguson Marine hits £750m amidst overspends
Premier Scots promoters, DF Concerts & Events also called for a consumer law to be introduced that banned ticket touts across all industries including sports and music events.
It has emerged that the costs of implementing the rules estimated by ministers will be between £320,000 to £440,000 in total between April 2026 and February 2030 with around half of that spent on the Scottish Government's estimated administrative costs for the bill's implementation. It also estimates that city council enforcement action will amount to between £60,000 and £110,000.
It is believed that further costs of enforcing the rules could take the public cost even higher.
Mr Swan stated: "Yes, it is a good thing that the Bill will hinder individuals and small groups from buying a few tickets, to then immediately re-sell them for profit via social media and other platforms.
'Yes, it will quell the tout lurking outside Hampden mentioning in passing that he needs to give up a ticket or two. But frankly, are these types of touts really the big concern for your everyday football fan trying to see their national team? I do not think so.'
He said the growing concern over the past ten years has been the ability of massive household-name entities "gobbling up" batches of tickets upon initial sale and then selling them on at inflated prices.
'The Bill simply does not address this particular group, and even if it did, a penalty of up to £20,000 is a drop in the ocean for these entities,' he said.
'If the Scottish Government wants to prevent monopolisation of ticket sales, it will need to introduce further restrictions on bulk buying and resale fees.
'Touts have contributed to the pricing-out of fans from the game, and so whilst this bill does have the right intentions, I fear it is aimed at a problem from a bygone-era – the man outside the ground waving a couple of tickets in the air – rather than the true culprits, the international faceless syndicates bulk-buying tickets with a view to profit. As a lifelong football fan, I know who I would rather the government targeted."
(Image: Alan Harvey - SNS Group) If passed the bill will also restrict street trading, such as burger vans and outdoor advertising within event zones in Glasgow, in line with commercial rights held by UEFA, the ruling body of European football.
The requirements for hosting matches at Hampden will meant that only UEFA-approved traders can trade around the stadium and other event zones.
The UEFA European Championship (Scotland) Bill would allow for unlimited fines possible for the most serious offences.
The laws would be automatically repealed on at the end of 2028, after the tournament is finished.
According to the Scottish Government, Euro 2028 will showcase Scotland internationally and is predicted to generate socioeconomic benefits of up to £2.6bn - across UK and Ireland.
According to its analysis of the whether to introduced the laws, it decided that doing nothing "would risk Scotland being unable to host any matches, reducing the anticipated economic and social benefit from Euro 2028."
Its analysis stated: "This could also cause reputational damage to Scotland which might adversely impact any bids to host future mega events."
Scottish Labour shadow community safety minister Katy Clark said: "Ticket touting is a disgraceful practice that sees sports fans and concert goers ripped off by being made to pay hugely over the odds to attend matches and events.
"There must be a full crackdown on touts and rogue traders who want to prey on hard-pressed football fans at Euro 2028.
"However, it's not enough to bring in these restrictions just for the few weeks of Scotland jointly staging Euro 2028.
"There needs to be a permanent ban on ticket touting at all sports and entertainment venues in Scotland.
Euro 2028 (Image: Mike Egerton/PA Wire) "It's vital that there are no loopholes and that the public is properly and permanently protected from ticket rip-offs."
Hampden Park, a 52,000 capacity stadium, was host to three group games and a round of 16 tie at Euro 2020 - held in 2021 due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
It was the first time the Scotland men's national team had qualified for a major tournament in more than 20 years.
For Euro 2028, nine venues across the four joint host countries of England, Scotland, Wales and the Republic of Ireland will stage the 24-team tournament.
Six stadiums in England - Wembley, Etihad Stadium, Anfield, Villa Park, Everton's Hill Dickinson Stadium and St James' Park in Newcastle - will host games in 2028.
Dublin's Aviva Stadium, Hampden Park in Glasgow and the Principality Stadium in Cardiff make up the list.
Business minister Richard Lochhead said about the legislation: 'Hosting Euro 2028 is an opportunity for Scotland to shine globally and to welcome thousands of fans to our cities, pubs, restaurants, hotels and communities.
'Our reputation for hosting major sporting and cultural events is known the world over. Hosting one of the most prestigious sporting events is an opportunity to truly cement this legacy.
'Our legislation intends to sustain the integrity of this world-class sporting event and enables us to grab the economic opportunities of the Euros by meeting our obligations as a host nation.
'That's why we want to tackle unscrupulous ticket touts and uphold our duties to UEFA as a privileged host nation.'
A Scottish Government spokesman said: The UEFA European Championship (Scotland) Bill is essential to tackle ticket touting and to meet UEFA's other commercial rights protection requirements, ensuring the tournament can be hosted here.
'The Bill sets out that the touting offence applies if a ticket is sold above face value or with a view to making a profit to act as a deterrent to touting online including public internet sites, private sales and in person, supporting fair access to tickets and helping ensure public confidence in the event.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
29 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Cross-Channel migrants to be detained as France treaty comes into force
The deal, which has now been approved by the European Commission, means the UK will be able to send people crossing the Channel in small boats back to France in exchange for asylum seekers with ties to Britain. It also means that anyone arriving in a small boat can be detained immediately, and space has been set aside at immigration removal centres in the expectation that detentions will begin within days. The Prime Minister said the ratification of the treaty will 'send a clear message – if you come here illegally on a small boat you will face being sent back to France'. But opposition parties have criticised the deal amid reports that the pilot scheme will see only 50 people a week returned to France while this year has seen a weekly average of more than 800 people make the crossing. The deal has also been criticised by refugee charities, which have urged the Government to provide more safe, legal routes for asylum seekers instead. Ministers have so far declined to say how many people could be returned under the deal, and insist that if the pilot is successful the figure will increase. Under the terms of the agreement, announced during French President Emmanuel Macron's state visit last month, adults arriving on small boats will face being returned to France if their asylum claim is inadmissible. In exchange, the same number of people will be able to come to the UK on a new legal route, provided they have not attempted a crossing before and subject to documentation and security checks. The Home Office said it had also learned from the 'lengthy legal challenges' over the previous government's Rwanda scheme and would 'robustly defend' any attempts to block removal through the courts. It is the first such deal with France, with the pilot scheme set to run until June 2026, pending a longer-term agreement. Sir Keir said the deal was 'The product of months of grown-up diplomacy delivering real results for British people'. He added: 'The days of gimmicks and broken promises are over – we will restore order to our borders with the seriousness and competence the British people deserve.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said it was 'an important step towards undermining the business model of the organised crime gangs that are behind these crossings – undermining their claims that those who travel to the UK illegally can't be returned to France'. Ratification of the deal comes as both Britain and France battle to bring the small boats problem under control, with 2025 on course to be a record year for crossings. Some 25,436 people have already made the journey this year, according to PA news agency analysis of Home Office figures – 49% higher than at the same point in 2024. The issue has also sparked concern that a series of protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers could lead to public disorder similar to last year's riots. On Monday, the Home Office announced it was providing another £100 million to tackle people smuggling and would introduce new powers to seize devices from people suspected of facilitating crossings. Ministers have also launched a crackdown on illegal working in an effort to reduce the 'pull factors' said to be encouraging people to make the journey, while French authorities have changed their guidance to allow police officers to intercept boats while they are in shallow waters. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp attacked the plans, saying they would return 'just 6% of illegal arrivals' and 'make no difference whatsoever'. He added: 'The Rwanda removals deterrent, under which 100% of illegal arrivals would be removed, was ready to go last summer but Labour cancelled it just days before it was due to start with no proper replacement plan. As a result, this year so far has been the worst ever for illegal immigrants crossing the Channel. 'Only removing all illegal immigrants upon arrival will provide the necessary deterrent to stop the crossings. This is the Conservative plan, but Labour is too weak to implement it and as a result they have lost control of our borders.' While the Conservatives' Rwanda plan was in theory uncapped, it was expected to take only around 1,000 asylum seekers in its first five years of operation thanks to limited capacity in the East African nation. The plan, which Sir Keir had previously dismissed as a 'gimmick', was scrapped as one of the first acts of the incoming Labour Government last year.
The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
NSW faces constitutional showdown as parliament's push to expel convicted rapist Gareth Ward delayed by supreme court
New South Wales politicians are facing a potential constitutional showdown with the state's supreme court over parliament's attempt to expel local MP and convicted rapist Gareth Ward. The Minns government was seeking an urgent hearing in the supreme court on Tuesday with a view to lifting an ex parte injunction granted the previous day to Ward. It prevented parliament, for now, from moving to expel the member for Kiama. Ward commenced the proceedings on Monday night via his lawyers from Silverwater jail, where he has been remanded pending sentencing in September. Ward has said he will appeal his July criminal convictions on three counts of indecent assault and one for sexual intercourse without consent involving two young men in incidents that occurred in 2013 and 2015. The leader of the Legislative Assembly, Ron Hoenig, told reporters that the government did not believe the court had the constitutional power to restrain the parliament or any member from moving a motion in the lower house. However, 'out of respect for the court,' the parliament would apply for a more urgent hearing date, when it would seek to have the injunction lifted. Justice Deborah Sweeney, the duty judge in the supreme court, granted Ward an urgent application for the injunction on Monday night after the government notified the MP and his lawyers of Tuesday's proposed motion to expel him. He was invited to submit any arguments he wished to make. The government did not have an opportunity to make submissions to the court on Monday night. Hoenig said the government's position was that the orders 'have no effect [and] are not binding on the house'. 'The house has an inherent power, in accordance with the constitution, unconstrained by any order. However, because the order has been made by the supreme court of NSW, I have instructed the crown solicitors to approch her honour as soon as possible to reconsider the orders she has made to allow the house to conduct its business … as it has for 169 years,' the leader of the house said. 'The issue is of considerable significance. The house needs to be able to make its [expulsion decision] to protect itself, and we will be making an approach to the judge as early as today.' Hoenig said the scheduled hearing on Friday was too late, as the parliament was due to rise on Friday and would need to be recalled if Ward's injunction was not dealt with more swiftly. The NSW premier, Chris Minns, has made it clear he wants Ward to resign – or the government would remove him via an expulsion motion. 'We've got a week of parliament to sit, and I think that most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in jail in Silverwater, convicted of serious sexual offences, who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid,' Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday. Sign up to Morning Mail Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Ward's conviction has plunged the NSW parliament into uncharted territory. As an independent member, he has not been under the usual pressure to resign from a political party. Therefore, the parliament is having to rely on a little-used inherent power to protect itself if the conduct of a member would damage the integrity of the parliament and endanger its proper functioning. The government had planned to begin moves to expel him on Tuersday with a vote expected on Wednesday. The opposition leader, Mark Speakman, said the Coalition would support the government seeking Ward's expulsion. 'Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill, and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive,' Speakman said on Tuesday. In 2021, Ward left the Liberal party and moved to the crossbench after identifying himself as the state MP under investigation by the child abuse and sex crimes squad of the NSW police force. When charges were laid in March 2022, the then NSW premier, Dominic Perrottet, called for his resignation. Later that month, Ward was suspended after a motion unanimously passed the Legislative Assembly. In August 2022, Ward was committed to stand trial. But Ward's voters in the south coast state seat of Kiama re-elected him in March 2023 and he returned to Macquarie Street.
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Tories demand Reeves ‘urgently rule out' investment tax hikes
The Tories claim scrapping the £500 dividend allowance will drag an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying investment levies. The party is seeking to pile pressure on ministers after a memo sent by Angela Rayner to Ms Reeves, in which the Deputy Prime Minister suggested a series of tax hikes, was leaked to the press. In the document, Ms Rayner proposed removing the dividend allowance to raise around £325 million a year in revenue, as well as axing inheritance tax relief for AIM shares and increasing dividend tax rates, the Telegraph reported. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'The Government need to urgently rule out these tax hikes on savers and investors before speculation causes further economic harm. 'Labour don't understand how business works and how to create growth. More taxes on investment, entrepreneurship and saving are the last thing our economy needs right now.' The Government's U-turns over welfare reform and winter fuel payments have left the Chancellor with a multibillion-pound black hole to fill, fuelling speculation that she will seek to raise revenue through tax hikes. The Tories claimed axing the dividend allowance would drag 'an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying dividend tax'. This figure appears to be based on an assumption that at least 8.82 million people in the UK hold shares that pay dividends. Some 3.6 million are already subject to dividend tax, according to data obtained by investment platform AJ Bell through a Freedom of Information request. The Chancellor last year said she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes' after her first budget but has since refused to rule out raising specific levies, saying it would be 'irresponsible' to do so. A Labour Party spokesperson said: 'The Conservatives have some brass neck. They've still not apologised for the damage caused by the Liz Truss mini-Budget, nor the £22 billion black hole they left – which hammered firms and families across the country. 'Labour is doing more to support business than the Tories ever could. 'We've already delivered three historic trade deals and four interest rate cuts – to reduce costs and put money back in people's pockets.'
